Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 23
Filter
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 206(3): 551-559, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703285

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Everolimus in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) was formerly approved as 2nd-line therapy in HR(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer (aBC) patients (pts) progressing during or after a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI). Since this approval, the treatment landscape of aBC has changed dramatically, particularly with the arrival of CDK 4-6 inhibitors. Endocrine monotherapy after progression to CDK4/6 inhibitors has shown a limited progression-free survival (PFS), below 3 months. Evidence of the efficacy of everolimus plus ET after CDK4/6 inhibitors is scarce. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of patients with aBC treated with everolimus and ET beyond CDK4/6-i progression compiled from February 2015 to December 2022 in 4 Spanish hospitals was performed. Clinical and demographic data were collected from medical records. The main objective was to estimate the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Everolimus adverse events (AE) were registered. Quantitative variables were summarized with medians; qualitative variables with proportions and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival estimates. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one patients received everolimus plus ET (exemestane: 96, fulvestrant: 54, tamoxifen: 10, unknown: 1) after progressing on a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The median follow-up time was 15 months (interquartile range: 1-56 months). The median age at diagnosis was 49 years (range: 35-90 years). The estimated mPFS was 6.0 months (95%CI 5.3-7.8 months). PFS was longer in patients with previous CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy lasting for > 18 months (8.7 months, 95%CI 6.6-11.3 months), in patients w/o visceral metastases (8.0 months, 95%CI 5.8-10.5 months), and chemotherapy-naïve in the metastatic setting (7.2 months, 95%CI 5.9-8.4 months). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis cohort of everolimus plus ET in mBC patients previously treated with a CDK4/6 inhibitor suggests a longer estimated mPFS when compared with the mPFS with ET monotherapy obtained from current randomized clinical data. Everolimus plus ET may be considered as a valid control arm in novel clinical trial designs.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Breast Neoplasms , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6 , Everolimus , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Humans , Everolimus/administration & dosage , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Middle Aged , Aged , Retrospective Studies , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Adult , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Aged, 80 and over , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Tamoxifen/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Fulvestrant/administration & dosage , Fulvestrant/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Androstadienes/administration & dosage , Androstadienes/therapeutic use , Disease Progression
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 30(10): 2160-2169, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38466643

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) are associated with pathologic complete response (pCR) and long-term outcomes for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the setting of anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The impact of sTILs on refining outcomes beyond prognostic information provided by pCR in anthracycline-free neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not known. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This is a pooled analysis of two studies where patients with stage I (T>1 cm)-III TNBC received carboplatin (AUC 6) plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2; CbD) NAC. sTILs were evaluated centrally on pre-treatment hematoxylin and eosin slides using standard criteria. Cox regression analysis was used to examine the effect of variables on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 474 patients, 44% had node-positive disease. Median sTILs were 5% (range, 1%-95%), and 32% of patients had ≥30% sTILs. pCR rate was 51%. On multivariable analysis, T stage (OR, 2.08; P = 0.007), nodal status (OR, 1.64; P = 0.035), and sTILs (OR, 1.10; P = 0.011) were associated with pCR. On multivariate analysis, nodal status (HR, 0.46; P = 0.008), pCR (HR, 0.20; P < 0.001), and sTILs (HR, 0.95; P = 0.049) were associated with OS. At 30% cut-point, sTILs stratified outcomes in stage III disease, with 5-year OS 86% versus 57% in ≥30% versus <30% sTILs (HR, 0.29; P = 0.014), and numeric trend in stage II, with 5-year OS 93% versus 89% in ≥30% versus <30% sTILs (HR, 0.55; P = 0.179). Among stage II-III patients with pCR, EFS was better in those with ≥30% sTILs (HR, 0.16; P, 0.047). CONCLUSIONS: sTILs density was an independent predictor of OS beyond clinicopathologic features and pathologic response in patients with TNBC treated with anthracycline-free CbD chemotherapy. Notably, sTILs density stratified outcomes beyond tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and pathologic response. These findings highlight the role of sTILs in patient selection and stratification for neo/adjuvant escalation and de-escalation strategies.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology , Female , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Anthracyclines/administration & dosage , Anthracyclines/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Outcome , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/administration & dosage
3.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 25(9): 2665-2678, sept. 2023. ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-224132

ABSTRACT

Advanced breast cancer represents a challenge for patients and for physicians due its dynamic genomic changes yielding to a resistance to treatments. The main goal is to improve quality of live and survival of the patients through the most appropriate subsequent therapies based on the knowledge of the natural history of the disease. In these guidelines, we summarize current evidence and available therapies for the medical management of advanced breast cancer (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Genomics , Neoplasm Staging , Societies, Medical , Spain
6.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 25(9): 2665-2678, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37148499

ABSTRACT

Advanced breast cancer represents a challenge for patients and for physicians due its dynamic genomic changes yielding to a resistance to treatments. The main goal is to improve quality of live and survival of the patients through the most appropriate subsequent therapies based on the knowledge of the natural history of the disease. In these guidelines, we summarize current evidence and available therapies for the medical management of advanced breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Physicians , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Genomics
7.
JAMA Oncol ; 9(6): 841-846, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37103916

ABSTRACT

Importance: Biomarkers to guide the use of pertuzumab in the treatment of early-stage ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive breast cancer beyond simple ERBB2 status are needed. Objective: To determine if use of the HER2DX genomic assay (Reveal Genomics) in pretreatment baseline tissue samples of patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer is associated with response to neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy with or without pertuzumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective diagnostic/prognostic analysis of a multicenter academic observational study in Spain performed during 2018 to 2022 (GOM-HGUGM-2018-05). In addition, a combined analysis with 2 previously reported trials of neoadjuvant cohorts with results from the assay (DAPHNe and I-SPY2) was performed. All patients had stage I to III ERBB2-positive breast cancer, signed informed consent, and had available formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens obtained prior to starting therapy. Exposures: Patients received intravenous trastuzumab, 8 mg/kg, loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks in combination with intravenous docetaxel, 75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks and intravenous carboplatin area under the curve of 6 every 3 weeks for 6 cycles, or this regimen plus intravenous pertuzumab, 840 mg, loading dose, followed by an intravenous 420-mg dose every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. Main Outcome and Measures: Association of baseline assay-reported pathologic complete response (pCR) score with pCR in the breast and axilla, as well as association of baseline assay-reported pCR score with response to pertuzumab. Results: The assay was evaluated in 155 patients with ERBB2-positive breast cancer (mean [range] age, 50.3 [26-78] years). Clinical T1 to T2 and node-positive disease was present in 113 (72.9%) and 99 (63.9%) patients, respectively, and 105 (67.7%) tumors were hormone receptor positive. The overall pCR rate was 57.4% (95% CI, 49.2%-65.2%). The proportion of patients in the assay-reported pCR-low, pCR-medium, and pCR-high groups was 53 (34.2%), 54 (34.8%), and 48 (31.0%), respectively. In the multivariable analysis, the assay-reported pCR score (as a continuous variable from 0-100) showed a statistically significant association with pCR (odds ratio [OR] per 10-unit increase, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.70; P < .001). The pCR rates in the assay-reported pCR-high and pCR-low groups were 75.0% and 28.3%, respectively (OR, 7.85; 95% CI, 2.67-24.91; P < .001). In the combined analysis (n = 282), an increase in pCR rate due to pertuzumab was found in the assay-reported pCR-high tumors (OR, 5.36; 95% CI, 1.89-15.20; P < .001) but not in the assay-reported pCR-low tumors (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.30-2.46; P = .77). A statistically significant interaction between the assay-reported pCR score and the effect of pertuzumab in pCR was observed. Conclusions and Relevance: This diagnostic/prognostic study demonstrated that the genomic assay predicted pCR following neoadjuvant trastuzumab-based chemotherapy with or without pertuzumab. This assay could guide therapeutic decisions regarding the use of neoadjuvant pertuzumab.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Genomics , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Retrospective Studies , Trastuzumab/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
8.
Clin. transl. oncol. (Print) ; 24(4): 724-732, abril 2022. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-203776

ABSTRACT

Infections are still a major cause of morbi-mortality in patients with cancer. Some of these infections are preventable through specific measures, such as vaccination or prophylaxis. This guideline aims to summarize the evidence and recommendations for the prevention of infections in cancer patients, devoting special attention to the most prevalent preventable infectious disease. All the evidences will be graded according to The Infectious Diseases Society of America grading system.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Immunosuppression Therapy , Drug Therapy , Vaccination
9.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 24(4): 724-732, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35230619

ABSTRACT

Infections are still a major cause of morbi-mortality in patients with cancer. Some of these infections are preventable through specific measures, such as vaccination or prophylaxis. This guideline aims to summarize the evidence and recommendations for the prevention of infections in cancer patients, devoting special attention to the most prevalent preventable infectious disease. All the evidences will be graded according to The Infectious Diseases Society of America grading system.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy
10.
Future Oncol ; 18(8): 1003-1022, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35094535

ABSTRACT

The present goal of therapy for early HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is to optimize disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates with the currently available therapies while avoiding any relevant long-term sequalae. Local therapies have evolved toward less aggressive techniques (i.e. breast-preserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy and intraoperative radiotherapy), which significantly reduce the long-term sequalae observed with more radical treatments. Endocrine therapy (ET) is still the cornerstone of adjuvant treatment because it significantly reduces BC relapse and mortality. Adjuvant chemotherapy is today recommended only for a particular subset of patients with a high risk of recurrence with ET alone, identified through genomic assays, age and/or disease stage. Bisphosphonates reduce the risk of bone metastasis and produce a slight although statistically significant improvement in survival in postmenopausal women. The CDK 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib has been recently approved by the US FDA for patients at high risk of relapse.


The goal of therapy for patients diagnosed with early HR+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is to maximize survival rates while maintaining the quality of life and avoiding long-term sequalae. Local therapies have evolved toward less aggressive techniques, which significantly reduce the long-term sequalae observed with more radical approaches. Endocrine therapy (ET) remains as the cornerstone of adjuvant treatment because it significantly reduces BC relapse and mortality. Adjuvant chemotherapy is, however, recommended only for a particular subset of patients with a high-risk of recurrence with ET alone, identified through genomic assays together with clinical variables such as age and/or axillary involvement. Additionally, bisphosphonates reduce the risk of bone metastasis with a slight improvement in survival in postmenopausal women. The CDK 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib has been recently approved by the US FDA for patients at high risk of relapse.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Decision Trees , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Mastectomy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
11.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 7064, 2021 03 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33782404

ABSTRACT

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is highly responsive to neoadjuvant polychemotherapy regimens including anthracyclines, taxanes, and, more recently, carboplatin. However, there is inadequate information on the individual contribution of each of these agents to the global activity of the combinations, and the use of combinations of up to four of these drugs is associated with relevant toxicity. Identifying single-drug activity in the clinical neoadjuvant setting is challenging. We developed patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) from several chemotherapy-naïve TNBC samples to assess the antitumor activity of single drugs and combinations of drugs. PDXs were established from chemotherapy-naïve TNBC samples. Nine TNBC PDX models (all of which corresponded to a basal-like phenotype according to the PAM50 classifier) were treated with carboplatin, docetaxel, and doxorubicin and the combination of docetaxel and carboplatin. Only one of nine PDX models showed sensitivity to doxorubicin, while eight of nine PDX models showed sensitivity to docetaxel and carboplatin as single agents. The 3 PDX models derived from patients with gBRCA-1 or gPALB2 mutations were very sensitive to carboplatin single agent. All 6 PDX models from patients without hereditary germ-line mutations showed increased sensitivity to the combination of docetaxel and carboplatin. In the present study, docetaxel and carboplatin single agents were active drugs against basal-like TNBC, while doxorubicin monotherapy showed low activity. The combination of docetaxel and carboplatin was more effective than the drugs used as single agents, except in the PDX from patients with gBRCA1/PALB2 mutations.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Animals , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays
12.
Future Oncol ; 16(17): 1165-1177, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32458702

