Characteristics of work-related spine injury in the USA: a National Trauma Data Bank analysis.

PURPOSE: Workplace injury is a commonplace occurrence in the USA. Spine injuries are especially devastating as they can cause chronic pain and limit mobility which prevents patients from returning to work. Gaining a better understanding of the patients, mechanisms, and treatments associated with these injuries can aid in improving outcomes. The purpose of this study is to characterize the nature of work-related spine injuries. METHODS: The National Trauma Data Bank was queried from 2017 to 2019 for all diagnoses involving the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine. Patient demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, spinal diagnoses, and procedures were identified for each occupation. Occupational industries, patient demographics, mechanisms of injury, diagnoses, and spinal procedures were characterized. RESULTS: A total of 100,842 work-related injuries were identified between 2017 and 2019. Of those, 19,002 (19%) were spine injuries, and subsequently, 3963 (21%) required spinal surgery. Eight thousand twenty-nine (42%) cases were seen among construction workers, which had the highest proportion of Hispanic patients (36%). Smoking was prevalent in labor-intensive occupations with high rates of spine injury such as building and grounds maintenance. The most common mechanism of injury was a fall from a roof. The most common injury diagnoses were L1, L2, and L3 fractures, and the most common procedures were T12-L1 fusion, multilevel thoracic fusion, and multilevel lumbar fusion. CONCLUSION: Spine injuries represent a significant portion of work-related injuries in the USA and a considerable portion require neurosurgical intervention. Initial efforts should focus on the prevention and management of lumbar spine injuries in the construction industry.

The Revised Baux Score as a Predictor of Burn Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mortality following a severe burn is influenced by both patient- and injury-factors, and a number of predictive models have been developed or applied. As there is no consensus on the optimal formula to use, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of the revised Baux score in comparison to other models when determining mortality risk in patients with burn injuries. A systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. The review yielded 21 relevant studies. The Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool quality appraisal checklist was used with many studies classified as "high" quality. All studies assessed the utility of the revised Baux score in comparison to other scoring systems such as the original Baux, Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury, Abbreviated Burn Severity Index, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Boston Group/Ryan scores, the Fatality by Longevity, APACHE II score, Measured Extent of burn, and Sex model, and the Prognostic Burn Index. There was a range of 48 to 15975 participants per study, with a mean age range of 16 to 52 years old. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the rBaux score ranged from 0.682 to 0.99, with a summary AUC of 0.93 for all included studies (CI 0.91-0.95). This summary value demonstrates that the rBaux equation is a reliable predictor for mortality risk in heterogeneous populations. However, this study also identified that the rBaux equation has a diminished ability to predict mortality risk when applied to patients at both extremes of age, highlighting an important area for future research. Overall, the rBaux equation offers a relatively easy means to quickly assess the mortality risk from burn injury in a broad range of patient populations.

A comparison of outcomes for above-knee-amputation and arthrodesis for the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Several strategies have been shown to have some efficacy in the chronically infected total knee arthroplasty (TKA): chronic antibiotic suppression, a second two-stage revision, arthrodesis, and above-the-knee amputation (AKA). We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy of these treatments in patients who had previously received a two-stage revision. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed which investigated PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases. Chronic infection was defined as a persistent infection of a TKA after a previous two-stage revision. Studies were independently evaluated by two reviewers. Quality appraisal was performed using MINORS Criteria. RESULTS: 14 studies were included for the final review. For chronically infected TKA, a second two-stage revision was often sufficient to control infection. If revision failed, the most common next procedure was either a repeat revision or AKA. AKA patients had less pain and higher quality of life scores compared to arthrodesis, but a higher five-year mortality rate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Chronic infection in TKA offers a multitude of challenges for orthopedic surgeons. We found that arthrodesis and AKA were not significantly different in rates of infection eradication or quality of life. We recommend clinicians to actively discuss options with patients to find a procedure most suitable for them.

Development of a low resource exercise rehabilitation application for musculoskeletal disorders to help underserved patients in a primary care setting.

Objective: We set out to create a Family Medicine EHR (electronic health record) embedded exercise application. This was done to evaluate the utility of the exercise app for providers and to understand the usefulness of the exercise app from the perspective of patients. Methods: This exercise application was developed through an iterative process with repeated pre-testing and feedback from an interprofessional team and embedded into the EHR at an academic family medicine clinic. Anecdotal feedback from patients was used to inform pre-testing adaptations. Results: The application required six iterations prior to clinical utility. It had several features that clinicians and patients felt were beneficial. These features involved a customizable exercise directory with pre-made templated plans which could be further modified. To overcome accessibility barriers, the application was developed to include digital and printable copies with an integrated direct email option for ease of remote sharing with patients. Conclusion: A customizable, open-source exercise application was developed to facilitate provider exercise prescription and support patient self-management. This project may be useful for other providers interested in developing similar programs to address musculoskeletal conditions in their patients. Next steps are to undertake pilot testing of the app with broader provider and patient feedback.

Objectif: Concevoir une application d'exercices intégrés au DES (dossier de santé électronique) de la médecine familiale. Cela visait à évaluer l'utilité de l'application d'exercices pour les prestataires et à en comprendre l'utilité du point de vue des patients. Méthodologie: Cette application d'exercices a été élaborée au moyen d'un processus itératif mettant en oeuvre une mise à l'essai répétée et une rétroaction d'une équipe interprofessionnelle et intégrée dans le DES d'une clinique universitaire de médecine familiale. Une rétroaction secondaire de patients a contribué aux adaptations de mise à l'essai. Résultats: L'application a dû être répétée six fois avant l'utilité clinique. Selon les cliniciens et les patients, plusieurs fonctions ont présenté un avantage. Il s'agissait notamment d'un répertoire d'exercices personnalisable assorti de modèles de plans préconçus et modifiables par la suite. Afin de surmonter les obstacles d'accessibilité, l'application était conçue pour comprendre des versions numériques et imprimables dotées d'une option de courriel direct intégré pour faciliter le partage à distance avec les patients. Conclusion: Une application d'exercices personnalisable et ouverte visait à faciliter la prescription d'exercices par les prestataires et à soutenir le traitement autonome des patients. Ce projet peut être utile à d'autres prestataires souhaitant élaborer des programmes semblables pour traiter les problèmes musculosquelettiques de leurs patients. Les étapes suivantes consistent à entreprendre des mises à l'essai de l'application avec un retour d'information plus large de la part des prestataires et des patients.