ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of postoperative pain control following a Cesarean section influences mother-child attachment, improves early healing, and undoubtedly hastens discharge. Transverse abdominis plane (TAP) and ilioinguinal iliohypogastric (ILIH) blocks have been used to minimize postoperative opioid intake, although their relative effectiveness is unknown. The study aims to determine which procedure was more effective at reducing the need for postoperative rescue analgesics after lower segment Cesarean section (LSCS). TAP block or I TAP (TAP block plus ilioinguinal iliohypogastric nerve block). Both procedures used the same amount of local anesthetic. METHODS: A sealed envelope technique was used to randomly assign 210 patients who received LSCS into two equal groups to receive either ultrasound (US)-guided TAP block or US-guided ILIH nerve block with US-guided TAP block at the conclusion of the procedure. As per the study protocol, the charge nurse in the postoperative ward gave rescue analgesics to patients who complained of discomfort. At hours 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 24 following surgeries, a blinded observer checked on the patient and noted the effectiveness of pain management, the quantity of rescue analgesics used, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: While there was a substantial decrease in pain score while resting at 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 postoperative hours in the ITAP group, there was not a significant change in visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the first postoperative hour. However, there was a large delay in the first request for analgesia in the ITAP group (13.15 ± 1.85) as opposed to the TAP group (10.06 ± 1.61) and there was a significant decline in nalbuphine use as well as a higher satisfaction score in the ITAP group. CONCLUSIONS: Following LSCS, ITAP block offered better postoperative analgesia than TAP block in terms of quality.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy (TIPN) among breast cancer patients is considered one of the most devastating side effects affecting compliance to chemotherapy protocol and patients' quality of life (QOL). OBJECTIVES: This trial aimed to evaluate the effect of lidocaine infusion vs oral duloxetine on the incidence and severity of TIPN and QOL in patients with breast cancer scheduled for neoadjuvant taxane therapy (TT). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial. SETTING: This study was carried out on 60 patients with breast cancer scheduled for 12 weeks of TT at the Medical Research Institute Hospital, Alexandria University after obtaining local Ethics Committee approval (IORG008812) and getting a written informed consent from each patient. It was registered in the "clinical trials library for protocol registration and results system" with the number NCT04732455. METHODS: Sixty women scheduled for TT weekly for 12 weeks, were randomly allocated to receive intravenous saline infusion in the control group (GC), or lidocaine 2mg/kg with saline infusion in the lidocaine group (GL), or saline infusion and 30 mg duloxetine in the duloxetine group (GD). All infusions were administered over 40 minutes before each TT. Oral duloxetine was prescribed once daily starting from the night before commencing TT and continued for 12 weeks. Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) questionnaire was filled weekly to detect the incidence of neuropathic pain (NP). The nerve conduction study (NCS) aimed to detect and measure the degree of neuropathy before starting the chemotherapy protocol and post-12 weeks of Taxol Therapy. NP Scale was measured weekly to assess the severity of NP symptoms. Patients' QOL was evaluated by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20-Item Scale. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients reported DN4 > 4 points in GC after 6 weeks of TT in comparison to 5% in GL and 0% in GD (P = .005). Moreover, the incidence rose to 75% in GC compared to 20% in GL and 25% GD at the end of TT (P < 0.001). The severity of symptoms, global pain intensity, and patients' unpleasantness were significantly more in GC than GL and GD in the last 4 weeks of TT (P < 0.05). NCS showed that 55% and 25% of patients developed mild and moderate axonal neuropathy, respectively, in GC. In contrast, mild neuropathy was developed in 20% and 25% of patients in GL and GD, respectively, and moderate neuropathy in 5% in both groups. The negative impact of TT on QOL was more significant in GC than GL and GD at weeks 8 and 12 of TT (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Limited reference data for all treatment regimens to include in the Discussion section. CONCLUSIONS: Lidocaine and duloxetine have a comparable effect to decrease the incidence and severity of TIPN. Moreover, patients' QOL was significantly better in both groups. KEY WORDS: Lidocaine infusion, duloxetine, taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy, breast cancer, DN4.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and spread of variable volumes of local anesthetics (LA) in Erector spinae plane block (ESPB). METHODS: Sixty patients aged between 18 and 50 years with an ASA I-II and scheduled for breast cancer surgery were randomized to receive either ESPB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (Standard volume ESPB), or with 40 ml 0.125% bupivacaine (High volume ESPB), or no ESPB (GA only group). The primary outcome was pain intensity evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS), 12 hours after surgery. P-values < 0.05 were considered the cutoff point for statistical significance. The secondary outcomes were pain at rest and pain on movement evaluated by the VAS, craniocaudal injectate spread, to paravertebral (PV) and epidural spaces assessed by CT, clinical dermatomal spread, level of sedation or agitation, and patient satisfaction with anesthesia and analgesia. RESULTS: VAS at rest 12 h after surgery was less in both intervention groups compared to the control (1.75 ± 0.79 vs. 1.6 ± 0.88 vs. 3.4 ± 1.96, p = 0.001). The LA had extended further in the high volume group than the standard volume group (11.20 ± 3.07 vs. 9.15 ± 2.54 vertebral levels, p = 0.027). No difference of the spread to PV or epidural spaces between the 2 intervention groups. More dermatomes were covered in the high volume group (7.20 ± 2.12 vs. 5.75 ± 1.37 dermatomes, p = 0.014). Agitation was higher in the GA only group than both ESPB groups in the first 8 postoperative hours. Patients were more satisfied in both ESPB groups than the GA only group. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative ESPB is an excellent analgesic modality and it can also attenuate both postoperative agitation and sedation. Doubling the injectate volume enhances the craniocaudal spreading and may be useful for surgeries requiring multiple dermatomes. However, larger volume has no effect on analgesic efficacy or patient satisfaction as there is no further spread to the PV, epidural spaces or spinal nerve rami. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04796363 (12/3/2021).