A comparison of piezo surgery osteotomies with conventional internal osteotomies as performed by trainee surgeons: a cadaveric study.

INTRODUCTION: Aesthetic rhinoplasty remains a challenging procedure with high expectations and narrow tolerance for errors. Considerable training is required to achieve controlled and reliable results. Use of the Piezotome is gaining popularity for performing the nasal osteotomies, a key step in rhinoplasty, where it is reported to improve precision and predictability and to keep tissue damage to a minimum. We compare the outcomes of conventional osteotomy techniques to piezosurgery in human cadavers as undertaken by surgical trainees. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven human cadavers were used and a total of 14 osteotomies were performed. Conventional osteotomies and piezosurgery were carried out each on one side of the cadaver. A number of fragments and a blinded assessment of the accuracy of the osteotomy compared with the preprocedure skin markings were carried out by two experienced rhinoplasty surgeons. The Mann-Whitney test for statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The mean number of fragments was 1.57 in the piezosurgery osteotomy and 2.14 using conventional osteotomies. Four of seven piezosurgery osteotomies achieved an accuracy within 1mm. The conventional osteotomies as performed by the trainees showed a significant mismatch of more than 3mm in three of seven of cases. Accuracy within 1mm was achieved in one of seven cases. DISCUSSION: Piezosurgery offers a safe, reliable and precise method of performing lateral nasal osteotomies. This human cadaver study shows a high accuracy of osteotomy and fewer comminuted fractures using this technique compared with conventional osteotomy techniques.

Influence of different techniques of secondary cleft lip revision surgery on upper lip projection.

Patient dissatisfaction with labial appearance in the adult cleft lip is frequently linked to poor upper lip projection. Other areas of concern include asymmetry and impaired upper lip height. Different surgical techniques are available to address volumetric deficiencies, according to extent and localization. However, data comparing outcomes in these different areas are limited. The main aim of this study was to assess the relative gains in upper lip projection. An evaluation of upper vermilion height and symmetry was also performed. Thirty-seven consecutive patients treated by a single surgeon had their pre- and postoperative results measured using standardized photographs; these were analysed using subjective and objective outcome measures. Seven examiners evaluated anonymized pre- and postoperative side and front views for subjective evaluation. The objective analysis was performed using Adobe Photoshop. Fifteen lip revisions, four Abbe flaps, 12 dermal grafts, and six PermaLip implants were performed. In bilateral cleft lip and palate patients, Abbe flaps showed the most significant improvement in labial projection, followed by PermaLip implants and dermal grafts. In unilateral cleft lip and palate patients, PermaLip implants best addressed impaired lip projection, followed by dermal grafts. Overall, functional lip revisions showed excellent outcomes for upper lip symmetry; however, only minor changes in labial projection were found.

The use of Medpor implants for midface contouring in cleft patients.

Three-dimensional midfacial deficiency in cleft patients is common and is frequently connected to impairment of the aesthetic facial appearance. Different approaches to augment relevant facial regions are available. Alloplastic facial implants have been established as a viable alternative to autologous tissue augmentation in various circumstances. However, in cleft patients, the application of facial implants has rarely been reported. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the use of Medpor implants for midfacial contouring in cleft patients. Fifty-one patients with orofacial clefts were assessed with regard to defined parameters. A range of Paranasal, Malar and Nasal Dorsum Medpor implants had been used. Unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) represented the most common indication, followed by bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Bilateral implant insertion was performed as a general rule with few exceptions. Insertion of implants was frequently combined with other cleft-related surgical procedures. Even after orthognathic surgery, midfacial augmentation was implemented to specifically address residual volume deficiency, particularly in the malar region. The complication rate amounted to 4.9% (6/122 implants). Based on our findings, Medpor implants are reliable and long-term stable materials to successfully augment paranasal, subnasal and malar areas as well as a solid nasal dorsum material with few complications in cleft patients.