Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
Perm J ; 27(3): 49-59, 2023 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37303184

ABSTRACT

Background Delivering in-person health care to the more than 1.2 million incarcerated adults can be expensive, logistically challenging, fragmented, and pose security risks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a specialty care telemedicine program in statewide prisons in North Carolina during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods We evaluated the first 6 months of implementation of a new telemedicine program to deliver specialty care to adults incarcerated in 55 North Carolina prison facilities. We measured patient and practitioner perceptions and the impact on the cost of care. Results A total of 3232 telemedicine visits were completed across 55 prisons within the first 6 months of the program. Most patients reported that the ability to use telemedicine contributed to their overall personal well-being and safety. Many practitioners found that working with the on-site nursing staff to conduct physical exams and to make collective decisions were key drivers to the success of telemedicine. A direct relationship was found between the telemedicine experience and patients' preference for future visits such that as satisfaction increased, the desire to use telemedicine increased. Telemedicine reduced total costs of care by $416,020 (net: -$95,480) within the first 6 months, and $1,195,377 estimated in the first 12 months postimplementation (95% confidence interval: $1,100,166-$1,290,587). Conclusions Implementing specialty care telemedicine in prison facilities enhanced patient and practitioner experiences and reduced costs within the prison system. The implementation of telemedicine in prison systems can increase access to care and reduce public safety risks by eliminating unnecessary off-site medical center visits.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Telemedicine , Adult , Humans , North Carolina , Pandemics , Prisons
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(1): 83-88, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27697086

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To assess knowledge about infection prevention among nursing home personnel and identify gaps potentially addressable through a quality improvement collaborative. DESIGN Baseline knowledge assessment of catheter-associated urinary tract infection, asymptomatic bacteriuria, antimicrobial stewardship, and general infection prevention practices for healthcare-associated infections. SETTING Nursing homes across 14 states participating in the national "Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Long-Term Care: Healthcare-Associated Infections/Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection." PARTICIPANTS Licensed (RNs, LPNs, APRNs, MDs) and unlicensed (clinical nursing assistants) healthcare personnel. METHODS Each facility aimed to obtain responses from at least 10 employees (5 licensed and 5 unlicensed). We assessed the percentage of correct responses. RESULTS A total of 184 (78%) of 236 participating facilities provided 1 response or more. Of the 1,626 respondents, 822 (50.6%) were licensed; 117 facilities (63.6%) were for-profit. While 99.1% of licensed personnel recognized the definition of asymptomatic bacteriuria, only 36.1% knew that pyuria could not distinguish a urinary tract infection from asymptomatic bacteriuria. Among unlicensed personnel, 99.6% knew to notify a nurse if a resident developed fever or confusion, but only 27.7% knew that cloudy, smelly urine should not routinely be cultured. Although 100% of respondents reported receiving training in hand hygiene, less than 30% knew how long to rub hands (28.5% licensed, 25.2% unlicensed) or the most effective agent to use (11.7% licensed, 10.6% unlicensed). CONCLUSIONS This national assessment demonstrates an important need to enhance infection prevention knowledge among healthcare personnel working in nursing homes to improve resident safety and quality of care. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2016;1-6.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/education , Nursing Homes/standards , Bacteriuria/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Quality Improvement , United States , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 38(3): 287-293, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27917728

