A model for delivery of extracorporeal life support in a stand-alone veterans affairs medical center.

INTRODUCTION: For the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to continue to perform complex cardiothoracic surgery, there must be an established pathway for providing urgent/emergent extracorporeal life support (ECLS). Partnership with a nearby tertiary care center with such expertise may be the most resource-efficient way to provide ECLS services to patients in post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock or respiratory failure. The goal of this project was to assess the efficiency, safety, and outcomes of surgical patients who required transfer for perioperative ECLS from a single stand-alone Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) to a separate ECLS center. METHODS: Cohort consisted of all cardiothoracic surgery patients who experienced cardiogenic shock or refractory respiratory failure at the local VAMC requiring urgent or emergent institution of ECLS between 2019 and 2022. The primary outcomes are the safety and timeliness of transport. RESULTS: Mean time from the initial shock call to arrival at the ECLS center was 2.8 h. There were no complications during transfer. Six patients (86%) survived to decannulation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that complex cardiothoracic surgery can be performed within the VHA system and when there is an indication for ECLS, those services can be safely and effectively provided at an affiliated, properly equipped center.

Supporting the right ventricle in postcardiotomy renal dysfunction: A case series.

Postcardiotomy RV dysfunction is an under-recognized cause of acute kidney injury (AKI). Insertion of a percutaneous right ventricular assist device (RVAD) reduces central venous hypertension and congestive nephropathy by augmenting cardiac output. In selected patients, percutaneous RVAD insertion may improve renal function and obviate the need for long-term dialysis.

Adhered ECMO cannula in COVID-19 related severe acute respiratory failure.

BACKGROUND: Crescent cannula adhesion in the setting of COVID-19 respiratory failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is a novel complication. The objective of this case presentation is to highlight this rare complication and to explore potential predisposing factors and our management strategies. CASE PRESENTATION: We present the case of a 25 y.o. patient with COVID-19 respiratory failure requiring ECMO support for 16-days in which a 32 Fr crescent cannula became adherent to the SVC and proximal jugular vein. Attempts to remove the cannula at the bedside failed due to immobility of the cannula. Ultrasound of the right neck was unremarkable, so he was taken to the hybrid OR where both TEE and fluoroscopy were unrevealing. An upper sternotomy was performed, and the superior vena cava and proximal jugular vein were dissected revealing a 2 cm segment of the distal SVC and proximal jugular vein that was densely sclerosed and adherent to the cannula. The vessel was opened across the adherent area at the level of the innominate vein and the cannula was then able to be withdrawn. The patient suffered no ill effects and had an unremarkable recovery to discharge. CONCLUSIONS: To date, there have been no reports of crescent cannula adhesion related complications. In patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure requiring ECMO, clinicians should be aware of widespread hypercoagulability and the potential of unprovoked, localized venous sclerosis and cannula adhesion. We report our technique of decannulation in the setting of cannula adhesion and hope that presentation will shed further light on this complication allowing clinicians to optimize patient care.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for COVID-19: An evolving experience through multiple waves.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has shown variable results in COVID-19 pneumonia however, some evidence supports benefit. Here we compare our institution's ECMO outcomes across multiple waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: All patients who received ECMO for COVID-19 between March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021, were reviewed. Patients received venovenous (VV) or right ventricular assist device (RVAD/ECMO) ECMO. Early (March 1-July 6, 2020, Era 1) and late (July 7, 2020-March 1, 2021, Era 2) pandemic RVAD/ECMO patients were compared. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received ECMO of which 16 (29.6%) patients received VV ECMO and 38 (70.4%) RVAD/ECMO. Median age was 53.0 years, body mass index 36.1 kg/m2 , 41.2% female, and 49% Caucasian. The most common pre-cannulation treatments included steroids (79.6%) and convalescent plasma (70.4%). Median time from admission to cannulation was 7.0 days. Median support time was 30.5 days (VV ECMO 35.0 days, RVAD/ECMO 26.0 days). In- hospital mortality was 42.6% (39.5% RVAD/ECMO, 50.0% VV ECMO). Significant morbidities included infection (80.8%), bleeding events (74.5%), and renal replacement therapy (30.8%). Cumulative mortality 120-days post-cannulation was 45.7% (VV ECMO 60.8%, RVAD/ECMO 40.0%). RVAD/ECMO Era 1 demonstrated a significantly lower cumulative mortality (16.2%) compared to Era 2 (60.4%). Competing risk analysis found age (HR 0.95, [95% CI 0.92, 0.98] p = 0.005) to be a protective factor for survival. CONCLUSION: ECMO support for COVID-19 is beneficial but carries significant morbidity. RVAD/ECMO support demonstrated consistent advantages in survival to VV-ECMO, but with declining efficacy across time during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Transcarotid Approach to Placement of an Impella 5.0.

Microaxial left ventricular assist devices (mLVADs) have traditionally been placed through a transfemoral or transaxillary arterial approach. Transfemoral access is restrictive, significantly limiting postoperative patient ambulation. Transaxillary placement is preferred but not feasible in a subset of patients due to small arterial diameter or tight angulation of the thoracic outlet. Transcarotid delivery has been utilized for other cardiovascular device deployment with good success; however, this approach has not been described for mLVAD support. We present a case series of transcarotid placement of mLVADs in cases where a transaxillary and transfemoral approach was not feasible. From May 2017 to April 2019, six patients in cardiogenic shock required mLVAD support achieved via a transcarotid approach. Technical success was achieved in all patients. One patient was directly weaned from mLVAD support and two patients died on mLVAD support. Escalation to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) was required for three patients, two of whom subsequently died. There were no bleeding or valvular complications related to device placement, and no obvious or known neurologic complications related to mLVAD support. Transcarotid placement of mLVADs expands the utility of these devices as an alternative to traditional support strategies or prohibitive arterial anatomy; however, further study is needed to determine its efficacy.

Sustained Use of the Impella 5.0 Heart Pump Enables Bridge to Clinical Decisions in 34 Patients.

We studied whether sustained hemodynamic support (>7 d) with the Impella 5.0 heart pump can be used as a bridge to clinical decisions in patients who present with cardiogenic shock, and whether such support can improve their outcomes. We retrospectively reviewed cases of patients who had Impella 5.0 support at our hospital from August 2017 through May 2019. Thirty-four patients (23 with cardiogenic shock and 11 with severely decompensated heart failure) underwent sustained support for a mean duration of 11.7 ± 9.3 days (range, ≤48 d). Of 29 patients (85.3%) who survived to next therapy, 15 were weaned from the Impella, 8 underwent durable left ventricular assist device placement, 4 were escalated to venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, and 2 underwent heart transplantation. The 30-day survival rate was 76.5% (26 of 34 patients). Only 2 patients had a major adverse event: one each had an ischemic stroke and flail mitral leaflet. None of the devices malfunctioned. Sustained hemodynamic support with the Impella 5.0 not only improved outcomes in patients who presented with cardiogenic shock, but also provided time for multidisciplinary evaluation of potential cardiac recovery, or the need for durable left ventricular assist device implantation or heart transplantation. Our study shows the value of using the Impella 5.0 as a bridge to clinical decisions.

Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation to Facilitate Removal of Endobronchial Tumors.

