Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Scand J Rheumatol ; : 1-10, 2024 Jan 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38275145

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore whether phenotypic characteristics of patients with chronic widespread pain (CWP) and fibromyalgia (FM) can be aggregated into definable clusters that may help to tailor treatments. METHOD: Baseline variables (sex, age, education, marital/employment status, pain duration, prior CWP/FM diagnosis, concomitant rheumatic disease, analgesics, tender point count, and disease variables derived from standardized questionnaires) collected from 1099 patients (93.4% females, mean age 44.6 years) with a confirmed CWP or FM diagnosis were evaluated by hierarchical cluster analysis. The number of clusters was based on coefficients in the agglomeration schedule, supported by dendrograms and silhouette plots. Simple and multiple regression analyses using all variables as independent predictors were used to assess the likelihood of cluster assignment, reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Only one cluster emerged (Cluster 1: 455 patients). Participants in this cluster were characterized as working (OR 66.67, 95% CI 7.14 to 500.00), with a medium-term/higher education (OR 16.80, 95% CI 1.94 to 145.41), married/cohabiting (OR 14.29, 95% CI 1.26 to 166.67), and using mild analgesics (OR 25.64, 95% CI 0.58 to > 999.99). The odds of being an individual in Cluster 1 were lower when having a worse score on the PDQ (score ≥ 18) (OR < 0.001, 95% CI < 0.001 to 0.02). CONCLUSION: We identified one cluster, where participants were characterized by a potentially favourable clinical profile. More studies are needed to evaluate whether these characteristics could be used to guide the management of patients with CWP and FM.

2.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 52(6): 654-663, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37162478

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Patient education is recommended as an integral component of the therapeutic plan for the management of chronic widespread pain (CWP) and fibromyalgia (FM). The key purpose of patient education is to increase the patient's competence to manage his or her own health requirements, encouraging self-management and a return to desired everyday activities and lifestyle. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence for the benefits and potential harms associated with the use of patient education as a stand-alone intervention for individuals with CWP and FM through randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHOD: On 24 November 2021 a systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov, American College of Rheumatology, European League Against Rheumatism, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform identified 2069 studies. After full-text screening, five RCT studies were found to be eligible for the qualitative evidence synthesis. RESULTS: Patient education as a stand-alone intervention presented an improvement in patients' global assessment (standardized mean difference 0.79, 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 1.46). When comparing patient education with usual care, no intervention, or waiting list, no differences were found for functioning, level of pain, emotional distress in regard to anxiety and depression, or pain cognition. CONCLUSION: This review reveals the need for RCTs investigating patient education as a stand-alone intervention for patients with FM, measuring outcomes such as disease acceptance, health-related quality of life, enhancement of patients' knowledge of pain, pain coping skills, and evaluation of prioritized learning outcomes.


Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia , Male , Female , Humans , Fibromyalgia/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Patient Education as Topic , Pain , Anxiety , Quality of Life
3.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 52(4): 385-394, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35924595

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Danish version of the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire - Revised (FIQR), when used to quantify the severity of disease burden in a Danish population of patients with chronic widespread pain (CWP), including fibromyalgia (FM). METHOD: A total of 924 participants diagnosed with CWP and/or FM completed an electronic version of the FIQR via touchscreens in the clinic at referral for specialist care. Data were collected from 1 January 2018 to 3 September 2020. Rasch measurement methods were applied. RESULTS: Rating scale analysis suggested multiple threshold disordering in the 0-10 category rating scale. A principal component analysis suggested assessment of a multidimensional construct. Thus, the Rasch analysis of the full FIQR was discontinued. Instead, Rasch analyses were performed on the two subscales: 'function' and 'symptoms'. By collapsing the rating scale to a 0-4 category scale, the remaining threshold disordering of both subscale was solved. Only the symptom subscale indicated multidimensionality. There was underfitting misfit of item 21 and overfitting misfit of item 12. No significant differential item functioning, defined by sex, ethnicity, or education, was found. CONCLUSION: The FIQR should be considered as an instrument consisting of three separate subscales representing 'function', 'overall impact', and 'symptoms'. We recommend calculating and reporting on both a 0-10 and a 0-4 category scale. Also, if using the total FIQR score as an outcome measure, this should be done with caution, until revision of the rating scale.


Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Fibromyalgia , Humans , Fibromyalgia/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Denmark
4.
Scand J Rheumatol ; 38(3): 227-30, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19169910

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The reproducibility of clinical tests for skin extensibility and consistency, essential for differentiating between types of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) and benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS), is unknown. Paraclinical methods may provide objective differential diagnostic methods. METHODS: Six EDS, 11 BJHS, and 19 controls completed the trial. We analysed the overall inter-examiner agreement on clinical tests for skin extensibility and consistency, in addition to analyses on suction cup (SC) and soft tissue stiffness meter (STSM) methods. RESULTS: Overall agreement on tests for skin extensibility and consistency varied between 0.44 and 0.72. Extensibility evaluated by SC showed an insignificant difference between EDS patients and controls (p = 0.056). Consistency evaluated by STSM showed significant differences (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Overall inter-examiner agreement on clinical tests for skin extensibility and consistency was below 0.80, which was required a priori to conduct a reproducibility study. Further refinement of tests and a training phase are necessary. The SC and STSM results are encouraging but must be reproduced in a larger study population.


Subject(s)
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome/pathology , Joint Instability/pathology , Physical Examination/methods , Physical Examination/standards , Skin/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Diagnosis, Differential , Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome/physiopathology , Elasticity , Elbow Joint/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Male , Observer Variation , Physical Examination/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Suction , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...