ABSTRACT

HER2-positive breast cancer accounts for 18-20% of all breast cancers. Despite significant advances and the currently available adjuvant treatments for management of the disease, approximately 25% of HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer patients show relapse and die. Neratinib is an irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Multiple studies have reported its significant antitumor activity in metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. It is administered orally and has also been tested in the adjuvant setting. In this article, we present a comprehensive review of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of neratinib as well as its clinical efficacy, with an emphasis on early HER2-positive breast cancer and suggestions for future directions for neratinib research.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/etiology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Quinolines/therapeutic use , Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Clinical Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Quinolines/pharmacology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Receptors, Estrogen/genetics , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Treatment Outcome
13.
JCO Precis Oncol ; 3: 1-16, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35100693

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Genetic heterogeneity between primary tumors and their metastatic lesions has been documented in several breast cancer studies. However, the selection of therapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer and the search for biomarkers for targeted therapy are often based on findings from the primary tumor, mainly because of the difficulty of distant metastasis core biopsies. New methods for monitoring genomic changes in metastatic breast cancer are needed (ie, circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA] genomic analysis). The objectives of this study were to assess the concordance of genomic variants between primary and metastatic tumor tissues and the sensitivity of plasma ctDNA analysis to identify variants detected in tumor biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Next-generation sequencing technology was used to assess the genomic mutation profile of a panel of 54 cancer genes in matched samples of primary tumor, metastatic tumor, and plasma from 40 patients with metastatic breast cancer. RESULTS: Using Ion Torrent technology (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), we identified 110 variants that were common to the primary and metastatic tumors. ctDNA analysis had a sensitivity of 0.972 in detecting variants present in both primary and metastatic tissues. In addition, we identified 13 variants in metastatic tissue and ctDNA not present in primary tumor. CONCLUSION: We identified genomic variants present in metastatic biopsies and plasma ctDNA that were not present in the primary tumor. Deep sequencing of plasma ctDNA detected most DNA variants previously identified in matched primary and metastatic tissues. ctDNA might aid in therapy selection and in the search for biomarkers for drug development in metastatic breast cancer.

14.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 44(8): 1191-1198, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685755

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The effect of surgery for metastases in patients with esophagogastric cancer is unknown, given the lack of randomized clinical trials; likewise, the criteria for selecting eligible patients remain to be determined. METHODS: This registry evaluates the results of patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the stomach, distal esophagus, or gastro-esophageal junction from 32 centers. To assess selection criteria and prognostic factors, a state arrival extended Markov proportional hazards (PH) model was used. RESULTS: 1792 subjects were analyzed, 5% of whom (n = 92) underwent surgery for metastasis. The most common surgeries were peritoneal (29%), hepatic (24%), and distant lymph nodes (11%). Subjects chosen for metastasectomy had higher survival rates, HR 0.34 (95% CI, 0.06-0.80, p = 0.021). Patients who underwent surgery had a mOS since metastasectomy of 16.7 months (95% CI, 12.5-22.4). The 1- and 3-year relapse rates following R0 resection were 58% and 65%, respectively. Median time since R0 metastasectomy until relapse was 8.4 months (95% CI, 7.6-23.7). The 3-year OS after surgery was 30.6% (95% CI, 19.3-40.4). Duration of chemotherapy prior to surgery (months) increased mortality (HR 1.04 [95% CI, 1.01-1.07]), p = 0.009. The only significant interaction involved the use of anti-HER2 therapy. CONCLUSION: The AGAMENON registry suggests that subjects with limited metastatic disease, selected on a clinical basis, can benefit from early surgeries. Prospective trials are needed to confirm these data.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagogastric Junction , Registries , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/secondary , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Metastasectomy , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Survival Rate/trends , Young Adult
15.
Clin Cancer Res ; 24(8): 1845-1852, 2018 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29378733

