Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters ; 35(4): 265-271, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38680630

ABSTRACT

Nutrition screening is an initial procedure in which the risk of malnutrition is identified. It plays a role in and can incur costs to health systems and patients. A customized nutrition screening tool for burn patients (NSTB) was formulated and the nutritional risk score of 22 patients from a burn unit in Bahrain using NSTB and MUST was compared. The samples selected were adult patients aged 18 years or over; pregnant and mentally retarded patients were excluded. Mean age of the total sample was 29.40, and 90.9% were male. Mean BMI was 26.96. The mean and SD for NSTB was 2.18±1.65, and for MUST 2.0±0.0. A difference in the nutritional screening risk score of the same group of patients was observed. In the MUST group, 100% patients were classified as high risk, while in the NSTB group 50% patients were classified as high risk, 36.36% as moderate risk and 13.63% as low risk respectively. The variability of the risk score in the NSTB group helps prioritize the patients based on high, medium, and low risk, whereas MUST categorizes all patients as high risk. A unique screening tool for burns will be more effective in determining risk patients due to tailor-made characteristics. Even though the data sample is small, the difference gives scope for extensive study.


L'évaluation du risque de dénutrition est nécessaire chez les patients brûlés, chez qui elle joue un rôle majeur dans l'évolution initiale. NSTB a été développé afin de ne pas passer à côté, et a été comparé à MUST au moyen d'une étude piloté réalisé auprès de 22 patients adultes (femmes enceintes et handicapés mentaux exclus) hospitalisés dans un CTB de Bahreïn. L'âge moyen était de 24,9 ans ; 90,9% étaient des hommes, le BMI moyen était de 29,96. Tous les patients de MUST était classés à haut risque quand était variable en utilisant NSTB. En effet, il classait 50% des patients à haut risque; 36,36% à risque modéré et 13,63% à risque faible. Ainsi, NSTB pourrait être plus précis que MUST pour évaluer le risque nutritionnel chez les brûlés, ce qui devrait être validé sur une série plus longue.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...