Data Dissemination of the Role of Neoadjuvant Radiation in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A CTOS and CSSO Survey.

Consensus guidelines call for complete resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma with consideration of neoadjuvant radiation for curative-intent treatment. The 15-month delay from the initial presentation of an abstract to the final publication of the STRASS trial results assessing the impact of neoadjuvant radiation led to a dilemma of how patients should be managed in the interim. This study aims to (1) understand perspectives regarding neoadjuvant radiation for RPS during this period; and (2) assess the process of integrating data into practice. A survey was distributed to international organizations including all specialties treating RPS. Eighty clinicians responded, including surgical (60.5%), radiation (21.0%) and medical oncologists (18.5%). Low kappa correlation coefficients on a series of clinical scenarios querying individual recommendations before and after initial presentation as an abstract indicate considerable change. Over 62% of respondents identified a practice change; however, most also noted discomfort in adopting changes without a manuscript available. Of the 45 respondents indicating discomfort with practice changes without a full manuscript, 28 (62%) indicated that their practice changed in response to the abstract. There was substantial variability in recommendations for neoadjuvant radiation between the presentation of the abstract and the publication of trial results. The difference in the proportion of clinicians describing comfort with changing practice based on the presentation of the abstract versus those that had done so shows that indications for proper integration of data into practice are not clear. Endeavors to resolve this ambiguity and expedite availability of practice-changing data are warranted.

Multicenter Adoption and Outcomes of Nodal Observation for Patients with Melanoma and Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases.

BACKGROUND: Following publication of the MSLT-II trial showing no survival benefit of completion lymphadenectomy (CLND) in patients with melanoma sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases, it is expected that practice patterns have changed. The purpose of this study is to understand real-world practices and outcomes after publication of this landmark trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with truncal/extremity melanoma SLN metastases diagnosed between 2013 and 2019 at four academic cancer centers were included in this retrospective cohort study. Descriptive statistics, Cox proportional hazards model, and multivariable regression were used to characterize the cohort and identify predictors of CLND, harboring non-SLN (NSLN) metastases, and survival. RESULTS: Results of 1176 patients undergoing SLN biopsy, 183 had SLN metastases. The number of patients who underwent CLND before versus after trial publication was 75.7.% versus 20.5% (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.09-0.28). Of those undergoing nodal observation (NO), 92% had a first nodal-basin ultrasound, while 63% of patients had a fourth. In exploratory multivariable analyses, age ≥ 50 years was associated with lower rate of CLND (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.92) and larger SLN deposit (> 1.0 mm) with increased rate of CLND (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.17-3.00) in the complete cohort. Extracapsular extension was associated with increased risk of NSLN metastases (HR 12.43, 95% CI 2.48-62.31). Adjusted survival analysis demonstrated no difference in recurrence or mortality between patients treated with CLND versus NO at median 2.2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Nodal observation was rapidly adopted into practice in patients with melanoma SLN metastases at four centers in Canada. Younger age and higher nodal burden were associated with increased use of CLND after trial publication. Ultrasound (US) surveillance decreased with time from SLNB. In our study, CLND was not associated with a decreased risk of recurrence or mortality.

Pelvic soft tissue sarcomas.

Pelvic soft tissue sarcomas (PSTS) are a rare, heterogeneous group of tumors. They have been usually analyzed with retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS), but actually have key differences. Due to their unique anatomic location, symptomatic presentation of PSTS may be more common than RPS. Adequate imaging approach is paramount for guiding differential diagnosis, while preoperative biopsy is mandatory, especially when preoperative treatment may be considered as initial approach. The most frequent histologic subtype is leiomyosarcoma, which is different as expected in the retroperitoneum where liposarcoma is the commonest histology. Also solitary fibrous tumor is commonly diagnosed in the pelvis. Surgical approach for PSTS differs from that for RPS mainly due to anatomic relations. Similarly, in the lack of definite evidence from specific trials about neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments, the anatomic constraints to obtain wide margins in the pelvis as well as the expected functional outcome in case of organ resections should be factored into decision for individualized treatment offer. Vascular and genitourinary involvement are frequent, as well as herniation through pelvic foramina. For these reasons a multidisciplinary surgical team should always be considered. Early referral of these patients to high-volume centers is critical and may impact on survival, given that optimal initial resection is a major predictor of curative treatment. International consensus on PSTS treatment is advocated, similarly to the recent efforts realized for RPS.

