Effects of different doses of exercise in adjunct to diet-induced weight loss on the AGE-RAGE axis in patients with short standing type 2 diabetes: Secondary analysis of the DOSE-EX multi-arm, parallel-group, randomised trial.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: These secondary analyses aimed to investigate the effects of different volumes of exercise in adjunct to diet-induced weight loss and standard care on advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) and receptor for AGE (RAGE). We hypothesized that exercise in adjunct to a diet-induced weight loss would dose-dependently increase the soluble decoy receptor for AGE (sRAGE) more than diet-induced weight loss and standard care alone. Secondarily, we expected changes in sRAGE to be associated with improved glycaemic control and inversely associated with low-grade inflammation. METHODS: The DOSE-EX study was a 16-week parallel-group, 4-arm, single-centre, assessor-blinded, randomised, controlled trial (NCT03769883). We included persons living with T2D, duration ≤7 years, BMI >27 kg/m2 and <40 kg/m2, without severe diabetic complications. Participants were randomised (1:1:1:1) to either 1) standard care as control (CON), 2) standard care + diet (DCON), 3) standard care + diet + moderate exercise dose (MED) or 4) standard care + diet + high exercise dose (HED). Standard care included algorithm-guided pharmacological treatment. The diet intervention aimed at 25% reduced energy intake. The supervised exercise sessions included two aerobic sessions + one combined (aerobic and resistance training) session per week for the MED group, and four aerobic sessions + two combined sessions per week for the HED group. Primary outcome was the change in sRAGE from baseline to 16-week follow-up. Secondary outcomes encompassed changes in advanced glycation endproducts (AGE), glycaemic control and markers of low-grade inflammation. RESULTS: A total of 80 participants (CON: n = 20, DCON: n = 19, MED: n = 20, HED: n = 21) were included in this secondary analysis. The mean age was 58.3 years (SD 9.9), 53% males, and median T2D duration was 4.1 years (IQR 2.0-5.5). No change in sRAGE was observed in any of the groups from baseline to follow-up (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: A 16-week intervention with either three or six exercise sessions per week in adjunct to diet-induced weight loss did not change the levels of sRAGE in persons living with well-regulated, short standing T2D.

Impact of high-intensity interval training on cardiac structure and function after COVID-19: an investigator-blinded randomized controlled trial.

A large proportion of patients suffer from a persistent reduction in cardiorespiratory fitness after recovery from COVID-19, of which the effects on the heart may potentially be reversed through the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT). In the present study, we hypothesized that HIIT would increase left ventricular mass (LVM) and improve functional status and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals previously hospitalized for COVID-19. In this investigator-blinded, randomized controlled trial, 12 wk of supervised HIIT (4 × 4 min, three times a week) was compared with standard care (control) in individuals recently discharged from hospital due to COVID-19. LVM was assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI, primary outcome), whereas the pulmonary diffusing capacity (DLCOc, secondary outcome) was examined by the single-breath method. Functional status and HRQoL were assessed by Post-COVID-19 functional scale (PCFS) and King's brief interstitial lung disease (KBILD) questionnaire, respectively. A total of 28 participants were included (age 57 ± 10, 9 females; HIIT: 58 ± 11, 4 females; standard care: 57 ± 9, 5 females), LVM increased in the HIIT vs. standard care group with a between-group difference of 6.8 [mean, 95%CI: 0.8; 12.8] g; P = 0.029. There were no between-group differences in DLCOc or any other lung function metric, which gradually resolved in both groups. Descriptively, PCFS suggested fewer functional limitations in the HIIT group. KBILD improved similarly in the two groups. HIIT is an efficacious exercise intervention for increasing LVM in individuals previously hospitalized for COVID-19.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this randomized clinical trial on individuals previously hospitalized for COVID-19, a 12 wk supervised high-intensity interval training (HIIT) scheme was found to increase left ventricular mass, whereas pulmonary diffusing capacity was unaffected. The findings indicate that HIIT is an efficacious exercise intervention for targeting the heart after COVID-19.