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) requires the iden- tification of reliable predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). For this purpose, we aimed to evaluate the performance of the TNBCtype-4 classifier in a cohort of patients with TNBC treated with neoadjuvant carboplatin and docetaxel (TCb).Methods: Patients with TNBC were accrued in a nonrandomized trial of neoadjuvant carboplatin AUC 6 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 for six cycles. Response was evaluated in terms of pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0) and residual cancer burden by Symmans and colleagues. Lehmann's subtyping was performed using the TNBCtype online tool from RNAseq data, and germline sequencing of a panel of seven DNA damage repair genes was conducted.Results: Ninety-four out of the 121 patients enrolled in the trial had RNAseq available. The overall pCR rate was 44.7%. Lehmann subtype distribution was 34.0% BL1, 20.2% BL2, 23.4% M, 14.9% LAR, and 7.4% were classified as ER+. Response to NACT with TCb was significantly associated with Lehmann subtype (P = 0.027), even in multivariate analysis including tumor size and nodal involvement, with BL1 patients achieving the highest pCR rate (65.6%), followed by BL2 (47.4%), M (36.4%), and LAR (21.4%). BL1 was associated with a significant younger age at diagnosis and higher ki67 values. Among our 10 germline mutation carriers, 30% were BL1, 40% were BL2, and 30% were M.Conclusions: TNBCtype-4 is associated with significantly different pCR rates for the different subtypes, with BL1 and LAR displaying the best and worse responses to NACT, respectively. Clin Cancer Res; 24(8); 1845-52. ©2018 AACR.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Biomarkers, Tumor , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Docetaxel/administration & dosage , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Genes, BRCA1 , Genes, BRCA2 , Heterozygote , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Outcome , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Tumor Burden
16.
J Genet Couns ; 27(4): 854-862, 2018 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29247312

ABSTRACT

The identification of patients at risk for breast cancer by genetic testing has proven to reduce breast cancer mortality. In 2010, due to a lack of systematization in hereditary cancer assistance in our center, we implemented a multidisciplinary Heredofamilial Cancer Unit (HFCU). We analyze if the HFCU improved the rates of referrals and preventive management of breast cancer patients with genetic risk. We retrospectively compared family history records, referrals of high-risk patients to genetic counseling, and detection and management of patients with BRCA1/2 mutations in two cohorts of breast cancer patients diagnosed before (first period: 2007-2010) and after the creation of the HFCU (second period: 2010-2013). In the first period, 893 patients were included, and 902 were included in the second. Due to the inability to establish their genetic risk, 142 patients (15.9%) vs. 70 (7.8%) were excluded from analysis (p < 0.001). Among the evaluable patients, 194 (25.8%) vs. 223 (26.8%) fulfilled one or more risk criteria (p = 0.65). Family history documentation in patient's medical records (92.4 vs. 97.8%, p < 0.001) and referral rate (26.3 vs. 52%, p < 0.0001) significantly increased in the second period. Eight BRCA1/2 mutations were detected among patients referred in the first period and 17 among those referred to the HFCU. The rate of preventive surgeries in patients with BRCA mutations significantly increased in the second period (25 vs. 76.5%, p = 0.03). In conclusion, there was a clear improvement in family history records, referrals, and preventive surgeries in breast cancer patients with genetic risk after the implementation of the HFCU.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Testing/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/prevention & control , Female , Genetic Testing/methods , Hospitals, University/organization & administration , Humans , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Middle Aged , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain
17.
Breast Care (Basel) ; 12(5): 296-302, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29234248

ABSTRACT

After optimizing endocrine monotherapy modalities in the setting of advanced luminal breast cancer (BC), dual endocrine/targeted therapy combinations have been tested with positive results, and are transforming this BC subtype treatment landscape. Cell cycle deregulation is a hallmark of cancer that has become a key druggable target in hormone receptor (HR)-positive BC due to its role in endocrine resistance mechanisms. Cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors have experienced a fast development in combination with endocrine therapy and have already been commercialized in some countries. In this review, we will summarize the development of these CDK4/6 inhibitors in luminal BC, from the preclinical data to the pivotal phase III trials that led to their approval, focusing on the efficacy and safety data for each of the treatment settings. Moreover, we will consider the challenges CDK4/6 inhibitors face in their positioning in the algorithm of treatment for advanced luminal BC and the considerations physicians should take into account when selecting these therapies for their patients. However, we are still in need of reliable predictive biomarkers in order to identify patients who will derive the greatest benefit from these drug combinations that are not exempt from toxicity.

