Balanced Nonopioid General Anesthesia With Lidocaine Is Associated With Lower Postoperative Complications Compared With Balanced Opioid General Anesthesia With Sufentanil for Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Propensity Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: There are no data on the effect of balanced nonopioid general anesthesia with lidocaine in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The main study objective was to evaluate the association between nonopioid general balanced anesthesia and the postoperative complications in relation to opioid side effects. METHODS: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass between 2019 and 2021 were identified. After exclusion of patients for heart transplantation, left ventricular assistance device, and off-pump surgery, we classified patients according to an opioid general balanced anesthesia or a nonopioid balanced anesthesia with lidocaine. The primary outcome was a collapsed composite of postoperative complications that comprise respiratory failure and confusion, whereas secondary outcomes were acute renal injury, pneumoniae, death, intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: We identified 859 patients exposed to opioid-balanced general anesthesia with lidocaine and 913 patients exposed to nonopioid-balanced general anesthesia. Propensity score matching yielded 772 individuals in each group with balanced baseline covariates. Two hundred thirty-six patients (30.5%) of the nonopioid-balanced general anesthesia versus 186 patients (24.1%) presented postoperative composite complications. The balanced lidocaine nonopioid general anesthesia group was associated with a lower proportion with the postoperative complication composite outcome OR, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58-0.92; P = .027). The number of patients with acute renal injury, death, and hospital length of stay did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: A balanced nonopioid general anesthesia protocol with lidocaine was associated with lower odds of postoperative complication composite outcome based on respiratory failure and confusion.

Epidemiology, risk factors and outcomes of norepinephrine use in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: a multicentric prospective study.

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to describe the prevalence of norepinephrine use, the factors associated with its use, and the incidence of postoperative complications according to norepinephrine use, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. METHOD: We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study in 4 University-affiliated medico-surgical cardiovascular units. We analyzed all patients treated with cardiac surgery after excluding pre-ECMO surgery, LVAD implantation, heart transplantation and intra-operative hemorrhage. RESULTS: Of 9316 patients screened during the study period, 2862 were included and 2510 were analyzed. Among them, 1549 (61%) were treated with norepinephrine with a median maximal dose of 0.11 [0.06-0.2] µg.kg-1.min-1 and a median duration of 10 h [2-24]. Norepinephrine was most often started in the operating room before cardiopulmonary bypass. The multiple regression logistic analysis identified several modifiable (haematocrit, maintenance of beta-blocker, cardiopulmonary bypass time, glucose-insulin-potassium, Custodiol cardioplegia, Delnido cardioplegia, and fibrinogen transfusion) and non-modifiable factors (age, ASA score, chronic high blood pressure, coronary disease, dyslipidemia, right ventricular dysfunction, left ventricular dysfunction, active endocarditis, and valvular aortic surgery) associated with norepinephrine use. Mortality, morbidity (neurological and renal complications, death) and length of stay in the ICU were higher in patients treated with norepinephrine. CONCLUSION: Norepinephrine is often used in cardiac surgical patients but for <24 h with a low dose. Many preoperative and surgical factors are associated with norepinephrine use. Patients supported by norepinephrine have a higher incidence of major postoperative events.

Leukocyte cell population data in patients with cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass: A potential readily available tool to monitor immunity.

Purpose: Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass triggers sterile inflammation that is responsible for post-operative morbidity. Automated flow cytometry devices used for leucocyte count provide cell population data (CPD) regarding fluorescence intensity, size and granularity of leukocytes that have never been studied in the context of sterile inflammation. Our objective was to explore leukocyte cell population data in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in order to determine whether CPD could be used to monitor immune cell activation. Methods: This is an ancillary study of a cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Cell population data (CPD) extracted from a routine automated flow cytometer were analyzed (Fluorescence targeted to nucleic acids). The time points of interest were: pre-operative, postoperative and 5 days after surgery. The variations in those parameters were studied. Data were then compared between patients according to the occurrence of a composite criteria (supra-ventricular arrythmia, stroke, acute renal failure, and/or death). Results: Data from 1453 patients were analyzed. The neutrophil count, fluorescence granularity (NE-SCC), intensity (NE-SFL) and size (NE-FSC) increased with surgery. Heterogeneity of neutrophils decreased in terms of fluorescence granularity (NE-WX) and size (NE-WZ) but increased in terms of intensity (NE-WY). The lymphocyte count decreased with surgery. While fluorescence granularity (LY-X) and size increased (LY-Z), Lymphocyte intensity decreased (LY-Y). Lymphocytes were less heterogeneous in terms of their granularity, size and intensity after surgery (LY-WX, LY-WY, LY-WZ). Patients who developed the composite complication criteria had a higher pre-operative neutrophil count (5.08 [3.89;6.95] vs 4.76 [3.60;6.13], p = 0.02; AUC = 0.56 [0.51;0.60]), and more heterogeneous neutrophils in terms of fluorescence granularity (NE-WX, AUC = 0.57 [0.52;0.62]) and intensity (NE-WY, AUC 0.61 [0.56;0.65]). Those patients also had lower pre-operative lymphocyte count (1.49 [1.10;1.14] vs 1.81 [1.39;2.39], p<0.01, AUC = 0.61 [0.57;0.66]) and fluorescence granularity (LY-X, AUC = 0.57 [0.53;0.62]). NE-WX, NE-WY and LY-X were associated with post-operative complications after adjustment on the EuroSCORE 2 (adjusted odd ratio of 1.01 [1.00;1.02]; 1.01 [1.00;1.01] and 1.08 [1.02;1.15] respectively). Conclusion: Cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass was associated with substantial alterations of CPD probably reflecting leukocytes activation in sterile inflammation. Pre-operative NE-WX, NE-WY and LY-X biomarkers levels were associated with post-operative complications, independently of the EuroSCORE 2. Such routine, unexploited and low cost parameters might represent useful tools likely to monitor immune function and predict outcomes for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Our findings requires validation on a larger external cohort.

Pupillometry pain index decreases intraoperative sufentanyl administration in cardiac surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Pupillometry has proven effective for the monitoring of intraoperative analgesia in non-cardiac surgery. We performed a prospective randomized study to evaluate the impact of an analgesia-guided pupillometry algorithm on the consumption of sufentanyl during cardiac surgery. Fifty patients were included prior to surgery. General anesthesia was standardized with propofol and target-controlled infusions of sufentanyl. The standard group consisted of sufentanyl target infusion left to the discretion of the anesthesiologist. The intervention group consisted of sufentanyl target infusion based on the pupillary pain index. The primary outcome was the total intraoperative sufentanyl dose. The total dose of sufentanyl was lower in the intervention group than in the control group and (55.8 µg [39.7-95.2] vs 83.9 µg [64.1-107.0], p = 0.04). During the postoperative course, the cumulative doses of morphine (mg) were not significantly different between groups (23 mg [15-53] vs 24 mg [17-46]; p = 0.95). We found no significant differences in chronic pain at 3 months between the 2 groups (0 (0%) vs 2 (9.5%) p = 0.49). Overall, the algorithm based on the pupillometry pain index decreased the dose of sufentanyl infused during cardiac surgery.Clinical trial number: NCT03864016.