Quantitation of the next-generation imipridone ONC206 in human plasma by a simple and sensitive UPLC-MS/MS assay for clinical pharmacokinetic application.

ONC206 is an imipridone derivative that is being developed clinically as a single agent given orally in a first-in-human trial (NCT04541082). This ongoing clinical trial requires pharmacokinetic analysis of ONC206 to fully characterize its pharmacologic profile. There is currently no published bioanalytical method for ONC206 quantitation. To understand the clinical pharmacokinetics of ONC206, a sensitive yet simple uHPLC-MS/MS method for quantitation of ONC206 in human plasma was developed. Protein-precipitation allowed rapid and sensitive bioanalytical measurement of ONC206 in human plasma. A Phenomenex Kinetex C18 (50 ×2.1 mm, 1.3 µm, 100 Å) analytical column achieved symmetrical and sharp chromatography peaks of ONC206 and the internal standard, [2H]7-ONC206, which were detected using multiple reaction monitoring. The assay calibration range was 1-500 ng/mL and was best fit by a linear regression model (r2 > 0.99732 ± 0.0010). The method proved accurate (< ± 9% deviation), precise (<11%CV), selective and specific with no interference and low inter-lot matrix variability. ONC206 demonstrated excellent short-term, long-term, and multiple freeze-thaw cycle stability in solution and human plasma. This fully validated method was used to quantitate ONC206 plasma concentrations from patients enrolled in the aforementioned clinical trial at the NCI to demonstrate its clinical applicability.

A quantitative LC-MS/MS method for the determination of tissue brincidofovir and cidofovir diphosphate in a MuPyV-infected mouse model.

Brincidofovir (BCV) is an investigational lipid conjugate of the nucleotide analog cidofovir (CDV), which is being developed as a medical countermeasure for the treatment of smallpox. BCV is active against double-stranded DNA viruses including BK and JC viruses. Here, we validated procedures for quantifying BCV and its pharmacologically active moiety cidofovir diphosphate (CDV-PP) in mouse kidney, brain and spleen tissue homogenates. Following homogenization, BCV and CDV-PP were extracted from the tissues by protein precipitation with their stable, isotopically labeled internal standards, BCV-d6 and 13 C3 15 N2 -CDV-PP. Then, samples were analyzed for BCV by reverse-phase chromatography on a Waters Xterra MS C18 (50 × 2.1 mm, 3.5 µm particle size) column while CDV-PP was analyzed on a Thermo BioBasic AX (50 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm particle size) column using anion exchange chromatography. Detection was achieved by electrospray ionization in positive ion mode on an AB Sciex API-5000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The calibration curves were linear over a range of 1.00-1,000 ng/ml homogenate and 0.050-50.0 ng/ml homogenate for BCV and CDV-PP, respectively. These methods were validated according to US Food and Drug Administration guidance for industry and may be used to characterize the tissue pharmacology of both analytes to advance its preclinical development.

Efficacy of delayed brincidofovir treatment against a lethal rabbitpox virus challenge in New Zealand White rabbits.

In the event of a bioterror attack with variola virus (smallpox), exposure may only be identified following onset of fever. To determine if antiviral therapy with brincidofovir (BCV; CMX001) initiated at, or following, onset of fever could prevent severe illness and death, a lethal rabbitpox model was used. BCV is in advanced development as an antiviral for the treatment of smallpox under the US Food and Drug Administration's 'Animal Rule'. This pivotal study assessed the efficacy of immediate versus delayed treatment with BCV following onset of symptomatic disease in New Zealand White rabbits intradermally inoculated with a lethal rabbitpox virus (RPXV), strain Utrecht. Infected rabbits with confirmed fever were randomized to blinded treatment with placebo, BCV, or BCV delayed by 24, 48, or 72 h. The primary objective evaluated the survival benefit with BCV treatment. The assessment of reduction in the severity and progression of clinical events associated with RPXV were secondary objectives. Clinically and statistically significant reductions in mortality were observed when BCV was initiated up to 48 h following the onset of fever; survival rates were 100%, 93%, and 93% in the immediate treatment, 24-h, and 48-h delayed treatment groups, respectively, versus 48% in the placebo group (p < 0.05 for each vs. placebo). Significant improvements in clinical and virologic parameters were also observed. These findings provide a scientific rationale for therapeutic intervention with BCV in the event of a smallpox outbreak when vaccination is contraindicated or when diagnosis follows the appearance of clinical signs and symptoms.

Integrating internal and external bioanalytical support to deliver a diversified pharmaceutical portfolio.