Short-term extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a useful adjunct to thoracic procedures. We report the cases of 2 middle-aged men who were supported with venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to facilitate tumor debulking and recanalization of the carina and mainstem bronchi. Neither patient had major complications or adverse events. These cases suggest that short-term extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is safe in patients undergoing complex resection or debulking of endobronchial lesions.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation with Right Ventricular Assist Device for COVID-19 ARDS.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular failure is an underrecognized consequence of COVID-19 pneumonia. Those with severe disease are treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) but with poor outcomes. Concomitant right ventricular assist device (RVAD) may be beneficial. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of intensive care unit patients admitted with COVID-19 ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome) was performed. Nonintubated patients, those with acute kidney injury, and age > 75 were excluded. Patients who underwent RVAD/ECMO support were compared with those managed via invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) alone. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-d mortality, acute kidney injury, length of ICU stay, and duration of mechanical ventilation. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients were admitted to the ICU with COVID-19. Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 21 received IMV, and 18 received RVAD/ECMO. In-hospital (52.4 versus 11.1%, P = 0.008) and 30-d mortality (42.9 versus 5.6%, P= 0.011) were significantly lower in patients treated with RVAD/ECMO. Acute kidney injury occurred in 15 (71.4%) patients in the IMV group and zero RVAD/ECMO patients (P< 0.001). ICU (11.5 versus 21 d, P= 0.067) and hospital (14 versus 25.5 d, P = 0.054) length of stay were not significantly different. There were no RVAD/ECMO device complications. The duration of mechanical ventilation was not significantly different (10 versus 5 d, P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: RVAD support at the time of ECMO initiation resulted in the no secondary end-organ damage and higher in-hospital and 30-d survival versus IMV in specially selected patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS. Management of severe COVID-19 ARDS should prioritize right ventricular support.

Temporary mechanical circulatory support prevents the occurrence of a low-output state in high-risk coronary artery bypass grafting: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a durable treatment for coronary artery disease. Left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) (a division of cardiothoracic surgery) (ejection fraction < 35%) significantly elevates perioperative risk for patients pursuing surgical revascularization. Periprocedural support with temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) has shown benefit in this patient population. METHODS: Four patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and LVD underwent CABG at our institution between 2017 and 2018. Each patient received perioperative ventricular support using a microaxial tMCS device (Impella 5.0®). The occurrence of a postoperative low-output state (LOS) was assessed for as well as postoperative morbidity and mortality, device-specific complications, and tMCS support duration. RESULTS: All patients survived to device explant without device-related complications. Two patients required reoperation for nondevice-related bleeding. All patients were without an LOS at 24 h postoperatively with cardiac indices of 2.9-3.6 L/min/m2 , normalized serum lactate, and vasoactive-inotrope scores of 0-12.0. There was a notably high incidence of acute renal failure (50%), which was observed in patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock. One patient died 10 days after the device explant. Of the three patients that survived to discharge, two were alive at the most recent follow-up. Postoperative device support varied widely (0-500 h). CONCLUSION: Perioperative tMCS may be a viable strategy for preventing postoperative LOS in high-risk CABG patients with a low complication rate and acceptable morbidity. The application of microaxial tMCS devices in CABG is an area that warrants further investigation to delineate its impact on perioperative outcomes and potentially expand the indications for such devices.

Safety, Tolerability, and Outcomes of Enteral Nutrition in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a supportive care system for patients with respiratory or cardiac failure. Patients requiring ECMO are at risk for significant inflammation, prolonged hospitalization, and acquired malnutrition and sarcopenia. Societal guidelines recommend early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients; however, in this population, optimal timing and dose of nutrition remains unknown and fear of reduced splanchnic perfusion, delayed gastric emptying, and bowel ischemia poses a barrier to appropriate energy and protein intake. This narrative review intends to provide an overview of ECMO, highlight the rationale for nutrition support in this population, and review the safety, tolerability, and outcomes associated with enteral nutrition during ECMO.

A Dual-Lumen Percutaneous Cannula for Managing Refractory Right Ventricular Failure.

A right ventricular assist device (RVAD) using a dual-lumen percutaneous cannula inserted through the right internal jugular vein (IJV) might improve weaning in patients with refractory right ventricular (RV) failure. However, the reported experience with this cannula is limited. We reviewed the records of all patients receiving RVAD support with this new dual-lumen cannula at our institution between April 2017 and February 2019. We recorded data on weaning, mortality, and device-specific complications. We compared outcomes among three subgroups based on the indications for RVAD support (postcardiotomy, cardiogenic shock, and primary respiratory failure) and against similar results in the literature. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of the 40 patients (29 men) was 53 (15.5) years. Indications for implantation were postcardiotomy support in 18 patients, cardiogenic shock in 12, and respiratory failure in 10. In all, 17 (94%) patients in the postcardiotomy group were weaned from RVAD support, five (42%) in the cardiogenic shock group, and seven (70%) in the respiratory failure group, overall higher than those reported in the literature (49% to 59%) for surgically placed RVADs. Whereas published in-hospital mortality rates range from 42% to 50% for surgically placed RVADs and from 41% to 50% for RVADs with percutaneous cannulas implanted through the right IJV, mortality was 11%, 58%, and 40% in our subgroups, respectively. There were no major device-related complications. This percutaneous dual-lumen cannula appears to be safe and effective for managing refractory RV failure, with improved weaning and mortality profile, and with limited device-specific adverse events.

Minimally Invasive Mechanical Circulatory Support Through the Perioperative Pulmonary Thromboendarterectomy Period: A Case Report.

A 64-year-old man being evaluated for pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) preoperatively experienced pulseless electrical activity secondary to right ventricular failure while undergoing bronchoscopy. After return of spontaneous circulation, a percutaneous right ventricular assist device (RVAD) was placed through the right internal jugular vein. He continued on right ventricular support with demonstration of right ventricular recovery over the following 8 days, and subsequently underwent PTE for treatment of his primary condition. He recovered and was weaned from his RVAD support uneventfully. The need for RVAD support has traditionally been a contraindication for PTE; however, circulatory assist devices have been used as a salvage procedure for right-heart failure after PTE. This case highlights the potential for percutaneous mechanical circulatory support in treating severe perioperative right ventricular dysfunction, and to facilitate successful recovery in patients undergoing PTE.

Cryopreserved Saphenous Vein Compared With PTFE Graft for Use as Modified Blalock-Taussig or Central Shunt in Cyanotic Congenital Heart Disease.

Many infants with congenital heart disease undergo palliative shunt procedures. In our center, cryopreserved saphenous vein and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) are used as grafts to construct these shunts. In this retrospective review, we compare morbidity, mortality, and freedom from reoperation associated with the use of these graft materials. We conducted a retrospective study of 136 consecutive patients who were palliated with shunts between 2006 and 2015. A total of 136 patients were identified, 9 had incomplete data; thus, 127 patients were included: 69 saphenous and 58 PTFE. The cohorts were matched with respect to birth weight, gestational age, age and weight at time of surgery, and underlying cardiac condition. There were 15 (12%) deaths in the study cohort with no intraoperative mortality. Thrombosis was seen in 5.2% (2/38) of the saphenous modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (mBTS) group and 20.6% (14/68) of those with PTFE mBTS. There was no thrombosis in the central shunt group. Freedom from reoperation was 83% in the saphenous vein group and 81% in the PTFE group. There was no difference in overall morbidity or mortality, although thrombosis was significantly less in the saphenous vein group. Cryopreserved saphenous vein is a safe alternative, either as a mBTS or as a central shunt.

Durability of central aortic valve closure in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.

BACKGROUND: A competent aortic valve is essential to providing effective left ventricular assist device support. We have adopted a practice of central aortic valve closure by placing a simple coaptation stitch at left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with significant aortic insufficiency. We conducted a follow-up study to evaluate the efficacy and durability of this procedure. METHODS: The study included patients who had undergone continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation. The patients were divided into 2 groups, those who did not require any aortic procedure because the valve was competent and those who underwent central aortic valve closure for mild or greater aortic regurgitation. The clinical endpoints were mortality, progression or recurrence of aortic insufficiency, and reoperation for aortic valve pathologic features. Aortic insufficiency was measured qualitatively from mild to severe on a scale of 0 to 5. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients received continuous flow left ventricular assist devices from February 2007 to August 2011. Of those, 18 (15%) underwent central aortic valve closure at left ventricular assist device implantation because of significant aortic insufficiency (1.8 ± 1.4) and 105 who did not (competent aortic valve, 0.15 ± 0.43; P < .01). At follow-up (median, 312 days; range, 0-1429 days), the mean aortic insufficiency score remained low for the patients with central aortic valve closure (0.27 ± 0.46) in contrast to those without central aortic valve closure who experienced aortic insufficiency progression (0.78 ± 0.89; P = .02). In addition, the proportion of patients with more than mild aortic insufficiency was significantly less in the central aortic valve closure group (0% vs 18%; P = .05). The patients in the central aortic valve closure group were significantly older and had a greater incidence of renal failure at baseline. The 30-day mortality was greater in the central aortic valve closure group, but the late survival was similar between the 2 groups. No reoperations were required for recurrent aortic insufficiency. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study have shown that repair of aortic insufficiency with a simple central coaptation stitch is effective and durable in left ventricular assist device-supported patients, with follow-up extending into 2 years. Although aortic insufficiency progressed over time in those with minimal native valve regurgitation initially, no such progression was noted in those with central aortic valve closure. Additional investigation is needed to evaluate whether prophylactic central aortic valve closure should be performed at left ventricular assist device implantation to avoid problematic aortic regurgitation developing over time, in particular in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation for life-long (destination therapy) support.

Hepatic and renal function with successful long-term support on a continuous flow left ventricular assist device.

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding the long-term clinical effects of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) on hepato-renal function is limited. Hence our aim was to assess changes in hepato-renal function over a one-year period in patients supported on a CF-LVAD. METHODS: During the study period 126 patients underwent CF-LVAD implant. Changes in hepato-renal laboratory parameters were studied in 61/126 patients successfully supported on a CF-LVAD for period of one year. A separate cohort of a high-risk group (HCrB) of patients (56/126) with a serum creat>1.9 mg/dL (168 µmol/L) (75th percentile) or a serum bil>1.5 mg/dL (25.65 µmol/L) (75th percentile) was created. Changes in serum creatinine and bilirubin were analysed at regular intervals for this group along with the need for renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: Baseline creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) for the entire cohort was 1.4[1.2,1.9 mg/dL] [123.7(106,168) µmol/L) and 27[20,39.5 mg/dL] [9.6(7.1,14.1) mmol/L] respectively. After an initial reduction at the end of one month [1(0.8,1.2) mg/dL; 88(70,105) µmol/L] (p<0.0001), a gradual increase was noted over the study period to reach (1.25[1.1,1.5] mg/dL; 106(97.2,132.6) µmol/L] (p=0.0003). The serum bilirubin normalised from a [1(0.7,1.55) mg/dL] [17(18.8,25.7) µmol/L) to 0.9(0.6,1.2)mg/dL [15.4(10.2,20.5) µmol/L] (p=0.0005) and continued to decline over one year. Improvement in the synthetic function of the liver was demonstrated by a rise in the serum albumin levels to reach 4.3[4.1,4.5] [43(41,45) gm/L] at the end of one year (p<0.0001). The baseline serum creatinine and bilirubin for the high-risk cohort (HCrB) was 1.9(1.3,2.4) mg/dL [168(115,212) µmol/L] and 1.7(1.00,2.4) mg/dL [29(17.1,68.4) µmol/L] respectively. The high-risk cohort (HCrB) demonstrated a trend towards higher 30-day mortality (p=0.06). While the need for temporary renal replacement therapy was higher in this cohort (16% vs. 4%; p=0.03), only 3% need it permanently. A significant reduction in creatinine was apparent at the end of one month [1.1(0.8,1.4) mg/dL; 97(70.7,123.7) µmol/L] (p<0.0001) and then remained stable at [1.3(1.1,1.5) mg/dL; 115(97,132.6) µmol/L]. Bilirubin demonstrated a 30% decline over one month and then remained low at [0.7(0.5,0.8) mg/dL; 62(44,70) µmol/L] p=0.0005 compared to the pre-operative baseline. CONCLUSION: Hepato-renal function demonstrates early improvement and then remains stable in the majority of patients on continuous flow left ventricular assist device support for one year. High-risk patients demonstrate a higher 30-day mortality and temporary need for renal replacement therapy. Yet even in this cohort, improvement is present over a period of one year on the device, with a minimal need for permanent haemodialysis.

Reoperation after arterial switch: a 27-year experience.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome and spectrum of reoperation after the arterial switch operation (ASO) has not been fully defined, and there are limited data in the literature. We reviewed our institutional experience with reoperation(s) after ASO. METHODS: Between January 1984 and January 2012, 32 patients (23 male) underwent reoperation(s) after ASO. Anatomy included simple transposition of the great arteries in 14, complex transposition of the great arteries in 14, and Taussig-Bing in 4. Mean age was 6.7 ± 1.4 years at first operation and 10.8 ± 13.4 years at the second operation. Isolated pathology was present in 11 (34.3%) and multiple pathologies in 21 (65.6%). Abnormalities at first reoperation were right-sided pathology in 18 (56.3%), left-sided pathology in 10 (31%), coronary artery in 3 (9%), mitral valve in 3 (9%), residual ventricular septal defect in 4 (12.5%), and recoarctation in 2 (6.3%). It was the second reoperation in 12 and the third reoperation in 3 patients. RESULTS: The first reoperation included pulmonary artery patch plasty in 18, aortic valve operation in 8 (4 valve replacement, 3 root replacement, and 1 repair), pulmonary valve replacement in 4, coronary artery bypass grafting in 3, and mitral valve repair in 3. Multiple reoperations occurred in 15 patients, comprising right-sided procedures (11), left-sided (2), and other (2). Pulmonary artery reconstruction occurred earlier than neoaortic intervention (5.4 ± 6.8 vs 13.8 ± 7.7 years, p < 0.001). There were 2 early deaths (6.2%); both patients had complex transposition of the great arteries and both were at early reoperation after ASO. Median follow-up was 14.5 years (maximum, 27 years). There were no late deaths. Freedom from reoperation at 1, 5, and 15 years was 88%, 78%, and 41%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The most common indication for reoperation after ASO is right-sided pathology, followed by neoaortic root pathology. Late survival after ASO is excellent and risk of late reoperation is low. Life-long medical surveillance is required.

Driveline infections in left ventricular assist devices: implications for destination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Infection is one of the major limitations to successful long-term support after ventricular assist device implantation. There are limited data specifically examining the incidence and predictors of driveline infections (DLI), with a changing treatment paradigm toward destination therapy (DT) and longer duration of support. METHODS: Between January 2007 and 2011, 143 patients underwent HeartMate II (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) implantation, with 87 (61%) as DT. Driveline maintenance strategy included sterile dressing changes with chlorhexidine and saline application, without prophylactic oral antibiotics. RESULTS: DLI developed in 18 patients (12%) at a median of 182 days (range, 26 to 1,138 days) after implantation, among which 12 (66%) were from the DT cohort. Infections were superficial in 15 (82%) and deep in 3 (18%). Trauma was documented in 6 patients (33%). Seven patients (38%) needed readmission for DLI. Surgical debridement was needed in 3 (17%). All patients were managed successfully, without the need for device explantation or urgent cardiac transplantation. No patient required continuous antibiotic prophylaxis after the infection subsided. Risk factor analysis identified duration of support as the only independent predictor of infection (mean. 600 vs 390 days; p = 0.03). The odds of having a DLI rose by 4% for every month of support. CONCLUSIONS: Longer duration of support significantly increased the risk of DLI and hence increased the risk of DLI in patients with DT. DLI may be successfully managed with antibiotics and local wound care. Most of the infections were superficial, and progression to deep pocket or pump infection is rare in our experience.

Ventricular fibrillation in an ambulatory patient supported by a left ventricular assist device: highlighting the ICD controversy.

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide an effective means of managing advanced pump failure as a means of bridging to cardiac transplantation or as permanent therapy. Although ventricular arrhythmias remain common post-LVAD implantation, such therapy may allow malignant arrhythmias to be tolerated hemodynamically. This report describes the clinical findings in a patient who had likely been in a ventricular tachyarrhythmia for several days and presented in ventricular fibrillation, ambulatory, and mentating normally. This report, with previous similar reports, is additive to the body of evidence that LVADs alter the physiologic impact of ventricular arrhythmias in advanced heart failure and highlights the need for thoughtful programming of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapies in these patients.