Incidental Findings from 16,400 Brain MRI Examinations of Research Volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Incidental findings are discovered in neuroimaging research, ranging from trivial to life-threatening. We describe the prevalence and characteristics of incidental findings from 16,400 research brain MRIs, comparing spontaneous detection by nonradiology scanning staff versus formal neuroradiologist interpretation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected 16,400 brain MRIs (7782 males, 8618 females; younger than 1 to 94 years of age; median age, 38 years) under an institutional review board directive intended to identify clinically relevant incidental findings. The study population included 13,150 presumed healthy volunteers and 3250 individuals with known neurologic diagnoses. Scanning staff were asked to flag concerning imaging findings seen during the scan session, and neuroradiologists produced structured reports after reviewing every scan. RESULTS: Neuroradiologists reported 13,593/16,400 (83%) scans as having normal findings, 2193/16,400 (13.3%) with abnormal findings without follow-up recommended, and 614/16,400 (3.7%) with "abnormal findings with follow-up recommended." The most common abnormalities prompting follow-up were vascular (263/614, 43%), neoplastic (130/614, 21%), and congenital (92/614, 15%). Volunteers older than 65 years of age were significantly more likely to have scans with abnormal findings (P < .001); however, among all volunteers with incidental findings, those younger than 65 years of age were more likely to be recommended for follow-up. Nonradiologists flagged <1% of MRIs containing at least 1 abnormality reported by the neuroradiologists to be concerning enough to warrant further evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Four percent of individuals who undergo research brain MRIs have an incidental, potentially clinically significant finding. Routine neuroradiologist review of all scans yields a much higher rate of significant lesion detection than selective referral from nonradiologists who perform the examinations. Workflow and scan review processes need to be carefully considered when designing research protocols.

Vitamin D and Vulnerable Carotid Plaque.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging-detected carotid intraplaque hemorrhage indicates vulnerable plaque with high stroke risk. Angiotensin II stimulates intraplaque hemorrhage in animal models, and the angiotensin system is highly regulated by vitamin D. Our purpose was to determine whether low vitamin D levels predict carotid intraplaque hemorrhage in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 65 patients with carotid disease underwent carotid MR imaging and blood draw. Systemic clinical confounders and local lumen imaging markers were recorded. To determine the association of low vitamin D levels with MR imaging detected intraplaque hemorrhage, we performed multivariable Poisson regression by using generalized estimating equations to account for up to 2 carotid arteries per patient and backward elimination of confounders. MR imaging detected intraplaque hemorrhage volume was also correlated with vitamin D levels and maximum plaque thickness. Thirty-five patients underwent carotid endarterectomy, and histology-detected intraplaque hemorrhage was correlated with vitamin D levels and total plaque area. RESULTS: Low vitamin D levels (<30 ng/mL, prevalence ratio = 2.05, P = .03) were a significant predictor of MR imaging detected intraplaque hemorrhage, along with plaque thickness (prevalence ratio = 1.40, P < .001). MR imaging detected intraplaque hemorrhage volume linearly correlated with plaque thickness (partial r = 0.45, P < .001) and low vitamin D levels (partial r = 0.26, P = .003). Additionally, histology-detected intraplaque hemorrhage area linearly correlated with plaque area (partial r = 0.46, P < .001) and low vitamin D levels (partial r = 0.22, P = .03). The association of intraplaque hemorrhage volume with low vitamin D levels was also higher with ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Low vitamin D levels and plaque thickness predict carotid intraplaque hemorrhage and outperform lumen markers of vulnerable plaque. This research demonstrates a significant link between low vitamin D levels and carotid intraplaque hemorrhage.

Prediction of Carotid Intraplaque Hemorrhage Using Adventitial Calcification and Plaque Thickness on CTA.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage is associated with stroke, plaque thickness, stenosis, ulceration, and adventitial inflammation. Conflicting data exist on whether calcification is a marker of plaque instability, and no data exist on adventitial calcification. Our goal was to determine whether adventitial calcification and soft plaque (a rim sign) help predict carotid intraplaque hemorrhage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of 96 patients who underwent carotid MRA and CTA within 1 month, from 2009 to 2016. We excluded occlusions (n = 4) and near occlusions (n = 0), leaving 188 carotid arteries. Intraplaque hemorrhage was detected by using MPRAGE. Calcification, adventitial pattern, stenosis, maximum plaque thickness (total, soft, and hard), ulceration, and intraluminal thrombus on CTA were recorded. Atherosclerosis risk factors and medications were recorded. We used mixed-effects multivariable Poisson regression, accounting for 2 vessels per patient. For the final model, backward elimination was used with a threshold of P < .10. Receiver operating characteristic analysis determined intraplaque hemorrhage by using the area under the curve. RESULTS: Our final model included the rim sign (prevalence ratio = 11.9, P < .001) and maximum soft-plaque thickness (prevalence ratio = 1.2, P = .06). This model had excellent intraplaque hemorrhage prediction (area under the curve = 0.94), outperforming the rim sign, maximum soft-plaque thickness, NASCET stenosis, and ulceration (area under the curve = 0.88, 0.86, 0.77, and 0.63, respectively; P < .001). Addition of the rim sign performed better than each marker alone, including maximum soft-plaque thickness (area under the curve = 0.94 versus 0.86, P < .001), NASCET stenosis (area under the curve = 0.90 versus 0.77, P < .001), and ulceration (area under the curve = 0.90 versus 0.63, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The CTA rim sign of adventitial calcification with internal soft plaque is highly predictive of carotid intraplaque hemorrhage.