Surgical approach to repair of traumatic avulsion and external herniation of the levator palpebrae superioris aponeurosis.

This report describes the unusual case and surgical repair of avulsion and external herniation of the levator palpebrae superioris (LPS) aponeurosis and attached muscle fibres associated with superior tarsal plate fracture in an 8-year-old Indigenous girl. To the authors' knowledge, isolated and complete levator palpebrae superioris avulsion with external herniation in trauma is previously unreported. Open injury to LPS requires swift surgical repair, and an anterior ptosis repair approach may facilitate identification of anatomical structures to prevent upper eyelid ptosis. Ultimately, the surgical repair in this case prevented further ptosis surgery and complications in a paediatric patient.

Optimising fundoscopy practices across the medical spectrum: A focus group study.

INTRODUCTION: Fundoscopy can be of great clinical value, yet remains underutilised. Educational attempts to improve fundoscopy utilisation have had limited success. We aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators underlying the uptake of clinical direct ophthalmoscopy across a spectrum of medical specialties and training levels. METHODS: Ten focus groups were conducted with medical students (n = 42), emergency department doctors (n = 24), basic physician trainees (n = 7), hospital physicians (n = 6) and general practitioners (n = 7). Independent thematic analysis of transcripts was conducted by three investigators. A consensus thematic framework was developed, and transcripts were reanalysed using this framework. RESULTS: Thematic analysis identified seven main themes: (1) technical barriers to performing fundoscopy examinations; (2) clinical culture and expectations regarding fundoscopy; (3) the influence of fundoscopy on clinical management; (4) motivation to perform the examination; (5) novel technology including smartphone fundoscopy, and the value of a digital fundus image; (6) training requirements, and; (7) use of limited resources. CONCLUSION: Our results build a more nuanced picture of the factors which determine fundoscopy utilisation. As current barriers limit practice by clinicians and medical students, expertise and confidence performing and interpreting fundoscopy are lost. This shifts the balance of perceived clinical utility to futility in changing patient management, and reinforces a cycle of reducing fundoscopy utilisation. We identified important cultural barriers such as accepted incompetence, and misperceptions of senior discouragement. Emerging technologies reduce the technical barriers to fundoscopy. Therefore education should: focus on detecting pathology from digital images; clarify the role of fundoscopy in patient management, and; be targeted at key career progression points.

Fundoscopy use in neurology departments and the utility of smartphone photography: a prospective prevalence and crossover diagnostic accuracy study amongst neurology inpatients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although fundoscopy is a crucial part of the neurological examination, it is challenging, under-utilized and unreliably performed. The aim was to determine the prevalence of fundus pathology amongst neurology inpatients and the diagnostic accuracy of current fundoscopy practice compared with systematic screening with smartphone fundoscopy (SF) and portable non-mydriatic fundus photography (NMFP). METHODS: This was a prospective cross-sectional surveillance and diagnostic accuracy study on adult patients admitted under neurology in an Australian hospital. Inpatients were randomized to initial NMFP (RetinaVue 100, Welch Allyn) or SF (D-EYE) followed by a crossover to the alternative modality. Images were graded by neurology doctors, using telemedicine consensus neuro-ophthalmology NMFP grading as the reference standard. Feasibility parameters included ease, comfort and speed. RESULTS: Of 79 enrolled patients, 14.1% had neurologically relevant pathology (seven, disc pallor; one, hypertensive retinopathy; three, disc swelling). The neurology team performed direct ophthalmoscopy in 6.6% of cases and missed all abnormalities. SF had a sensitivity of 30%-40% compared with NMFP (45.5%); however, it had a lower rate of screening failure (1% vs. 13%, p < 0.001), a shorter examination time (1.10 vs. 2.25 min, p < 0.001) and a slightly higher patient comfort rating (9.2 vs. 8/10, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates a clinically significant prevalence of fundus pathology amongst neurology inpatients which was missed by current fundoscopy practices. Portable NMFP screening appears more accurate than SF, whilst both are diagnostically superior to routine fundoscopic practice, feasible and well tolerated by patients.

Impact on patient management of non-mydriatic fundus photography compared to direct ophthalmoscopy in a regional Australian emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the management impact of non-mydriatic fundus photography (NMFP) implementation for appropriate ED patients; compare the diagnostic accuracy of direct ophthalmoscopy (DO) and NMFP, and determine the prevalence of fundus pathology in a regional Australian ED. METHODS: This before/after crossover study prospectively enrolled patients presenting with headache, neurological deficit, visual disturbance and/or hypertensive urgency. Patients received DO examination, then separate NMFP examination. Emergency clinicians (ECs) were surveyed on their patient management plans following both DO examination and NMFP imaging. Telemedicine review of NMFP images was performed by an ophthalmologist within 48 h, and any additional management changes were documented. RESULTS: The use of NMFP influenced changes in management in 52 (39%) of 133 enrolled patients (95% confidence interval 31-48%). Of these, 65% were escalations of management due to acute fundus pathology, while 35% were de-escalating changes following normal fundus findings. ECs diagnostic accuracy for acute fundus pathology improved from 0% to 29% sensitivity, and 59% to 84% specificity using DO and NMFP respectively, and telemedicine registrar review increased this to 50% sensitivity and 86% specificity. The period prevalence of acute fundus pathology was 10.5% (95% confidence interval 6-17%). CONCLUSION: The addition of NMFP images can significantly impact the management of ED patients requiring fundus examination, facilitating expedited and optimised patient care. NMFP improves ECs diagnostic acumen for fundus pathology over DO examination and telehealth specialist review is important for diagnostic accuracy. There is a clinically important prevalence of fundus pathology in this regional ED setting.

eFOCUS 2: A randomised crossover trial of smartphone fundoscopy and direct ophthalmoscopy aiming to improve optic disc interpretation by medical students with e-learning support.

