Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Cardiol ; 97(7): 993-6, 2006 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16563903

ABSTRACT

The neutrophil to lymphocyte (N/L) ratio is a recently described independent predictor of death/myocardial infarction in patients who have undergone coronary angiography. We hypothesized that an elevated N/L ratio would be a predictor of long-term mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 1,046 patients who underwent PCI were divided into tertiles based on their preprocedural N/L ratio (mean N/L ratio, tertile 1, 1.7 +/- 0.5; tertile 2: 3.2 +/- 0.6; tertile 3, 11.2 +/- 12.9). Vital status was assessed using the Social Security Death Index. There were a total of 144 deaths over a mean follow-up of 32 months. The best survival was seen in tertile 1, with an increase in long-term mortality seen in tertiles 2 and 3 (p <0.0001). In multivariable modeling, after adjusting for age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left ventricular ejection fraction, serum hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and lesion severity, the log N/L, but not the white blood cell count, was an independent significant predictor of long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.85, 95% confidence interval 1.3, to 3.04, p = 0.01). The risk persisted when patients with an acute myocardial infarction were excluded from the analysis (hazard ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 4.4, p = 0.002). In conclusion, an elevated preprocedural N/L ratio in patients undergoing PCI is associated with an increased risk of long-term mortality.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary , Coronary Disease/blood , Coronary Disease/mortality , Leukocyte Count , Lymphocyte Count , Neutrophils , Aged , Coronary Disease/therapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome
2.
Med J Aust ; 178(7): 318-23, 2003 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12670272

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of evidence-based investigations and treatments in patients with acute stroke in selected Australian hospitals and to compare management and outcomes between stroke and other types of hospital specialty unit. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicentre audit of hospital case files. SETTING: Eight metropolitan tertiary-care hospitals from five Australian States. SUBJECTS: 300 consecutive patients from each hospital admitted between 17 September 1999 and 23 May 2001 and having a discharge diagnosis of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of investigations and treatments supported by best available evidence; comparison of management and outcomes between stroke, neurology, general medical and geriatric units. RESULTS: 2383 patients were audited (median age, 72.7 years; 52% men); 72% had ischaemic events, and 28% haemorrhagic events. Use of investigations and treatments varied between hospitals and types of unit. Stroke units or teams cared directly for 23% of patients (range across hospitals, 0-100%). Although 47% of patients with ischaemic events presented within 3 hours of symptom onset (when thrombolysis might provide benefit), only nine (2%) received thrombolysis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were given to 28% of survivors at discharge (range, 14%-38%). Stroke units were more likely to use diagnostic tests, while neurology units were more likely to prescribe heparin acutely for patients with ischaemic stroke (not recommended for patients in general), and geriatric units were less likely to discharge patients with atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation therapy. Outcomes also varied significantly between types of unit. In-hospital survival rates were 90% (stroke units), 91% (neurological units), 82% (general medical units) and 79% (geriatric units) (P < 0.001). Stroke units and neurological units sent more patients home than the other units. Stroke units also sent fewer patients to rehabilitation and had longer mean length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Acute stroke care varies between Australian tertiary-care hospitals and types of specialty unit, with suboptimal use of many evidence-based interventions.


Subject(s)
Coronary Care Units/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine , Medical Audit , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Stroke/mortality , Stroke/therapy , Aged , Australia/epidemiology , Coronary Care Units/classification , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Ischemic Attack, Transient/mortality , Ischemic Attack, Transient/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...