Improving type 2 diabetes care and self-management at the individual level by incorporating social determinants of health.

OBJECTIVE: Suboptimal social determinants of health impede type 2 diabetes self-management. They are usually considered at population and community levels, not individually. The study objective was to draw on perspectives of people who have type 2 diabetes to identify and explore the impact of social determinants on self-management and ways to incorporate them into individual care. METHODS: Purposively selected participants chose to partake in focus groups or interviews. Data were analysed and themes identified through deductive and inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Social issues hinder type 2 diabetes self-management. Additionally, an individual's feelings and poor mental health, competing priorities and understanding about diabetes are important considerations. Support was provided via health professionals, community supports, financial support, personal support and informal self-management support. CONCLUSIONS: Social determinants of health could be formally incorporated into individual care for people with type 2 diabetes if a socio-ecological view of health is taken as it considers the broader social and environmental circumstances in peoples lives. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: Care for people with type 2 diabetes could be transformed if social determinants of health are formally assessed and responded to at an individual level. A socio-ecological view of health in individual care and clinical settings would enable social determinants of health to be formally incorporated into type 2 diabetes care.

Incorporating social determinants of health into individual care-a multidisciplinary perspective of health professionals who work with people who have type 2 diabetes.

Social determinants of health (SDoH) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are interrelated. The prevalence of T2DM is increased amongst those with suboptimal SDoH. Poor SDoH can also negatively impact T2DM self-management. Social determinants of health are mostly considered at population and community levels, rather than individually or clinically. This qualitative study combines the perspectives of a multidisciplinary cohort of health professionals to identify and explore the impact of social determinants on self-management, and ways they could be incorporated into individual clinical care. Purposively selected participants chose to partake in an in-depth, semi-structured, one-on-one interview or focus group. Data were analysed, and themes identified using a combination of deductive and inductive thematic analysis. Fifty-one health professionals volunteered for the study. Two small focus groups (n = 3 and n = 4) and 44 one-on-one interviews were conducted. The identified themes were: 1) Support for incorporating SDoH into T2DM care, 2) Effect of SDoH on T2DM self-management, 3) Identifying and addressing social need, 4) Requirements for incorporating SDoH into T2DM individual clinical care. Health professionals reported that poor social determinants negatively affect an individual's ability to self manage their T2DM. Person-centred care could be enhanced, and people with T2DM may be more likely to achieve self-management goals if SDoH were included in individual clinical care. To achieve successful and sustained self-management for people with T2DM, health professionals require a thorough understanding of T2DM and the effect of social determinants, respect for client privacy, client trust and rapport, effective communication skills, validated tools for assessing SDoH, team champions, teamwork, ongoing education and training, adequate resources, guiding policies and procedures, and management support. Incorporating SDoH into individual, clinical care for people with T2DM was strongly supported by health professionals. If embraced, this addition to care for individuals with T2DM could improve self-management capacity and enhance person-centred care.

What Injured Workers With Complex Claims Look For in Online Communities: Netnographic Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Improved understanding of social constructs around injury may help insurance case managers to understand how best to support people after injury. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to explore what people who sustain work-related injuries may seek from online communities. The study highlights potential opportunities for improved engagement with insurance case management practice. METHODS: An observational netnographic analysis was undertaken on anonymous, publicly available messages posted on Australian message boards. All research data were drawn from anonymous, online communities. A person (author SM) with experience of making a claim through an Australian workers' compensation system and online engagement was involved in study conception, design, and analysis. Data were analyzed using NVivo12 in an iterative, multistage process including coding, journaling, and member checking. A total of 141 people were engaged in discussion across 47 threads housed on 4 Australian forums. RESULTS: In this qualitative study, themes emerged from the data, describing how injured workers use online communities to help make decisions, get support, and solve problems. The key motivators for action and engagement were seeking information, connection, or justice. Establishment of relationships was a key mediator of each of these parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Some work-related injuries may involve medical and medicolegal complexity as well as changed lifestyle and routine during convalescence and recovery. The mechanism used by some injured workers to seek information and problem solve suggests a capacity for self-management and self-care after work-related injury. Netnography provides information on a community that may not regularly engage with research because of the complexity of their situation and their vulnerability.

iValidate: a communication-based clinical intervention in life-limiting illness.

