ABSTRACT
AIM: The present study aimed to compare the effectiveness of intralesional placentrex versus hyaluronidase + dexamethasone injection in the symptomatic management of stage II OSMF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a non-randomized prospective study conducted over a period of 14 months at a tertiary referral center. Patients with clinical stage II OSMF were randomly grouped into A(n = 18) and B(n = 17). These patients were treated with weekly intralesional injection of placentrex and hyaluronidase + dexamethasone respectively, over a period of six weeks. Variables such as mouth opening, burning sensation and colour of mucosa were evaluated at baseline(T0), second week(T1), fourth week(T3), sixth week(T4) of follow up. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 15 patients completed the study in each group with regular follow up. The mean improvement in mouth opening was 4.3 ± 0.57 mms in group A(p-value < 0.001) and 7.2 ± 0.76 mms in group B(p-value < 0.001) which were significant at the end of six weeks. Mean change in burning sensation at the end of six weeks in group A was 1.2 ± 0.73(p-value < 0.001), and 3.6 ± 0.63(p-value < 0.001) in group B. Mean change in colour of mucosa at the end of six weeks was 1.4 in group A(p-value > 0.05) and 2 in group B(p-value > 0.05). On comparison between both groups, patients in group B exhibited better mouth opening and reduction of burning sensation than patients in group A(p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Both intralesional placentrex and hyaluronidase + dexamethasone injection are effective in alleviating the symptoms of stage II OSMF. However, hyaluronidase + dexamethasone injection showed slightly better improvement in mouth opening and burning sensation after six weeks.
ABSTRACT
Many options exist in the diagnosis and management of condylar osteochondroma. The purpose of this study was to provide a congregate information concerning treatment of the osteochondroma involving the mandibular condyle. The search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and Cochrane database until February 2022. Twenty-seven studies were included for the final review. The review included 439 patients who underwent surgical management for mandibular condylar osteochondroma. The position of osteochondroma was mentioned in 13 studies. Preauricular, retromandibular, endaural, submandibular, transzygomatic, and intraoral approaches were used for approaching the tumor. Surgical techniques included resection, conservative condylectomy, and total condylectomy. Concomitant orthognathic surgery was performed along with tumor resection in 19 studies. In the entire review, the recurrence rate was 0.22% (1/439). The results of the meta-analysis showed that 2 studies reported significant malocclusion events after surgical therapy. Total joint replacement after tumor resection has a higher improvement in maximal mouth opening (8 mm) compared with vertical ramus osteotomy and no reconstruction groups, which have similar improvements (6 mm). The mainstay of treatment of osteochondroma is surgical excision either as condylectomy or conservative condylectomy. Among the various reconstruction modalities, total joint replacement showed better improvement in mouth opening. Adjunct procedures like orthodontic and orthognathic surgery have an important role in holistic management of severe cases. The treating surgeon must choose the surgical procedures in a pragmatic way.
Subject(s)
Mandibular Neoplasms , Osteochondroma , Humans , Mandibular Condyle/surgery , Mandibular Condyle/pathology , Mandibular Neoplasms/surgery , Mandibular Neoplasms/pathology , Osteotomy/methods , Treatment Outcome , Osteochondroma/diagnostic imaging , Osteochondroma/surgery , Osteochondroma/complications , Facial Asymmetry/complications , Facial Asymmetry/pathology , Facial Asymmetry/surgeryABSTRACT
The present paper discusses the diagnostic challenges we faced in a 60-year-old woman with a history of schizophrenia, presenting with left unilateral facial pain for the past three months. Based on the elaborate clinical examination and diagnostic nerve blocks, the patient was diagnosed with trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and non-surgical therapy commenced. Further investigations with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) revealed the presence of an extracranial schwannoma involving a branch of the maxillary nerve. The patient was symptomatically relieved after surgical excision of the benign tumor under general anesthesia. Hence, we emphasize the need for special care and attention in psychiatric patients presenting with orofacial pain.
Subject(s)
Neurilemmoma , Schizophrenia , Trigeminal Neuralgia , Female , Humans , Aged , Middle Aged , Trigeminal Neuralgia/diagnosis , Maxillary Nerve/pathology , Neurilemmoma/complications , Neurilemmoma/diagnosis , Neurilemmoma/pathology , Facial Pain , Diagnostic ErrorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the complications of arthroscopic lysis and lavage with joint sweep (ALL) procedure in the management of disc derangement of the temporomandibular joint. METHODS: Patients with internal derangement of the TMJ who were treated by ALL in a tertiary institution from July 2018 to December 2021 were studied retrospectively. RESULTS: The study included 39 patients (males, n = 14; females, n = 25) and 50 joints. The complications observed in the study were classified into intra and post operative complications. Post operative complications such as pain (16%), swelling (6%), reduced mouth opening (22%) and neurological complications were the most commonly observed ones. Rare complications such as ipsilateral palatal swelling (6%), parapharyngeal swelling (4%), and post operative malocclusion (2%) were also observed. CONCLUSION: Although the complications of ALL are entirely unavoidable, their incidence can be reduced by strict adherence to standard techniques. Three-dimensional awareness and orientation of the dangerous angles and depth around the TMJ region is mandatory to reduce the complications.
Subject(s)
Joint Dislocations , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Male , Female , Humans , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery , Therapeutic Irrigation/adverse effects , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Arthroscopy/adverse effects , Arthroscopy/methods , Temporomandibular Joint/surgeryABSTRACT
Our aim was to observe if there was any appreciable difference in the etiology and pattern of maxillofacial fractures during the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods in Central Kerala, South India. This retrospective study was conducted with data over a period of two years from the central database registry of our hospital. Age, sex, etiology, date of injury, and site of facial fractures were recorded and compared between both the time periods. Increase in facial fractures due to fall at home (p value < 0.01) and decrease in mass casualty cases (p value < 0.01) were observed during the COVID-19 period. Pedestrians involved were significantly more in the pre-COVID-19 period (p value < 0.01) and heavy vehicle accidents producing facial fractures were significantly more in the COVID-19 period (p value < 0.01). Frontal bone (p value = 0.008), nasal bone (p value < 0.001) and zygomatico-maxillary complex fractures (p value < 0.001) occurred significantly more in the COVID-19 time period whereas naso-orbito-ethmoidal (p value = 0.003), mandibular (p value = 0.011) and dentoalveolar fractures (p value < 0.001) were seen significantly more in the pre-COVID-19 period. There was decrease in the total number of maxillofacial cases during the COVID-19 period. However, this was not significant when only the number of facial fractures were compared between the two periods. This study provided an insight on the differences in etiology and pattern of maxillofacial fractures during the pre-COVID-19 and COVID-19 periods. Road traffic accidents involving two wheelers predominate during the COVID-19 period also, prompting further critical exploration of the reasons behind this finding.
ABSTRACT
The management of odontogenic infections is established and several guidelines have been proposed for its effective treatment. Outbreak of COVID-19 has posed serious challenge in the management of odontogenic infections, further complicated by immunocompromised status of the patient, where adequate evaluation and prompt attention is mandatory to avoid untoward consequences. Ludwig's angina being a life threatening infection by itself, association or simultaneous presentation with COVID-19 infection can add further complexity in the management for a maxillofacial surgeon. Here we present a case report of Ludwig's angina in a patient who tested positive for Coronavirus infection and how we treated her successfully.