Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 63
Filter
1.
Diabetes Metab ; 45(3): 301-305, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29395812

ABSTRACT

AIM: Islet autotransplantation (IAT) is considered a 'non-immune' model of islet transplant, with no risk for autoimmune-mediated beta cell loss, but we have previously observed de novo type 1 diabetes in one total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) recipient. We aimed to investigate the clinical significance of glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), as a sensitive marker for autoimmune diabetes mellitus (DM), in patients with chronic pancreatitis undergoing TPIAT. METHODS: We identified 9 patients undergoing TPIAT with elevated GADA pre-TPIAT (8 non-diabetic and 1 with C-peptide positive DM), otherwise demographically similar to GADA negative TPIAT recipients (n=341). Metabolic and clinical measures related to islet cell function were recorded both before and after TPIAT. RESULTS: None of the 9 TPIAT patients achieved insulin independence after surgery, vs. 33% of GADA negative patients (n=318 with 1-yr follow-up). The two patients with the highest titters of GADA (>250 IU/mL) both experienced islet graft failure, despite normoglycaemia pre-TPIAT and high islet mass transplanted (5276 and 9378 IEQ per kg), with elevated HbA1c levels post-TPIAT (8.3%, 9.6%). The remaining 7 seven were insulin dependent with partial graft function and HbA1c levels <7%. CONCLUSION: Insulin dependence was more frequent in 9 patients with elevated GADA prior to TPIAT than in GADA negative TPIAT recipients, with graft failure in 2 cases. We speculate that beta-cell autoimmunity may occur in a small subset of TPIAT recipients and that beta cell antibody testing prior to TPIAT may be warranted to identify individuals at higher risk for insulin dependence.


Subject(s)
Autoantibodies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery , Glutamate Decarboxylase/immunology , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/methods , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatitis, Chronic/surgery , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/immunology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pancreatitis, Chronic/immunology , Prognosis , Transplantation, Autologous , Young Adult
3.
Am J Transplant ; 17(12): 3123-3130, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28613436

ABSTRACT

Incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) has been established as an effective option for end-stage renal disease patients with willing but HLA-incompatible living donors, reducing mortality and improving quality of life. Depending on antibody titer, ILDKT can require highly resource-intensive procedures, including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and/or cell-depleting antibody treatment, as well as protocol biopsies and donor-specific antibody testing. This study sought to compare the cost and Medicare reimbursement, exclusive of organ acquisition payment, for ILDKT (n = 926) with varying antibody titers to matched compatible transplants (n = 2762) performed between 2002 and 2011. Data were assembled from a national cohort study of ILDKT and a unique data set linking hospital cost accounting data and Medicare claims. ILDKT was more expensive than matched compatible transplantation, ranging from 20% higher adjusted costs for positive on Luminex assay but negative flow cytometric crossmatch, 26% higher for positive flow cytometric crossmatch but negative cytotoxic crossmatch, and 39% higher for positive cytotoxic crossmatch (p < 0.0001 for all). ILDKT was associated with longer median length of stay (12.9 vs. 7.8 days), higher Medicare payments ($91 330 vs. $63 782 p < 0.0001), and greater outlier payments. In conclusion, ILDKT increases the cost of and payments for kidney transplantation.


Subject(s)
Blood Group Incompatibility/economics , Graft Rejection/economics , Histocompatibility Testing/economics , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Living Donors , Postoperative Complications/economics , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Survival , Humans , Kidney Function Tests , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
4.
Am J Transplant ; 17(4): 1112-1118, 2017 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27643615

ABSTRACT

Beta cell death may occur both after islet isolation and during infusion back into recipients undergoing total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) for chronic pancreatitis. We measured the novel beta cell death marker unmethylated insulin (INS) DNA in TPIAT recipients before and immediately after islet infusion (n = 21) and again 90 days after TPIAT, concurrent with metabolic functional assessments (n = 25). As expected, INS DNA decreased after pancreatectomy (p = 0.0002). All TPIAT recipients had an elevated unmethylated INS DNA ratio in the first hours following islet infusion. In four samples (three patients), INS DNA was also assessed immediately after islet isolation and again before islet infusion to assess the impact of the isolation process: Unmethylated and methylated INS DNA fractions both increased over this interval, suggesting death of beta cells and exocrine tissue before islet infusion. Higher glucose excursion with mixed-meal tolerance testing was associated with persistently elevated INS DNA at day 90. In conclusion, we observed universal early elevations in the beta cell death marker INS DNA after TPIAT, with pronounced elevations in the islet supernatant before infusion, likely reflecting beta cell death induced by islet isolation. Persistent posttransplant elevation of INS DNA predicted greater hyperglycemia at 90 days.


Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , DNA/chemistry , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery , Insulin-Secreting Cells/pathology , Insulin/genetics , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Pancreatitis, Chronic/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Biomarkers/metabolism , Child , DNA/genetics , Female , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Insulin-Secreting Cells/metabolism , Male , Postoperative Complications , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Transplantation, Autologous , Young Adult
5.
Am J Transplant ; 17(2): 443-450, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27459721

ABSTRACT

Insulin independence after total pancreatectomy and islet autotransplant (TPIAT) for chronic pancreatitis is limited by a high rate of postprocedure beta cell apoptosis. Endogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, which are increased by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor therapy (sitagliptin) may protect against beta cell apoptosis. To determine the effect of sitagliptin after TPIAT, 83 adult TPIAT recipients were randomized to receive sitagliptin (n = 54) or placebo (n = 29) for 12 months after TPIAT. At 12 and 18 months after TPIAT, participants were assessed for insulin independence; metabolic testing was performed with mixed meal tolerance testing and frequent sample intravenous glucose tolerance testing. Insulin independence did not differ between the sitagliptin and placebo groups at 12 months (42% vs. 45%, p = 0.82) or 18 months (36% vs. 44%, p = 0.48). At 12 months, insulin dose was 9.0 (standard error 1.7) units/day and 7.9 (2.2) units/day in the sitagliptin and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.67) and at 18 months 10.3 (1.9) and 7.1 (2.6) units/day, respectively (p = 0.32). Hemoglobin A1c levels and insulin secretory measures were similar in the two groups, as were adverse events. In conclusion, sitagliptin could be safely administered but did not improve metabolic outcomes after TPIAT.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/therapy , Graft Rejection/drug therapy , Graft Survival/drug effects , Insulin-Secreting Cells/pathology , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Sitagliptin Phosphate/therapeutic use , Adult , Blood Glucose , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin , Graft Rejection/etiology , Humans , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Transplantation, Autologous
6.
Am J Transplant ; 17(3): 782-790, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27992110

ABSTRACT

Organ shortage is the major limitation to kidney transplantation in the developed world. Conversely, millions of patients in the developing world with end-stage renal disease die because they cannot afford renal replacement therapy-even when willing living kidney donors exist. This juxtaposition between countries with funds but no available kidneys and those with available kidneys but no funds prompts us to propose an exchange program using each nation's unique assets. Our proposal leverages the cost savings achieved through earlier transplantation over dialysis to fund the cost of kidney exchange between developed-world patient-donor pairs with immunological barriers and developing-world patient-donor pairs with financial barriers. By making developed-world health care available to impoverished patients in the developing world, we replace unethical transplant tourism with global kidney exchange-a modality equally benefitting rich and poor. We report the 1-year experience of an initial Filipino pair, whose recipient was transplanted in the United states with an American donor's kidney at no cost to him. The Filipino donor donated to an American in the United States through a kidney exchange chain. Follow-up care and medications in the Philippines were supported by funds from the United States. We show that the logistical obstacles in this approach, although considerable, are surmountable.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Directed Tissue Donation , Health Care Costs/legislation & jurisprudence , Kidney Failure, Chronic/economics , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Living Donors/supply & distribution , Tissue and Organ Procurement/economics , Developing Countries , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Graft Survival , Health Resources , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Philippines , Policy Making , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Tissue and Organ Procurement/methods , United States
7.
Am J Transplant ; 17(7): 1868-1878, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28029219