18.
Br J Cancer ; 117(6): 775-782, 2017 Sep 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28765618

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The choice of chemotherapy in HER2-negative gastric cancer is based on centre's preferences and adverse effects profile. No schedule is currently accepted as standard, nor are there any factors to predict response, other than HER2 status. We seek to evaluate whether Lauren type influences the efficacy of various chemotherapies and on patient overall survival (OS). METHODS: We have conducted a multicenter study in 31 hospitals. The eligibility criteria include diagnosis of stomach or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, HER2 negativity, and chemotherapy containing 2-3 drugs. Cox proportional hazards regression adjusted for confounding factors, with tests of 'treatment-by-histology' interaction, was used to estimate treatment effect. RESULTS: Our registry contains 1303 tumours analysable for OS end points and 730 evaluable for overall response rate (ORR). A decrease in ORR was detected in the presence of a diffuse component: odds ratio 0.719 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.525-0.987), P=0.039. Anthracycline- or docetaxel-containing schedules increased ORR only in the intestinal type. The diffuse type displayed increased mortality with hazard ratio (HR) of 1.201 (95% CI, 1.054-1.368), P=0.0056. Patients receiving chemotherapy with docetaxel exhibited increased OS limited to the intestinal type: HR 0.65 (95% CI, 0.49-0.87), P=0.024, with no increment in OS for the subset having a diffuse component. With respect to progression-free survival (PFS), a significant interaction was seen in the effect of docetaxel-containing schedules, with better PFS limited to the intestinal type subgroup, in the comparison against any other schedule: HR 0.65 (95% CI, 0.50-0.85), P=0.015, and against anthracycline-based regimens: HR 0.64 (95% CI, 0.46-0.88), P=0.046. CONCLUSIONS: As a conclusion, in this registry, Lauren classification tumour subtypes predicted survival and responded differently to chemotherapy. Future clinical trials should stratify effect estimations based on histology.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Registries , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/mortality , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Anthracyclines/administration & dosage , Chile , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Docetaxel , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Spain , Stomach Neoplasms/classification , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome
19.
Future Oncol ; 13(24): 2137-2149, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28758424

ABSTRACT

CDK4/6 inhibitors are a promising new class of drugs for hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer and have been shown to overcome and delay hormone resistance in advanced breast cancer. Ribociclib, a selective oral inhibitor of CDK4/6, was approved by the US FDA for first-line treatment of hormone-receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. This review summarizes the clinical evidence available for ribociclib, from preclinical data to the pivotal studies, with a special focus on toxicity and its management. In addition, this article reviews potential new combinations under study, as well as ongoing clinical trials both in the metastatic and early setting. Finally, this review compares ribociclib activity and toxicity with those of the drugs of the same class (palbociclib and abemaciclib).


Subject(s)
Aminopyridines/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Purines/therapeutic use , Aminopyridines/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Clinical Trials as Topic , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/antagonists & inhibitors , Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6/antagonists & inhibitors , Drug Evaluation, Preclinical , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/chemistry , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Purines/pharmacology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism
20.
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther ; 17(8): 669-679, 2017 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28649882

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Despite the advances in the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer, resistance to actual chemotherapeutic regimens eventually occurs. Neratinib, an orally available pan-inhibitor of the ERBB family, represents an interesting new option for early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Areas covered: In this article, the development of neratinib, with a special focus on its potential value in the treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, has been reviewed. For this purpose, a literature search was conducted, including preclinical studies, early-phase trials in advanced cancer with neratinib in monotherapy and in combination, and phase II and large phase III trials in the early setting. Management of neratinib-induced toxicity, future perspectives for the drug, and ongoing trials are also discussed in this review. Expert commentary: Neratinib is emerging as a promising oral drug for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Although FDA and EMA approval is derived from the extended adjuvant treatment, this setting may not be the ideal scenario to obtain the beneficial effects of neratinib. Confirmatory data in the neoadjuvant setting and subgroup analysis from the ExTENET trial might bring some light into the best setting for neratinib therapy. Data from confirmatory trials in the metastatic setting are also required.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Quinolines/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Quinolines/adverse effects , Quinolines/pharmacology , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...