Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 32(3): 1-7, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35993983

ABSTRACT

Given the shift toward value-based healthcare, strategies that decrease risk in commonly performed procedures such as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are of interest. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of a two-attending surgeon team on the outcomes of patients undergoing single-level ACDF. A retrospective matched-cohort study of patients undergoing single-level ACDF for degenerative cervical spondylosis, with minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. Patients were subdivided into two cohorts: cases with procedures performed by one attending surgeon assisted by a resident physician and cases with procedures performed by an attending surgeon with another attending surgeon as first-assist. Patients were matched by age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesia grade and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Perioperative data and complications were compared. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analysis were performed. Forty-two patients were included (21 in each group). There were 22 males and 20 females, with a mean age of 47.7 years and mean follow-up of 43.4 months. There were no differences in any demographic variable between groups, indicating successful matching. Cohort B had decreased anesthesia time (114.9 vs. 157.1 minutes, P < 0.001), operative time (58.1 vs. 98.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and blood loss (14.8 vs. 24.3 mL, P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in terms of post-operative complications including dysphagia, wound infection, neurologic or cardiovascular related complications. A two-attending surgeon team significantly reduces anesthesia time, surgical time, and blood loss in single-level ACDF procedures without an increase in complications or a decrease in fusion rates.


Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Surgeons , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Cohort Studies , Diskectomy/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Orthopedics ; 45(3): e134-e139, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35112966

ABSTRACT

The literature has shown the importance of long-term follow-up for adults with scoliosis treated surgically because complication and revision rates are high. The goal of this study was to determine long-term outcomes and complications of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior instrumentation for adult patients with scoliosis. A retrospective review of our institution's database was performed to identify adult patients with scoliosis treated with LLIF between 2008 and 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Medical records were reviewed for complications and revisions. Pre- and postoperative deformity Cobb angle measurements were taken as well as pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL). Functional outcome scores, including Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale score for back and leg pain, were assessed preoperatively and at follow-up. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analysis was performed. The 26 patients included had a mean age of 62 years, mean follow-up of 89 months, and mean of 1.8 levels per operation. Four patients (15.4%) required revisions. Mean deformity Cobb angle was 26° preoperatively and 14° postoperatively. Mean PI-LL mismatch was 11.7° preoperatively and 5.9° postoperatively. Nineteen (73%) patients had a PI-LL mismatch greater than 10° preoperatively, whereas only 2 (7.7%) had a mismatch postoperatively. Improvement was seen in all functional outcome scores. Long-term clinical results of LLIF for adults with deformity showed a low proportion of revision in the treatment of a condition with an established high rate of revision. The ability to reduce pelvic mismatch may further reduce the rate of revision. In this study, LLIF resulted in improved functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):e134-e139.].


Subject(s)
Lordosis , Scoliosis , Spinal Fusion , Adult , Humans , Lordosis/surgery , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Scoliosis/surgery , Spinal Fusion/methods , Treatment Outcome
3.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 47(4): 324-330, 2022 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34107527

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To compare minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of unilateral cervical radiculopathy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MI-PCF has been shown to be equally effective as ACDF in treating cervical radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis and similar pathologies. Additionally, it has been hypothesized that preserving motion and avoiding fusion reduces risk for adjacent segment disease, but potentially increases risk for subsequent revision to an ACDF. With similar short-term outcomes and substantial advantages, MI-PCF may be an effective alternative to ACDF for addressing appropriate cervical pathology. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients between 2009 and 2013 who underwent ACDF or MI-PCF with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. Demographic data was recorded. Revision rates and average time to revision between cohorts were compared. Clinical outcomes were assessed at each follow-up visit with Neck Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale for neck and Visual Analog Scale for arm pain scores. All complications were reviewed. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 251 consecutive patients were included (205 ACDF, 46 MI-PCF). Mean follow-ups for the ACDF and MI-PCF groups were 98.3 and 95.9 months, respectively. Complication rates were 2.9% and 2.2% for the ACDF and MI-PCF cohorts, respectively (P = 0.779). Revision rates were 7.8% for the ACDF cohort and 8.7% for the MI-PCF cohort (P = 0.840). Both cohorts experienced significant improvements in their clinical scores compared with their preoperative values. Final Visual Analog Scale for neck pain (ACDF: 2.6; MI-PCF: 1.6) and Visual Analog Scale for arm pain (ACDF: 1.1; MI-PCF: 0.4) scores differed significantly at final follow-up (P =  < 0.001; P =  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MI-PCF is a safe and effective alternative to ACDF in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, demonstrating substantial benefit. After final follow-up, MI-PCF demonstrated superior improvements in Visual Analog Scale scores, without increased complication or revision rates.Level of Evidence: 3.


Subject(s)
Foraminotomy , Radiculopathy , Spinal Fusion , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy , Humans , Radiculopathy/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
4.
Spine J ; 21(11): 1830-1838, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33940171

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although highlighted in joint arthroplasty studies, long-term outcomes between differing biomaterial composites, such as metal-on-metal (MoM) and metal-on-plastic (MoP) in anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) have not been thoroughly investigated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported clinical outcomes, overall reoperation rates, complications, and rates of ASD of MoM versus MoP artificial discs in two-level ACDR for the treatment of cervical DDD. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Meta-analysis and systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE: Nine hundred eighty patients (442 MoM, 538 MoP) across seven studies. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient reported clinical outcomes (NDI, VAS-n, VAS-a), overall reoperation rates, complications, and rates of ASD. METHODS: A systematic search strategy of three electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and SCOPUS) was conducted utilizing terms related to two-level ACDR. All studies included had a sample size of >10 patients, had a minimum 5-year follow-up, and reported data on adjacent segment disease. Cadaver studies, non-English manuscripts, articles with less than 5-year follow-up and studies in which only single-level ACDR was investigated were excluded. A total of seven studies were included in this analysis. Studies were analyzed for demographic data, clinical outcome scores (NDI, VAS-neck, and VAS-arm), overall reoperation rates, complications, and rates of ASD. A random-effects model of meta-analysis was used for groups that were determined to be heterogenous and a fixed-effects model was utilized for groups that were not. An overlap of 95% confidence intervals suggests no statistically significant difference at the p<.05 level. RESULTS: Seven studies were included with data on 980 patients (442 MoM, 538 MoP). The study population was 52.84% female, with a mean age of 48.01 years, and a mean follow-up of 85.66 months. The mean improvement in NDI was 34.42 (95% CI, 32.49-36.36) and 29.72 (95% CI, 27.15-32.29) for the MoM and MoP groups, respectively. The mean improvement in VAS-neck was 11.20 (95% CI, 10.69-11.70) and 8.78 (95% CI, 7.81-9.74) for the MoM and MoP groups, respectively. The mean improvement in VAS-arm was 10.73 (95% CI, 9.83-11.63) and 8.49 (95% CI, 7.59-9.39) for the MoM and MoP groups, respectively. 3.85% (95% CI, 2.40-6.10) of patients who underwent ACDR with a MoM implant required reoperation compared to 5.33% (95% CI, 3.68-7.65) of patients with a MoP implant. Heterotopic ossification and dysphagia were the most common complications in both groups. The MoM cohort showed a higher incidence of HO (72.62% vs. 21.07%), but a lower incidence of dysphagia (0.96% vs. 16.31%) compared to the MoP cohort. The MoM cohort had a larger proportion of patients with ASD who underwent subsequent surgery at an adjacent level (7.89% MoM versus 1.91% MoP). CONCLUSIONS: Our present meta-analysis suggests that the use of MoM artificial discs in two-level ACDR results in superior clinical outcome score improvement, but higher rates of ASD requiring secondary surgery compared to MoP discs after a follow-up period of 5 years or more.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , Metal-on-Metal Joint Prostheses , Spinal Fusion , Total Disc Replacement , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Plastics , Total Disc Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
5.
Spine J ; 21(8): 1318-1324, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33744435

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Obese patients can pose significant challenges to spine surgeons in lumbar fusion procedures. The increased risk of complications has led surgeons to be wary in pursing operative interventions in these patients. Since the advent of minimally-invasive techniques in lumbar fusion, surgeons are turning to these procedures in an attempt to minimize operative time, blood loss and overall cost. With an increased proportion of obese patients in the population, it is imperative to understand the long-term outcomes in these minimally-invasive approaches. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in the obese. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 115 patients (53 nonobese and 62 obese) who underwent XLIF with a minimum of 5-year follow-up. OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Patient reported outcome scores: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), (2) Reoperation rate, (3) Pelvic incidence (PI)- Lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch correction, (4) Graft subsidence and fusion rate METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent XLIF with percutaneous posterior stabilization since 2007 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Demographics including BMI were recorded and patients were subdivided into 2 cohorts: nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m2) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Functional outcomes were assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative VAS and ODI scores. Reoperation rates were compared between cohorts. PI-LL mismatch was calculated from both pre- and postoperative radiographs. Rates of graft subsidence and fusion were measured at final follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 115 consecutive patients were included (53 nonobese and 62 obese) with a mean follow up of 95.3 months. Mean BMI was 25.3 in the nonobese group and 35.3 in the obese group (p<.001). There were more females in nonobese cohort. VAS scores decreased by a mean of 5.7 in the nonobese cohort, and 5.4 in the obese cohort (p=.213). ODI improvement was also similar between the groups. 5.6% of nonobese patients required reoperation compared to 9.6% of obese patients (p=.503). Graft subsidence rates at final follow-up were 5.66% and 8.06% for the nonobese and obese groups, respectively (p=.613). Rates of successful fusion were 96.23% and 98.39% for the nonobese and obese groups, respectively (p=.469). Both cohorts achieved a similar proportion of PI-LL mismatch correction, 85% in obese versus 78% in nonobese patients (p=.526). CONCLUSION: Obese patients have similar surgical outcomes to nonobese patients with respect to functional outcome scores, reoperation rates, graft subsidence and correction of PI-LL mismatch after long-term follow-up. With similar outcome and reoperation profiles, minimally-invasive approaches to the spine, such as XLIF, may be an acceptable alternative to traditional open procedures in obese patients.


Subject(s)
Spinal Fusion , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Obesity/complications , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
6.
Asian Spine J ; 15(3): 301-307, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32872750

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: To assess long-term clinical outcomes of adjacent segment disease (ASD) in patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw (PS) instrumentation. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: ASD is a well-known sequela of spinal fusion, and is reported to occur at a rate of 2%-3% per year. There is debate as to whether ASD is a result of the instrumentation and fusion method or is the natural history of the patient's disease. Minimally invasive percutaneous PS augmentation of lumbar interbody fusion aims to prevent the disruption of posterior soft tissue stabilizers. METHODS: From 2004-2014, 419 consecutive patients underwent anterior, lateral, or minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous PS placement at a single institution. The mean follow-up was 4.5 years. The primary outcome measure was reoperation due to ASD. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those who underwent revision surgery secondary to ASD and those who did not require further surgery. Radiographic parameters were performed using postoperative radiographs. Patients with a pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch >10° were noted. RESULTS: Revision proportion secondary to ASD was 4.77% (n=20). Mean time to revision surgery was 2.5 years. Revision rate secondary to ASD was 1.1% per year. Patients who developed ASD were younger than those who did not (50.5 vs. 56.9 years, p=0.015). There was no difference in number of levels fused between cohorts. Revision proportion secondary to ASD was similar between approaches (anterior, lateral, minimally invasive). There was no significant difference in PI-LL mismatch between those who underwent revision for ASD and those who did not (22.2% vs. 18.8%, p=0.758). CONCLUSIONS: ASD rates in patients who underwent percutaneous PS placement were lower than those previously published after open PS placement, possibly related to greater preservation of the posterior stabilizing elements of the lumbar spine.

7.
Global Spine J ; 10(8): 992-997, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32875840

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the management of trauma patients with cervical spine fractures by identifying high-risk patients for vertebral artery injury (VAI), and evaluating how frequently patients undergo subsequent surgical/procedural intervention as a result of these findings. METHODS: All trauma patients with cervical spine fractures who underwent CTA of the head and neck at our institution between January 2013 and October 2017 were identified. Patients were indicated for CTA according to our institutional protocol based on the modified Denver criteria, and included patients with cervical fractures on scout CT. Those with positive VAI were noted, along with their fracture location, and presence or absence of neurological deficit on physical examination. Statistical analysis was performed and odds ratios were calculated comparing the relationship of cervical spine fracture with presence of VAI. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were included in our study. Of those, 25 patients (17.4%) were found to have VAI. Two patients (1.4%) with VAI underwent subsequent surgical/procedural intervention. Of the 25 cervical fractures with a VAI, 20 (80%), were found to involve the upper cervical region (4.2 OR, 95% CI 1.5-12.0; P = .007). Of the 25 who had a VAI, 9 were unable to undergo reliable neurologic examination. Of the remaining 16 patients, 5 (31.3%) had motor or sensory deficits localized to the side of the VAI, with no other attributable etiology. CONCLUSIONS: Cervical spine fractures located in the region of the C1-C3 vertebrae were more likely to have an associated VAI on CTA. VAI should also be considered in cervical trauma patients who present with neurological deficits not clearly explained by other pathology. Despite a finding of VAI, patients rarely underwent subsequent surgical or procedural intervention.