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.

Feasibility of Prospectively Comparing Opioid Analgesia With Opioid-Free Analgesia After Outpatient General Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The overprescription of opioids to surgical patients is recognized as an important factor contributing to the opioid crisis. However, the value of prescribing opioid analgesia (OA) vs opioid-free analgesia (OFA) after postoperative discharge remains uncertain. Objective: To investigate the feasibility of conducting a full-scale randomized clinical trial (RCT) to assess the comparative effectiveness of OA vs OFA after outpatient general surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This parallel, 2-group, assessor-blind, pragmatic pilot RCT was conducted from January 29 to September 3, 2020 (last follow-up on October 2, 2020). at 2 university-affiliated hospitals in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Participants were adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing outpatient abdominal (ie, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or hernia repair) or breast (ie, partial or total mastectomy) general surgical procedures. Exclusion criteria were contraindications to drugs used in the trial, preoperative opioid use, conditions that could affect assessment of outcomes, and intraoperative or early complications requiring hospitalization. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive OA (around-the-clock nonopioids and opioids for breakthrough pain) or OFA (around-the-clock nonopioids with increasing doses and/or addition of nonopioid medications for breakthrough pain) after postoperative discharge. Main Outcomes and Measures: Main outcomes were a priori RCT feasibility criteria (ie, rates of surgeon agreement, patient eligibility, patient consent, treatment adherence, loss to follow-up, and missing follow-up data). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity and interference, analgesic intake, 30-day unplanned health care use, and adverse events. Between-group comparison of outcomes followed the intention-to-treat principle. Results: A total of 15 surgeons were approached; all (100%; 95% CI, 78%-100%) agreed to have patients recruited and adhered to the study procedures. Rates of patient eligibility and consent were 73% (95% CI, 66%-78%) and 57% (95% CI, 49%-65%), respectively. Seventy-six patients were randomized (39 [51%] to OA and 37 [49%] to OFA) and included in the intention-to-treat analysis (mean [SD] age, 55.5 [14.5] years; 50 [66%] female); 40 (53%) underwent abdominal surgery, and 36 (47%) underwent breast surgery. Seventy-five patients (99%; 95% CI, 93%-100%) adhered to the allocated treatment; 1 patient randomly assigned to OFA received an opioid prescription. Seventeen patients (44%) randomly assigned to OA consumed opioids after discharge. Seventy-three patients (96%; 95% CI, 89%-99%) completed the 30-day follow-up. The rate of missing questionnaires was 37 of 3724 (1%; 95% CI, 0.7%-1.4%). All the a priori RCT feasibility criteria were fulfilled. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this pilot RCT support the feasibility of conducting a robust, full-scale RCT to inform evidence-based prescribing of analgesia after outpatient general surgery. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04254679.

Spatially mapping the immune landscape of melanoma using imaging mass cytometry.

