Non-invasive myocardial work in aortic stenosis: validation and improvement in left ventricular pressure estimation.

AIMS: The non-invasive myocardial work index (MWI) has been validated in patients without aortic stenosis (AS). A thorough assessment of methodological limitations is warranted before this index can be applied to patients with AS. METHODS AND RESULTS: We simultaneously measured left ventricular pressure (LVP) by using a micromanometer-tipped catheter and obtained echocardiograms in 20 patients with severe AS. We estimated LVP curves and calculated pressure-strain loops using three different models: (i) the model validated in patients without AS; (ii) the same model, but with pressure at the aortic valve opening (AVO) adjusted to diastolic cuff pressure; and (iii) a new model based on the invasive measurements from patients with AS. Valvular events were determined by echocardiography. Peak LVP was estimated as the sum of the mean aortic transvalvular gradient and systolic cuff pressure. In same-beat comparisons between invasive and estimated LVP curves, Model 1 significantly overestimated early systolic pressure by 61 ± 5 mmHg at AVO compared with Models 2 and 3. However, the average correlation coefficients between estimated and invasive LVP traces were excellent for all models, and the overestimation had limited influence on MWI, with excellent correlation (r = 0.98, P < 0.001) and good agreement between the MWI calculated with estimated (all models) and invasive LVP. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the validity of the non-invasive MWI in patients with AS. The accuracy of estimated LVP curves improved when matching AVO to the diastolic pressure in the original model, mirroring that of the AS-specific model. This may sequentially enhance the accuracy of regional MWI assessment.

An investigator-sponsored pragmatic randomized controlled trial of AntiCoagulation vs AcetylSalicylic Acid after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Rationale and design of ACASA-TAVI.

BACKGROUND: The optimal antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) is associated with adverse outcomes and may be prevented by anticoagulation therapy. A dedicated randomized trial comparing monotherapy NOAC to single antiplatelet therapy has not been performed previously. We hypothesize that therapy with any anti-factor Xa NOAC will reduce BVD compared to antiplatelet therapy, without compromising safety. METHODS: ACASA-TAVI is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint, all-comers trial comparing a monotherapy anti-factor Xa NOAC strategy (intervention arm) with a single antiplatelet therapy strategy (control arm) after successful TAVI. Three-hundred and sixty patients without indication for oral anticoagulation will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either apixaban 5 mg twice per day, edoxaban 60 mg daily, or rivaroxaban 20 mg daily for 12 months followed by acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg daily indefinitely, or to acetylsalicylic acid 75 mg daily indefinitely. The 2 co-primary outcomes are (1) incidence of Hypo-Attenuated Leaflet Thickening (HALT) on 4-dimensional cardiac CT at 12 months, and (2) a Safety Composite of VARC-3 bleeding events, thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction and stroke), and death from any cause, at 12 months. RESULTS: The first 100 patients had a mean age of 74 ± 3.6 years, 33% were female, the average body-mass index was 27.9 ± 4.4 kg/m2, and 15% were smokers. A balloon-expanded valve was used in 82% and a self-expandable valve in 18%. CONCLUSIONS: The trial is planned, initiated, funded, and conducted without industry involvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05035277.

Thrombus formation in the noncoronary sinus of Valsalva following primary graft dysfunction.

We hereby present a case of thrombus formation in the noncoronary sinus of Valsalva following primary graft dysfunction. The case highlights that stagnant and nonpulsatile flow can form thrombi in the noncoronary sinus since this sinus does not have a natural distal runoff.

Strain echocardiography improves risk prediction of ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that strain echocardiography might improve arrhythmic risk stratification in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). BACKGROUND: Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias after MI is challenging. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% is the main parameter for selecting patients for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter study, 569 patients >40 days after acute MI were included, 268 of whom had ST-segment elevation MIs and 301 non-ST-segment elevation MIs. By echocardiography, global strain was assessed as average peak longitudinal systolic strain from 16 left ventricular segments. Time from the electrocardiographic R-wave to peak negative strain was assessed in each segment. Mechanical dispersion was defined as the standard deviation from these 16 time intervals, reflecting contraction heterogeneity. RESULTS: Ventricular arrhythmias, defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia or sudden death during a median 30 months (interquartile range: 18 months) of follow-up, occurred in 15 patients (3%). LVEFs were reduced (48 ± 17% vs. 55 ± 11%, p < 0.01), global strain was markedly reduced (-14.8 ± 4.7% vs. -18.2 ± 3.7%, p = 0.001), and mechanical dispersion was increased (63 ± 25 ms vs. 42 ± 17 ms, p < 0.001) in patients with arrhythmias compared with those without. Mechanical dispersion was an independent predictor of arrhythmic events (per 10-ms increase, hazard ratio: 1.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 2.5; p < 0.01). Mechanical dispersion and global strain were markers of arrhythmias in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MIs (p < 0.05 for both) and in those with LVEFs >35% (p < 0.05 for both), whereas LVEF was not (p = 0.33). A combination of mechanical dispersion and global strain showed the best positive predictive value for arrhythmic events (21%; 95% confidence interval: 6% to 46%). CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical dispersion by strain echocardiography predicted arrhythmic events independently of LVEF in this prospective, multicenter study of patients after MI. A combination of mechanical dispersion and global strain may improve the selection of patients after MI for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, particularly in patients with LVEFs >35% who did not fulfill current implantable cardioverter-defibrillator indications.

Mitral annular displacement by Doppler tissue imaging may identify coronary occlusion and predict mortality in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Mitral annular displacement (MAD) is a simple marker of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that MAD can distinguish patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMIs) from those with significant coronary artery disease without infarctions, identify coronary occlusion, and predict mortality in patients with NSTEMIs. MAD was compared with established indices of LV function. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 167 patients with confirmed NSTEMIs were included at two Scandinavian centers. Forty patients with significant coronary artery disease but without myocardial infarctions were included as controls. Doppler tissue imaging was performed at the mitral level of the left ventricle in the three apical planes, and velocities were integrated over time to acquire MAD. LV ejection fraction, global longitudinal strain (GLS), and wall motion score index were assessed according to guidelines. RESULTS: MAD and GLS could accurately distinguish patients with NSTEMIs from controls. During 48.6 ± 12.1 months of follow-up, 22 of 167 died (13%). MAD, LV ejection fraction, and GLS were reduced and wall motion score index was increased among those who died compared with those who survived (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, and P = .02, respectively). Multivariate Cox proportional-hazards analyses revealed that MAD was an independent predictor of death (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.73; P = .01). MAD and GLS were reduced and wall motion score index was increased in patients with coronary artery occlusion compared with those without occlusion (P = .006, P = .001, and P = .02), while LV ejection fraction did not differ (P = .20). CONCLUSIONS: MAD accurately identified patients with NSTEMIs, predicted mortality, and identified coronary occlusion in patients with NSTEMIs.