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE The impact of healthcare system integration on infection prevention programs is unknown. Using catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention as an example, we hypothesize that US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes have a more robust infection prevention infrastructure due to integration and centralization compared with non-VA nursing homes. SETTING VA and non-VA nursing homes participating in the AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care collaborative. METHODS Nursing homes provided baseline information about their infection prevention programs to assess strengths and gaps related to CAUTI prevention via a needs assessment questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 353 of 494 nursing homes from 41 states (71%; 47 VA and 306 non-VA facilities) responded. VA nursing homes reported more hours per week devoted to infection prevention-related activities (31 vs 12 hours; P<.001) and were more likely to have committees that reviewed healthcare-associated infections. Compared with non-VA facilities, a higher percentage of VA nursing homes reported tracking CAUTI rates (94% vs 66%; P<.001), sharing CAUTI data with leadership (94% vs 70%; P=.014) and with nursing personnel (85% vs 56%, P=.003). However, fewer VA nursing homes reported having policies for appropriate catheter use (64% vs 81%; P=.004) and catheter insertion (83% vs 94%; P=.004). CONCLUSIONS Among nursing homes participating in an AHRQ-funded collaborative, VA and non-VA nursing homes differed in their approach to CAUTI prevention. Best practices from both settings should be applied universally to create an optimal infection prevention program within emerging integrated healthcare systems. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:287-293.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Nursing Homes/standards , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Leadership , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Nursing Homes/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Management, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
5.
N Engl J Med ; 374(22): 2111-9, 2016 Jun 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27248619

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common device-associated infection in hospitals. Both technical factors--appropriate catheter use, aseptic insertion, and proper maintenance--and socioadaptive factors, such as cultural and behavioral changes in hospital units, are important in preventing catheter-associated UTI. METHODS: The national Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program, funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, aimed to reduce catheter-associated UTI in intensive care units (ICUs) and non-ICUs. The main program features were dissemination of information to sponsor organizations and hospitals, data collection, and guidance on key technical and socioadaptive factors in the prevention of catheter-associated UTI. Data on catheter use and catheter-associated UTI rates were collected during three phases: baseline (3 months), implementation (2 months), and sustainability (12 months). Multilevel negative binomial models were used to assess changes in catheter use and catheter-associated UTI rates. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 926 units (59.7% were non-ICUs, and 40.3% were ICUs) in 603 hospitals in 32 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. The unadjusted catheter-associated UTI rate decreased overall from 2.82 to 2.19 infections per 1000 catheter-days. In an adjusted analysis, catheter-associated UTI rates decreased from 2.40 to 2.05 infections per 1000 catheter-days (incidence rate ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 0.96; P=0.009). Among non-ICUs, catheter use decreased from 20.1% to 18.8% (incidence rate ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.96; P<0.001) and catheter-associated UTI rates decreased from 2.28 to 1.54 infections per 1000 catheter-days (incidence rate ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.82; P<0.001). Catheter use and catheter-associated UTI rates were largely unchanged in ICUs. Tests for heterogeneity (ICU vs. non-ICU) were significant for catheter use (P=0.004) and catheter-associated UTI rates (P=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A national prevention program appears to reduce catheter use and catheter-associated UTI rates in non-ICUs. (Funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.).


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Urinary Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Hospital Bed Capacity , Hospital Units , Humans , Incidence , Models, Statistical , United States , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology
6.
Pediatrics ; 136(6): 1080-6, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26574587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Central venous catheters in the NICU are associated with significant morbidity and mortality because of the risk of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of catheter dwell time on risk of CLABSI. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 13,327 infants with 15,567 catheters (93% peripherally inserted central catheters [PICCs], 7% tunneled catheters) and 256,088 catheter days cared for in 141 NICUs. CLABSI was defined using National Health Surveillance Network criteria. We defined dwell time as the number of days from line insertion until either line removal or day of CLABSI. We generated survival curves for each week of dwell time and estimated hazard ratios for CLABSI at each week by using a Cox proportional hazards frailty model. We controlled for postmenstrual age and year, included facility as a random effect, and generated separate models by line type. RESULTS: Median postmenstrual age was 29 weeks (interquartile range 26-33). The overall incidence of CLABSI was 0.93 per 1000 catheter days. Increased dwell time was not associated with increased risk of CLABSI for PICCs. For tunneled catheters, infection incidence was significantly higher in weeks 7 and 9 compared with week 1. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should not routinely replace uninfected PICCs for fear of infection but should consider removing tunneled catheters before week 7 if no longer needed. Additional studies are needed to determine what daily maintenance practices may be associated with decreased risk of infection, especially for tunneled catheters.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Central Venous Catheters/adverse effects , Sepsis/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Male , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sepsis/etiology , Time Factors , United States
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61(1): 86-94, 2015 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25814630

