Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports ; 23: 100513, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33678368

ABSTRACT

The expansion of anaplasmosis to non-endemic areas in Argentina has created the need for specific treatments to eliminate Anaplasma marginale from carriers. The most recent studies have failed to chemosterilize A. marginale infections. In this work, we compare the efficacy of long-acting oxytetracycline (OTC) and imidocarb dipropionate (IMD) to chemosterilize the A. marginale infection. For this purpose, twenty steers were randomly clustered into two groups of ten animals each 78 days after A. marginale experimental infection (day 0). Cattle from group 1 (G1) were treated with three doses of 20 mg kg-1 of OTC (Terramycin® LA, 200 mg/ml) 7 days apart by intramuscular injection. Cattle from G2 were treated with two doses of 5 mg kg-1 of IMD (Imizol®, 120 mg/ml) 14 days apart by intramuscular injection. The efficacy of sterilizing treatments was evaluated by detection of DNA by nested PCR, anti-MSP5 antibodies by ELISA and by inoculation of splenectomized calves with blood from the steers 104 days post-treatment (dpt). The results showed 50% efficacy of the OTC treatment to chemosterilize persistent A. marginale infections in cattle and the failure of the IMD treatment under the evaluated conditions. The persistence of specific antibody levels in the sterilized animals (56 dpt) was shorter than the period of DNA detection. The ELISA was the test of choice to confirm the sterilizing outcome after 60 dpt. In spite of its limitations, the sterilization of A. marginale carrier status using OTC, could be useful for high-value bovines in non-endemic areas.


Subject(s)
Anaplasmosis , Cattle Diseases , Imidocarb/analogs & derivatives , Oxytetracycline , Anaplasma marginale , Anaplasmosis/drug therapy , Animals , Argentina , Cattle/parasitology , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Imidocarb/therapeutic use , Oxytetracycline/therapeutic use
2.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 32(3): 401-408, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32306865

ABSTRACT

Neospora caninum is a protozoan parasite that causes abortion and important economic losses in cattle worldwide. There are no treatments or vaccines available; disease control is based on diagnosis and herd management strategies. We developed, validated, and evaluated under field conditions a competitive inhibition ELISA based on the truncated SAG1 protein (tSAG1), expressed in Escherichia coli, and the RafNeo5 monoclonal antibody (ciELISAtSAG1). A criterion based on the 3-y sequential serologic analysis of 230 dairy cows by IFAT was used as the gold standard. The assay was validated using 860 serum samples from cows that were consistently positive or negative by IFAT throughout the study period. ciELISAtSAG1 was then used to evaluate the prevalence of neosporosis in 16 beef cow herds (22 samples per herd, 352 total samples). The results were compared with those from IFAT and a commercial cELISA (cELISAVMRD). The ciELISAtSAG1 cutoff was ≥ 29%I, with a diagnostic sensitivity of 98.7% (95% CI = 96.8-99.7%) and a diagnostic specificity of 97.9% (95% CI = 96.4-99.0%). Concordance among IFAT, cELISAVMRD, and ciELISAtSAG1 was 90.3%. The agreement (κ) between ciELISAtSAG1 and the other 2 tests was ≥ 0.81. The overall prevalence of neosporosis in the 16 beef herds was 30% (range: 5-60%). The ciELISAtSAG1 could be useful for large-scale detection of anti-N. caninum antibodies in cattle and seroepidemiologic investigations, given its appropriate sensitivity and specificity, and the simplicity of production.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Coccidiosis/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Neospora/isolation & purification , Protozoan Proteins/analysis , Recombinant Proteins/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Coccidiosis/diagnosis , Coccidiosis/parasitology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods
3.
PLoS One ; 15(2): e0229301, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32084216