8.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31875199

ABSTRACT

As a consultant, the orthopaedic spine surgeon is often asked to evaluate patients with acute-onset extremity weakness. In some cases, patient's deficits can be attributed to nonspinal pathology; therefore, it is important to be aware of nonorthopaedic diagnoses when evaluating these patients. We report a case of thyrotoxic periodic paralysis that was initially confused by the consulting service with spinal pathology. A 32-year-old Hispanic man presented to our emergency department with rapid onset of lower extremity weakness. The consulting team ordered CT of the cervical and lumbar spine, as well as MRI of the lumbar spine which was aborted due to the patient's worsening tachycardia and chest pain. The spine service was subsequently consulted to evaluate the patient. Review of the metabolic panel revealed a low potassium, and additional testing led to the eventual diagnosis of thyrotoxic periodic paralysis. After correction of the patient's potassium, his weakness rapidly resolved, and no additional spinal workup was pursued. We describe this patient's presentation and outline the differential diagnosis for acute, nontraumatic extremity weakness, including both orthopaedic and other medical causes, that the spine surgeon should be aware of when evaluating patients with extremity weakness.

9.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 44(24): 1731-1739, 2019 Dec 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31343619

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes, complications, and reoperations of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) for unilateral cervical radiculopathy without myelopathy, in comparison to anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is a standard treatment for cervical radiculopathy secondary to lateral disc herniation or foraminal stenosis. Recent studies have suggested MI-PCF to be an effective alternative to ACDF. However, concern for reoperation and whether similar improvements in clinical outcomes can be achieved has led to a debate in the literature. METHODS: We comprehensively searched PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and SCOPUS utilizing terms related to MI-PCF. Two independent reviewers assessed potential studies and extracted data on clinical outcome scores (neck disability index [NDI], visual analog scale [VAS]-neck, and VAS-arm), reoperation proportion, and complications. Studies included were on noncentral cervical pathology, published in the last 10 years, had a sample size of >10 patients, and reported data on minimally invasive techniques for posterior cervical foraminotomy. Heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were performed. The pooled proportions of each outcome were compared to those of ACDF obtained from two previously published studies. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included with data of 1216 patients. The study population was 61.8% male, with a mean age of 51.57 years, and a mean follow-up of 30 months. MI-PCF resulted in a significantly greater improvement in VAS-arm scores compared to ACDF, and similar improvements in VAS-neck and NDI scores. Proportions of complications and reoperations were similar between the two cohorts. The most common complications were transient neuropraxia, wound-related, and durotomy. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that MI-PCF may be utilized as a safe and effective alternative to ACDF in patients with unilateral cervical radiculopathy without myelopathy, without concern for increased reoperations or complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Foraminotomy/methods , Radiculopathy/surgery , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Diskectomy/adverse effects , Foraminotomy/adverse effects , Humans , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/complications , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/complications , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Radiculopathy/etiology , Reoperation , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Spinal Stenosis/complications , Treatment Outcome
10.
Eur Spine J ; 28(8): 1829-1832, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28733720

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to present a unique case of a patient who presented to our Emergency Department with evidence of a chronic traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with severe displacement treated with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) of C2-C3 as well as and posterior cervical fusion (PCF) of C1-C3. METHODS: One patient with an untreated traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with Levine type II injury pattern and 1.2 cm of anterior subluxation underwent ACDF C2-C3 and PCF C1-C3. RESULTS: The patient recovered well, radiographs demonstrated reduction of the anterior subluxation, and the patient reported a neck disability index (NDI) score of 20 at 6-month follow-up with full neurologic function intact. The patient was then lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: In this report, we present an alcoholic patient with a history of many falls who presented with a Levine type II traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis with signs of chronicity seen on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We were able to partially reduce the anterior displacement with traction, but needed both anterior and posterior cervical approaches to achieve adequate reduction and stabilization of the injury.