Melanoma is an immunogenic cancer with a high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). It harbors a high mutation burden compared with other cancers and, as a result, has abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) within its microenvironment. However, understanding the complex interplay between the stroma, tumor cells, and distinct TIL subsets remains a substantial challenge in immune oncology. To properly study this interplay, quantifying spatial relationships of multiple cell types within the tumor microenvironment is crucial. To address this, we used cytometry time-of-flight (CyTOF) imaging mass cytometry (IMC) to simultaneously quantify the expression of 35 protein markers, characterizing the microenvironment of 5 benign nevi and 67 melanomas. We profiled more than 220,000 individual cells to identify melanoma, lymphocyte subsets, macrophage/monocyte, and stromal cell populations, allowing for in-depth spatial quantification of the melanoma microenvironment. We found that within pretreatment melanomas, the abundance of proliferating antigen-experienced cytotoxic T cells (CD8+CD45RO+Ki67+) and the proximity of antigen-experienced cytotoxic T cells to melanoma cells were associated with positive response to ICIs. Our study highlights the potential of multiplexed single-cell technology to quantify spatial cell-cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment to understand immune therapy responses.

Disparities in Cancer Care: The Example of Sarcoma-In Search of Solutions for a Global Issue.

Disparities in health care have an adverse effect on the outcome of disadvantaged patients with cancer. Patients may be at a disadvantage because of geographic isolation; insurance status; or racial, ethnic, or other factors. In this article, we examine how disparities affect the care of patients with sarcoma in the United States, Canada, and the Asia-Pacific region. Because of the rarity of sarcomas and their challenging diagnosis and complex treatment patterns, some professional or national guidelines stipulate that patients with sarcoma should be treated at centers of expertise by multidisciplinary teams. This recommendation, based on published evidence, is not always applicable because of various sociopolitical or patient-related factors. We are proposing solutions to overcome these obstacles in a practical and patient-centered way while acknowledging that disparities exist among countries as well as within any country.

Oncologic Safety of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The oncologic safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone for clinically node-positive (cN1-2) patients who convert to pathologic node-negativity (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not well established. METHODS: This study retrospectively identified 244 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of cT1-3cN0-2 breast cancer who underwent NAC followed by SLNB at the authors' institution between 2013 and 2018. The patients were categorized as clinically node-negative (cN0) or cN1-2 before the onset of NAC, and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare locoregional and distant recurrence rates after SLNB alone for ypN0 patients. RESULTS: Among 244 patients who underwent NAC followed by surgery with SLNB for axillary staging, 112 (45.9%) were cN0 at presentation, whereas 132 (54.5%) had biopsy-proven cN1-2 disease and converted to cN0 after treatment. Of the patients presenting with cN0 disease, 102 (91.1%) were ypN0 on SLNB pathology compared with 60 cN1/2 patients (45.5%; p < 0.001). Regional nodal irradiation was administered to 5% of the cN0/ypN0 patients compared with 70.7% of the cN1-2/ypN0 patients (p < 0.001). Overall, 211 patients were treated with SLNB alone and had a median follow-up period of 36 months (interquartile range [IQR], 24-53 months). For 101 cN0/ypN0 patients who underwent SLNB alone, the 5-year local and regional recurrence rates were respectively 5.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-13.8) and 1% (95% CI 0.1-7.0). For 58 cN1-2/ypN0 patients who underwent SLNB alone, the 5-year local and regional recurrence rates were respectively 4.1% (95% CI 1.0-15.5) and 0%, with no axillary recurrences noted. CONCLUSION: For ypN0 patients, SLNB alone after NAC is associated with low and acceptable short-term axillary recurrence rates. Additional follow-up data from prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm long-term oncologic safety and define optimal local therapy recommendations.

Dynamic Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio: A Novel Prognosis Measure for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a measure of systemic inflammation and a prognostic factor for multiple malignancies. This study assesses the value of the NLR as an independent prognostic marker in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and explores the association between dynamic NLR changes and patient outcomes. METHODS: The study retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained database including patients 18 to 80 years old with TNBC treated at the authors' institution between 2006 to 2016. Clinical and demographic data were collected, including blood test results and treatments received. Age at diagnosis, stage of disease, and NLR scores were tested for association with overall and disease-free survival in uni- and multivariate Cox models. RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were met by 329 women with a median age of 58. Most of the patients had early-stage disease (30.1% with stage 1 and 47% with stage 2 malignancy). An NLR higher than 2.84 at diagnosis was associated with decreased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.023-3.176), whereas an NLR higher than 7.82 at any time during the follow-up period was a strong predictor of 5-year mortality (HR, 10.76; 95% CI, 4.193-26.58), independent of age or stage of disease. Patients who experienced recurrence had a higher NLR than their counterparts during the 6 months before recurrence. The NLR also significantly rose during the final 18 months of life (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The NLR is an important prognostic marker in TNBC, both at diagnosis and during the course of the disease. Moreover, dynamic changes in NLR strongly correlate with disease recurrence and the time of death.

Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy for a Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients, Including Cases with High-Risk Features.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) remains controversial in patients with high-risk breast cancer. The objective of this study was to assess surgical and oncologic outcomes of NSM and to evaluate associations of outcomes with high-risk features. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all NSM cases performed for breast cancer at 2 academic cancer centers between January 2013 and August 2018. RESULTS: Of the 175 patients who underwent NSM, 13 (7.4%) had locally advanced breast cancer (LABC), 52 (29.2%) had previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 21 (12.0%) had previous radiation therapy, 40 (22.8%) received postmastectomy radiation, 27 (15.4%) had de-epithelialized skin reduction, and 13 (7.4%) had free nipple grafting. The median duration of follow-up was 24 months. Nipple necrosis (4 cases; 2.2%) was associated with previous radiation (9.5%; P = .018), skin reduction (11.1%; P = .001), and nipple grafting (15.4%; P = .001). The nipple-areolar complex margin (NAC) was involved with invasive disease in 1 case. Local recurrence occurred in 8 cases (4.6%), with 1 in-NAC recurrence. Overall survival was 98.3%, and disease-free survival (DFS) was 88.6%. LABC was associated with worse DFS (hazard ratio, 4.28; P = .011), with all 4 recurrences being distant. CONCLUSIONS: Previous radiation, skin reduction, and nipple grafting are associated with an increased risk of NAC necrosis. None of these should be considered absolute contraindications, but patients should be counseled appropriately. Although LABC is associated with worse DFS, relapses are systemic. Longer follow-up is needed to establish oncologic safety in unselected breast cancer patients.

Time to Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer Affects Survival: Implications for the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Quality Metrics.

BACKGROUND: To optimize breast cancer care, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer developed quality measures regarding receipt and timing of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Nationwide compliance with these measures and its impact on overall survival (OS) are evaluated herein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 285,291) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from 2004 to 2012 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Compliance with RT administration within 365 days from diagnosis was determined for patients with stage III disease with ≥ 4 positive lymph nodes post mastectomy and stage I-III disease post breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to assess factors associated with compliance and OS, respectively. RESULTS: In the mastectomy cohort, 66.9% received timely RT, showing improved OS versus no RT patients (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.67-0.73). Delayed RT patients (≥ 365 days) achieved equivalent OS to those receiving timely RT (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.93-1.23) and superior OS to no RT patients (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65-0.85). In the BCS cohort, 89.4% received timely RT, showing improved OS versus no RT patients (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.45-0.49). Delayed RT was associated with improved OS versus no RT (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.56-0.74) and decreased OS versus timely RT (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19-1.58). Factors associated with noncompliance included insurance type and distance to hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Quality measure compliance with adjuvant RT improves OS, regardless of timing after mastectomy. However, timeliness does impact OS after BCS. Focus on modifiable factors to improve compliance such as access to care may lead to improved compliance and OS.

Axillary Lymph Node Ultrasound Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Biopsy-Proven Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Results from the SN FNAC Study.

BACKGROUND: The sentinel node biopsy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (SN FNAC) study has shown that in node-positive (N+) breast cancer, sentinel node biopsy (SNB) can be performed following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), with a low false negative rate (FNR = 8.4%). A secondary endpoint of the SN FNAC study was to determine whether axillary ultrasound (AxUS) could predict axillary pathological complete response (ypN0) and increase the accuracy of SNB. METHODS: The SN FNAC trial is a study of patients with biopsy-proven N+ breast cancer who underwent SNB followed by completion node dissection. All patients had AxUS following NAC and the axillary nodes were classified as either positive (AxUS+) or negative (AxUS-). AxUS was compared with the final axillary pathology results. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the baseline characteristics of patients with AxUS+ versus those with AxUS-. Overall, 82.5% (47/57) of AxUS+ patients had residual positive lymph nodes (ypN+) at surgery and 53.8% (42/78) of AxUS- patients had ypN+. Post NAC AxUS sensitivity was 52.8%, specificity 78.3%, and negative predictive value 46.2%. AxUS FNR was 47.2%, versus 8.4% for SNB. If post-NAC AxUS- was used to select patients for SNB, FNR would decrease from 8.4 to 2.7%. However, using post-NAC AxUS in addition to SNB as an indication for ALND would have led to unnecessary ALND in 7.8% of all patients. CONCLUSION: AxUS is not appropriate as a standalone staging procedure, and SNB itself is sufficient to assess the axilla post NAC in patients who present with N+ breast cancer.

Hospital factors strongly influence robotic use in general surgery.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that general surgeons are more likely to use a robotic surgical platform at hospitals where more urologic and gynecologic robotic operations are performed, suggesting that hospital-related factors are important for choice of usage of minimally invasive platforms. METHODS: We queried the National Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2014 for patients who underwent stomach, gallbladder, pancreas, spleen, colon and rectum, or hernia (general surgery), prostate or kidney (urologic surgery), and ovarian or uterine surgery (gynecologic surgery). Hospitals were grouped into quartiles according to percent volume of robotic urologic or gynecologic operations. Multivariable logistic regression modeling determined independent variables associated with robotics. RESULTS: Survey-weighted results represented 482,227 open, 240,360 laparoscopic, and 42,177 robotic general surgical operations at 3,933 hospitals. Robotics use increased with each year studied and was more likely to be performed on younger men with private insurance. The odds of a general surgery patient receiving a robotic operation increased with urologic and gynecologic use at the hospital. Patients at top quartile hospitals for robotic urologic surgery had 1.34 times greater odds of receiving robotic general surgery operations (confidence interval 1.15-1.57, P < .001) and 1.53 times greater odds (confidence interval 1.32-1.79, P < .001) at top quartile robotic gynecologic hospitals. These findings were independent of study year, surgical site, insurance type, and hospital type and persisted when only comparing laparoscopic to robotic procedures. CONCLUSION: Use of robotics in general surgery is independently associated with use in urologic and gynecologic surgery at a hospital, suggesting that institutional factors are important drivers of use when considering laparoscopy versus robotics in general surgery.

The effect of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition on breast cancer staging and prognostication.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer staging has been developed to quantify prognosis and guide treatment. The American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition manual (AJCC8) departed from traditional anatomic staging by incorporating biological factors such as grade, hormone and HER2 receptor status into a novel prognostic staging model. The aim of this study was to externally validate AJCC8 prognostic staging. METHODS: This retrospective cohort investigated patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 at the McGill University Health Center. Patients were classified using both anatomic and prognostic staging systems according AJCC8. Overall survival analysis using a multivariate Cox-proportional hazard model was performed and model accuracy was evaluated using the Harrell concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). RESULTS: The cohort included 1703 women. Anatomic and prognostic stage assignments displayed discrepancies for 46.2% of patients, where 38.8% were downstaged and 7.5% were upstaged with prognostic staging. Patients with anatomic stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIC had high rates of downstaging (64.6-96.5%), as opposed to anatomic stages IA and IIIB where 93.1% and 75.0% of patients stage remained unchanged, respectively. The prognostic stage displayed increased prognostic accuracy with respect to overall survival, where the C-index was significantly higher compared to anatomic staging (0.810 vs 0.799, p < 0.05). In addition, prognostic staging displayed an improved model fit with a lower AIC (983.9) compared to anatomic staging (995.2). CONCLUSION: Prognostic and anatomic staging differ in their classification of patients, where prognostic staging displays improved accuracy, supporting its use in informing patient prognosis and guiding treatment decisions.