ABSTRACT

Anaplasma marginale is the most prevalent tick-borne livestock pathogen with worldwide distribution. Bovine anaplasmosis is a significant threat to cattle industry. Anaplasmosis outbreaks in endemic areas are prevented via vaccination with live A. centrale produced in splenectomized calves. Since A. centrale live vaccine can carry other pathogens and cause disease in adult cattle, research efforts are directed to develop safe recombinant subunit vaccines. Previous work found that the subdominant proteins of A. marginale type IV secretion system (T4SS) and the subdominant elongation factor-Tu (Ef-Tu) were involved in the protective immunity against the experimental challenge in cattle immunized with the A. marginale outer membrane (OM). This study evaluated the immunogenicity and protection conferred by recombinant VirB9.1, VirB9.2, VirB10, VirB11, and Ef-Tu proteins cloned and expressed in E. coli. Twenty steers were randomly clustered into four groups (G) of five animals each. Cattle from G1 and G2 were immunized with a mixture of 50 µg of each recombinant protein with Quil A® or Montanide™ adjuvants, respectively. Cattle from G3 and G4 (controls) were immunized with Quil A and Montanide adjuvants, respectively. Cattle received four immunizations at three-week intervals and were challenged with 107 A. marginale-parasitized erythrocytes 42 days after the fourth immunization. After challenge, all cattle showed clinical signs, with a significant drop of packed cell volume and a significant increase of parasitized erythrocytes (p<0.05), requiring treatment with oxytetracycline to prevent death. The levels of IgG2 induced in the immunized groups did not correlate with the observed lack of protection. Additional strategies are required to evaluate the role of these proteins and their potential utility in the development of effective vaccines.


Subject(s)
Anaplasma marginale/immunology , Anaplasma marginale/pathogenicity , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Type IV Secretion Systems/immunology , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Bacterial Vaccines/genetics , Cattle , Immunization , Recombinant Proteins/genetics , Type IV Secretion Systems/genetics , Virulence/immunology
4.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 32(1): 70-76, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31777316

ABSTRACT

Bovine anaplasmosis is a worldwide infectious disease caused by the intraerythrocytic bacterium Anaplasma marginale, which is transmitted by ticks and fomites. A. centrale is a less virulent subspecies used as a live vaccine in cohorts of 8- to 10-mo-old calves that did not naturally reach enzootic stability. We developed 3 variants of a double-antigen sandwich ELISA (dasELISA) using a recombinant major surface protein 5 (MSP5) from A. marginale (dasELISAm) or from A. centrale (dasELISAc) or using MSP5 from both organisms (dasELISAmc). Each dasELISA was tested for the detection of antibodies against A. marginale and A. centrale. The tests were validated using serum samples from cattle not infected with Anaplasma spp. (n = 388), infected with A. marginale (n = 436), and vaccinated with A. centrale (n = 358), confirmed by nested PCR. A total of 462 samples were compared with a commercial competitive ELISA (cELISA). For dasELISAm, dasELISAc, and dasELISAmc, specificities were 98.7%, 98.7%, and 97.4%, and overall sensitivities were 92.6%, 85.7%, and 97.4%, respectively. For A. marginale-infected and A. centrale-vaccinated cattle, sensitivities were 97.7% and 86.3% for dasELISAm, and 77.7% and 95.5% for dasELISAc, respectively. Sensitivity of dasELISAmc was similar for both groups (>96%). The agreement rate between dasELISAmc and cELISA was 96.3% (κ = 0.92); the former test allowed earlier detection of seroconversion of vaccinated cattle than did cELISA. Based on these results, the test could be used to 1) determine the enzootic stability or instability of anaplasmosis in calves, 2) conduct epidemiologic studies, and 3) evaluate the immunogenicity of A. centrale live vaccine.


Subject(s)
Anaplasma centrale/immunology , Anaplasma marginale/isolation & purification , Anaplasmosis/diagnosis , Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Anaplasma/immunology , Anaplasmosis/microbiology , Anaplasmosis/prevention & control , Animals , Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/microbiology , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Parasitol Res ; 118(10): 2945-2955, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31485864

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to characterize the specific immune response in prepubertal female calves inoculated with Neospora caninum. Forty-eight N. caninum-seronegative 6-month-old Angus female calves were randomly allocated into two groups: group A calves were inoculated subcutaneously (sc) with 1 × 106 tachyzoites of the low virulence NC-Argentina LP1 isolate in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); group B calves were mock inoculated sc with sterile PBS. Calves from group A developed a specific immune response characterized by the production of IgG antibodies and the expression of IFN-γ and TNF-α cytokines. Animals did not present any febrile reaction or reactions at the site of inoculation. Although chronic N. caninum infection was developed in 50% of calves of group A after inoculation, according to the presence of antibodies against rNc-SAG4, antigen characteristic of bradyzoites, N. caninum antibodies dropped below the cut-off of ELISA from day 210 post-inoculation onwards. Future trials using the same group of inoculated animals will allow the characterization of the evolution of the immune response during pregnancy and to determine whether the immunization with the local isolate is able to prevent congenital transmission and to protect against heterologous challenges.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Antigens, Protozoan/immunology , Cattle Diseases/immunology , Coccidiosis/veterinary , Neospora/immunology , Animals , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/parasitology , Coccidiosis/immunology , Coccidiosis/parasitology , Cytokines/metabolism , Female , Immunization/veterinary , Neospora/pathogenicity , Random Allocation
6.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 50(1): 75-84, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28918478