Subject(s)
Axis, Cervical Vertebra , Spondylolisthesis , Accidental Falls , Alcoholism , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/diagnostic imaging , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/injuries , Axis, Cervical Vertebra/surgery , Diskectomy , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Spinal Fusion , Spondylolisthesis/diagnostic imaging , Spondylolisthesis/surgery
11.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 29(3): 209-214, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32478992

ABSTRACT

Rotator cuff tear (RCT) and cervical spinal stenosis (CSS) are common pathologies in the elderly. Both conditions may present with lateral shoulder pain and weakness or numbness of the upper extremity, potentially affecting patients' ability to live independently. Few data are available on the incidence of CSS among patients with concurrent RCT. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of CSS among RCT patients, demographics, and surgical management using a national insurance database. The Medicare database was used to identify patients with RCT and concomitant CSS by ICD-9 codes from 2005-2014. Trends based on age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) were assessed. Utilization of open and arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) was compared. A total of 86,501 patients were identified. The number of patients diagnosed with RCT and CSS significantly increased (p< 0.0001). The incidence of CSS in patients with RCT increased from 9% to 13% (p < 0.05). Females < 64 years were more likely to exhibit combined pathology than age-matched males (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.18) or females > 65 years (OR 1.64, 96% CI 1.61 to 1.67). A BMI of 30-40 kg/m2 demonstrated the highest incidence (43%, p < 0.0001). Arthroscopic RCR increased by 2% (p = 0.03) in RCT-CSS. The incidence of CSS in RCT patient is increasing. Orthopedic surgeons should maintain high clinical suspicion for concurrent CSS pathology in patients with RCT, particularly in obese female patients > 65 years with several medical comorbidities. Further investigation into the influence of these concurrent pathologies on patient outcomes is warranted.


Subject(s)
Rotator Cuff Injuries/epidemiology , Spinal Stenosis/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arthroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Arthroscopy/trends , Body Mass Index , Cervical Vertebrae , Comorbidity/trends , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Sex Factors , Spinal Stenosis/surgery , United States/epidemiology
12.
Asian Spine J ; 12(5): 830-838, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30213165

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (level of evidence: 4). PURPOSE: To describe the potential comorbid, operative, and radiographic risk factors for the development of clinically-relevant pseudarthrosis following minimally-invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: MIS-TLIF has shown long-term clinical outcomes with decreased perioperative morbidity and earlier return to work, similar to those of open TLIF. However, unsuccessful fusion still remains a concern. The impacts of various patient, operative, and radiographic risk factors have not been evaluated for their potential association with pseudarthrosis related to MIS-TLIF. METHODS: Between 2012 and 2015, 204 consecutive patients underwent one or two-level MIS-TLIF at St. Joseph's University Medical Center, Paterson, NJ, USA; they had a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. The patients were divided into two cohorts: those who developed clinically-relevant pseudarthrosis and those who did not. Clinically-relevant pseudarthrosis was determined by both evidence on computed tomography and presence of continued clinical symptoms at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Revision surgery was the only identified non-radiographic factor associated with pseudarthrosis. Disc angle had the highest (R 2=0.8), followed by anterior disc height (R 2=0.79). Although posterior disc height and the ratio of anterior to posterior disc height showed a marked relationship with the outcome, the R 2-values were <0.3, thus indicating a less-strong correlation. The overall pseudarthrosis rate was 8%. No statistically significant differences were identified between the two cohorts with respect to mean age, sex, medical comorbidities, smoking status, or number of levels fused. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically-relevant pseudarthrosis is not uncommon following MIS-TLIF. In the current study, undergoing revision surgery, disc angle, and anterior disc height were observed to be associated with clinically-relevant pseudarthrosis. This study demonstrated that the patient population may benefit from an alternate approach.