OBJECTIVES: Report the implementation, user evaluation and key outcome measures of an educational intervention-the iValidate educational programme-designed to improve engagement in shared decision-making by health professionals caring for patients with life-limiting illness (LLI). DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive, cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Health professionals working in acute care settings caring for patients with an LLI. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURED: Participant evaluation of learning outcomes for communication skills and shared decision-making; demographic data of participants attending education workshops; and documentation of patients with LLI goals of management, including patient values and care decision based on area in acute care and seniority of doctor. RESULTS: The programme was well accepted by participants. Participant evaluations demonstrated self-reported improved confidence in the areas of patient identification, information gathering to ascertain patient values and shared decision-making. There was strong agreement with the course-enhanced knowledge of core communication skills and advanced skills such as discussing mismatched agendas. CONCLUSIONS: We described the educational pedagogy, implementation and key outcome measures of the iValidate education programme, an intervention designed to improve person-centred care for patients with an LLI. A targeted education programme could produce cultural and institutional change for vulnerable populations within a healthcare institution. A concurrent research programme suggests effectiveness within the current service and the potential for transferability.

An evaluation of interventions to improve outcomes for hospitalized patients in isolation: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Isolation is effective in preventing transmission of infectious disease. However, it has been shown to have negative effects including increased anxiety and poor physical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To summarize the effects of interventions to improve safety and outcomes for patients in isolation DESIGN: Systematic review (PROSPERO protocol registration - CRD42020222779). SETTING: Acute hospital PARTICIPANTS: Intervention studies including patients in preventative or protective isolation in a single room. METHODS: MEDLINE, Global Health, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, and Excerpta Medica database were searched from 1996-October 2020. Two independent reviewers screened references and assessed risk of bias. One reviewer extracted data and was checked by another. Main outcomes were Quality of Life and mortality. RESULTS: We identified 16,698 references and included 6 studies with different study designs. Average age ranged from 4-71 years. Samples sizes were small (range 10-49 participants) apart from one non-randomized controlled trial including >600 participants. Interventions were music therapy (n = 3), psychological counseling (n = 2) and exercise training (n = 1). One study reporting on Quality of Life and found no change after exercise. None of the studies reported on mortality. Due to heterogeneous results no meta-analyses were performed. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of high-quality evidence for effective comprehensive interventions to manage adverse effects associated with isolation. Future studies should investigate the effect of multi-component interventions using rigorous methods to improve outcomes for hospitalized isolated patients.

'For me, it didn't seem as drastic a step as being controlled by insulin': A qualitative investigation of expectations and experiences of non-insulin injectable therapy among adults with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: This qualitative study aims to explore beliefs, attitudes and experiences of injectable glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) use and discontinuation, as well as attitudes to further injectable treatment intensification, among adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: Nineteen in-depth semi-structured interviews lasting (mean ± standard deviation) 45 ± 18 min were conducted, face-to-face (n = 14) or via telephone (n = 5). Transcripts were analysed using inductive template analyses. Eligible participants were English-speaking adults with T2D who had recently initiated (≤3 years) GLP-1RA treatment. RESULTS: Participants were aged 28-72 years, who predominantly lived in metropolitan areas (n = 15), and had an experience of daily (n = 11) and/or once-weekly (n = 13) GLP-1RA formulations. Six participants had discontinued treatment and seven had trialled two or more formulations. Expectations and experiences of GLP-1RA were related to the perceived: (1) symbolism and stigma of injectable diabetes treatment; (2) ease of injectable administration and device preferences; (3) treatment convenience and social impact; (4) treatment efficacy and benefits, and; (5) negative treatment side effects. Some participants reported increased receptiveness to insulin therapy following their GLP-1RA experience, others emphasised unique concerns about insulin beyond injectable administration. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a novel understanding of expectations and experience of non-insulin injectables among Australian adults with T2D. Our data suggest expectations may be informed by attitudes to insulin therapy, while perceived treatment benefits (e.g. weight-related benefits, administration frequency) may motivate uptake and ongoing use despite concerns. Experience of GLP-1RA injections may impact receptiveness to future insulin use.

Frailty associations with socioeconomic status, healthcare utilisation and quality of life among older women residing in regional Australia.

OBJECTIVES: The health and well-being of older women may be influenced by frailty and low socioeconomic status (SES). This study examined the association between frailty and SES, healthcare utilisation and quality of life (QOL) among older women in regional Australia. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the Geelong Osteoporosis Study was conducted on 360 women (ages ≥60yr) in the 15-year follow up. Frailty was identified using modified Fried's phenotype. Individual SES measures and healthcare utilisation were documented by questionnaire. Area-based SES was determined by cross-referencing residential addresses with the Australian Bureau of Statistics Index of Relative Socio-economic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD). QOL was measured using the Australian World Health Organisation Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQoL-Bref). Multinomial logistic regression was conducted with frailty groupings as outcome. RESULTS: Sixty-two (17.2%) participants were frail, 199 (55.3%) pre-frail and 99 (27.5%) robust. Frail participants were older with higher body mass index. Frailty was associated with lower education but not marital status, occupation or IRSAD. Strong associations with frailty were demonstrated for all WHOQoL-Bref domains. Frailty was associated with more primary care doctor visits (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study highlights the significant impact of frailty on older women, indicating reduced QOL and increased primary care doctor visits.

Indigenous Australian perspectives on incorporating the social determinants of health into the clinical management of type 2 diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Type 2 diabetes mellitus and social disadvantage are related. In Australia, this association is most pronounced among Indigenous Australians (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples). Indigenous Australians are among the most socially disadvantaged in the country, having the worst social determinants of health (SDoH). SDoH are typically addressed at a population level, and not on an individual or a clinical level. However, the SDoH-related needs of individuals also require attention. The adverse link between type 2 diabetes and SDoH suggests that simultaneous consideration at an individual, clinical level may be beneficial for type 2 diabetes care and self-management. Identifying and addressing SDoH-related barriers to type 2 diabetes self-management may augment current care for Indigenous Australians. This study aimed to combine the perspectives of Indigenous Australians with type 2 diabetes and Indigenous health workers to explore the SDoH-related barriers and facilitators to self-managing type 2 diabetes, and how SDoH could be incorporated into the usual clinical care for Indigenous Australians with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Under the guidance of a cultural advisor and Indigenous health workers, seven Indigenous Australians with type 2 diabetes and seven Indigenous health workers from rural and remote north Queensland, Australia, participated in a series of semi-structured, in-depth face-to-face interviews and yarning circles. A clinical yarning approach to data collection was used, and both an inductive and a deductive data analysis were applied. Data were analysed, and themes were identified using NVivo v12. RESULTS: Study participants described a holistic view of health that innately includes SDoH. Specific to type 2 diabetes care, participants identified that culturally responsive service delivery, suitable transport provision, an infinite flexible approach to accommodate for individuals' unique social circumstances, appropriate client education and appropriate cultural education for health professionals, support mechanisms and community support services were all essential components. These were not seen as separate entities, but as interrelated, and all were required in order to incorporate SDoH into care for Indigenous Australians with type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSION: SDoH are implicit to the Indigenous Australian holistic view of health. Consequently, an approach to type 2 diabetes care that complements this view by simultaneously considering SDoH and usual type 2 diabetes clinical management could lead to enhanced type 2 diabetes care and self-management for Indigenous Australians.

Patient perspectives and experiences of sexual health conversations and cardiovascular disease: A qualitative study.

AIM: This study aimed to explore the experiences of individuals discussing sexual well-being with healthcare professions within the context of their cardiac illness to determine their sexual health information needs. BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and known to have a detrimental impact on sexual health. Despite sexual health being recognised as a fundamental component of well-being, it may be a neglected aspect of care within the context of cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: A qualitative exploratory study conducted in accordance with COREQ guidelines. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants (n = 13) aged between 30-77 years who had been diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease. Data were transcribed and subject to thematic analysis. RESULTS/FINDINGS: Analysis revealed two major themes-Sexual healthcare information and expectations: I expect them to tell me and Experiences of sexual adversity: it's really scary. Although participants expected and welcomed information in relation to their illness and sexual health, this was rarely received. Subsequently, when some participants experienced sexual adversity including erectile dysfunction, they felt anxious and distressed which impacted their intimated relationships. It was often when participants sought information associated with adversity that information was provided and this was primarily in relation to medication associated with assisting dysfunction. CONCLUSION: Individuals who have cardiovascular disease may require sexual health care. Nurses are well placed to provide information and education associated with cardiovascular disease and associated sexual well-being to promote positive outcomes for individuals and minimise distress around sexual adversity. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Findings highlight the importance of providing clear and accurate information about sexual well-being and function to patients experiencing cardiovascular disease. Provision of information should be considered an essential and routine aspect of care with patients being afforded opportunities to discuss concerns associated with their sexual well-being.

Discussing diabetes, palliative and end of life care: choosing the 'right' language.

BACKGROUND: Palliative care and advance care planning are important components of diabetes and other chronic disease management plans. Most people with diabetes do not have conversations about palliative/end of life (EOL) care or advance care directives; often because diabetes clinicians are reluctant to discuss these issues. Guidelines for conversations and decision aids can assist shared decision-making for both clinicians and patients. The aim was to co-design information with older people with diabetes, families and clinicians to facilitate conversations about palliative and EOL care and to identify the language (words) people with diabetes, families and diabetes clinicians use to discuss death and dying. METHODS: We co-designed and tailored the information with advisory groups: (I) older people with diabetes/families, (II) interdisciplinary expert clinicians and undertook a scoping literature review to identify relevant content. The penultimate versions were independently evaluated in focus groups and via written feedback from representative stakeholder clinicians, people with diabetes and international experts in communication, palliative care and diabetes. RESULTS: The information met design and language criteria: 62 people participated in focus groups (48 clinicians, 14 older people with diabetes and 4 family members). There were important differences between people with diabetes and diabetes clinicians concerning the words used to refer to death: 'the language of death'. Diabetes clinicians choose soft words/euphemisms such as 'passed away' and 'gone' and indicated they mirrored patient language. People with diabetes preferred clear language and indicated euphemisms were confusing and misleading. Diabetes clinicians, rarely encountered death in their practice and indicated they lacked education about how to discuss diabetes EOL care. CONCLUSIONS: Co-design with key end-users improved relevance to these groups. Diabetes clinicians prefer to use euphemisms for death and would benefit from education and strategies to help them initiate conversations about EOL diabetes care.

Values, preferences and goals identified during shared decision making between critically ill patients and their doctors.

Objective: Examine values, preferences and goals elicited by doctors following goals-of-care (GOC) discussions with critically ill patients who had life-limiting illnesses. Design: Descriptive qualitative study using four-stage latent content analysis. Setting: Tertiary intensive care unit (ICU) in South Western Victoria. Participants: Adults who had life-limiting illnesses and were admitted to the ICU with documented GOC, between October 2016 and July 2018. Intervention: The iValidate program, a shared decision-making clinical communication education and clinical support program, for all ICU registrars in August 2015. Main outcome measures: Matrix of themes and subthemes categorised into values, preferences and goals. Results: A total of 354 GOC forms were analysed from 218 patients who had life-limiting illnesses and were admitted to the ICU. In the categories of values, preferences and goals, four themes were identified: connectedness and relational autonomy, autonomy of decision maker, balancing quality and quantity of life, and physical comfort. The subthemes - relationships, sense of place, enjoyment of activities, independence, dignity, cognitive function, quality of life, longevity and physical comfort - provided a matrix of issues identified as important to patients. Relationship, place, independence and physical comfort statements were most frequently identified; longevity was least frequently identified. Conclusion: Our analysis of GOC discussions between medical staff and patients who had life-limiting illnesses and were admitted to the ICU, using a shared decision-making training and support program, revealed a framework of values, preferences and goals that could provide a structure to assist clinicians to engage in shared decision making.

Translating dignity principles into practice for continence care for older people in care homes: A study protocol.

AIM: To develop, implement, evaluate, and disseminate an evidence-based, person-centred education program to protect the dignity of care-dependent older people with dementia and continence care needs in care homes. DESIGN: A mixed method two-phase design underpinned by integrated knowledge translation. METHODS: An education program that frames dignity as the main goal of continence care will be co-designed with a purposive sample of care home staff who provide or supervise continence care for care-dependent older people with dementia in care homes and resident relatives. The program will then be implemented and evaluated in a representative sample of care home staff to determine its clinical relevance, feasibility, acceptability, and effects on staff ratings of dignity in continence care; self-reported continence care practices and the person centeredness of the environment. Data analysis will include descriptive statistics (survey data) and thematic analysis (focus groups). Funding obtained November 2018. Ethics approval obtained May 2019. DISCUSSION: This protocol outlines a mixed methods integrated knowledge translation protocol designed to translate principles about dignity into practice to improve the care of older people who are at risk of violations to their dignity in care homes. The outcome will be a contextually appropriate, evidence-based education program that protects the dignity of care-dependent older people who have dementia and continence care needs. IMPACT: Based on a sound theoretical model, the education program will be contextually appropriate for use in the care homes setting and contribute to improving the overall quality and safety of care in this setting. It could also support and inform continence care for other individuals who are care dependent. Adopting an integrated knowledge translation approach to the design and delivery of the education program and piloting it will ensure the program is contextually relevant and sustainable.

Palliative and End-of-Life Care: Vital Aspects of Holistic Diabetes Care of Older People With Diabetes.

Palliative and end-of-life care and advance care planning are important components of holistic diabetes management, especially for older people with a long duration of diabetes and comorbidities who experience unpleasant symptoms and remediable suffering. Many diabetes clinicians do not have conversations about advance care planning with people with diabetes, often because they are reluctant to discuss these issues and are not familiar with palliative care. This article outlines palliative, terminal, and end-of-life care for older people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes and suggests when to consider changing the focus on tight blood glucose control to a focus on safety and comfort. It proposes strategies to incorporate palliative and end-of-life care into personalized holistic diabetes care, determined with older people with diabetes and their families through shared decision-making.

Perspectives about dignity during acute care for older people and their relatives: A qualitative study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to enhance understanding about dignified care from older peoples' and their carers' perspectives. The information will contribute to the development of a tool to measure older peoples' dignity during hospitalisation. BACKGROUND: Older people are a vulnerable cohort at risk of loss of dignity during acute hospitalisation arising from environmental, behavioural and patient factors. It is not clear how older people and their relatives define dignified care in acute care settings. DESIGN: An interpretative descriptive method was used. METHODS: A purposive sample of older people (at least 65 years) who had been hospitalised in acute care and subsequently transferred to sub-acute care, and their relatives, were invited to participate. The study was undertaken in one sub-acute ward in a regional healthcare organisation in Victoria, Australia. Individual interviews were audio-recorded then transcribed. Data were analysed using thematic content analysis. The COREQ checklist was used to document reporting of the study. RESULTS: Individual interviews were conducted: 24 patients and 12 relatives. Three main themes were identified: "Involve me in decisions about my care and treatment," "Keep me safe when I am vulnerable" and "Treat me as an individual and with respect." Older people want to be involved in decisions about their care and treatment and to receive adequate, suitable information. They feel vulnerable during hospitalisation and want to feel safe when speaking up about concerns. Individual acknowledgement is an important aspect of dignity. CONCLUSIONS: Older people and their relatives identified specific elements of care that uphold or threaten dignity during acute hospitalisation. Nurses play a major role in upholding dignity for older people in hospital. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Clinicians may benefit from systematic dignity-related training. Specific strategies to enhance older persons' dignity, including communication skills training and continence management need to be developed, implemented and evaluated.

WITHDRAWN: The epidemiology of emergency presentations for falls across Western Victoria, Australia.

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2019.08.003. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

Prevalence of Frailty in Older Men and Women: Cross-Sectional Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.

Few studies have investigated the prevalence of frailty in the Australian general population. This study determined the prevalence of frailty in a population-based sample of older adults and examined the relationship between frailty and comorbid conditions. Men (n = 347) and women (n = 360) aged ≥ 60 year from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (GOS) were assessed between 2016-2019 and 2011-2014, respectively. Frailty was identified using a modified Fried frailty phenotype. Prevalence estimates were standardised to the 2011 Australian population. Kruskal-Wallis test and χ2 test were used to analyse data. For women, mean standardised prevalence estimates were 18.3% (14.1-22.5) for frail, 54.1% (47.3-60.8) pre-frail and 22.9% (18.9-26.8) robust. Corresponding estimates for men were 13.1% (9.8-16.3) frail, 47.8% (42.0-53.6) pre-frail and 27.3% (22.7-31.8) robust. Women who were frail were older, shorter, tended to have a higher body mass index (BMI) and used more medications compared to other groups. Compared to robust women, those who were frail were more likely to have cardio-metabolic (OR 3.5 (0.7-20.0)), pulmonary (OR 3.5 (1.5-8.4)) and musculoskeletal (OR 10.1 (2.1-48.0)) conditions. Frail men were older, had a higher BMI and were more likely to have musculoskeletal conditions (OR 5.8 (2.8-12.3)) and tended to be from a lower SES. No further associations were observed. This study reported the prevalence of frail and pre-frail individuals in a population-based sample of Australian men and women. Frailty was associated with musculoskeletal conditions for both men and women; however, associations with cardio-metabolic and pulmonary comorbidities were evident in women only.

Vital sign abnormalities as predictors of clinical deterioration in subacute care patients: A prospective case-time-control study.

BACKGROUND: Emergency interhospital transfers from inpatient subacute care to acute care occur in 8% to 17.4% of admitted patients and are associated with high rates of acute care readmission and in-hospital mortality. Serious adverse events in subacute care (rapid response team or cardiac arrest team calls) and increased nursing surveillance are the strongest known predictors of emergency interhospital transfer from subacute to acute care hospitals. However, the epidemiology of clinical deterioration across sectors of care, and specifically in subacute care is not well understood. OBJECTIVES: To explore the trajectory of clinical deterioration in patients who did and did not have an emergency interhospital transfer from subacute to acute care; and develop an internally validated predictive model to identify the role of vital sign abnormalities in predicting these emergency interhospital transfers. DESIGN: This prospective, exploratory cohort study is a subanalysis of data derived from a larger case-time-control study. SETTING: Twenty-two wards of eight subacute care hospitals in five major health services in Victoria, Australia. All subacute care hospitals were geographically separate from their health services' acute care hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with an emergency transfer from inpatient rehabilitation or geriatric evaluation and management unit to an acute care hospital within the same health service were included. Patients receiving palliative care were excluded. METHODS: Study data were collected between 22 August 2015 and 30 October 2016 by medical record audit. The Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and bivariate logistic regression analysis were used to compare cases with controls and to account for health service clustering effect. RESULTS: Data were collected on 603 transfers (557 patients) and 1160 controls. Adjusted for health service, ≥2 vital sign abnormalities in subacute care (adjusted odds ratio=8.81, 95% confidence intervals:6.36-12.19, p<0.001) and serious adverse events during the first acute care admission (adjusted odds ratio=1.28, 95% confidence intervals:1.08-1.99, p=0.015) were the clinical factors associated with increased risk of emergency interhospital transfer. An internally validated predictive model showed that vital sign abnormalities can fairly predict emergency interhospital transfers from subacute to acute care hospitals. CONCLUSION: Serious adverse events in acute care should be a key consideration in decisions about the location of subacute care delivery. During subacute care, 15.7% of cases had vital signs fulfilling organisational rapid response team activation criteria, yet missed rapid response team activations were common suggesting that further consideration of the criteria and strategies to optimise recognition and response to clinical deterioration in subacute care are needed.

The effectiveness of training interventions on nurses' communication skills: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this systematic review was to identify, critically appraise and synthesise evidence for the effectiveness of communication skills training interventions in nursing practice. DESIGN: A systematic review of literature. DATA SOURCES: Randomised controlled trials published in English from 1998 to 2018, identified in five computerised databases (Medline, Cinahl, Embase, Psychinfo and Cochrane Database). Studies were included if they reported an educational intervention to enhance nurses' communication with patients and contained an objective measure of communication skills and/or patient outcome measures. REVIEW METHODS: The Preferred reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guided the review. Data were extracted regarding study design and effectiveness on nurses' communication skills. Trial quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist. The heterogeneity of the included studies prohibited meta-analysis. RESULTS: Of the 7811 papers identified, seven trials met the eligibility criteria. The quality was modest. Training programs varied significantly in duration, structure, location and use of outcome measurement tools. Five trials focused on communication with cancer patients using simulated patients. All trials found at least one statistically significant improvement for nurses' communication skills. CONCLUSIONS: Educational interventions to enhance nurses' capacity to communicate with patients show promise. The paper reports the first systematic review of randomised controlled trials concerning the effect of communication skills training on nurses' abilities to communicate with patients, inclusive of non-cancer settings. The direct impact of educational interventions on nurses' communication skills is difficult to measure arising from non-standardised outcome measurement tools. Further research is particularly needed in acute, chronic illness, aged care and community settings.

The development and validation of instruments to measure dignity-protective continence care for care-dependent older people in residential aged care facilities: A study protocol.

AIMS: To develop and validate two instruments to measure dignity-protective continence care for care-dependent older people in residential aged care facilities: one instrument to be completed by care recipients and another for healthcare professionals. METHODS: The first phase of the project will involve a review of literature to identify the attributes of "dignity-protective continence care" for older people, which will be used to design the initial drafts of the instruments. Thereafter the Delphi survey technique will be used to establish the face and content validity of the draft instruments with three purposive samples; (a) care recipients (care-dependent older people with decisional capacity), (b) formal carers (nurses and personal care workers from residential aged care facilities, and (c) healthcare professionals with gerontological expertize in the management of incontinence. After instrument development, a large cross-sectional survey of care recipients and formal carers will be conducted to establish the internal consistency and construct validity of the instruments. This will be followed by a series of tests to establish their test-retest reliability. CONCLUSION: The completed research will result in two reliable and valid instruments that will support broader efforts to ensure that care practices in residential aged care facilities do not violate the dignity of care-dependent older people with continence care needs, and allow care partners and providers to act upon the results.