An analytical workflow for investigating cytokine profiles.

Understanding cytokine profiles of disease states has provided researchers with great insight into immunologic signaling associated with disease onset and progression, affording opportunities for advancement in diagnostics and therapeutic intervention. Multiparameter flow cytometric assays support identification of specific cytokine secreting subpopulations. Bead-based assays provide simultaneous measurement for the production of ever-growing numbers of cytokines. These technologies demand appropriate analytical techniques to extract relevant information efficiently. We illustrate the power of an analytical workflow to reveal significant alterations in T-cell cytokine expression patterns in type 1 diabetes (T1D) and breast cancer. This workflow consists of population-level analysis, followed by donor-level analysis, data transformation such as stratification or normalization, and a return to population-level analysis. In the T1D study, T-cell cytokine production was measured with a cytokine bead array. In the breast cancer study, intracellular cytokine staining measured T cell responses to stimulation with a variety of antigens. Summary statistics from each study were loaded into a relational database, together with associated experimental metadata and clinical parameters. Visual and statistical results were generated with custom Java software. In the T1D study, donor-level analysis led to the stratification of donors based on unstimulated cytokine expression. The resulting cohorts showed statistically significant differences in poststimulation production of IL-10, IL-1 beta, IL-8, and TNF beta. In the breast cancer study, the differing magnitude of cytokine responses required data normalization to support statistical comparisons. Once normalized, data showed a statistically significant decrease in the expression of IFN gamma on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells when stimulated with tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) when compared with an infectious disease antigen stimulus, and a statistically significant increase in expression of IL-2 on CD8+ T cells. In conclusion, the analytical workflow described herein yielded statistically supported and biologically relevant findings that were otherwise unapparent.

Functional T cell responses to tumor antigens in breast cancer patients have a distinct phenotype and cytokine signature.

The overall prevalence with which endogenous tumor Ags induce host T cell responses is unclear. Even when such responses are detected, they do not usually result in spontaneous remission of the cancer. We hypothesized that this might be associated with a predominant phenotype and/or cytokine profile of tumor-specific responses that is different from protective T cell responses to other chronic Ags, such as CMV. We detected significant T cell responses to CEA, HER-2/neu, and/or MAGE-A3 in 17 of 21 breast cancer patients naive to immunotherapy. The pattern of T cell cytokines produced in response to tumor-associated Ags (TAAs) in breast cancer patients was significantly different from that produced in response to CMV or influenza in the same patients. Specifically, there was a higher proportion of IL-2-producing CD8(+) T cells, and a lower proportion of IFN-gamma-producing CD4(+) and/or CD8(+) T cells responding to TAAs compared with CMV or influenza Ags. Finally, the phenotype of TAA-responsive CD8(+) T cells in breast cancer patients was almost completely CD28(+)CD45RA(-) (memory phenotype). CMV-responsive CD8(+) T cells in the same patients were broadly distributed among phenotypes, and contained a high proportion of terminal effector cells (CD27(-)CD28(-)CD45RA(+)) that were absent in the TAA responses. Taken together, these results suggest that TAA-responsive T cells are induced in breast cancer patients, but those T cells are phenotypically and functionally different from CMV- or influenza-responsive T cells. Immunotherapies directed against TAAs may need to alter these T cell signatures to be effective.

Performance of plate-based cytokine flow cytometry with automated data analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cytokine flow cytometry (CFC) provides a multiparameter alternative to ELISPOT assays for rapid quantitation of antigen-specific T cells. To increase the throughput of CFC assays, we have optimized methods for stimulating, staining, and acquiring whole blood or PBMC samples in 96-well or 24-well plates. RESULTS: We have developed a protocol for whole blood stimulation and processing in deep-well 24- or 96-well plates, and fresh or cryopreserved peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) stimulation and processing in conventional 96-well round-bottom plates. Samples from both HIV-1-seronegative and HIV-1-seropositive donors were tested. We show that the percent response, staining intensity, and cell recovery are comparable to stimulation and processing in tubes using traditional methods. We also show the equivalence of automated gating templates to manual gating for CFC data analysis. CONCLUSION: When combined with flow cytometry analysis using an automated plate loader and an automated analysis algorithm, these plate-based methods provide a higher throughput platform for CFC, as well as reducing operator-induced variability. These factors will be important for processing the numbers of samples required in large clinical trials, and for epitope mapping of patient responses.

Drug surveillance : international cooperation past, present and future, proceedings of the XXVIIth CIOMS Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, 14-15 September 1993 / edited by Z. Bankowski and J. F. Dunne

Records the proceedings of an international conference convened to consider mechanisms for improving international cooperation in the surveillance of drug safety and the reporting of adverse reactions. Attended by close to 200 representatives of regulatory authorities and the pharmaceutical industry as well as clinical pharmacologists, the conference aimed to identify the strengths and weaknesses of existing mechanisms for international cooperation and to propose improvements for the future. The conference, which marked the 25th anniversary of the World Health Organization's programme for international drug monitoring, also responded to a number of new challenges created by the use of biotechnology to develop novel products, and the recently discovered importance of genetically determined differences in drug metabolism. Papers are grouped according to the five main sessions of the conference. The first, focused on the past twenty-five years of drug surveillance, provides a history of key developments in the monitoring and reporting of adverse drug reactions, emphasizing lessons learned from different national and international systems for collecting, interpreting, and communicating data. Papers in the econd part, on methodological approaches, describe and compare various mechanisms for supervising drugs on the market and alerting regulatory authorities and prescribers to adverse reactions. Part three reports on projects under way to harmonize the reporting of adverse drug reactions and develop a single, universal terminology. Various efforts to standardize definitions and classification systems are described in detail. Part four examines responses to several enduring problems, including the need to educate physicians and patients, the special challenge of safety monitoring of vaccines and other biologicals, and the difficult problems encountered in developing countries. These are illustrated through examples of efforts to monitor the safety of drugs used to treat malaria, onchocerciasis, and tuberculosis. Papers from the final session explore the many practical, legal, and ethical issues surrounding access to information and the decision to release data about drug risks to patients and the public