13.
Orthopedics ; 41(6): e802-e806, 2018 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30222793

ABSTRACT

Clinical care of patients with unstable thoracolumbar vertebral body fractures may be challenging, especially in the setting of polytrauma patients who require other acute intervention. Compared with the traditional open approach, percutaneous short-segment fixation constructs place less surgical burden on patients regarding operative time and blood loss. Between 2008 and 2012, 32 patients with a mean age of 49 years (range, 19-80 years) underwent percutaneous short-segment fixation at the authors' institution and had a minimum of 6 months of complete clinical and radiographic follow-up. Load-sharing classification scores were determined. Outcomes evaluated included anterior body height, posterior body height, local kyphosis, regional kyphosis, thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis, mean operative time, and total blood loss. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analyses were performed. All load-sharing classification scores were 7 or less, and 11 of the 32 patients were polytrauma patients requiring surgery. No difference was seen between preoperative and late measurements of anterior body height, posterior body height, local kyphosis, regional kyphosis, or thoracolumbar junctional kyphosis. There were no complications, revisions, or anterior corpectomies. Only 2 patients (6%) underwent elective removal of hardware at 1 year. Mean operative time was 43 minutes (range, 33-56 minutes), and mean estimated blood loss was less than 50 mL. Percutaneous short-segment fixation prevented loss of vertebral body height and progression of kyphosis in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures with load-sharing classification scores of 7 or less. This study shows that these fractures with a load-sharing classification score of 6 and 7 may be stabilized using fewer screws than traditional methods in some patients and allow polytrauma patients to undergo other acute treatment. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(6):e802-e806.].


Subject(s)
Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Loss, Surgical , Female , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Humans , Kyphosis/diagnostic imaging , Kyphosis/etiology , Lumbar Vertebrae/injuries , Lumbar Vertebrae/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Operative Time , Pedicle Screws , Radiography , Spinal Fractures/complications , Spinal Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/injuries , Thoracic Vertebrae/pathology , Young Adult
14.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 29(4): 358-364, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29957145

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) with tubes for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy in terms of the 1) overall revision proportion, 2) index and adjacent level revision rates, and 3) functional outcome scores. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients who had undergone ACDF or MI-PCF at a single institution between 2009 and 2014. Patients treated for cervical radiculopathy without myelopathy and with a minimum 2-year follow-up were compared according to the procedure performed for their pathology. Primary outcome measures included the overall rate of revision with fusion and overall revision proportion as well as the rate of index and adjacent level revisions per year. Secondarily, self-reported outcome measures-Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for arm (VASa) and neck (VASn) pain-at the preoperative and postoperative evaluations were analyzed. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients were treated with MI-PCF, and 210 consecutive patients were treated with ACDF. The mean follow-up for the MI-PCF cohort was 42.9 ± 6.6 months (mean ± SD) and for the ACDF cohort was 44.9 ± 10.3 months. There was no difference in the overall revision proportion between the two cohorts (4 [8.2%] of 49 MI-PCF vs. 12 [5.7%] of 210 ACDF, p = 0.5137). There was no difference in the revision rate per level per year (3.1 vs. 1.7, respectively, p = 0.464). Moreover, there was no difference in the revision rate per level per year at the index level (1.8 vs. 0.7, respectively, p = 0.4657) or at an adjacent level (1.3 vs. 1.1, p = 0.9056). Neither was there a difference between the cohorts as regards the change from preoperative to final postoperative functional outcome scores (NDI, VASa, VASn). CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive PCF for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy demonstrates rates of revision at the index and adjacent levels similar to those following ACDF. In order to confirm the positive efficacy and cost analysis findings in this study, future studies need to extend the follow-up and show that the rate of revision with fusion does not increase substantially over time.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Diskectomy , Foraminotomy , Radiculopathy/surgery , Adult , Aged , Diskectomy/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Foraminotomy/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Neck/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Cord Diseases/surgery , Spinal Fusion/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
16.
Asian Spine J ; 12(2): 238-245, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29713404

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series with prospective arm. PURPOSE: To assess the safety and accuracy of percutaneous lumbosacral pedicle screw placement (PLPSP) in the lumbosacral spine using intraoperative dual-planar fluoroscopy (DPF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: There are several techniques available for achieving consistent, safe, and accurate results with PLPSP. There is a paucity of literature describing the beneficial operative, economic, and clinical outcomes of DPF, the most readily accessible image guidance system. METHODS: From 2004 to 2014, 451 consecutive patients underwent PLPSP using DPF, for a total of 2,345 screw placement. The results of prospectively obtained postoperative computed tomography (CT) examinations of an additional 41 consecutive patients were compared with the results of 104 CT examinations obtained postoperatively due to clinical symptomatology; these results were interpreted by three reviewers. The rates of revision indicated by misplaced screws with consistent clinical symptomatology were compared between groups. Pedicle screw placement was graded according to 2-mm increments in medial pedicle wall breach and measurement of screw axis placement. RESULTS: Seven of the 2,345 pedicle screws placed percutaneously with the use of the dual-planar fluoroscopic technique required revision because of a symptomatic misplaced screw, for a screw revision rate of 0.3%. There were no statistically significant demographic differences between patients who had screws revised and those who did not. All screws registered greater than 10 mA on electromyographic stimulation. In the 41 prospectively obtained CT examinations, one out of 141 screws (0.7%) was revised due to pedicle wall breach; whereas among the 104 patients with 352 screws, three screws were revised (0.9%). CONCLUSIONS: DPF is an extremely accurate, safe, and reproducible technique for placement of percutaneous pedicle screws and is a readily available and cost-effective alternative to CT-guided pedicle screw placement techniques. Postoperative CT evaluation is not necessary with PLPSP unless the patient is symptomatic. Acceptable electromyographic thresholds may need to be reevaluated.