ABSTRACT

Preventing healthcare-associated infection (HAI) is a key contributor to enhancing resident safety in nursing homes. In 2013, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services approved a plan to enhance resident safety by reducing HAIs in nursing homes, with particular emphasis on reducing indwelling catheter use and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Lessons learned from a recent multimodal Targeted Infection Prevention program in a group of nursing homes as well as a national initiative to prevent CAUTI in over 950 acute care hospitals called "On the CUSP: STOP CAUTI" will now be implemented in nearly 500 nursing homes in all 50 states through a project funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). This "AHRQ Safety Program in Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI" will emphasize professional development in catheter utilization, catheter care and maintenance, and antimicrobial stewardship as well as promoting patient safety culture, team building, and leadership engagement. We anticipate that an approach integrating technical and socio-adaptive principles will serve as a model for future initiatives to reduce other infections, multidrug resistant organisms, and noninfectious adverse events among nursing home residents.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods , Nursing Homes , Patient Safety , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Health Policy , Humans , United States/epidemiology
8.
Am J Infect Control ; 42(10 Suppl): S230-5, 2014 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25239715

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Interdisciplinary Academy for Coaching and Teamwork (I-ACT) was an advanced course aimed at educating leaders of a quality improvement project on addressing clinical challenges associated with catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI), overcoming socioadaptive issues among a multidisciplinary team, and effective coaching. METHODS: The I-ACT course provided substantial opportunities for interaction among participants and faculty experts through role playing. Participants were grouped so that each discipline of a potential CAUTI improvement team was represented during interactive components of the training. Precourse and postcourse surveys were used to assess participants' comfort in addressing various challenges associated with implementation of interventions. RESULTS: After the course, participants expressed improved comfort with using the tools provided to address challenging socioadaptive issues. Written comments indicated that the participants valued being able to learn from experts and meet in a face-to-face setting. CONCLUSIONS: The I-ACT course was successful in training faculty to serve as improvement experts for US hospitals working on CAUTI prevention. After completing the course, participants felt that their comfort and ability to address complex improvement problems had improved. This model may be effective for use in preparing improvement project leaders and participants to tackle other healthcare-associated infections and complex quality problems.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Personnel/education , Infection Control/methods , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Health Education , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Hospitals , Humans , Patient Care Team , Quality Improvement , Surveys and Questionnaires , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 34(10): 1048-54, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24018921

ABSTRACT

Catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) represents a significant proportion of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The US Department of Health and Human Services issued a plan to reduce HAIs with a target 25% reduction of CAUTI by 2013. Michigan's successful collaborative to reduce unnecessary use of urinary catheters and CAUTI was based on a partnership between diverse hospitals, the state hospital association (SHA), and academic medical centers. Taking the lessons learned from Michigan, we are now spreading this work throughout the 50 states. This national spread leverages the expertise of different groups and organizations for the unified goal of reducing catheter-related harm. The key components of the project are (1) centralized coordination of the effort and dissemination of information to SHAs and hospitals, (2) data collection based on established definitions and approaches, (3) focused guidance on the technical practices that will prevent CAUTI, (4) emphasis on understanding the socioadaptive aspects (both the general, unit-wide issues and CAUTI-specific challenges), and (5) partnering with specialty organizations and governmental agencies who have expertise in the relevant subject area. The work may serve in the future as a model for other large improvement efforts to address other hospital-acquired conditions, such as venous thromboembolism and falls.


Subject(s)
Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Infection Control/organization & administration , Program Development/methods , Quality Improvement , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Academic Medical Centers , Catheter-Related Infections/etiology , Cooperative Behavior , Cross Infection/etiology , Data Collection , Government Agencies , Health Policy , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Information Dissemination , Public-Private Sector Partnerships , Societies, Hospital , Societies, Medical , United States , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL