Diversity in randomized clinical trials for peripheral artery disease: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Significant race and sex disparities exist in the prevalence, diagnosis, and outcomes of peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, clinical trials evaluating treatments for PAD often lack representative patient populations. This systematic review aims to summarize the demographic representation and enrollment strategies in clinical trials of lower-extremity endovascular interventions for PAD. METHODS: Following the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we searched multiple sources (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane, Clinicaltrials.gov, WHO clinical trial registry) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RCT protocols, and peer-reviewed journal publications of RCTs conducted between January 2012 and December 2022. Descriptive analysis was used to summarize trial characteristics, publication or study protocol characteristics, and the reporting of demographic characteristics. Meta-regression was used to explore associations between demographic characteristics and certain trial characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 2,374 records were identified. Of these, 59 met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 35 trials, 14 publications, and 10 protocols. Information regarding demographic representation was frequently missing. While all 14 trial publications reported age and sex, only 4 reported race/ethnicity, and none reported socioeconomic or marital status. Additionally, only 4 publications reported clinical outcomes by demographic characteristics. Meta-regression analysis revealed that 6% more women were enrolled in non-European trials (36%) than in European trials (30%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review highlight potential issues that may compromise the reliability and external validity of study findings in lower-extremity PAD RCTs when applied to the real-world population. Addressing these issues is crucial to enhance the generalizability and impact of clinical trial results in the field of PAD, ultimately leading to improved clinical outcomes for patients in underrepresented populations. REGISTRATION: The systematic review methodology was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022378304).

Regular aspirin use among a sample of American Indians/Alaskan Natives in the Upper Midwest region of the United States.

Despite high prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD risk factors among American Indian or Alaska Native adults (AI/AN), there is little information on aspirin use in this population. This survey-based study seeks to understand prevalence of aspirin use in a sample of AI/AN adults in the Upper Midwestern United States. In-person and telephone based surveys were conducted querying self-reported CVD and CVD risk factors, aspirin use, and aspirin related discussion with clinicians. A total of 237 AI/AN participants were included: mean age (SD) was 60.8 (8.4) years; 143 (60 %) were women; 59 (25 %) reported CVD history. CVD risk factors were common particularly smoking (37 %) and diabetes (37 %). Aspirin use was much higher among those with CVD (secondary prevention, 76 %) than those without (primary prevention, 33 %). Primary prevention aspirin use was significantly associated with age and all CVD risk factors in unadjusted analyses. After adjustment for demographics and CVD risk factors, only age (aRR 1.13 per 5 years, 95 % CI 1.02, 1.25) and diabetes (aRR 2.44, 95 % CI 1.52, 3.92) remained significantly associated with aspirin. Regardless of CVD status, a higher proportion of those taking aspirin reported a conversation about aspirin with their doctor compared to those not taking aspirin. Among participants with no CVD, those who had such a conversation were 2.6 times more likely to use aspirin than those who did not have a conversation (aRR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.58, 4.44). The findings of this study emphasize the importance of the patient-provider relationship for preventive therapy.

Hemodynamics, survival and neurological function with early versus delayed automated head-up CPR in a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest.

AIM: To determine if controlled head and thorax elevation, active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), and an impedance threshold device combined, termed automated head-up positioning CPR (AHUP-CPR), should be initiated early, as a basic (BLS) intervention, or later, as an advanced (ALS) intervention, in a severe porcine model of cardiac arrest. METHODS: Yorkshire pigs (n = 22) weighing ∼40 kg were anesthetized and ventilated. After 15 minutes of untreated ventricular fibrillation, pigs were randomized to AHUP-CPR for 25 minutes (BLS group) or conventional CPR for 10 minutes, followed by 15 minutes of AHUP-CPR (ALS group). Thereafter, epinephrine, amiodarone, and defibrillation were administered. Neurologic function, the primary endpoint, was assessed 24-hours later with a Neurological Deficit Score (NDS, 0 = normal and 260 = worst deficit score or death). Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), cumulative survival, hemodynamics and epinephrine responsivity. Data, expressed as mean ± standard deviation, were compared using Fisher's Exact, log-rank, Mann-Whitney U and unpaired t-tests. RESULTS: ROSC was achieved in 10/11 pigs with early AHUP-CPR versus 6/11 with delayed AHUP-CPR (p = 0.14), and cumulative 24-hour survival was 45.5% versus 9.1%, respectively (p < 0.02). The NDS was 203 ± 80 with early AHUP-CPR versus 259 ± 3 with delayed AHUP-CPR (p = 0.035). ETCO2, rSO2, and responsiveness to epinephrine were significantly higher in the early versus delayed AHUP-CPR. CONCLUSION: When delivered early rather than late, AHUP-CPR resulted in significantly increased hemodynamics, 24-hour survival, and improved neurological function in pigs after prolonged cardiac arrest. Based on these findings, AHUP-CPR should be considered a BLS intervention.

Diversity in clinical trial inclusion for peripheral artery disease lower extremity endovascular interventions: a systematic review protocol.

Aim: This review provides a study protocol for a systematic review of peripheral artery disease (PAD) clinical trials to examine the eligibility criteria, demographic representation, and enrollment strategies among PAD patients undergoing lower extremity (LE) endovascular interventions. Methods: This systematic review will be conducted according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology for systematic reviews and following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P). Eligible studies will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between January 2012 and December 2022. The primary outcome will be a description and summary of the frequency of the reporting of demographic characteristics. The feasibility of a meta-analysis or meta-regression will be explored, but if determined to be infeasible, the Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) reporting guideline will be followed for the reporting of findings. Discussion: The findings may help to quantify existing inequities in clinical trial participation that may be addressed through optimizing enrollment strategies for future PAD trials. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO (CRD42022378304).

Effect of beta-blocker therapy on weight loss outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy & Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Patients taking beta-blockers (BBs) commonly experience weight gain. There is limited research exploring how BBs impact weight loss after bariatric surgery. OBJECTIVES: We examined how BBs impact 12-month weight loss in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). SETTING: Large midwest health system. METHODS: We reviewed health records of SG and RYGB patients (2011-2022) and categorized them by BB usage (none, pre-, post-, or pre- and postoperative). Multivariable linear regression models examined the relation between BB use, percent total body weight loss (%TBWL), and percent excess body mass index lost (%EBMIL). RESULTS: A total of 889 individuals (SG, n = 485; RYGB, n = 404) had complete data. RYGB led to greater %TBWL compared to SG (31% versus 26%, P < .01) and greater %EBMIL (79% versus 64%, P < .01). BB status did not significantly affect 12-month %TBWL or %EBMIL. CONCLUSIONS: BB use may not significantly affect weight loss 12 months after bariatric surgery. This finding could enable physicians to prescribe BBs for improved blood pressure control in bariatric surgery patients with less concern of blunting weight loss. Longer term follow-up with a larger sample size would be an important next step to better characterize the relationship between BB usage and bariatric surgery.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia: A National Perspective.

Background Recent guidelines have emphasized the use of medical management, early diagnosis, and a multidisciplinary team to effectively treat patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). Previous literature briefly highlighted the current racial disparities in its intervention. Herein, we analyze the trend over a 14-year time period to investigate whether the disparities gap in CLI management is closing. Methods and Results The National Inpatient Sample was queried between 2005 and 2018 for hospitalizations involving CLI. Nontraumatic amputations and revascularization were identified. Utilization trends of these procedures were compared between races (White, Black, Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, Native American, and Other). Multivariable regression assessed differences in race regarding procedure usage. There were 6 904 562 admissions involving CLI in the 14-year study period. The rate of admissions in White patients who received any revascularization decreased by 0.23% (P<0.001) and decreased by 0.25% (P=0.025) for Asian and Pacific Islander patients. Among all patients, the annual rate of admission in White patients who received any amputation increased by 0.21% (P<0.001), increased by 0.19% (P=0.001) for Hispanic patients, and increased by 0.19% (P=0.012) for the Other race patients. Admissions involving Black, Hispanic, Asian and Pacific Islander, or Other race patients had higher odds of receiving any revascularization compared with White patients. All races had higher odds of receiving major amputation compared with White patients. Conclusions Our analysis highlights disparities in CLI treatment in our nationally representative sample. Non-White patients are more likely to receive invasive treatments, including major amputations and revascularization for CLI, compared with White patients.

What interventions keep older people out of nursing homes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Nursing home admission remains a central outcome in many healthcare systems and community-based programs. The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions in preventing nursing home admission for adults aged 65 years or older. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were all last searched in March 2022 to identify up-to-date eligible studies for the meta-analysis. Two reviewers screened each abstract independently. In instances where reviewers disagreed as to inclusion, all reviewers convened to review the Abstract to come to a consensus decision regarding inclusion. Two reviewers independently collected data from each report. Disagreements were resolved using group consensus. The first author reviewed the narrative descriptions of intervention components to create a categorization scheme for the various interventions evaluated in selected studies. These categorizations were reviewed with the co-authors (second-fifth) and collapsed to create the final classification of intervention type. Study risk of bias was assessed using an instrument developed based on Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality (AHRQ) guidance. Differences between the percentages of participants in treatment versus control arms was the outcome of interest. RESULTS: Two-hundred and eighty-three studies with a total of 203,735 older persons were included in the meta-analysis. Specialty geriatrics care (OR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.60-0.99), multicomponent interventions (OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.67-0.99), and cognitive stimulation (OR = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.38-0.96) were associated with less frequent nursing home admission. Home-based and inpatient/discharge management interventions approached statistical significance but were not associated with reduced institutionalization. CONCLUSIONS: Even in the face of complex care needs, older adults wish to live at home. Effectively disseminating and implementing geriatric care principles across healthcare encounters could achieve a highly valued and preferred outcome in older adulthood: aging in place.

Performance of Computed Tomographic Angiography-Based Aortic Valve Area for Assessment of Aortic Stenosis.

Background A total of 40% of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) have low-gradient AS, raising uncertainty about AS severity. Aortic valve calcification, measured by computed tomography (CT), is guideline-endorsed to aid in such cases. The performance of different CT-derived aortic valve areas (AVAs) is less well studied. Methods and Results Consecutive adult patients with presumed moderate and severe AS based on echocardiography (AVA measured by continuity equation on echocardiography <1.5 cm2) who underwent cardiac CT were identified retrospectively. AVAs, measured by direct planimetry on CT (AVACT) and by a hybrid approach (AVA measured in a hybrid manner with echocardiography and CT [AVAHybrid]), were measured. Sex-specific aortic valve calcification thresholds (≥1200 Agatston units in women and ≥2000 Agatston units in men) were applied to adjudicate severe or nonsevere AS. A total of 215 patients (38.0% women; mean±SD age, 78±8 years) were included: normal flow, 59.5%; and low flow, 40.5%. Among the different thresholds for AVACT and AVAHybrid, diagnostic performance was the best for AVACT <1.2 cm2 (sensitivity, 85%; specificity, 26%; and accuracy, 72%), with no significant difference by flow status. The percentage of patients with correctly classified AS severity (correctly classified severe AS+correctly classified moderate AS) was as follows; AVA measured by continuity equation on echocardiography <1.0 cm2, 77%; AVACT <1.2 cm2, 73%; AVACT <1.0 cm2, 58%; AVAHybrid <1.2 cm2, 59%; and AVAHybrid <1.0 cm2, 45%. AVACT cut points of 1.52 cm2 for normal flow and 1.56 cm2 for low flow, provided 95% specificity for excluding severe AS. Conclusions CT-derived AVAs have poor discrimination for AS severity. Using an AVACT <1.2-cm2 threshold to define severe AS can produce significant error. Larger AVACT thresholds improve specificity.

Agreement of Proximal Thoracic Aorta Size by Two-Dimensional Transthoracic Echocardiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography.

There is currently a lack of uniformity in methods of aortic diameter measurements across different imaging modalities. In this study, we sought to evaluate the accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in comparison with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) for the measurement of proximal thoracic aorta diameters. This is a retrospective analysis of 121 adult patients at our institution who had TTE and electrocardiogram  (ECG)-gated MRA performed within 90 days of each other between 2013 and 2020. Measurements were made at the level of sinuses of Valsalva (SoV), sinotubular junction (STJ), and ascending aorta (AA) using leading edge-to-leading edge (LE) convention for TTE and inner-edge-to-inner-edge (IE) convention for MRA. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman methods. Intra- and interobserver variability were assessed by intraclass correlation. The average age of patients in the cohort was 62 years, and 69% of patients were male. The prevalence of hypertension, obstructive coronary artery disease, and diabetes was 66%, 20%, and 11%, respectively. The mean aortic diameter by TTE was SoV 3.8 ± 0.5 cm, STJ 3.5 ± 0.4 cm, and AA 4.1 ± 0.6 cm. The TTE-derived measurements were larger than the MRA ones by 0.2 ± 2 mm, 0.8 ± 2 mm, and 0.4 ± 3 mm at the level of SoV, STJ, and AA, respectively, but the differences were not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in the aorta measurements by TTE compared with MRA, when stratified by gender. In conclusion, transthoracic echocardiogram-derived proximal aorta measurements are comparable to MRA measurements. Our study validates current recommendations that TTE is an acceptable modality for screening and serial imaging of the proximal aorta.

Head and thorax elevation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using circulatory adjuncts is associated with improved survival.

BACKGROUND: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains poor. A physiologically distinct cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) strategy consisting of (1) active compression-decompression CPR and/or automated CPR, (2) an impedance threshold device, and (3) automated controlled elevation of the head and thorax (ACE) has been shown to improve neurological survival significantly versus conventional (C) CPR in animal models. This resuscitation device combination, termed ACE-CPR, is now used clinically. OBJECTIVES: To assess the probability of OHCA survival to hospital discharge after ACE-CPR versus C-CPR. METHODS: As part of a prospective registry study, 227 ACE-CPR OHCA patients were enrolled 04/2019-07/2020 from 6 pre-hospital systems in the United States. Individual C-CPR patient data (n = 5196) were obtained from three large published OHCA randomized controlled trials from high-performing pre-hospital systems. The primary study outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Secondary endpoints included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and favorable neurological survival. Propensity-score matching with a 1:4 ratio was performed to account for imbalances in baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Irrespective of initial rhythm, ACE-CPR (n = 222) was associated with higher adjusted odds ratios (OR) of survival to hospital discharge relative to C-CPR (n = 860), when initiated in <11 min (3.28, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.55-6.92) and < 18 min (1.88, 95 % CI, 1.03-3.44) after the emergency call, respectively. Rapid use of ACE-CPR was also associated with higher probabilities of ROSC and favorable neurological survival. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with C-CPR controls, rapid initiation of ACE-CPR was associated with a higher likelihood of survival to hospital discharge after OHCA.

Hypotension on cardiopulmonary stress test predicts 90 day mortality after LVAD implantation in INTERMACS 3-6 patients.

AIMS: Cardiopulmonary stress test (CPX) is routinely performed when evaluating patient candidacy for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The predictive value of hypotensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) response during CPX on clinical outcomes is unknown. This study aims to determine the effect of hypotensive SBP response during to clinical outcomes among patients who underwent LVAD implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective single center study enrolling consecutive patients implanted with a continuous flow LVAD between 2011 and 2022. Hypotensive SBP response was defined as peak exercise SBP below the resting value. Multivariable Cox-regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between hypotensive SBP response and all-cause mortality within 30 and 90 days of LVAD implantation. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients implanted with a HeartMate III (HM III) device. Four hundred thirty-two patients underwent LVAD implantation during the pre-defined period and 156 with INTERMACS profiles 3-6 met our inclusion criteria. The median age was 63 years (IQR 54-69), and 52% had ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Hypotensive SBP response was present in 35% of patients and was associated with increased 90 day all-cause mortality (unadjusted HR 9.16, 95% CI 1.98-42; P = 0.0046). Hazard ratio remained significant after adjusting for age, INTERMACS profile, serum creatinine, and total bilirubin. Findings were similar in the HM III subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Hypotensive SBP response on pre-LVAD CPX is associated with increased perioperative and 90 day mortality after LVAD implantation. Additional studies are needed to determine the mechanism of increased mortality observed.

Inappropriate sinus tachycardia: an examination of existing definitions.

AIMS: Inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is a syndrome characterized by an elevated sinus rate unassociated with known physiological, pathological, or pharmacological causes. Despite published consensus documents, IST definitions appear to vary in the literature. In this study, we reviewed IST publications to evaluate IST definition variability and ascertain the degree to which consensus definitions are being adopted. METHODS AND RESULTS: English-language articles in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Google Scholar published from 1 January 1970 to 1 June 2021 with the title terms 'inappropriate sinus tachycardia,' 'non-paroxysmal sinus tachycardia,' or 'permanent sinus tachycardia' were searched. In each, the IST definition used, qualifying characteristics, and publications cited to support each definition were recorded. We identified 138 publications meeting the search criteria. Inappropriate sinus tachycardia definitions were provided in 114 of 138 articles (83%). A majority of definitions (92/114, 81%) used distinct heart rate (HR) thresholds. Among these, the most common threshold was ≥100 beats per minute (BPM) (75/92, 82%), mainly measured at rest (54/92, 59%). Most definitions (47/92, 51%) included a second criterion to qualify for IST; these were most often an HR threshold of 90 BPM measured over 24 h by ambulatory electrocardiogram (37/47, 79%). Diagnosis of exclusion was a common criterion (75/92, 82%) but symptom status was not (41/92, 45%). The 2015 Heart Rhythm Society IST consensus was commonly cited but adopted in only 37% of definitions published after 2015. CONCLUSIONS: Inappropriate sinus tachycardia definitions in current literature are inconsistent, and professional society consensus IST definitions have, to date, had limited impact.

Baroreflex activation therapy with the Barostim™ device in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a patient level meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

AIMS: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains associated with high morbidity and mortality, poor quality of life (QoL) and significant exercise limitation. Sympatho-vagal imbalance has been shown to predict adverse prognosis and symptoms in HFrEF, yet it has not been specifically targeted by any guideline-recommended device therapy to date. Barostim™, which directly addresses this imbalance, is the first Food and Drug Administration approved neuromodulation technology for HFrEF. We aimed to analyse all randomized trial evidence to evaluate the effect of baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) on heart failure symptoms, QoL and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in HFrEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was performed on all eligible trials that randomized HFrEF patients to BAT + guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) or GDMT alone (open label). Endpoints included 6-month changes in 6-min hall walk (6MHW) distance, Minnesota Living With Heart Failure (MLWHF) QoL score, NT-proBNP, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in all patients and three subgroups. A total of 554 randomized patients were included. In all patients, BAT provided significant improvement in 6MHW distance of 49 m (95% confidence interval [CI] 33, 64), MLWHF QoL of -13 points (95% CI -17, -10), and 3.4 higher odds of improving at least one NYHA class (95% CI 2.3, 4.9) when comparing from baseline to 6 months. These improvements were similar, or better, in patients who had baseline NT-proBNP <1600 pg/ml, regardless of the cardiac resynchronization therapy indication status. CONCLUSION: An IPD meta-analysis suggests that BAT improves exercise capacity, NYHA class, and QoL in HFrEF patients receiving GDMT. These clinically meaningful improvements were consistent across the range of patients studies. BAT was also associated with an improvement in NT-proBNP in subjects with a lower baseline NT-proBNP.

Association of a Community Population and Clinic Education Intervention Program With Guideline-Based Aspirin Use for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Low-dose aspirin is used for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in approximately one-third of the US adult population. Overuse and underuse are common and not concordant with guidelines. Objective: To test a community and clinic education intervention to improve guideline-based aspirin use for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Ask About Aspirin project was a nonrandomized controlled trial conducted from, July 1, 2015, to March 31, 2020, using professional education, traditional media, and digital media to improve guideline-based aspirin use. The adult population (aged 45-79 years for men and 55-79 years for women) and primary care clinics in Minnesota were the education targets. The 4 adjacent states were controls. Interventions: The statewide campaign distributed billboards, newspaper articles and other print material, and radio announcements. An Ask About Aspirin website was heavily promoted. Primary care clinics identified appropriate aspirin candidates, and clinicians received continuing education about aspirin. Main Outcomes and Measures: Guideline-based aspirin use by the target population. Results: Cross-sectional random telephone surveys of 8342 men aged 45 to 79 years and women aged 55 to 79 years were conducted at baseline, 2 years, and 4 years after the intervention. Participation was similar between men and women (baseline: 973 [49%] vs 1001 [51%]; year 4: 912 [50%] vs 930 [50%]). Age during the study also was similar (baseline: 64.7 [IQR, 64.4-65.1] years; year 4: 66.2 [IQR, 65.8-66.5] years). A validated questionnaire evaluated aspirin use. The Ask About Aspirin website had more than 1 million visits; 124 primary care clinics with more than 1000 participating clinicians were part of the education program. Small, nonsignificant increases in discussions with clinicians regarding aspirin resulted (baseline: 341 of 1001 [34%]; year 4: 339 of 930 [36%]; P = .27). Overall aspirin use decreased after the release of new US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines in 2016 and 3 aspirin randomized clinical trials in 2018 suggested reduced aspirin use (baseline: 816 of 1974 [41%]; year 4: 629 of 1842 [34%]; P < .001). Decreases were also noted from year 2 to year 4 in appropriate use (year 2: 597 of 1208 [49%]; year 4: 478 of 1191 [40%]; P < .001) and overuse (year 2: 170 of 602 [28%]; year 4: 151 of 651 [23%]; P = .04). There were no significant differences between Minnesota and the control states. Conclusions and Relevance: In this nonrandomized controlled trial, a multiyear statewide campaign was not associated with increased appropriate aspirin use for cardiovascular disease prevention. Contextual factors during the project, including guideline changes and media controversy following the new trials, undermined study goals. These findings suggest that although education programs using social media for cardiovascular disease prevention can result in millions of hits, the use of this strategy to encourage behavior change is problematic, even with supportive clinical sites. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02607917.

Mortality in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the Modern Era: Early Insights From the Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry.

Background Current mortality data for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in the United States are based on registries that enrolled patients prior to 2010. We sought to determine mortality in PAH in the modern era using the PHAR (Pulmonary Hypertension Association Registry). Methods and Results We identified all adult patients with PAH enrolled in the PHAR between September 2015 and September 2020 (N=935). We used Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models to assess mortality at 1, 2, and 3 years. Patients were stratified based on disease severity by 3 validated risk scores. In treatment-naïve patients, we compared survival based on initial treatment strategy. The median age was 56 years (44-68 years), and 76% were women. Of the 935 patients, 483 (52%) were ≤6 months from PAH diagnosis. There were 121 deaths (12.9%) during a median follow-up time of 489 days (281-812 days). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year mortality was 8% (95% CI, 6%-10%), 16% (95% CI, 13%-19%), and 21% (95% CI, 17%-25%), respectively. When stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk PAH, the mortality at 1, 2, and 3 years was 1%, 4% to 6%, and 7% to 11% for low risk; 7% to 8%, 11% to 16%, and 18% to 20% for intermediate risk; and 12% to 19%, 22% to 38%, and 28% to 55% for high risk, respectively. In treatment-naïve patients, initial combination therapy was associated with better 1-year survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.19-0.95]; P=0.037). Conclusions Mortality in the intermediate- and high-risk patients with PAH remains unacceptably high in the PHAR, suggesting the importance for early diagnosis, aggressive use of available therapies, and the need for better therapeutics.

Association of Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors With Sociodemographic Characteristics and Health Beliefs Among a Community-Based Sample of African American Adults in Minnesota.

OBJECTIVE: To assess cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CVD risk factors and their association with sociodemographic characteristics and health beliefs among African American (AA) adults in Minnesota. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted of a community-based sample of AA adults enrolled in the Minnesota Heart Health Program Ask About Aspirin study from May 2019 to September 2019. Sociodemographic characteristics, health beliefs, and self-reported CVD and CVD risk factors were collected. Prevalence ratio (PR) estimates were calculated using Poisson regression modeling to assess the association between participants' characteristics and age- and sex-adjusted CVD risk factors. RESULTS: The sample included 644 individuals (64% [412] women) with a mean age of 61 years. Risk factors for CVD were common: hypertension (67% [434]), hyperlipidemia (47% [301]), diabetes (34% [219]), and current cigarette smoking (25% [163]); 19% (119) had CVD. Those with greater perceived CVD risk had a higher likelihood of prevalent hyperlipidemia (PR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.57), diabetes (PR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.30 to 1.98), and CVD (PR 1.61; 95% CI, 1.16 to 2.23) compared with those with lower perceived risk. Trust in health care provider was high (83% [535]) but was not associated with CVD or CVD risk factors. CONCLUSION: In this community sample of AAs in Minnesota, CVD risk factors were high, as was trust in health care providers. Those with greater CVD risk perceptions had higher CVD prevalence. Consideration of sociodemographic and psychosocial influences on CVD and CVD risk factors could inform development of effective cardiovascular health promotion interventions in the AA Minnesota community.

Axillary or Subclavian Impella 5.0 Support in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

data around survival and adverse events of cardiogenic shock (CS) patients supported with axillary or subclavian artery 5.0 Impella are presently unavailable. We performed a systematic search of studies reporting the outcomes of axillary or subclavian access 5.0 Impella for refractory CS in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was 30-day survival. Secondary outcomes included survival to next therapy and adverse events on support. Proportional meta-analysis was used to pool across studies. Of the 795 potential studies identified, 13 studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 256 patients). The average age of patients across studies was 56 ± 5 years. Thirty-day survival for the overall cohort was 66% (95% CI: 59-73). Survival to the next therapy was 68% (95% CI: 60-76). The occurrence of adverse events over an average of 13 (95% CI: 12-14) days of support was the following: stroke 5.9%, hemolysis 27%, pump thrombosis 4.4%, limb ischemia 0.1%, major bleeding 5.4%, device malfunction 10.6%, exchange 6.6%, and infection 14%. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we report survival and adverse event rates of axillary or subclavian access 5.0 Impella for CS. Such summary data can inform clinician decision-making.

Faster time to automated elevation of the head and thorax during cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases the probability of return of spontaneous circulation.

OBJECTIVES: Resuscitation in the Head Up position improves outcomes in animals treated with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an impedance threshold device (ACD + ITD CPR).We assessed impact of time to deployment of an automated Head Up position (AHUP) based bundle of care after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). METHODS: Observational data were analyzed from a patient registry. Patients received treatment with 1) ACD + and/or automated CPR 2) an ITD and 3) an AHUP device. Probability of ROSC (ROSCprob) from the 9-1-1 call to AHUP device placement was assessed with a restricted cubic spline model and linear regression. RESULTS: Of 11 sites, 6 recorded the interval from 9-1-1 to AHUP device (n = 227). ROSCprobfor all rhythms was 34%(77/227). Median age (range) was 66 years (19-101) and 68% men. TheROSCprobfor shockable rhythms was 47%(18/38). Minutes from 9-1-1 to AHUP device (median, range) varied between sites: 1) 6.4(4,15), 2) 8.0(5,19), 3) 9.9(4, 12), 4) 14.1(6, 36), 5) 15.9(6, 34), 6) 19.0(8, 38),(p = 0.0001).ROSCprobalso varied; 1) 55.1%(16/29), 2) 60%(3/5), 3) 50%(3/6), 4) 22.7%(17/75), 5) 26.4%(9/34), and 6) 37.1%(29/78), (p = 0.019). For all rhythms between 4 and 12 min (n = 85),ROSCprobdeclined 5.6% for every minute elapsed (p = 0.024). For shockable rhythms, between 6 and 15 min (n = 23),ROSCprobdeclined 9.0% for every minute elapsed (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Faster time to deployment of an AHUP based bundle of care is associated with higher incidence of ROSC. This must be considered when evaluating and implementing this bundle.