17.
Clin Orthop Relat Res ; 476(7): 1506-1513, 2018 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29470234

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several studies have sought to address the role of routine preoperative MRI in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing deformity correction. Despite similar results regarding the prevalence of neuraxial anomalies detected on MRI, published conclusions conflict and give opposing recommendations. Lack of consensus has led to important variations in use of MRI before spinal surgery for patients with AIS. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: This systematic review and meta-analysis of studies about patients with AIS evaluated (1) the overall proportion of neuraxial abnormalities; (2) the patient factors and curve characteristics that may be associated with abnormalities; and (3) the proportion of patients who underwent neurosurgical intervention before scoliosis surgery and the kinds of neuraxial lesions that were identified. METHODS: We performed a search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Plus, and SCOPUS) utilizing search terms related to routine MRI and AIS, yielding 206 articles. Studies included had at least 20 participants, patients with ages 11 to 21 years, and a Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) study quality score of 8 and 16 points for noncomparative and comparative studies, respectively. Non-English manuscripts, animal studies, and those that did not include patients with AIS solely were excluded. Eighteen articles with 4746 patients were included for analysis of the overall proportion of neuraxial abnormalities, 12 articles with 3028 patients for analysis by sex, eight articles with 1603 patients for right main thoracic curve, eight articles with 665 patients for a left main thoracic curve, and 13 articles with 3063 patients and 230 (7.5%) abnormalities for number of neurosurgical interventions before scoliosis correction. The mean MINORS score for studies included was 14 (range, 10-20). Each study was analyzed for the proportion of patients identified with neuraxial abnormalities and associations with specific demographics. We determined the proportion of patients who underwent surgical interventions before scoliosis surgery as well as the types of neuraxial lesions identified. The articles were assessed for heterogeneity and publication bias. Because all groups were determined to be heterogeneous, a random-effects model was used for each group in this meta-analysis; with this analysis, an overlap of 95% confidence intervals suggests no difference at the p < 0.05 level, but this analytic approach does not provide p values. RESULTS: The pooled proportion of neuraxial abnormalities detected on MRI was 8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 6%-12%). With the numbers available, we found no difference in the proportion of male and female patients with neuraxial abnormalities (18% [95% CI, 11%-29%] versus 9% [95% CI, 6%-12%], respectively). Likewise, there was no difference in the proportion of pooled neuraxial abnormalities in right and left curves (9% [95% CI, 6%-14%] versus 15% [95% CI, 5%-35%], respectively). In the subset of abnormalities analyzed for number of neurosurgical interventions before scoliosis correction, the pooled proportion showed that 33% (95% CI, 24%-43%) underwent neurosurgical intervention before deformity correction. The most common abnormalities of the 367 found on MRI were syringomyelia in 127 patients (35%), Arnold-Chiari Type 1 malformation with syrinx in 103 patients (28%), and isolated Arnold-Chiari Type 1 malformation in 91 patients (25%). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with AIS who have neuraxial abnormalities is high (8%) and a large number undergo surgical intervention before scoliosis reconstruction. We did not find any particular demographic variables that indicated an increased risk of abnormality. Clinicians should consider advanced imaging before surgical intervention in the treatment of a patient with an idiopathic diagnosis. Preventable variables need to be identified by future studies to establish a better working treatment protocol for these patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.


