ABSTRACT
During the pandemic period, health care systems were substantially reorganized for managing COVID-19 cases. Corresponding consequences on persons with chronic diseases remain insufficiently documented. This observational cohort study investigated the direct and indirect impact of the pandemic period on the survival of kidney transplant recipients (KTR). Using the French National Health Data System, incident persons with end-stage kidney disease between 2015 and 2020, and who received a kidney transplant during this period were included and followed up from their transplantation date to December 31, 2021. The survival of KTR during the prepandemic and pandemic periods was investigated using Cox models with time-dependent covariates. There were 10 637 KTR included in the study, with 324 and 430 deaths observed during the prepandemic and pandemic periods, respectively. The adjusted risk of death during the pandemic period was similar to that observed during the prepandemic period (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval]: 0.92 [0.77-1.11]), COVID-19-related hospitalization was associated with an increased risk of death (HR: 10.62 [8.46-13.33]), and a third vaccine dose was associated with a lower risk of death (HR: 0.42 [0.30-0.57]). The pandemic period was not associated with an indirect higher risk of death in KTR with no COVID-19-related hospitalization.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Kidney Transplantation , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Transplant Recipients , France/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The pivotal event in the pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy is the binding of circulating IgA-containing immune complexes to mesangial cells, with secondary glomerular and tubulointerstitial inflammation and fibrosis. The paramount difficulty in the management of IgA nephropathy is the heterogeneity in its clinical presentation and prognosis, requiring an individualized treatment approach. Goal-directed supportive care remains the bedrock of therapy for all patients, regardless of risk of progression. Sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors and sparsentan should be integral to contemporary supportive care, particularly in patients with chronic kidney damage. Pending the development of reliable biomarkers, it remains a challenge to identify patients prone to progression due to active disease and most likely to derive a net benefit from immunosuppression. The use of clinical parameters, including the degree of proteinuria, the presence of persistent microscopic hematuria, and the rate of eGFR loss, combined with the mesangial hypercellularity, endocapillary hypercellularity, segmental glomerulosclerosis, tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis, crescents score, is currently the best approach. Systemic glucocorticoids are indicated in high-risk patients, but the beneficial effects wane after withdrawal and come at the price of substantial treatment-associated toxicity. Therapies with direct effect on disease pathogenesis are increasingly becoming available. While targeted-release budesonide has garnered the most attention, anti-B-cell strategies and selective complement inhibition will most likely prove their added value. We propose a comprehensive approach that tackles the different targets in the pathophysiology of IgA nephropathy according to their relevance in the individual patient.
Subject(s)
Glomerulonephritis, IGA , Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental , Humans , Glomerulonephritis, IGA/drug therapy , Glomerulonephritis, IGA/complications , Kidney Glomerulus/pathology , Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental/pathology , Prognosis , FibrosisABSTRACT
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common inherited kidney disease. While biallelic variants affecting IFT140 are responsible for Mainzer-Saldino syndrome (characterized by severe ciliopathy causing skeletal abnormalities, kidney disease, and cysts), monoallelic loss-of-function (LoF) variants have been recently reported as an important cause of ADPKD beyond PKD1/2 genes. Herein, we report 6 non-family-related cases of monoallelic IFT140 LoF variants, identified from 1,340 exomes sequenced for nephrological indications in our local database. Every patient presented with polycystic kidney disease. Furthermore, the mother of a boy diagnosed with Mainzer-Saldino syndrome with a biallelic variant affecting IFT140 presented with several bilateral cysts, revealed after kidney imaging, and was found to carry a pathologic frameshift IFT140 variation. As well as this particular Mainzer-Saldino case, our 6 additional patients confirm that heterozygous IFT140 frameshift variants are responsible for the cystic phenotype and kidney failure. Interestingly, of the 6 patients, 2 also exhibited dilated cardiomyopathy, which was of unknown origin, as no genetic cause was found after exome sequencing analysis, suggesting a potential connection between IFT140 and heart disease.