BACKGROUND: Ophthalmoscopy and its interpretation are complex. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of smartphone fundoscopy with traditional direct ophthalmoscopy for optic disc interpretation, with e-learning support. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, crossover study of 102 medical students. Students were offered e-learning for optic disc interpretation. A fundoscopy objective structured clinical examination was conducted after an introductory lecture and 10-min practical training session on smartphone fundoscopy and traditional ophthalmoscopy. Participants examined patients and simulator slides with a randomised crossover between smartphone [D-eye (Padova, Italy) or iExaminer (Welch Allyn, Macquarie Park, Australia)] and traditional ophthalmoscopy (Welch Allyn). Optic discs were graded independently by three masked ophthalmologists. The primary outcome was the ability to interpret an optic disc as normal or abnormal. Secondary outcomes included other optic disc aspects; student preferences; and e-learning performance. RESULTS: Students' agreement with the gold standard for an abnormal or normal disc was significantly greater using a smartphone (74.4%) than with direct ophthalmoscopy (68.1%, p = 0.032). More students preferred smartphone (74%) over direct ophthalmoscopy (26%, p < 0.001). E-learning led to an improvement in optic disc interpretation scores (mean improvement = 4.5%, 95% CI = 3.7-5.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Medical students are more accurate at recognising an abnormal optic disc using smartphone fundoscopy than traditional direct ophthalmoscopy, and have a strong preference for smartphone fundoscopy. E-learning may improve the interpretation of optic disc abnormalities. Smartphone fundoscopy may mitigate some technical challenges of fundoscopy and reinvigorate use of this valuable clinical examination.

Using non-mydriatic fundus photography to detect fundus pathology in Australian metropolitan emergency departments: A prospective prevalence and diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of fundus pathology in metropolitan Australian EDs utilising a non-mydriatic fundus photography screening programme. Secondary objectives include diagnostic accuracy among emergency physicians compared to telehealth ophthalmologist review. METHODS: Prospective cross-sectional study investigating non-mydriatic fundus photography as a new diagnostic test in two tertiary Australian EDs. Consecutive adult patients were enrolled if they presented with headache, focal neurological deficit, visual disturbance or diastolic BP >120 mmHg. Diagnostic agreement was determined using kappa statistics and sensitivity and specificity using a reference standard consensus ophthalmology review. RESULTS: A total of 345 consecutive patients were enrolled among whom 56 (16%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 13-21) had urgent fundus pathology. Agreement between emergency physician and ophthalmic assessment of fundus photographs was 74% (kappa = 0.196, P = 0.001). Emergency physicians had 40% sensitivity (95% CI 27-54) and 82% specificity (95% CI 76-86) for detecting urgent pathology on photographs. CONCLUSIONS: Fundus photography detects a clinically significant proportion of fundus pathology and urgent diagnoses. Telehealth specialist image review is important to detect some important, time-critical illnesses that can be missed in routine care. This offers an accurate alternative to direct ophthalmoscopy that warrants further research in Australian EDs.

Ophthalmic findings in neonates receiving sildenafil.

AIM: To determine the risk of ocular complications of sildenafil therapy in neonates. METHODS: Retrospective case review of neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn who received sildenafil therapy between 2010 and 2015 in a single, tertiary surgical neonatal intensive care unit in Australia. Ophthalmic examination findings in the neonatal intensive care unit and follow-up were examined. RESULTS: Twenty-seven neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn received sildenafil. The median gestational age (GA) was 38 weeks (range 24-41 weeks), and median birthweight was 2690 g (range 454-4270 g). Ophthalmic review was undertaken in 23 neonates, and 16 neonates were term or near-term infants (GA 31-40 weeks). All of them had a normal initial ophthalmic examination; one child was later diagnosed with hypermetropia and another with infantile esotropia. Amongst the seven premature infants (GA 24-30 weeks), three had retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) diagnosed at the first ophthalmic review and the other four had normal initial examinations. Two patients later developed ROP, one of whom was also diagnosed with congenital motor nystagmus. All five patients diagnosed with ROP were extremely preterm (<28 weeks) with low birthweight (454-635 g). CONCLUSIONS: There were no short-term complications attributable to sildenafil therapy identified in term or near-term neonates (GA ≥31 weeks). This cohort of neonates does not typically undergo ophthalmic review as part of the ROP screening protocol in our institution. Routine ophthalmic review of neonates on sildenafil therapy, who are not at risk of ROP, is therefore unlikely to be warranted. Further research is required to clarify the relationship between sildenafil and ROP.