Subject(s)
Arnold-Chiari Malformation/epidemiology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Nervous System Malformations/epidemiology , Scoliosis/diagnostic imaging , Syringomyelia/epidemiology , Adolescent , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/complications , Arnold-Chiari Malformation/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Nervous System Malformations/complications , Nervous System Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Preoperative Care/methods , Preoperative Care/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Scoliosis/complications , Scoliosis/surgery , Syringomyelia/complications , Syringomyelia/diagnostic imaging
18.
J Orthop Case Rep ; 6(4): 53-56, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28164053

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Long-term bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis is associated with an increased risk of low-to-no energy atypical subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures with characteristic radiologic findings. There are few reports of patients with long-term bisphosphonate-induced periprosthetic fractures, all of them had a hip arthroplasty prosthesis. In this report, we present a unique case of a 90-year-old Caucasian female on long-term bisphosphonate therapy with a sliding hip screw implant who sustained a periprosthetic fracture of the femoral shaft at the distal aspect of the plate. CASE REPORT: In April 2014, a 90-year-old female presented with left thigh pain after a fall from standing height. She had a previous fixation of a left intertrochanteric hip fracture with a sliding hip screw in 1999 and a 9-year history of bisphosphonate therapy. Radiographs obtained in the emergency department revealed a left-sided femoral shaft fracture at the distal aspect of the previously applied five-hole side plate. Of note, the periprosthetic fracture demonstrated cortical thickening at the fracture site of the lateral femoral cortex, lack of comminution as well as a transverse appearance. The patient was taken to the operating room the next day for retrograde placement of an intramedullary nail of the left femur with revision of left intertrochanteric femur fracture fixation. By 3 months postoperatively, she had obtained full radiographic union. CONCLUSION: This case report highlights the possibility of an atypical fracture distal to the sliding hip screw implant after open reduction internal fixation of an intertrochanteric hip fracture in patients on long-term bisphosphonates.

19.
J Long Term Eff Med Implants ; 25(4): 313-9, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26852640

ABSTRACT

Vertebral compression fractures are a significant source of morbidity and mortality among patients of all age groups. These fractures result in both acute and chronic pain. Patients who sustain such fractures are known to suffer from more comorbidities and have a higher mortality rate compared with healthy people in the same age group. In recent years, balloon kyphoplasty has become a popular method for treating vertebral compression fractures. However, as longer-term follow-up becomes available, the effects of cement augmentation on adjacent spinal segments require investigation. Here, we have performed a retrospective chart review of 258 consecutive patients with pathologic vertebral compression fractures secondary to osteoporosis, treated by either conservative measures or balloon kyphoplasty with polymethylmethacrylate cement augmentation. Multivariate analysis of patient comorbidities was performed to assess the risks associated with subsequent adjacent and remote compression fracture at a minimum of 2 years follow-up. A total of 258 patients had 361 vertebral compression fractures. A total of 121 patients were treated nonoperatively and 137 underwent balloon kyphoplasty with polymethylmethacrylate cement augmentation. The mean follow-up for both cohorts was 2.7 years (range, 2-6 years). The kyphoplasty cohort was significantly older than the nonoperative cohort (mean age, 78.5 versus 74.2 years; p = 0.02), had 24 more patients with diabetes mellitus (37 versus 13; p = 0.05), and had 34 more patients with a history of smoking (50 versus 16; p = 0.05). However, the kyphoplasty cohort had less patients with a history of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use (45 versus 71; p = 0.07). There were no demographic differences between groups in patients with secondary fractures. Nonoperative treatment was identified as a statistically significant independent risk factor for subsequent vertebral compression fracture [odds ratio (OR), 2.28]. Univariate analysis identified age, diabetes mellitus, smoking, NSAID usage, and female gender as risk factors for subsequent vertebral compression fracture. When adjusted for multivariate analysis, no individual factor demonstrated increased risk for subsequent fracture. Patients diagnosed with vertebral compression fractures secondary to osteoporosis suffer from multiple medical comorbidities. No particular comorbidity was identified as solely attributable for increased risk of subsequent remote or adjacent compression fractures. Patients in this series treated with nonoperative (conservative) management had a 2.28 times greater risk for a subsequent vertebral compression fracture than patients treated with balloon kyphoplasty and polymethylmethacrylate cement augmentation.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment/adverse effects , Fractures, Compression/therapy , Fractures, Spontaneous/therapy , Kyphoplasty/adverse effects , Spinal Fractures/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fractures, Compression/etiology , Fractures, Spontaneous/etiology , Humans , Kyphoplasty/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/complications , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Fractures/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...