ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The problem of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, which is caused by ESBL and AmpC ß-lactamases, is getting worse globally. Infections caused by bacterial isolates harboring these enzymes are difficult to treat with carbapenems being the sole effective treatment option for such infections. The objective of this study was to determine the frequency of ESBLs and AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens and to evaluate the sensitivity of cefepime-tazobactam combination against them. METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional study carried out on 100 Gram-negative bacilli at Theodor Bilharz Research Institute Hospital during the period from February 2015 to January 2016. ESBL production was screened by using the disc diffusion test followed by confirmation by the combined disc confirmatory test, the screening for AmpC production was conducted using the cefoxitin disc test, which was subsequently confirmed by the AmpC disc test. Isolates confirmed positive for ESBL and/ or AmpC production were investigated for their susceptibility to antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 100 Gram-negative bacilli, 44 isolates were confirmed as ESBL producers by the combined disc confirmatory test out of 56 isolates that tested positive for ESBL production through the disc diffusion test. The presence of AmpC production was assessed using the cefoxitin disc test, 32 isolates were screened to be AmpC producers, and the AmpC disc test confirmed AmpC production in 9 isolates of them. Using the Mast® D68C set, 32 isolates were ESBL producers, 3 were AmpC producers, and 4 isolates were ESBL/AmpC co-producers. The highest sensitivity was to cefepime-tazobactam (91.48%) followed by the carbapenems. CONCLUSION: Cefepime-tazobactam showed remarkable activity against ESBL and/or AmpC-producing Gram-negative bacilli and may be considered as a therapeutic alternative to carbapenems.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents , Bacterial Proteins , Cefepime , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Tazobactam , beta-Lactamases , beta-Lactamases/metabolism , Cefepime/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/drug effects , Gram-Negative Bacteria/enzymology , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Tazobactam/pharmacology , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Cephalosporins/pharmacology , Male , Female , Penicillanic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Penicillanic Acid/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection remains a challenging threat because of limited treatment options. Ceftaroline was identified as having potent anti-MRSA activity. Aim: To evaluate the susceptibility of MRSA to gentamicin, macrolides, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin, and ceftaroline and to perform molecular characterization of different resistance genes as aminoglycoside modifying enzyme genes, ermA and ermC, and vanA and vanB genes. Patients and Methods: One hundred non-duplicate MRSA strains were isolated from different samples of hospitalized patients in Cairo University teaching hospitals from November 2015 to August 2016. Determination of antibiotic susceptibility was done using disk diffusion test and minimum inhibitory concentration followed by detection of resistance genes by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Results: Of 100 MRSA isolates, 63 (63%) were resistant to gentamicin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and ciprofloxacin, however, all were sensitive to ceftaroline. Fifteen isolates (15%) were vancomycin intermediate resistant and were sensitive to ceftaroline as well. Conclusion: Ceftaroline was potent against MRSA, which was found to be non-susceptible to vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, and gentamicin and it may represent a successful treatment for MRSA infections.