The Diagnosis and Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare tumor whose diagnosis and management can be challenging and for which management requires a multidisciplinary team in a specialized center. An important part of the diagnosis-identification of the histologic subtype-depends on pathology; identifying the histologic subtype is important because this can affect prognosis and treatment options. Complete surgical resection with negative margins remains the cornerstone of treatment of nonmetastatic RPS and is the only chance for cure. In order to achieve negative margins, multivisceral en bloc resection is often necessary. Neoadjuvant therapies (chemotherapy, external beam radiation, or combination radiation and chemotherapy) are safe in well-selected patients and may be considered after careful review by a multidisciplinary sarcoma tumor board when the recurrence risk is high.

Divergence from osteoporosis screening guidelines in older breast cancer patients treated with anti-estrogen therapy: A population-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: Older Breast Cancer (BC) survivors are an increased risk of osteoporosis due to natural aging and long-term cancer treatment-related toxicity. It is well known that anti-estrogen therapy (AET), especially aromatase inhibitors (AI), is associated with rapid bone loss and thus increases the risk of osteoporosis. This study characterizes patterns and predictors of receiving guideline-recommended bone densitometry (BD) screening at AET initiation. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (1998-2012) of all women ≥65 years of age initiating AET was designed using claims data from Quebec's universal health care. Associations with BD screening were estimated using a generalized estimating equations regression model, adjusting for clustering of patients within physicians. RESULTS: Among 16,480 women initiating AET, 36.1% received a baseline BD. Among AI users, the rate was 58.4%. In the multivariate analysis, age, lower socioeconomic status, tamoxifen use, lack of periodic health exam and having a general practitioner as the AET prescriber were associated with lower odds of BD screening. In terms of quality of care-related variables, lack of guideline-appropriate radiotherapy (OR: 0.69 (95% CI, 0.57-0.83), or chemotherapy consideration (0.82 (95% CI, 0.71-0.94)) and non-adherence to AET (0.76 (95% CI, 0.68-0.84)) were associated with lower odds of receiving BD screening. Women diagnosed with BC after 2003 had significantly better odds of being screened. CONCLUSION: Despite an increase in rates since 2003, BD screening remains suboptimal, especially for women at higher risk of osteoporosis. Coordination of health care and service-delivery monitoring can potentially optimize long-term management of treatment-related toxicity in older BC survivors.

Disparities in managing emotions when facing a diagnosis of breast cancer: Results of screening program of couples distress.

INTRODUCTION: Distress screening is now required for cancer center accreditation. Understanding patient and caregiver stress is critical to successful cancer care. This study examines the perceived emotional impact of breast cancer on both patients and partners. METHODS: From March 2011-February 2016, patients and partners undertook an electronic, 48-point distress screen during their first visit at a surgical breast clinic. Distress was measured via self-reported concerns on a five point Likert scale. Respondents were also asked about preferred interventions. The ability of the patient and partner to manage emotions was assessed in relation to education, ethnicity, fatigue, anxiety, and depression using ordered logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 665 individuals screened, 51.7%(n = 344) were patients, while 48.3%(n = 321) were partners. Patients were more distressed than partners regarding fatigue, anxiety, depression, and worrying about the future (p < 0.005). Only 19.7% of partners requested information with regards to "managing emotions" compared to 46.3% of patients. In the univariate analysis, being a partner was protective (OR 0.49 (95%CI 0.34-0.70, p < 0.000) as was holding an advanced educational degree (OR 0.36 (95%CI 0.14-0.93) p = 0.035). In the multivariate regression, having more education remained protective, while being a partner was no longer protective (OR 0.93(95%CI 0.62-1.39, p = 0.789). Financial concerns, anxiety, depression, and worrying about the future remained statistically significant. Partners asked for help less than patients (OR 0.28 (95%CI 0.17-0.48), p < 0.000). CONCLUSION: While partners have similar concerns as patients, they do not seek information or help in managing emotions as often as do patients. Both patient and partners with less education and increased financial distress were likely to report difficulty in managing emotions. This study identifies groups who would benefit from supportive measures even in the absence of a request for help.

