Impact of Real-Time Therapeutic Drug Monitoring on the Prescription of Antibiotics in Burn Patients Requiring Admission to the Intensive Care Unit.

As pharmacokinetics after burn trauma are difficult to predict, we conducted a 3-year prospective, monocentric, randomized, controlled trial to determine the extent of under- and overdosing of antibiotics and further evaluate the impact of systematic therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with same-day real-time dose adaptation to reach and maintain antibiotic concentrations within the therapeutic range. Forty-five consecutive burn patients treated with antibiotics were prospectively screened. Forty fulfilled the inclusion criteria; after one patient refused to participate and one withdrew consent, 19 were randomly assigned to an intervention group (patients with real-time antibiotic concentration determination and subsequent adaptations) and 19 were randomly assigned to a standard-of-care group (patients with antibiotic administration at the physician's discretion without real-time TDM). Seventy-three infection episodes were analyzed. Before the intervention, only 46/82 (56%) initial trough concentrations fell within the range. There was no difference between groups in the initial trough concentrations (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.39 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.81 to 2.39], P = 0.227) or the time to reach the target. However, thanks to real-time dose adjustments, the trough concentrations of the intervention group remained more within the predefined range (57/77 [74.0%] versus 48/85 [56.5%]; adjusted odd ratio [OR] = 2.34 [95% CI, 1.17 to 4.81], P = 0.018), more days were spent within the target range (193 days/297 days on antibiotics [65.0%] versus 171 days/311 days in antibiotics [55.0%]; adjusted OR = 1.64 [95% CI, 1.16 to 2.32], P = 0.005), and fewer results were below the target trough concentrations (25/118 [21.2%] versus 44/126 [34.9%]; adjusted OR = 0.47 [95% CI, 0.26 to 0.87], P = 0.015). No difference in infection outcomes was observed between the study groups. Systematic TDM with same-day real-time dose adaptation was effective in reaching and maintaining therapeutic antibiotic concentrations in infected burn patients, which prevented both over- and underdosing. A larger multicentric study is needed to further evaluate the impact of this strategy on infection outcomes and the emergence of antibiotic resistance during long-term burn treatment. (This study was registered with the ClinicalTrials.gov platform under registration no. NCT01965340 on 27 September 2013.).

Staphylococcus aureus carriage at admission predicts early-onset pneumonia after burn trauma.

Early-onset pneumonia (EOP) is frequent after burn trauma, increasing morbidity in the critical resuscitation phase, which may preclude early aggressive management of burn wounds. Currently, however, preemptive treatment is not recommended. The aim of this study was to identify predictive factors for EOP that may justify early empirical antibiotic treatment. Data for all burn patients requiring ≥4 h mechanical ventilation (MV) who were admitted between January 2001 and October 2012 were extracted from the hospital's computerized information system. We reviewed EOP episodes (≤7 days) among patients who underwent endotracheal aspiration (ETA) within 5 days after admission. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent factors associated with EOP. Logistic regression was used to identify factors predicting EOP development. During the study period, 396 burn patients were admitted. ETA was performed within 5 days in 204/290 patients receiving ≥4 h MV. One hundred and eight patients developed EOP; 47 cases were caused by Staphylococcus aureus, 37 by Haemophilus influenzae, and 23 by Streptococcus pneumoniae. Among the 33 patients showing S. aureus positivity on ETA samples, 16 (48.5 %) developed S. aureus EOP. Among the 156 S. aureus non-carriers, 16 (10.2 %) developed EOP. Staphylococcus aureus carriage independently predicted EOP (p < 0.0001). We identified S. aureus carriage as an independent and strong predictor of EOP. As rapid point-of-care testing for S. aureus is readily available, we recommend testing of all patients at admission for burn trauma and the consideration of early preemptive treatment in all positive patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate this new strategy.

Agreement between spirometers: a challenge in the follow-up of patients and populations?

BACKGROUND: Long-term cohort studies and lung function laboratories are confronted with the need for replacement of spirometers. Lack of agreement between spirometers might affect the longitudinal comparison of data, notably when replacing conventional by portable spirometers. OBJECTIVES: To compare the handheld EasyOne (EO) with the conventional SensorMedics (SM) spirometer, and to analyze the interdevice reproducibility of EO spirometers. METHODS: In total, 82 volunteers completed spirometry sessions with 1 SM and 2 of 3 EO spirometers following a Latin square design. Analyses of differences in forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory flow in 1 s (FEV1), FEV1/FVC and mean forced expiratory flow calculated between 25 and 75% of the FVC between spirometers used a mixed effect model with a random intercept for each subject and the effect of the device as fixed effect adjusted for sex, age, height and order of spirometer tested. Bland-Altman plots show the 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: Comparisons between EO and SM showed relatively small mean differences of <3%, but systematically lower values for FVC and FEV1 in all EO devices. The 95% agreement exceeded the limits for FEV1 by 50 ml in 2 EO spirometers. The EO interdevice comparisons showed mean differences and limits of agreement within established thresholds, thus indicating fair accuracy when comparing devices. Repeats with the same spirometer did not result in statistically significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests fair agreement between the handheld and the conventional spirometer. Differences slightly exceeding limits for FEV1 in 2 EO devices might be considered mostly irrelevant for clinical practice. However, the systematically lower FVC and FEV1 observed with EO may be significant for epidemiological studies, thus justifying inspection before replacing devices.