ABSTRACT
Background: Few studies have been conducted on young people's attitudes to the COVID-19 vaccine during the pandemic. We wished to examine how young people with an ethnic minority background decided whether to have the COVID-19 vaccine, based on the concept of vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy involves uncertainty with regard to vaccination, irrespective of the decision taken. Material and method: Fourteen qualitative in-depth interviews with young people aged 16-25 years with an ethnic minority background and from the east side of Oslo were analysed and categorised into main themes. The participants also had links to the Middle East, South Asia and Africa. Results: Several of the study participants were hesitant to be vaccinated. Their hesitation was linked to the impression that the vaccine had been developed rapidly, false rumours, long travel times to vaccination centres and fear of adverse effects. A number called for better information. Vaccination through the school was described as a facilitating factor. Family and friends were less crucial in their assessment of whether to have the COVID-19 vaccine. The majority had trust in the authorities. Interpretation: Insufficient knowledge about the vaccine and fear of adverse effects, as well as practical barriers associated with undergoing vaccination, appears to contribute to vaccine scepticism among young people with an ethnic minority background. The authorities and healthcare personnel should provide young people with better vaccine information. Information should be provided by personnel they already trust, such as the school nurse.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Vaccination Hesitancy , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Ethnicity/psychology , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice/ethnology , Minority Groups/psychology , Norway , Qualitative Research , Vaccination/psychology , Vaccination Hesitancy/psychology , Middle East/ethnology , Asia, Southern/ethnology , Africa/ethnologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Advanced age is the most important risk factor for death as a result of COVID-19, but there is a dearth of knowledge regarding the impact of chronic diseases. Using health registry data, we describe the disease profiles of persons who died after a confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 during the first three months of the pandemic in Norway. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Data from the specialist health service (Norwegian Patient Registry, NPR) and the primary health service (Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care, NRPHC) were linked to information on positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 from the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases (MSIS) and on deaths from the National Population Register. The data retrieval included the Norwegian population as of 1 March 2020 with data for confirmed infections, hospitalisations and deaths until 31 May 2020. RESULTS: Of 8 412 persons with a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, altogether 244 (2.9 %) died, whereof 133 (55 %) were men. Among those with a confirmed infection, the proportion who died varied from 0.2 % (age < 60 years) to 52 % (age ≥ 90 years). Altogether 92 (38 %) patients died in hospital. 25 (16 %) of those who died elsewhere had previously been hospitalised for COVID-19. The proportion with no registered chronic disease was 39 % in the age group < 70 years and 26 % in the age group ≥ 70 years. The disease distribution varied between those patients who had died in and outside of hospital, especially for diagnoses of diabetes, renal failure and dementia. INTERPRETATION: Among those who had a SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed during the first three months of the pandemic in Norway, only a small proportion died. The majority of those who died were 70 years or older and had at least one chronic disease, but the disease profile varied between patients who died in and outside of hospital. Health registry data can help provide a better overview of and advice to risk groups in the population during an ongoing pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Pandemics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Norway/epidemiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases, cancer, type-2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were initially noted as the most common diseases among individuals who were hospitalised for COVID-19. However, the evidence base is weak. The objective of this study is to describe how selected diseases were distributed among adults with confirmed COVID-19 (COVID-19 positive tests) and among those hospitalised for COVID-19 compared to the general population. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We used data from the Norwegian Patient Registry, the Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care and the Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases for adults from the age of 20 and older for the period 1 March 2020-13 May 2020. RESULTS: Of all those who tested positive for COVID-19, 7 632 (94 %) were aged 20 years or older, and 1 025 (13.4 %) of these had been hospitalised. Among those hospitalised with COVID-19, there was a higher proportion of individuals with cardiovascular diseases (18.3 % versus 15.6 %), cancer (6.9 % versus 5.4 %), type-2 diabetes (8.6 % versus 5.2 %) and COPD (3.8 % versus 2.7 %) than in the general population as a whole after adjusting for age. The proportion of hospitalised patients with asthma, other chronic respiratory disease, cardiovascular disease, ongoing cancer treatment, complications related to hypertension, obesity and overweight, neurological disorders and cardiac and renal failure was also higher than in the general population. There were few differences between persons who had tested positive for COVID-19 and the general population in terms of underlying conditions. INTERPRETATION: Among those hospitalised for COVID-19, there was a higher proportion of patients with underlying illnesses than in the general population. This may indicate that these patients tend to have a more severe course of disease or that they are more likely to be hospitalised compared to healthy individuals. The results must be interpreted with caution, since the sample of COVID-19 individuals is non-random.