ABSTRACT

The United Network for Organ Sharing recommends that fellowship-trained surgeons participate in 15 laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) procedures to be considered proficient. The American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) mandates 12 LDNs during an abdominal transplant surgery fellowship. We performed a retrospective intraoperative case analysis to create a risk-adjusted cumulative summation (RACUSUM) model to assess the learning curve of novice transplant surgery fellows (TSFs). Between January 2000 and December 2014, 30 novice TSFs participated in the organ procurement rotation of our ASTS-approved abdominal transplant surgery fellowship. Measures of surgical performance included intraoperative time, estimated blood loss, and incidence of intraoperative complications. The performance of senior TSFs was used to benchmark novice TSF performance. Scores were tabulated in a learning curve model, adjusting for case complexity and prior TSF case volume. Rates of adverse surgical events were significantly higher for novice TSFs than for senior TSFs. In univariable analysis, multiple renal arteries, high BMI, prior abdominal surgery, male donor, and nephrolithiasis were correlated with higher incidence of adverse surgical events. Based on the RACUSUM model, high intraoperative time is mitigated after 28 procedures, incidence of intraoperative complications tends to diminish after 24 procedures, and improvement in estimated blood loss did not remain consistent. TSFs exhibit a tipping point in LDN performance by 24-28 cases and proficiency by 35-38 cases.


Subject(s)
General Surgery/education , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Living Donors , Nephrectomy/methods , Tissue and Organ Harvesting/methods , Fellowships and Scholarships , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Learning Curve , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
8.
Am J Transplant ; 16(8): 2401-12, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26814363

ABSTRACT

To enhance selection of appropriate deceased donors for pancreas transplants, we sought to determine whether HLA matching improved posttransplantation outcomes. In this single-center study of 1219 pancreas transplants, we correlated posttransplantation outcomes with HLA-A, -B, -C, -DR, and -DQ matches and mismatches. Rejection was linearly correlated with the number of mismatches. The individual number of HLA mismatches reached significance at four or more with a 2.3- to 2.9-fold increase in rejection. The effect was most predominant with HLA-B (1.8-fold with one mismatch and 2.0-fold with two mismatches) and -DR (1.9-fold with two mismatches) loci, whereas HLA-A, -C, and -DQ matches or mismatches did not independently predict acute rejection. The affect was strongest in solitary pancreas transplants, with little impact for simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK). In contrast, HLA matching did not affect graft or patient survival rates but was associated with a reduced risk of opportunistic infection. Avoidance of acute rejection saved an estimated $32 000 for solitary pancreas recipients and $52 000 for SPK recipients in hospital costs. Our data do not support the use of HLA matching for predicting pancreas graft survival but do support its significance for the reduction of acute rejection, particularly for solitary pancreas recipients.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Graft Survival/immunology , Histocompatibility Testing , Pancreas Transplantation , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , HLA-A Antigens/immunology , HLA-B Antigens/immunology , HLA-C Antigens/immunology , HLA-DQ Antigens/immunology , HLA-DR Antigens/immunology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Minnesota/epidemiology , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tissue Donors
9.
Am J Transplant ; 16(2): 527-34, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26588810

ABSTRACT

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) may relieve the pain of chronic pancreatitis while avoiding postsurgical diabetes. Minimizing hyperglycemia after TPIAT limits beta cell apoptosis during islet engraftment. Closed-loop (CL) therapy combining an insulin pump with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) has not been investigated previously in islet transplant recipients. Our objective was to determine the feasibility and efficacy of CL therapy to maintain glucose profiles close to normoglycemia following TPIAT. Fourteen adult subjects (36% male; aged 35.9 ± 11.4 years) were randomized to subcutaneous insulin via CL pump (n = 7) or multiple daily injections with blinded CGM (n = 7) for 72 h at transition from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin. Mean serum glucose values were significantly lower in the CL pump group than in the control group (111 ± 4 vs. 130 ± 13 mg/dL; p = 0.003) without increased risk of hypoglycemia (percentage of time <70 mg/dL: CL pump 1.9%, control 4.8%; p = 0.46). Results from this pilot study suggest that CL therapy is superior to conventional therapy in maintaining euglycemia without increased hypoglycemia. This technology shows significant promise to safely maintain euglycemic targets during the period of islet engraftment following islet transplantation.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/analysis , Hypoglycemia/prevention & control , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Pancreas, Artificial , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatitis, Chronic/therapy , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Postoperative Complications , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Transplantation, Autologous , Young Adult
10.
Am J Transplant ; 15(7): 1991-4, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25765064

ABSTRACT

Total pancreatectomy with islet autotransplantation (TPIAT) is performed for definitive treatment of chronic pancreatitis; patients are not diabetic before surgery, or have C-peptide positive pancreatogenous diabetes. Thus, TPIAT recipients are not traditionally considered at risk for autoimmune loss of the islet graft. We describe a 43-year-old female who underwent TPIAT with high mass islet graft of 6031 IEQ/kg, with no evidence of presurgical ß cell autoimmunity who developed type 1 diabetes within the first year after TPIAT, resulting in complete loss of beta cell function. The patient had positive GAD and insulin autoantibodies at 1 year and 18 months after TPIAT, not present prior, and undetectable C-peptide after mixed meal and intravenous glucose tolerance testing at 18 months. Glucagon secretion was preserved, suggesting the transplanted alpha cell mass was intact. HLA typing revealed a DR3/DR4 class II haplotype. This case highlights the need to consider de novo type 1 diabetes in patients with unexpected islet graft failure after TPIAT.


Subject(s)
Autoimmunity , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/surgery , Graft Rejection/etiology , Insulin-Secreting Cells/pathology , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/adverse effects , Pancreatectomy/adverse effects , Adult , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/complications , Female , Graft Rejection/metabolism , Graft Rejection/pathology , Graft Survival , Humans , Postoperative Complications , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Transplantation, Autologous
11.
Am J Transplant ; 14(7): 1573-80, 2014 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24913913

ABSTRACT

Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) offers a survival advantage over dialysis to patients with anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Program-specific reports (PSRs) fail to account for ILDKT, placing this practice at regulatory risk. We collected DSA data, categorized as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF) (n = 185), positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC) (n = 536) or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC) (n = 304), from 22 centers. We tested associations between DSA, graft loss and mortality after adjusting for PSR model factors, using 9669 compatible patients as a comparison. PLNF patients had similar graft loss; however, PFNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-2.23, p = 0.007) and PCC (aHR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.71-6.77, p < 0.001) were associated with increased graft loss in the first year. PLNF patients had similar mortality; however, PFNC (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.28-3.26; p = 0.003) and PCC (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI: 2.98-7.07; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. We simulated Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services flagging to examine ILDKT's effect on the risk of being flagged. Compared to equal-quality centers performing no ILDKT, centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PFNC had a 1.19-, 1.33- and 1.73-fold higher odds of being flagged. Centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PCC had a 2.22-, 4.09- and 10.72-fold higher odds. Failure to account for ILDKT's increased risk places centers providing this life-saving treatment in jeopardy of regulatory intervention.


Subject(s)
Antibodies/immunology , Blood Group Incompatibility/epidemiology , Graft Rejection/etiology , HLA Antigens/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/legislation & jurisprudence , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Living Donors/supply & distribution , Adult , Blood Group Incompatibility/diagnosis , Blood Group Incompatibility/immunology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Humans , Incidence , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Kidney Failure, Chronic/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
12.
Am J Transplant ; 13(12): 3183-91, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24148548