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) p.Val142Ile (V122I) mutation is the most common inherited cause of cardiac amyloidosis and little is known about the phenotype and outcome of the rare homozygotic genotype. This study aimed to compare phenotypic characteristics and outcomes between heterozygous and homozygous patients with ATTRv V122I amyloidosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This monocentric, observational, retrospective study conducted at the French National Referral Centre for Cardiac Amyloidosis (Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil), described clinical, electrocardiographic, cardiac imaging features and prognostic data for patients with ATTRv V122I amyloidosis. RESULTS: Among 185 ATTRv V122I patients identified, 161 were heterozygous and 24 were homozygous. The homozygous frequency was 13%. Onset occured significantly earlier in the homozygotes compared to heterozygotes with earlier median age at diagnosis (67[63-71] years vs 76[70-79] years, p < .001), age at first cardiac symptom (66[61-71] years vs 74[68-78] years, p < .001) and age at first extracardiac symptom (59[52-70] years vs 69[62-75] years, p = .003). Homozygous ATTRv V122I was also associated with greater disease burden with earlier events (death, transplant or hospitalisation for acute heart failure) compared with heterozygotes (71[67-74] vs 78[76-79] years, p = .018). CONCLUSION: This rare, homozygous V122I cohort confirmed the earlier age of onset, death and cardiac events in this population.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial , Prealbumin , Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Cohort Studies , Homozygote , Heterozygote , Retrospective Studies , Prealbumin/genetics , Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial/genetics , Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial/complicationsABSTRACT
Data regarding renal involvement in patients with hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis are scarce and the natural course of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in this population remains unclear. This observational study, including adult patients diagnosed with ATTRv amyloidosis at the French Reference Centre for Cardiac Amyloidosis, investigated renal function outcome and its determinants. Multivariable logistic regression models identified factors associated with CKD at baseline. Determinants of the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over 24 months of follow-up were assessed with a multivariable linear mixed-effects model. In total, 232 patients (78 women [34%], mean age: 64 years) with ATTRv amyloidosis were classified on the basis of their TTR variants: ATTRV122I (37%), ATTRV30M (29%), and other variants (34%). Median baseline eGFR was 78 ml/min/1.73 m2. Seventy-two patients (31%) had an eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73m2 and 27/137 patients (20%) had significant proteinuria (urine protein/creatinine ratio ≥30 mg/mmol). Renal biopsy, performed in four cases, found typical Congo red-positive and TTR-labelled amyloid deposits in all cases. Older age (OR 1.07, p < .001) and a prior history of hypertension (OR 2.09, p = .04) were associated with a higher prevalence of CKD at baseline, whereas higher left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) (OR 0.83, p < .001) was associated with a lower prevalence. The estimated change in eGFR was -7.12 [-9.61, -4.63] and -8.21 [-10.81, -5.60] ml/min/1.73 m2 after 12 and 24 months of follow-up, respectively. eGFR decline was independently associated with older age ((67-74], coefficient= -14.35 mL/min/1.73 m2, p < .01, >74, coefficient = -22.93 mL/min/1.73 m2, p < .001, versus <56), ATTRV122I (coefficient = -17.17 mL/min/1.73m2, p < .01, versus ATTRV30M) and LVGLS (coefficient = 1.22, p < .01). These data suggest that CKD is a common finding in patients with ATTRv amyloidosis, and that eGFR decline is rapid during the first year of evaluation. Older age, lower LVGLS and ATTRV122I were associated with a worse renal outcome. Further studies are now needed to evaluate effects of new targeted therapies on long term renal function.
Subject(s)
Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Adult , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Kidney Function Tests , Kidney , Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial/complications , Amyloid Neuropathies, Familial/genetics , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
The causal protein of amyloid light-chain (AL) amyloidosis is a monoclonal immunoglobulin free light chain (mFLC), which must be quantified in the serum for patient diagnosis and monitoring. Several manufacturers commercialize immunoassays that quantify total kappa (κ) and lambda (λ) FLC, but results can differ greatly between these tests. Here, we compared a recently developed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Sebia) with N-Latex immunonephelometry (Siemens) in 96 patients diagnosed with AL amyloidosis (histologically confirmed) and 48 non-AL patients sent to our referral center for suspicion of cardiac amyloidosis. ELISA free-light chain difference (dFLC) were lower than N-Latex values, and agreement between methods was reduced in the case of involved λ FLC. Diagnosis sensitivity and specificity were >85% with both assays. A receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that ELISA performances could be improved by using a higher value for the lower limit of the κ/λ ratio. We also assessed Freelite (The Binding Site) in a subgroup of these same AL patients, including 18 cases with normal κ/λ ratio by at least one assay. Only two patients had normal κ/λ ratio with all three assays. Overall, ELISA demonstrated slightly lower sensitivity than N-Latex but may be an alternative to nephelometry/turbidimetry in certain difficult cases.
ABSTRACT
Importance: Older patients are underrepresented in studies of rituximab for the treatment of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis. Little is known about outcomes and adverse events associated with the use of rituximab therapy among patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis. Objective: To examine outcomes and adverse events associated with the use of rituximab therapy in patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis, specifically granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) or microscopic polyangiitis (MPA). Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study involved 93 patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis from 36 university and nonuniversity hospitals in France. Data were obtained from the French Vasculitis Study Group database between January 1, 2000, and July 1, 2018, and a call for observation sent to French Vasculitis Study Group members on June 6, 2019. Data analysis was performed from November 15 to December 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of GPA or MPA according to European Medicines Agency classification criteria and receipt of treatment with rituximab after age 75 years. Patients were excluded if they were missing relevant clinical or biological data. Data on race and ethnicity were not reported because inclusion of this information was not authorized by the ethics committee. Exposure: At least 1 infusion of rituximab as induction or maintenance therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Occurrence of remission, relapse, drug discontinuation, death, and serious infections (including types of serious infections). Results: Of 238 patients screened, 93 were included (median [IQR] age, 79.4 [76.7-83.1] years; 51 women [54.8%]); 52 patients (55.9%) had a diagnosis of GPA, and 41 (44.1%) had a diagnosis of MPA. Thirty patients (32.3%) received rituximab as induction therapy in combination with high-dose glucocorticoid regimens, 27 (29.0%) received rituximab as maintenance therapy, and 36 (38.7%) received rituximab as both induction and maintenance therapy. The median (IQR) follow-up was 2.3 (1.1-4.0) years. Among 66 patients who received rituximab as induction therapy, 57 (86.4%) achieved remission, and 2 (3.0%) experienced relapses. The incidence of serious infection was significantly higher when rituximab was used as induction therapy vs maintenance therapy (46.6 [95% CI, 24.8-79.7] per 100 patient-years vs 8.4 [95% CI, 3.8-15.9] per 100 patient-years; P = .004). Most infections (12 of 22 [54.5%]) were gram-negative bacterial infections. The incidence of death was 19.7 (95% CI, 7.2-42.9) per 100 patient-years among those who received rituximab as induction therapy and 5.3 (95% CI, 1.9-11.6) per 100 patient-years among those who received rituximab as maintenance therapy. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, rituximab therapy was associated with achievement and maintenance of remission in most patients 75 years and older with ANCA-associated vasculitis. The incidence of serious infections and death was high when rituximab was used as induction therapy in combination with high-dose glucocorticoid regimens but not when rituximab was used as maintenance therapy. Efforts might focus on reducing serious infections during the first months of therapy.
Subject(s)
Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic , Aged , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/chemically induced , Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis/drug therapy , Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Female , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Recurrence , Rituximab/adverse effects , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: There is currently no evidence of the possible benefit of plasma cell-targeting therapies (PCTT) in immunoglobulin A (IgA) monoclonal gammopathy (MG) associated with IgA vasculitis (IgAV). We report the outcome of different PCTT regimens in a cohort of MG-IgAV. METHODS: We used a French network to retrospectively describe the outcome of MG-IgAV patients treated with PCTT. RESULTS: Five patients were included (mean age 65 years). All patients had severe baseline presentation including extensive necrotic purpura (n = 5), gastrointestinal involvement (n = 2), peripheral neuropathies (n = 2), and glomerulonephritis (n = 1). Two patients had IgA indolent multiple myeloma and three had IgA "MG of undetermined significance." Monotypic IgA deposition in the skin vessels wall was highlighted using an immunofluorescence assay. Cases of vasculitis in three patients (n = 3) were refractory to multiple line therapies, including cyclophosphamide (n = 3) or rituximab. Finally, PCTT including bortezomib plus cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone, bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone, or bortezomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone were proposed, allowing complete remission in 4/5 patients without major adverse drug events. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the MG-IgAV phenotype might be distinctive of usual IgAV (severe and refractory to conventional immunosuppressive regimens) and supports the benefit of PCTT. This study sheds new light on the overall biology of IgAV, strengthening the pathogenic role of the monoclonal IgA component in IgAV.
Subject(s)
IgA Vasculitis , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance , Paraproteinemias , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Humans , Immunoglobulin A , Lenalidomide , Melphalan , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/complications , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/drug therapy , Paraproteinemias/complications , Paraproteinemias/drug therapy , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/drug therapy , Plasma Cells , Prednisone , Retrospective Studies , Rituximab/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: After two doses of mRNA vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), patients on dialysis show a defective humoral response, but a third dose could increase anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike IgG titers. Responses could be different in virus-naive and SARS-CoV-2-recovered patients on dialysis. However, characterization of memory B cell response after three doses is lacking. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We evaluated the dynamics of antireceptor binding domain IgG titers and antireceptor binding domain memory B cells until 6 months after two and three doses (administered within 6 months after the second dose) of mRNA vaccine in SARS-CoV-2-recovered and virus-naive dialysis populations. Results were analyzed by ordinary one-way ANOVA, the Kruskal-Wallis test, or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test as appropriate. RESULTS: In total, 108 individuals (59 patients on dialysis and 49 controls) were included. In virus-naive patients on dialysis, antireceptor binding domain IgG response was quantitatively lower after two doses compared with healthy controls, but IgG titers increased by three-fold after three doses (P=0.008). In SARS-CoV-2-recovered patients on dialysis, antireceptor binding domain IgG titers after two doses were significantly higher compared with virus-naive patients on dialysis but did not significantly increase after a third dose. Regarding memory B cell response, we detected receptor binding domain-specific memory B cells at similar proportions in virus-naive patients on dialysis and vaccinated controls after two doses. Moreover, a strong receptor binding domain-specific memory B cell expansion was observed after the third dose in virus-naive patients on dialysis (5.5-fold; P<0.001). However, in SARS-CoV-2-recovered patients on dialysis, antireceptor binding domain memory B cells remained unchanged after the third dose. CONCLUSIONS: The third dose of mRNA vaccine given within 6 months after the second dose boosts serologic and memory response in virus-naive patients but not in SARS-CoV-2-recovered patients on dialysis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: COVID-19: SARS-CoV-2 Specific Memory B and T-CD4+ Cells (MEMO-COV2), NCT04402892.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibodies, Viral , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Immunity , Immunoglobulin G , Renal Dialysis , Vaccination , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA VaccinesABSTRACT
Background: The prevalence, prognostic role, and diagnostic value of blood pressure in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) and other thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) remain unclear. Methods: Using a national cohort of iTTP (n = 368), Shigatoxin-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (n = 86), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (n = 84), and hypertension-related thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 25), we sought to compare the cohort's blood pressure profile to assess its impact on prognosis and diagnostic performances. Results: Patients with iTTP had lower blood pressure than patients with other TMAs, systolic (130 [interquartile range (IQR) 118-143] vs 161 [IQR 142-180] mmHg) and diastolic (76 [IQR 69-83] vs 92 [IQR 79-105] mmHg, both p < 0.001). The best threshold for iTTP diagnosis corresponded to a systolic blood pressure <150 mmHg. iTTP patients presenting with hypertension had a significantly poorer survival (hazard ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.04), and this effect remained significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio = 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.30). Addition of a blood pressure criterion modestly improved the French clinical score to predict a severe A disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 deficiency in patients with an intermediate score (i.e., either platelet count <30 × 109/L or serum creatinine <200 µM). Conclusions: Elevated blood pressure at admission affects the prognosis of iTTP patients and may help discriminate them from other TMA patients. Particular attention should be paid to blood pressure and its management in these patients.
ABSTRACT
Increasing number of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have been approved for chronic haematopoietic neoplasms and inflammatory/autoimmune diseases. We aimed to assess safety of the first three approved JAK inhibitors: ruxolitinib, tofacitinib and baricitinib. In this retrospective observational study, pharmacovigilance data were extracted from the World Health Organization database. Adverse events are classified according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities hierarchy. Until February 28, 2021, all Individual Case Safety Reports [ICSRs] with the suspected drug ruxolitinib, tofacitinib or baricitinib were included. Disproportionality analysis was performed and the information component (IC) was estimated. Adverse events were considered a significant signal if the lower end of the 95% credibility interval of the IC (IC025) was positive. We identified 126,815 ICSRs involving JAK inhibitors. Ruxolitinib, tofacitinib and baricitinib were associated with infectious adverse events (IC025 1.7, especially with viral [herpes and influenza], fungal, and mycobacterial infectious disorders); musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (IC025 1.1); embolism and thrombosis (IC025 0.4); and neoplasms (IC025 0.8, especially malignant skin neoplasms). Tofacitinib was associated with gastrointestinal perforation events (IC025 1.5). We did not find a significant increase in the reporting of major cardiovascular events. We identified significant association between adverse events and ruxolitinib, tofacinitib and baricitinib in international pharmacovigilance database.
Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Janus Kinase Inhibitors , Databases, Factual , Humans , Janus Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Pharmacovigilance , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Dialysis patients have a high mortality risk after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and an altered immunologic response to vaccines, but vaccine clinical effectiveness remains unknown in this population. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Using Bayesian multivariable spatiotemporal models, we estimated the association between vaccine exposure and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) severe infections (with hospital admission) in dialysis patients from simultaneous incidence in the general population. For dialysis patients, cases were reported within the French end-stage kidney disease REIN registry from March 11, 2020, to April 29, 2021, and vaccine exposure (first dose) was reported in weekly national surveys since January 2021. Cases in the general population were obtained from the national exhaustive inpatient surveillance system (SI-VIC database), and vaccination coverage (first dose) was obtained from the national surveillance system (VAC-SI database). RESULTS: During the first wave, incidence in dialysis patients was approximately proportional to the general population. However, we showed a lower relative incidence for dialysis patients during the second wave (compared with that observed in nondialysis patients), suggesting an effect of prevention measures. Moreover, from the beginning of the vaccination rollout, incidence in dialysis patients was lower compared with predictions based on the first and second waves. Adding vaccination coverages in dialysis and nondialysis patients as predictors allowed the reported cases to be fit correctly (3685 predicted cases, 95% confidence interval, 3552 to 3816, versus 3620 reported). Incidence rate ratios were 0.37 (95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.71) for vaccine exposure in dialysis patients and 0.50 (95% confidence interval, 0.40 to 0.61) per 10% higher in vaccination coverage in the same-age general population, meaning that vaccine exposure in dialysis patients and the general population was independently associated with lower hospitalization rate of dialysis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that vaccination may yield a protective effect against severe forms of COVID-19 in dialysis patients, despite altered immunologic vaccine responses.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , COVID-19/prevention & control , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Renal Dialysis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Vaccine Efficacy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bayes Theorem , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Female , France/epidemiology , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/immunology , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Spatio-Temporal Analysis , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , VaccinationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Maintenance haemodialysis (MHD) patients have a high risk of initial mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, long-term consequences of this disease in the MHD population are poorly described. We report the clinical presentation, outcome and long-term follow-up of MHD patients affected by COVID-19 in a multicentric cohort from the Paris, France area. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of clinical presentation and long-term follow-up of MHD patients affected by COVID-19 in 19 MHD centres in the Paris, France area. RESULTS: In this cohort of 248 patients with an initial mortality rate of 18%, age, comorbidities, dyspnoea and previous immunosuppressive treatment were associated with death at <30 days. Among the 203 surviving patients following the acute phase, long-term follow-up (median 180 days) was available for 189 (93%) patients. Major adverse events occurred in 30 (16%) patients during follow-up, including 12 deaths (6%) after a median of 78 days from onset of symptoms. Overall, cardiovascular events, infections and gastrointestinal bleeding were the main major adverse events. Post-COVID-19 cachexia was observed in 25/189 (13%) patients. Lower initial albuminaemia was significantly associated with this cachexia. No reinfection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was observed. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrates the long-term consequences of COVID-19 in MHD patients, highlighting both initial and long-term severity of the disease, including severe cachexia.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has profound adverse effects on the population on dialysis. Patients requiring dialysis are at an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and mortality, and many have experienced psychological distress as well as delayed or suboptimal care. COVID-19 survivors have prolonged viral shedding, but generally develop a robust and long-lasting humoral immune response that correlates with initial disease severity. However, protection against reinfection is incomplete. A growing body of evidence reveals delayed and blunted immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Administration of a third dose within 1 to 2 months of prime-boost vaccination significantly increases antibody levels, in particular in patients with poor initial responses. Patients on dialysis have inferior immune responses to adenoviral vector vaccines than to mRNA vaccines. The immunogenicity of the mRNA-1273 vaccine is markedly better than that of the BNT162b2 vaccine, most likely by virtue of its higher mRNA content. Despite suboptimal immune responses in patients on dialysis, preliminary data suggest that vaccination partially protects against infection and severe disease requiring hospitalization. However, progressive waning of immunity and emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with a high potential of immune escape call for a booster dose in all patients on dialysis 4 to 6 months after prime-boost vaccination. Patients with persistent poor vaccine responses may be candidates for primary prophylaxis strategies. In the absence of specific data in patients on dialysis, therapeutic strategies in the event of established COVID-19 must be extrapolated from evidence obtained in the population not on dialysis. Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies may be an attractive option after a high-risk exposure or during the early course of infection.