Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 34(2): 270-278, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36434797

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is effective at treating 50% of unselected patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Alternatively, PVI combined with a new ablation strategy entitled the Marshall-PLAN ensures a 78% 1-year sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance rate in the same population. However, a substantial subset of patients could undergo the Marshall-PLAN unnecessarily. It is therefore essential to identify those patients who can be treated with PVI alone versus those who may truly benefit from the Marshall-PLAN before ablation is performed. In this context, we hypothesized that electrical cardioversion (EC) could help to select the most appropriate strategy for each patient. METHODS: In this multicentre, prospective, randomized study, patients with AF recurrence within 4 weeks after EC will be randomized 1:1 to PVI alone or the Marshall-PLAN. Conversely, patients in whom SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC will be treated with PVI only and included in a prospective registry. The primary endpoint will be the 1-year SR maintenance rate after a single ablation procedure. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The Marshall-PLAN might be necessary in patients with an advanced degree of persistent AF (i.e., where SR is not maintained for ≥4 uninterrupted weeks after EC). Conversely, in patients with mild or moderate persistent AF (i.e., where SR is maintained for ≥4 weeks after EC), PVI alone might be a sufficient ablation strategy. The PACIFIC trial is the first study designed to assess whether rhythm monitoring after EC could help to identify patients who should undergo adjunctive ablation strategies beyond PVI.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Pulmonary Veins , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Recurrence
2.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 9: 997998, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36324749

ABSTRACT

Background: The role of atrial fibrillation (AF) drivers located at the left atrium, superior vena cava, crista terminalis and coronary sinus (CS) is well established. While these regions are classically targeted during catheter ablation, the role of right atrial appendage (RAA) drivers has been incompletely investigated. Objective: To determine the prevalence and electrophysiological characteristics of AF driver's arising from the RAA. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical and procedural data of 317 consecutive patients who underwent an AF ablation procedure after bi-atrial mapping (multipolar catheter). We selected patients who presented with a per-procedural RAA firing (RAAF). RAAF was defined as the recording of a sustained RAA EGM with a cycle length shorter than 120 ms or 120 < RAAF CL ≤ 130 ms and ratio RAA CL/CS CL ≤ 0.75. Results: Right atrial/atrium appendage firing was found in 22 patients. The prevalence was estimated at 7% (95% CI, 4-10). These patients were mostly men (72%), median age: 66 yo ± 8 without structural heart disease (77%). RAAFs were predominantly found in paroxysmal AF patients (63%, 32%, and 5% for paroxysmal, short standing and long-standing AF, respectively, p > 0.05). RAAF median cycle length was 117 ms ± 7 while CS cycle length was 180 ms ± 10 (p < 0.01). Conclusion: In 317 consecutive AF ablation patients (22 patients, 7%) the presence of a high-voltage short-cycle-length right atrial appendage driver (RAAF) may conclusively be associated with AF termination. This case series exemplifies the not-so-uncommon role of the RAA in the perpetuation of AF.

3.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol ; 33(11): 2250-2260, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35989543

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Multiple groups have reported on the usefulness of ablating in atrial regions exhibiting abnormal electrograms during atrial fibrillation (AF). Still, previous studies have suggested that ablation outcomes are highly operator- and center-dependent. This study sought to evaluate a novel machine learning software algorithm named VX1 (Volta Medical), trained to adjudicate multipolar electrogram dispersion. METHODS: This study was a prospective, multicentric, nonrandomized study conducted to assess the feasibility of generating VX1 dispersion maps. In 85 patients, 8 centers, and 17 operators, we compared the acute and long-term outcomes after ablation in regions exhibiting dispersion between primary and satellite centers. We also compared outcomes to a control group in which dispersion-guided ablation was performed visually by trained operators. RESULTS: The study population included 29% of long-standing persistent AF. AF termination occurred in 92% and 83% of the patients in primary and satellite centers, respectively, p = 0.31. The average rate of freedom from documented AF, with or without antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), was 86% after a single procedure, and 89% after an average of 1.3 procedures per patient (p = 0.4). The rate of freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia, with or without AADs, was 54% and 73% after a single or an average of 1.3 procedures per patient, respectively (p < 0.001). No statistically significant differences between outcomes of the primary versus satellite centers were observed for one (p = 0.8) or multiple procedures (p = 0.4), or between outcomes of the entire study population versus the control group (p > 0.2). Interestingly, intraprocedural AF termination and type of recurrent arrhythmia (i.e., AF vs. AT) appear to be predictors of the subsequent clinical course. CONCLUSION: VX1, an expertise-based artificial intelligence software solution, allowed for robust center-to-center standardization of acute and long-term ablation outcomes after electrogram-based ablation.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Catheter Ablation , Pulmonary Veins , Humans , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Catheter Ablation/methods , Prospective Studies , Artificial Intelligence , Treatment Outcome , Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Software , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Recurrence
4.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 12(6): e007304, 2019 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31164003

ABSTRACT

Background Although proposed to facilitate pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), high-power ablation may favor extracardiac damage. Negative component abolition of the unipolar signal reflects lesion transmurality. The present study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of high-power ablation using unipolar signal modification as a local end point. Methods High power and standard power were compared in 4 swine and 100 consecutive patients referred for PVI. The first 50 patients were included in the control group (25-30 W) and the last 50 patients in the study group (40-50 W). Atrial radiofrequency applications were stopped 2 s (study group and swine) or 5 s (control group) after unipolar signal modification. Ventricular radiofrequency applications of 500 J (25 W·20 s versus 50 W·10 s) were performed at the swine epicardium. Results Swine gross necropsy did not show any extracardiac damage related to atrial lesions. At equal energy of 500 J, 50 W lesions were deeper (3±0.9 versus 2.6±1.1 mm; P=0.03) and wider (6.2±2 versus 5±2.3 mm; P=0.006) than 25 W lesions. No complications occurred during the clinical study, whatever the power output used for PVI. For a similar sinus rhythm maintenance at 12 months (90% versus 88%; P=0.75), the study group displayed higher first-pass PVI (92% versus 73%; P<0.001), lower acute pulmonary vein reconnection (2% versus 17%; P<0.001), reduced procedure time (73.1±18.2 versus 107.4±21.2 min; P<0.001), and ablation time (13±2.9 versus 30.3±8.8 min; P<0.001). Conclusions High-power PVI guided by unipolar signal modification safely decreases procedural burden while ensuring robust 12-month outcomes.


Subject(s)
Action Potentials , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Heart Rate , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Aged , Animals , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Catheter Ablation/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Animal , Operative Time , Prospective Studies , Pulmonary Veins/physiopathology , Risk Factors , Sus scrofa , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 49(3): 299-306, 2017 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28643171

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Elimination of the negative component of the unipolar atrial electrogram is a reliable indicator of the creation of a transmural lesion. Contact-force (CF) sensing technology has the potential to increase the durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). In the present multicenter study, we assessed the 2-year sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance rate in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) after PVI guided by these two approaches. METHODS: Two hundred fifteen consecutive PAF patients (62.1 ± 10.1 years, 65 women) were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent PVI under CARTO guidance according to a systematic contiguous "point-by-point" approach, using radiofrequency energy, and a CF externally irrigated ablation catheter with the goal of at least 10g (ideally 20g) of force. The ablation endpoint of each individual lesion was elimination of the negative component of the unipolar atrial signal. The procedural endpoint was PVI with bidirectional block. RESULTS: All PVs were successfully isolated. After 30 min of waiting time, 35 patients (16%) had PV reconnection and in all of them, the PVs were re-isolated. Two years after a single ablation procedure, 187 patients (87%) remained arrhythmia free, without anti-arrhythmic drugs. Of the 28 patients presenting with AF recurrence, 25 had PV reconnection and underwent repeat PVI while in the remaining 3 patients, all four PVs were isolated and extra-PV triggers were identified. There were six groin hematomas and one transient ischemic attack. CONCLUSIONS: Unipolar atrial signal analysis combined with CF sensing ensures a robust 2-year SR maintenance rate in the treatment of PAF. Clinical trial registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02520960.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/diagnostic imaging , Atrial Fibrillation/surgery , Catheter Ablation/methods , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac/methods , Pulmonary Veins/surgery , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Risk Assessment , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...