The Comprehensive Complication Index: a New Measure of the Burden of Complications After Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are complex surgeries with multiple comorbidities. The Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) is the most commonly used method to report surgical morbidity, but limits it to the highest-grade complication. The Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) is a score ranging from 0 to 100, calculated using all 30-day complications and their treatment after abdominal surgery. The aim of this study is to assess the CCI's validity in the HIPEC patient population. METHODS: A review of our institutional cytoreduction database from 2009 to 2015 was undertaken. Patient demographics, pathology, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (PCI), complications and their treatments, and length of stay (LOS) were reviewed. The CCI was calculated for each patient. Linear regression was used to assess whether the CCI and CDC were predictors of LOS. RESULTS: Of 157 patients reviewed, 110 (70.1%) underwent HIPEC. The majority were female (77, 66.9%), and the mean age was 53.7 years. Mean PCI was 13.2 [interquartile range (IQR) 7-18]. Median CDC was grade 2 (IQR 0-2), and only 9.8% had CDC of grade 4 or higher. Mean CCI was 21.4, while the median was 20.9 (IQR 0-30.8). Mean LOS was 16.2 days, while the median was 11 days (IQR 8-15 days). The CCI strongly correlated with LOS with coefficient of 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38-0.54, p = 0.000]. CONCLUSIONS: The CCI is an adequate tool to capture all complications and their overall burden in patients having undergone HIPEC. This study shows that the CCI can predict LOS and could be used to quantify and compare the burden of multiple complications.

Association of Fluid Administration With Morbidity in Cytoreductive Surgery With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.

IMPORTANCE: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for peritoneal cancers can be associated with significant complications. Randomized trials have demonstrated increased morbidity with liberal fluid regimens in abdominal surgery. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of intraoperative fluid administration and morbidity in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective analysis of information from a prospectively collected institutional database was conducted at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center. A total of 133 patients from April 15, 2009, to June 23, 2016, with primary or secondary peritoneal cancers were included. EXPOSURES: Cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Morbidity associated with intraoperative fluid management calculated by the comprehensive complication index, which uses a formula combining all perioperative complications and their severities into a continuous variable from 0 to 100 in each patient. RESULTS: Of the 133 patients identified, 38% and 37% had diagnoses of metastatic appendiceal and colorectal cancers, respectively. Mean age was 54 (interquartile range [IQR], 47-64) years, and mean peritoneal cancer index was 13 (IQR, 7-18). Mitomycin and platinum-based chemotherapeutic agents were used in 96 (72.2%) and 37 (27.8%) of the patients, respectively. Mean intraoperative fluid (IOF) rate was 15.7 (IQR, 11.3-18.7) mL/kg/h. Mean comprehensive complication index (CCI) was 26.0 (IQR, 8.7-36.2). On multivariate analysis, age (coefficient, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.01-0.64; P = .04), IOF rate (coefficient, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.19-1.75; P = .02), and estimated blood loss (coefficient, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01-0.03; P = .002) were independent predictors of increased CCI. In particular, patients who received greater than the mean IOF rate experienced a 43% increase in the CCI compared with patients who received less than the mean IOF rate (31.5 vs 22.0; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Intraoperative fluid administration is associated with a significant increase in perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC. Fluid administration protocols that include standardized restrictive fluid rates can potentially help to mitigate morbidity in patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC.