Germline Genetic Testing Among Women ≤ 45 Years of Age with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Versus Invasive Breast Cancer in a Large Integrated Health Care System.

BACKGROUND: We compared the results of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients ≤ 45 years of age diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) versus invasive breast cancer (IBC) in a large integrated health care system. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of hereditary cancer gene testing among women ≤ 45 years of age diagnosed with DCIS or IBC at Kaiser Permanente Northern California between September 2019 and August 2020 was performed. During the study period, institutional guidelines recommended the above population be referred to genetic counselors for pretesting counseling and testing. RESULTS: A total of 61 DCIS and 485 IBC patients were identified. Genetic counselors met with 95% of both groups, and 86.4% of DCIS patients and 93.9% of IBC patients (p = 0.0339) underwent gene testing. Testing differed by race/ethnicity (p = 0.0372). Among those tested, 11.76% (n = 6) of DCIS patients and 16.71% (n = 72) of IBC patients had a pathogenic variant (PV) or likely pathogenic variant (LPV) based on the 36-gene panel (p = 0.3650). Similar trends were seen in 13 breast cancer (BC)-related genes (p = 0.0553). Family history of cancer was significantly associated with both BC-related and non-BC-related PVs in IBC, but not DCIS. CONCLUSION: In our study, 95% of patients were seen by a genetic counselor when age was used as an eligibility criterion for referral. While larger studies are needed to further compare the prevalence of PVs/LPVs among DCIS and IBC patients, our data suggest that even in younger patients, the prevalence of PVs/LPVs in BC-related genes is lower in DCIS patients.

Survival of Elderly Patients Undergoing Pancreatoduodenectomy in an Integrated Health System.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to examine pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) perioperative outcomes and consider how age may be related to overall survival in an integrated health system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of 309 patients who underwent PD between December 2008 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: aged 75 y or less and more than 75 y, defined as senior surgical patients. Univariate and multivariable analyses of predictive clinicopathologic factors associated with overall survival at 5 y were performed. RESULTS: In both groups, the majority underwent PD for malignant disease. The proportion of senior surgical patients alive at 5 y was 33.3% compared to 53.6% of younger patients (P = 0.003). There were also statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to body mass index, cancer antigen 19-9, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Charlson comorbidity index. On multivariable analysis, disease type, cancer antigen 19-9, hemoglobin A1c, length of surgery, length of stay, Charlson comorbidity index, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status were found to be statistically significant factors for overall survival. Age was not significantly related to overall survival on multivariable logistic regression and when the analysis was limited to pancreatic cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the difference in overall survival between patients aged less than and more than 75 years was significant, age was not an independent risk factor for overall survival on multivariable analysis. Rather than a patient's chronological age, his/her physiologic age including medical comorbidities and functional status may be more correlated to overall survival.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy: A Large Integrated Health Care System's Approach and Outcomes.

Introduction Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) may not be as effective in the community compared with clinical trials. Methods The authors reviewed data from the electronic health records of patients who received IORT between February 2014 and February 2020 at a single center within a large integrated health care system. The primary outcome was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. Results Of 5731 potentially eligible patients, 245 (4.3%) underwent IORT (mean age: 65.4 ± 0.4 years; median follow-up time: 3.5 years ± 2.2 months). According to the American Society for Radiation Oncology's accelerated partial breast irradiation guidelines based on final pathology, 51% of patients were suitable candidates for IORT, 38.4% were cautionary, and 10.6% were unsuitable. For adjuvant therapy, 6.5% had consolidative whole breast irradiation, and 66.4% received endocrine treatment. At the median follow-up time of 3.5 years, overall ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was 3.7%. Recurrences tended to be more frequent in patients who refused or did not complete endocrine treatment than in those who received it (7.4% vs 1.9%, p = 0.07). The complication rate was 14.7%, with seroma being the most common (8.2%). Discussion The IORT ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rate of 3.7% confirms a higher-than-expected rate compared to randomized clinical trials, possibly due to less compliance with endocrine therapy. Conclusion The authors subsequently revised their IORT protocol to require endocrine treatment as a part of the IORT treatment plan and to strongly recommend adjuvant whole breast irradiation for all patients deemed cautionary or unsuitable for IORT according to the American Society for Radiation Oncology's accelerated partial breast irradiation guidelines.

Racial Disparities Among Trauma Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: Given the disparate effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on people of color, we hypothesized that patients of color experienced a disproportionate increase in trauma during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We compared trauma patients arriving in the 3 y before our statewide stay-at-home mandate on March 20, 2020 (PRE) to those arriving in the year afterward (POST). In addition to race/ethnicity, we assessed patient demographics and other clinical variables. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney U tests were used for univariate analyses. A multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess for associations with mortality. RESULTS: During the study period, 8583 patients were included in the PRE group and 2883 were included in the POST group. There were increases in penetrating trauma (PRE 14.7%, POST 23.1%; P < 0.001) and mortality rates (PRE 3.20%, POST 4.60%; P < 0.001). From PRE to POST, the percentage of Black patients increased from 35.0% to 38.3% (P = 0.01) and the percentage of Hispanic patients increased from 19.2% to 23.0% (P < 0.001). After a multivariable analysis, Asian patients experienced an independent increase in mortality from PRE to POST (odds ratio 2.00, 95% confidence interval 1.13-3.54, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Penetrating trauma and mortality rates increased during the pandemic. There was a simultaneous increase in the percentage of Black and Hispanic trauma patients. Asian patient mortality increased significantly after the start of the pandemic independent of other variables. Identifying racial/ethnic disparities is the first step in finding ways to improve dissimilar outcomes.

A step-up approach to management of complex bronchopleural fistula.

Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) is a sinus tract between a mainstem, lobar or segmental bronchus and the pleural space. We present a 68-year-old male with a 13 mm spiculated left lower lobe nodule who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery left lower lobe wedge resection followed by persistent BPF requiring open window thoracostomy. We present a step-up approach to management of persistent BPF with discussion of conservative, operative and reconstructive techniques for closure.

An Epidemic Within the Pandemic: The Rising Tide of Trauma During COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: In the age of COVID-19 and enforced social distancing, changes in patterns of trauma were observed but poorly understood. Our aim was to characterize traumatic injury mechanisms and acuities in 2020 and compare them with previous years at our level I trauma center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with trauma triaged in 2016 through 2020 from January to May were reviewed. Patient demographics, level of activation (1 versus 2), injury severity score, and mechanism of injury were collected. Data from 2016 through 2019 were combined, averaged by month, and compared with data from 2020 using chi-squared analysis. RESULTS: During the months of interest, 992 patients with trauma were triaged in 2020 and 4311 in 2016-2019. The numbers of penetrating and level I trauma activations in January-March of 2020 were similar to average numbers for the same months during 2016 through 2019. In April 2020, there was a significant increase in the incidence of penetrating trauma compared with the prior 4-year average (27% versus 16%, P < 0.002). Level I trauma activations in April 2020 also increased, rising from 17% in 2016 through 2019 to 32% in 2020 (P < 0.003). These findings persisted through May 2020 with similarly significant increases in penetrating and high-level trauma. CONCLUSIONS: In the months after the initial spread of COVID-19, there was a perceptible shift in patterns of trauma. The significant increase in penetrating and high-acuity trauma may implicate a change in population dynamics, demanding a need for thoughtful resource allocation at trauma centers nationwide in the context of a global pandemic.

High Compliance With Choosing Wisely Breast Surgical Guidelines at a Safety-Net Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Professional organizations recently set guidelines for avoiding surgeries of low utility and overutilization for the Choosing Wisely campaign. These include re-excision for invasive cancer close to margins, double mastectomy in patients with unilateral breast cancer, axillary lymph node dissection in patients with limited nodal disease, and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in patients ≥70 years with early-stage breast cancer. Variable adherence to these recommendations led us to evaluate implementation rates of low-value surgical guidelines at a safety-net hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2015 to 2020. Each patient was assessed for eligibility for omission of the listed surgeries. Trends were evaluated by cohorts before and after a fellowship-trained breast surgeon joined the faculty in 2018. Outcomes were compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Among 195 patients, none underwent re-excision for close margins of invasive cancer. Only 6.7% of patients (3/45) received contralateral mastectomy and 1.8% of eligible patients (3/169) received axillary lymph node dissection. Overall, 60% of patients ≥ 70 years with stage 1 hormone-positive breast cancer (9/15) received SLNB. There was a downward trend from 71% of eligible patients receiving SLNB in 2015-2018 to 50% in 2019-2020. CONCLUSIONS: De-implementation of traditional surgical practices, deemed as low-value care, toward newer guidelines is achievable even at community hospitals serving a low socioeconomic community. By avoiding overtreatment, hospitals can achieve effective resource allocation which allow for social distributive justice among patients with breast cancer and ensure strategic use of scarce health economic resources while preserving patient outcomes.