The portfolios of pharmaceutical companies have diversified substantially over recent years in recognition that monotherapies and/or small molecules are less suitable for modulating many complex disease etiologies. Furthermore, there has been increased pressure on drug-development budgets over this same period. This has placed new challenges in the path of bioanalytical scientists, both within the industry and with contract research organizations (CROs). Large pharmaceutical, biotechnology and small-medium healthcare enterprises have had to make important decisions on what internal capabilities they wish to retain and where CROs offers a significant strategic benefit to their business model. Our journey has involved asking where we believe an internal bioanalytical facility offers the greatest benefit to progressing drug candidates through the drug-development cycle and where externalization can help free up internal resources, adding flexibility to our organization in order to deal with the inevitable peaks and troughs in workload.

Small molecule specific run acceptance, specific assay operation, and chromatographic run quality assessment: recommendation for best practices and harmonization from the global bioanalysis consortium harmonization teams.

Consensus practices and regulatory guidance for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays of small molecules are more aligned globally than for any of the other bioanalytical techniques addressed by the Global Bioanalysis Consortium. The three Global Bioanalysis Consortium Harmonization Teams provide recommendations and best practices for areas not yet addressed fully by guidances and consensus for small molecule bioanalysis. Recommendations from all three teams are combined in this report for chromatographic run quality, validation, and sample analysis run acceptance.

Cytomorphology of Erdheim-Chester disease presenting as a retroperitoneal soft tissue lesion.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare, multisystem disorder of macrophages. Patients manifest with histiocytic infiltrates that lead to xanthogranulomatous lesions in multiple organ systems. The cytologic features of this disorder are not well characterized. As a result, the cytologic diagnosis of ECD can be very challenging. The aim of this report is to describe the cytomorphology of ECD in a patient presenting with a retroperitoneal soft tissue lesion. A 54-year-old woman with proptosis and diabetes insipidus was found on imaging studies to have multiple intracranial lesions, sclerosis of both femurs and a retroperitoneal soft tissue mass. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) and a concomitant core biopsy of this abnormal retroperitoneal soft tissue revealed foamy, epithelioid and multinucleated histiocytes associated with fibrosis. The histiocytes were immunoreactive for CD68, CD163, Factor XIIIa and fascin, and negative for S100, confirming the diagnosis of ECD. ECD requires a morphologic diagnosis that fits with the appropriate clinical context. This case describes the cytomorphologic features of ECD and highlights the role of cytology in helping reach a diagnosis of this rare disorder.

Pharmacokinetics of lamivudine in subjects receiving peritoneal dialysis in end-stage renal failure.

AIMS: To establish whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) requires dosing modification from the CL(CR)-corrected lamivudine dose in end-stage renal failure subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label cohort study. A total of 12 subjects undergoing PD, six continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and six automated peritoneal dialysis (APD), for at least 3 months received lamivudine 10 mg (5 mg ml (-1) x 2 ml) daily for 8 consecutive days, followed by an intensive pharmacokinetic assessment. Urine and dialysate were collected from 0 to 24 h postdose on day 8 where possible. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental techniques. RESULTS: The plasma pharmacokinetic results demonstrated that peritoneal dialysis clearance (CL(D)) of lamivudine was similar between APD and CAPD patients with median (range) of 0.19 l h(-1) (0.14-0.25) and 0.1 l h(-1) (0.09-0.25), respectively. CL(D) was approximately 1/15th to 1/30th of plasma clearance, demonstrating that peritoneal dialysis does not contribute significantly to overall lamivudine clearance in this patient population. The AUC(0,24 h) of lamivudine given 10 mg daily to APD and CAPD patients was 3430 ng ml(-1) h and 3469 ng ml(-1) h, respectively, similar to historical data obtained in patients with normal renal function administered at the normal dose of 100 mg daily (3781 ng ml(-1) h). There were no clinically significant changes in any safety assessments that were attributable to lamivudine. CONCLUSIONS: ESRD patients who receive CAPD or APD require no supplemental dosing. These patients should follow the standard dosing reduction for patients infected with HIV or HBV with renal dysfunction.

Determination of amprenavir, a HIV-1 protease inhibitor, in human seminal plasma using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

A HPLC-MS-MS method to measure amprenavir in human seminal plasma has been developed and validated. The procedure uses stable, isotopically labeled 13C6-amprenavir as an internal standard and 100 microl of sample. The method is accurate (bias less than or equal to 7.2%) and precise (within- and between-day RSDs less than or equal to 4.2%) over the dynamic range of 30-4,000 ng/ml. Recently, this simple and sensitive method was used to determine amprenavir concentrations in seminal samples collected from HIV-1 positive subjects receiving amprenavir antiretroviral therapy as part of a multicenter clinical trial.