ABSTRACT

We carried out an inter-laboratory trial to compare the serological tests commonly used for the detection of specific Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle in Ibero-American countries. A total of eight laboratories participated from the following countries: Argentina (n = 4), Brazil (n = 1), Peru (n = 1), Mexico (n = 1), and Spain (n = 1). A blind panel of well-characterized cattle sera (n = 143) and sera representative of the target population (n = 351) was tested by seven in-house indirect fluorescent antibody tests (IFATs 1-7) and three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs 1-3; two in-house and one commercial). Diagnostic performance of the serological tests was calculated and compared according to the following criteria: (1) the "Pre-test information," which uses previous epidemiological and serological data; (2) the "Majority of tests," which classifies a serum as positive or negative according to the results obtained by most tests evaluated. Unexpectedly, six tests showed either sensitivity (Se) or specificity (Sp) values lower than 90%. In contrast, the best tests in terms of Se, Sp, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) values were IFAT 1 and optimized ELISA 1 and ELISA 2. We evaluated a high number of IFATs, which are the most widely used tests in Ibero-America. The significant discordances observed among the tests regardless of the criteria employed hinder control programs and urge the use of a common test or with similar performances to either the optimized IFAT 1 and ELISAs 1 and 2.


Subject(s)
Cattle Diseases/diagnosis , Coccidiosis/veterinary , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/veterinary , Neospora/isolation & purification , Serologic Tests/veterinary , Animals , Antibodies, Protozoan/analysis , Argentina , Brazil , Cattle , Coccidiosis/diagnosis , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/methods , Mexico , Peru , Serologic Tests/methods , Spain
8.
Vet Parasitol ; 157(3-4): 203-10, 2008 Nov 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18783887

ABSTRACT

Bovine babesiosis is caused by Babesia bovis and B. bigemina in Argentina. These protozoans are prevalent north of parallel 30 degrees S, where their natural vector Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus is widespread. To prevent babesiosis outbreaks in endemic areas, an increasing population of 4-10-month-old calves are vaccinated with low virulence B. bovis R1A (BboR1A) and B. bigemina S1A (BbiS1A) strains. In non-endemic areas, an additional calf population is also vaccinated and boostered as adults, before they are relocated to R. microplus-endemic areas of the country. Serological tests are currently utilized not only to determine the status of natural Babesia spp. infections, but also to confirm the infection caused by vaccine strains. For this purpose, an indirect enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) based on the recombinant major surface antigen-2c (rMSA-2c) of B. bovis expressed in Escherichia coli, was standardized using sera from Babesia spp. experimentally infected cattle. ELISA(rMSA-2c) was validated using sera obtained weekly during 336 days from steers primed and boostered with BboR1A and/or BbiS1A on days 0 and 154, then compared with the immunofluorescent-antibody test (IFAT). Western blot (WB) protein analysis was used to confirm the specificity of the immune response to rMSA-2c. The sensitivity and specificity for ELISA(rMSA-2c) were 92 and 96% after the Babesia spp. priming and 88 and 73% after the boostering immunization, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for IFAT were 99 and 90% after priming and 92 and 98% after boostering, respectively. Unlike IFAT, ELISA(rMSA-2c) detected a remarkable delayed booster response and a significant drop in specificity between 35 and 84 days after the booster immunization. Simultaneously, 87.5% of cattle boostered with B. bigemina showed cross-reactions in the ELISA(rMSA-2c), particularly between 63 and 77 days after the inoculation. A reaction against E. coli was observed, since bands of approximately 40 and/or 42kDa were detected using sera from cattle before and after Babesia spp. inoculations. ELISA(rMSA-2c) showed to be useful between 42 and 98 days after priming with Babesia spp. live vaccine to evaluate the success of infecting cattle. However, after boostering the test showed low specificity.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Protozoan/blood , Babesia bovis/immunology , Babesiosis/immunology , Cattle Diseases/immunology , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/veterinary , Protozoan Vaccines/immunology , Animals , Antigens, Protozoan/immunology , Babesiosis/blood , Cattle , Cattle Diseases/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Immunization, Secondary , Protozoan Vaccines/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...