ABSTRACT

The simple question of how much tissue volume (TV) is really safe to infuse in total pancreatectomy-islet autotransplantation (TP-IAT) for chronic pancreatitis (CP) precipitated this analysis. We examined a large cohort of CP patients (n = 233) to determine major risk factors for elevated portal pressure (PP) during islet infusion, using bivariate and multivariate regression modeling. Rates of bleeding requiring operative intervention and portal venous thrombosis (PVT) were evaluated. The total TV per kilogram body weight infused intraportally was the best independent predictor of change in PP (ΔPP) (p < 0.0001; R(2) = 0.566). Rates of bleeding and PVT were 7.73% and 3.43%, respectively. Both TV/kg and ΔPP are associated with increased complication rates, although ΔPP appears to be more directly relevant. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an increased risk of PVT above a suggested cut-point of 26 cmH2O (area under the curve = 0.759), which was also dependent on age. This ΔPP threshold was more likely to be exceeded in cases where the total TV was >0.25 cm(3)/kg. Based on this analysis, we have recommended targeting a TV of <0.25 cm(3)/kg during islet manufacturing and to halt intraportal infusion, at least temporarily, if the ΔPP exceeds 25 cmH2O. These models can be used to guide islet manufacturing and clinical decision making to minimize risks in TP-IAT recipients.


Subject(s)
Islets of Langerhans Transplantation/methods , Islets of Langerhans/cytology , Pancreas/surgery , Pancreatectomy/methods , Pancreatitis, Chronic/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Body Weight , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Pancreatitis , Portal Vein/pathology , ROC Curve , Risk Factors , Thrombosis , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
13.
Am J Transplant ; 13(10): 2664-71, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23924045

ABSTRACT

Islet autotransplant (IAT) may ameliorate postsurgical diabetes following total pancreatectomy (TP), but outcomes are dependent upon islet mass, which is unknown prior to pancreatectomy. We evaluated whether preoperative metabolic testing could predict islet isolation outcomes and thus improve assessment of TPIAT candidates. We examined the relationship between measures from frequent sample IV glucose tolerance tests (FSIVGTT) and mixed meal tolerance tests (MMTT) and islet mass in 60 adult patients, with multivariate logistic regression modeling to identify predictors of islet mass ≥2500 IEQ/kg. The acute C-peptide response to glucose (ACRglu) and disposition index from FSIVGTT correlated modestly with the islet equivalents per kilogram body weight (IEQ/kg). Fasting and MMTT glucose levels and HbA1c correlated inversely with IEQ/kg (r values -0.33 to -0.40, p ≤ 0.05). In multivariate logistic regression modeling, normal fasting glucose (<100 mg/dL) and stimulated C-peptide on MMTT ≥4 ng/mL were associated with greater odds of receiving an islet mass ≥2500 IEQ/kg (OR 0.93 for fasting glucose, CI 0.87-1.0; OR 7.9 for C-peptide, CI 1.75-35.6). In conclusion, parameters obtained from FSIVGTT correlate modestly with islet isolation outcomes. Stimulated C-peptide ≥4 ng/mL on MMTT conveyed eight times the odds of receiving ≥2500 IEQ/kg, a threshold associated with reasonable metabolic control postoperatively.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/prevention & control , Islets of Langerhans Transplantation , Islets of Langerhans/metabolism , Pancreatectomy , Pancreatitis, Chronic/surgery , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Adult , C-Peptide/analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , Male , Preoperative Care , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Transplantation, Autologous
14.
Am J Transplant ; 13(7): 1840-9, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23711225

ABSTRACT

Technical failure (TF) continues to have a significant impact on the success of pancreas transplantation. We assessed risk factors for TF in 1115 pancreas transplants performed at a single center between 1998 and 2011. The overall TF rate was 10.2%. In a multivariable model, donor BMI ≥ 30 (HR 1.87, p = 0.005), donor Cr ≥ 2.5 (HR 3.16, p = 0.007), donor age >50 (HR 1.73, p = 0.082) and preservation time >20 h (HR 2.17, p < 0.001) were associated with TF. Bladder drainage of exocrine secretions was protective (HR 0.54, p = 0.002). We incorporated these factors in a Composite Risk Model. In this model the presence of one risk factor did not significantly increase risk of TF (HR 1.35, p = 0.346). Two risk factors in combination increased risk greater than threefold (HR 3.65, p < 0.001) and three risk factors increased risk greater than sevenfold (HR 7.66, p = <0.001). The analysis also identified many factors that were not predictive of TF, including previous transplants, immunosuppressive agent selection, and almost all recipient demographic parameters. While the model suggests that two or more risk factors predict TF, strategies to reduce preservation time may mitigate some of this risk.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/epidemiology , Pancreas Transplantation , Registries , Risk Assessment/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Rejection/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Tissue and Organ Procurement/standards , Treatment Failure , United States/epidemiology
15.
Am J Transplant ; 13(6): 1400-4, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23617244

ABSTRACT

Solid organ transplantation is encumbered by an increasing number of waitlisted patients unrequited by the current organ supply. Preclinical models suggest that advances in deceased donor management and treatment can increase the quantity and quality of organs available for transplantation. However, the science of donor intervention and the execution of high quality, prospective, multi-center, randomized-controlled trials are restricted by a myriad of logistical challenges mired in regulatory and ethical ambiguity. By highlighting the obstacles to conducting research in deceased donors, this report endeavors to stimulate the creation of a multi-disciplinary framework to facilitate the design, implementation and supervision of innovative trials that increase the quantity and/or quality of deceased donor organs.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Organ Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Tissue and Organ Procurement/standards , Humans
16.
Am J Transplant ; 13(4): 961-970, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23432755

ABSTRACT

Rapid discontinuation of prednisone (RDP) has minimized steroid-related complications following kidney transplant (KT). This trial compares long-term (10-year) outcomes with three different maintenance immunosuppressive protocols following RDP in adult KT. Recipients (n=440; 73% living donor) from March 2001 to April 2006 were randomized into one of three arms: cyclosporine (CSA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (CSA/MMF, n=151); high-level tacrolimus (TAC, 8-12 µg/L) and low-level sirolimus (SIR, 3-7 µg/L) (TACH/SIRL, n=149) or low-level TAC (3-7 µg/L) and high-level SIR (8-12 µg/L) (TACL/SIR(H) , n=140). Median follow-up was ∼7 years. There were no differences between arms in 10-year actuarial patient, graft and death-censored graft survival or in allograft function. There were no differences in the 10-year actuarial rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection (30%, 26% and 20% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH) and chronic rejection (38%, 35% and 31% in CSA/MMF, TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH). Rates of new-onset diabetes mellitus were higher with TACH/SIRL (p=0.04), and rates of anemia were higher with TACH/SIRL and TACL/SIRH (p=0.04). No differences were found in the overall rates of 16 other post-KT complications. These data indicate that RDP-based protocol yield acceptable 10-year outcomes, but side effects differ based on the maintenance regimen used and should be considered when optimizing immunosuppression following RDP.


Subject(s)
Immunosuppression Therapy/methods , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kidney Transplantation/methods , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Adult , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Living Donors , Male , Middle Aged , Mycophenolic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Mycophenolic Acid/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications , Prospective Studies , Sirolimus/therapeutic use , Steroids/therapeutic use , Tacrolimus/therapeutic use , Time Factors , Transplantation, Homologous , Treatment Outcome
17.
Am J Transplant ; 12(2): 447-57, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22070451

ABSTRACT

The shortage of deceased donor organs for solid organ transplantation continues to be an ongoing dilemma. One approach to increase the number of pancreas transplants is to share organs between procurement regions. To assess for the effects of organ importation, we reviewed the outcomes of 1014 patients undergoing deceased donor pancreas transplant at a single center. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses of the association of donor, recipient and surgical characteristics with patient outcomes. Organ importation had no effect on graft or recipient survival for recipients of solitary pancreas transplants. Similarly, there was no effect on technical failure rate, graft survival or long-term patient survival for simultaneous kidney-pancreas (SPK) recipients. In contrast, there was a significant and independent increased risk of death in the first year in SPK recipients of imported organs. SPK recipients had longer hospitalizations and increased hospital costs. This increased medical complexity may make these patients more susceptible to short-term complications resulting from the longer preservation times of import transplants. These findings support the continued use of organ sharing to reduce transplant wait times but highlight the importance of strategies to reduce organ preservation times.


Subject(s)
International Agencies , Pancreas Transplantation , Registries , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Tissue and Organ Procurement/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , United States
18.
Am J Transplant ; 11(10): 2132-43, 2011 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21812918

ABSTRACT

Single-antigen bead (SAB) testing permits reassessment of immunologic risk for kidney transplantation. Traditionally, high panel reactive antibody (PRA), retransplant and deceased donor (DD) grafts have been associated with increased risk. We hypothesized that this risk was likely mediated by (unrecognized) donor-specific antibody (DSA). We grouped 587 kidney transplants using clinical history and single-antigen bead (SAB) testing of day of transplant serum as (1) unsensitized; PRA = 0 (n = 178), (2) third-party sensitized; no DSA (n = 363) or (3) donor sensitized; with DSA (n = 46), and studied rejection rates, death-censored graft survival (DCGS) and risk factors for rejection. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) rates were increased with DSA (p < 0.0001), but not with panel reactive antibody (PRA) in the absence of DSA. Cell-mediated rejection (CMR) rates were increased with DSA (p < 0.005); with a trend to increased rates when PRA>0 in the absence of DSA (p = 0.08). Multivariate analyses showed risk factors for AMR were DSA, worse HLA matching, and female gender; for CMR: DSA, PRA>0 and worse HLA matching. AMR and CMR were associated with decreased DCGS. The presence of DSA is an important predictor of rejection risk, in contrast to traditional risk factors. Further development of immunosuppressive protocols will be facilitated by stratification of rejection risk by donor sensitization.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection , Kidney Transplantation , Adult , Autoantibodies/immunology , Female , Graft Rejection/immunology , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Tissue Donors
19.
Transplant Proc ; 42(6): 2003-5, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20692392

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) are the basis of contemporary immunosuppression in clinical pancreas transplantation (PT). Nevertheless, CNI toxicities, especially nephrotoxicity, have stimulated the search for CNI-sparing protocols. We performed a retrospective analysis of 25 PT patients with progressive CNI toxicities that were switched to a daclizumab (DAC)-based maintenance regimen. METHODS: From 2003 to 2007, 25 PT patients with progressive CNI toxicity (predominantly nephrotoxicity) were identified and switched from CNI to monthly DAC maintenance therapy. The DAC group was compared with matched control subjects (1:1) by transplant type and number, age, year of transplant, and duct management. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Results showed improved graft survival rates and decreased immunologic loss rates at 1, 3, and 5 years in the DAC group compared with the control group. There was no difference in patient survival rate between the 2 groups. Analysis demonstrates that DAC maintenance therapy is safe and effective for PT patients experiencing CNI toxicities. A randomized trial to compare DAC- and CNI-based regimens is needed in CNI-intolerant patients, with particular attention to the impact on renal function and patient morbidity (eg, infection rates).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Pancreas Transplantation/immunology , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Daclizumab , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival/immunology , Humans , Interleukin-2 Receptor alpha Subunit/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Pancreas Transplantation/mortality , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
20.
Am J Transplant ; 9(6): 1337-46, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19459828

ABSTRACT

Nonadherence (NA) is a difficult posttransplant problem that can lead to graft loss. A retransplant is controversial because of a fear of recurrent NA. We reviewed our center's data base and identified 114 kidney recipients who lost their graft to overt NA; of this group, 35 (31%) underwent a retransplant after a thorough reevaluation. We compared this NA retransplant group to a control group of second transplant recipients who did not lose their first graft to overt NA (non-NA) (n = 552). After 8 years of follow-up, we found no significant differences between the groups in actuarial graft or patient survival rates, renal function, or the incidence of biopsy-proven chronic rejection. However, 5 of 35 (14%) NA recipients versus 10 of 552 (2%) non-NA recipients lost their retransplant to NA (p = 0.0001). Twenty of 35 (57%) of the NA group exhibited repeat NA behavior after retransplant. We conclude that prior graft loss to NA is associated with increased graft loss to NA after retransplant. However, the majority of NA retransplant recipients did well-with overall long-term outcomes similar to those of the non-NA group. With careful patient selection and aggressive intervention, prior overt NA should not be an absolute contraindication to retransplantation.


Subject(s)
Graft Rejection/etiology , Kidney Transplantation , Patient Compliance , Reoperation , Adult , Female , Graft Survival/immunology , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/immunology , Kidney Transplantation/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Care Team , Patient Selection , Tissue and Organ Procurement , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL