Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
2.
BMJ Open ; 9(3): e026209, 2019 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30826769

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery are frequently criticised because surgeon expertise and standards of surgery are not considered or accounted for during study design. This is particularly true in pragmatic trials (which typically involve multiple centres and surgeons and are based in 'real world' settings), compared with explanatory trials (which are smaller and more tightly controlled). OBJECTIVE: This protocol describes a process to develop and test quality assurance (QA) measures for use within a predominantly pragmatic surgical RCT comparing minimally invasive and open techniques for oesophageal cancer (the NIHR ROMIO study). It builds on methods initiated in the ROMIO pilot RCT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We have identified three distinct types of QA measure: (i) entry criteria for surgeons, through assessment of operative videos, (ii) standardisation of operative techniques (by establishing minimum key procedural phases) and (iii) monitoring of surgeons during the trial, using intraoperative photography to document key procedural phases and standardising the pathological assessment of specimens. The QA measures will be adapted from the pilot study and tested iteratively, and the video and photo assessment tools will be tested for reliability and validity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained (NRES Committee South West-Frenchay, 25 April 2016, ref: 16/SW/0098). Results of the QA development study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN59036820, ISRCTN10386621.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , General Surgery/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/standards , Humans
3.
Endoscopy ; 49(2): 121-129, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28103621

ABSTRACT

Background and study aims Acetic acid chromoendoscopy (AAC) enhances the ability to correctly identify Barrett's neoplasia, and is increasingly used by both expert and nonexpert endoscopists. Despite its increasing use, there is no validated training strategy to achieve competence. The aims of our study were to develop a validated training tool in AAC-assisted lesion recognition, to assess endoscopists' baseline knowledge of AAC-assisted lesion recognition, and to evaluate the efficacy and impact of this training tool. Methods A validated assessment of 40 images and 20 videos was developed. A total of 13 endoscopists with experience of Barrett's endoscopy but no formal training in AAC were recruited to the study. Participants underwent: baseline assessment 1, online training, assessment 2, interactive seminar, assessment 3. Results Baseline assessment demonstrated a sensitivity of 83 % and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 83 %. The online training intervention significantly improved sensitivity to 95 % and NPV to 94 % (P < 0.01). Further improvement was seen after a 1-day interactive seminar including live cases, with sensitivity increasing to 98 % and NPV to 97 %. Conclusions The data demonstrate the need for training in AAC-assisted lesion recognition as baseline performance, even by Barrett's experts, was poor. The online training and testing tool for AAC for Barrett's neoplasia was successfully developed and validated. The training intervention improved performance of endoscopists to meet ASGE PIVI standards. The training tool increases the endoscopist's degree of confidence in the use of AAC. The training tool also leads to shift in attitudes of endoscopists from Seattle protocol towards AAC-guided biopsy protocol for Barrett's surveillance.


Subject(s)
Acetic Acid/administration & dosage , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophagoscopy/education , Esophagoscopy/standards , Indicators and Reagents/administration & dosage , Biopsy/methods , Clinical Competence , Esophagoscopy/methods , Humans , Program Development
4.
Surg Endosc ; 29(2): 417-24, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25007975

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The uptake of minimally invasive oesophagectomy (MIO) in the UK has increased dramatically in recent years. Post-oesophagectomy diaphragmatic hernias (PODHs) are rare, but may be influenced by the type of approach to resection. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of symptomatic PODH following open and MIO in a UK specialist centre. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing oesophagectomy for malignant disease between 1996 and 2012 were included. A standardised, radical approach to the abdominal phase was employed, irrespective of the type of procedure undertaken. Patient demographics, details of surgery and post-operative complications were collected from patient records and a prospective database. RESULTS: A total of 273 oesophagectomies were performed (205 open; 68 MIO). There were 62 hybrid MIOs (laparoscopic abdomen and thoracotomy) and six total MIOs. Seven patients required conversion and were analysed as part of the open cohort. Nine patients (13.2 %) developed a PODH in the MIO cohort compared with two patients (1.0 %) in the open cohort, (p < 0.001). Five patients developed hernias in the early post-operative period (days 2-10): all following MIO. Both PODHs in the open cohort occurred following transhiatal oesophagectomy. All PODHs were symptomatic and required surgical repair. CT thorax confirmed the diagnosis in 10 patients. Seven hernias were repaired laparoscopically, including two cases in the early post-operative period. PODHs were repaired using the following techniques: suture (n = 6), mesh reinforcement (n = 4) and omentopexy to the anterior abdominal wall without hiatal closure (n = 1). There were two recurrences (18 %). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of symptomatic PODH may be higher following MIO compared to open surgery. The reasons for this are unclear and may not be completely explained by the reduction in adhesion formation. Strategies such as fixation of the conduit to the diaphragm and omentopexy to the abdominal wall may reduce the incidence of herniation.


Subject(s)
Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/etiology , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications , Thoracotomy/adverse effects , Aged , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/methods , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/diagnosis , Hernia, Diaphragmatic/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , United Kingdom/epidemiology
6.
J Med Case Rep ; 2: 314, 2008 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18826596

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Juvenile polyposis syndrome(JPS) is a rare autosomal dominant inherited condition. Hamartomatous polyps can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract but usually predominate in the colon. In this case report we present an unusual case of JPS that presented with massive gastric polyposis requiring a total gastrectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 51-year-old man presented with symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroscopy showed massive gastric polyposis with a large antral polyp that had prolapsed through the pylorus causing gastric outlet obstruction. Initially endoscopic polypectomy was performed, but due to progressive symptoms a total gastrectomy was then performed. Histology confirmed massive gastric juvenile polyposis. CONCLUSION: Massive gastric polyposis is an uncommon manifestation of juvenile polyposis syndrome. This case illustrates important principles in managing this condition.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...