Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol ; 74(3): 365-371, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29198061

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to describe the development of PHARAO (Pharmacological Risk Assessment Online), a decision support system providing a risk profile for adverse events, associated with combined effects of multiple medicines, and to present data from a pilot study, testing the use, functionality, and acceptance of the PHARAO system in a clinical setting. METHODS: About 1400 substances were scored in relation to their risk to cause any of nine common and/or serious adverse effects. Algorithms for each adverse effect score were developed to create individual risk profiles from the patient's list of medication. The system was tested and integrated to the electronic medical record, during a 4-month period in two geriatric wards and three primary healthcare centers, and a questionnaire was answered by the users before and after the test period. RESULTS: A total of 732 substances were tagged with one or more of the nine risks, most commonly with the risk of sedation or seizures. During the pilot, the system was used 933 times in 871 patients. The most common signals generated by PHARAO in these patients were related to the risks of constipation, sedation, and bleeding. A majority of responders considered PHARAO easy to use and that it gives useful support in performing medication reviews. CONCLUSIONS: The PHARAO decision support system, designed as a complement to a database on drug-drug interactions used nationally, worked as intended and was appreciated by the users during a 4-month test period. Integration aspects need to be improved to minimize unnecessary signaling.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/drug therapy , Decision Support Systems, Clinical , Drug Interactions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Geriatrics/methods , Polypharmacy , Primary Health Care/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Attitude of Health Personnel , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Drug Utilization Review , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Finland/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Internet , Pilot Projects , Risk , Risk Assessment , Sweden/epidemiology , Workforce
2.
Qual Prim Care ; 17(3): 179-89, 2009.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19622268

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Financial incentives have been suggested to be effective in increasing the quality and efficiency of drug prescribing. Concern has been raised in relation to potential negative consequences on the quality of care. AIMS: To describe and analyse the impact of an incentives model linking payment with adherence to drug and therapeutics committee (DTC) guidelines and self-reflection of prescribing pattern in a 'prescribing quality report'. METHODS: The study was performed in the county of Stockholm, Sweden, with 139 (out of 154) primary healthcare centres (PHCs) participating in the project and 15 PHCs not participating. The study consisted of two parts: a quantitative observational study of prescribing patterns and a qualitative analysis of the submitted prescribing quality reports. All prescriptions issued from PHCs and dispensed at pharmacies during October to December 2005 and October to December 2006 were analysed, using adherence to the regional DTC guidelines as the main outcome measure. Adherence was assessed using the drug utilisation 90% methodology, i.e. focusing on drugs constituting 90% of the prescribed volume and the proportion of drugs included in the guidelines. The qualitative analysis focused on reports on the quality of drug prescribing submitted by each PHC in early 2007. RESULTS: The 139 PHCs participating in the programme accounted for 85% of all prescriptions issued in primary care during October to December 2006. Mean adherence to guidelines increased among participating practices by 3.3 percentage units (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9-3.7%) to 83% (82.6-83.7%) during the year. The adherence among practices not participating increased by 3.1 percentage units (95% CI 1.7-4.4%) to 78.8% (95% CI 76.7-80.9%). The higher adherence achieved during the year corresponded to savings estimated at five times greater than the cost of running the programme including the financial incentives. In addition, many areas for improving prescribing were identified, such as limiting the prescribing of drugs with uncertain safety profiles and documentation as well as reporting adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSION: Although no causal effect can be attributed without a control group, we have shown the feasibility of a model linking payment to DTC adherence. This approach with its own quality assessment and goal setting offers an example to other regions and countries of how to increase the quality and efficiency of drug prescribing within limited resources.


Subject(s)
Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Quality of Health Care/organization & administration , Reimbursement, Incentive/organization & administration , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Health Care/economics , Quality of Health Care/standards , Reimbursement, Incentive/economics , Reimbursement, Incentive/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL