Visión epidemiológica, psicosocial y terapéutica de la diabetes mellitus en Argentina desde las perspectivas del equipo de salud y de las personas con diabetes / Epidemiological, psychosocial and therapeutic vision of diabetes mellitus in Argentina from the perspectives of health team and people with diabetes

Introducción: la diabetes mellitus (DM) genera una pesada carga socioeconómica, y para su abordaje es necesario indagar sobre sus posibles condicionantes para lograr su control, prevención y tratamiento efectivo. Objetivos: entender la problemática de la DM en Argentina y las estrategias para mejorarla según la perspectiva de los profesionales de la salud y de las personas con DM. Materiales y métodos: se implementó un estudio descriptivo con metodología cualitativa basado en la técnica del Metaplan. Se diseñó un cuestionario con dos preguntas (¿Cuáles son a su criterio los problemas que enfrenta la DM en nuestro país?, ¿Qué estrategias emplearía para solucionarlos?), que se distribuyó entre los profesionales de la salud y las personas con DM vía Internet a través de sus respectivas Sociedades, durante junio-julio de 2021. Los participantes (adultos, residentes en Argentina) debían responder hasta cuatro alternativas en cada pregunta. Se revisaron todas las respuestas recibidas, se las agrupó por temas y se las analizó/cuantificó mediante técnicas descriptivas expresando los resultados como porcentajes. Resultados: la muestra final incluyó 404 profesionales del equipo de salud y 272 personas con DM, mayoritariamente con DM1. El análisis demostró que existe: a) una organización deficiente de la cobertura; b) un predominio de hábitos no saludables; c) escasa provisión de educación diabetológica estructurada que dificulta el diagnóstico y el tratamiento adecuado, y falta de capacitación al paciente para participar activa y eficientemente en el control y tratamiento de su enfermedad; d) deficiente calidad de atención. Conclusiones: los resultados, similares a los obtenidos en otros países, sugieren que las estrategias de solución implicarían la restructuración de la formación médica para lograr un balance armónico entre el nivel primario de atención y las especialidades, disminuyendo además la carga psicológica del paciente, la cual se vería facilitada mediante la cooperación armónica de las instituciones educativas y las sociedades científicas, al igual que con una intervención consensuada de diferentes sectores de la sociedad.

Introduction: diabetes mellitus (DM) generates a heavy socioeconomic burden, and to address it, it is necessary to investigate its possible conditioning factors to achieve effective control, prevention, and treatment. Objectives: to understand the problem of diabetes in Argentina, from the perspective of health professionals and people with DM and the strategies to improve it. Materials and methods: it was implemented a descriptive study with qualitative methodology based on the metaplan technique. A questionnaire was designed with two questions (What are, in your opinion, the problems faced by diabetes in our country?, What strategies would you use to solve them?), which was distributed to health professionals and people with DM via the Internet of their respective Societies during JuneJuly 2021. The participants (adults, residents of Argentina) had to answer up to 4 alternatives in each question. All the responses received were reviewed, grouped by topic and analyzed/ quantified using descriptive techniques, expressing the results as percentages. Results: the final sample included 404 professionals from the health team and 272 people with DM: mostly with type 1 DM. The analysis shows that there is: a) a poor organization of coverage; b) a predominance of unhealthy habits; c) scarce provision of structured diabetes education, which makes it difficult to diagnose and adequately treat, and train patients to participate actively and efficiently in the control and treatment of their disease; d) there is a deficient quality of care. Conclusions: our results, similar to those obtained in other countries, suggest that the solution strategies would go through the restructuring of medical training, achieving a harmonious balance between the primary level of care and the specialties, adding a decrease in the psychological burden of the patient. It would be facilitated by the harmonious cooperation of educational institutions and scientific societies. Likewise, through a consensual intervention of different sectors of society.

Health inequalities and the impact on the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and chronic complications in Argentina: a study on national risk factors surveys. / Desigualdades en salud, su impacto sobre la prevalencia de factores de riesgo cardiovascular y el desarrollo de sus complicaciones crónicas en Argentina: estudio sobre Encuesta Nacional de Factores de Riesgo.

BACKGROUND: In Argentina, there is evidence of health inequalities, measured both at the general level and also using income as a parameter of social status. However, few studies address the issue of health equality in chronic diseases such as cardiovascular risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To describe health inequalities, using cardiovascular risk factors as a tracer for chronic diseases in different areas of the country and over time. In addition, we aim to identify differences in the quality of care provided to people with cardiovascular risk factors, between 2005 and 2009. METHODS: This is an observational study, which used descriptive and quantitative methods. Data from the National Risk Factors Survey from 2005 and 2009 in the cohorts who have chronic diseases (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia and overweight/obesity) were analyzed to assess associations between health status and several demographic, epidemiological and socioeconomic variables. Additionally, clinical and metabolic characteristics of people with diabetes and other cardiovascular risks factors were analyzed in 2005 and 2009 using the database Quality of Diabetes Care (QUALIDIAB). RESULTS: Cardiovascular risk factors are more frequent in people with lower socioeconomic status, regardless of the indicator. The inequalities detected showed the worst indicators in strata with lower education and income, with the same results both nationwide and separated by region. This inequalities were more pronounced in 2009, and their magnitude changed by region and cardiovascular risk factor. From 2005 to 2009, body mass index, blood glucose and HbA1c value increased. In contrast, both systolic blood pressure and triglycerides decreased, with no significant changes in total cholesterol and diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Cardiovascular risk factors present inequalities attributed to social status manifesting at both national and regional levels.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Argentina muestra evidencia de desigualdades en salud medida, tanto a nivel general como utilizando el ingreso como parámetro de posición social. Sin embargo, pocos estudios abordan la problemática de la equidad en salud a nivel de enfermedades crónicas como los factores de riesgo cardiovascular. OBJETIVO: Describir las desigualdades en salud utilizando como trazador de enfermedades crónicas a los factores de riesgo cardiovascular a nivel subnacional y su evolución temporal. Para complementar, se busca identificar las diferencias en la calidad de atención brindada a personas con factores de riesgo cardiovascular entre 2005 y 2009. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional y cuantitativo basado en métodos descriptivos. Se analizó la Encuesta Nacional de Factores de Riesgo 2005 y 2009 para evaluar hipertensión, diabetes, dislipemia y sobrepeso/obesidad en las cohortes correspondientes, las asociaciones entre el estado de salud y diversas variables demográficas, epidemiológicas y socioeconómicas. Adicionalmente, y utilizando la base de datos del registro Quality of Diabetes Care (QUALIDIAB), se analizaron las características clínicas y metabólicas de las personas con diabetes y otros factores de riesgo cardiovascular en los años 2005 y 2009. RESULTADOS: Los factores de riesgo cardiovascular se presentan más frecuentemente en personas con menor posición socioeconómica, independientemente del indicador considerado. Las desigualdades detectadas mostraron peores indicadores en los estratos con educación e ingreso más bajo, manifestándose tanto a nivel nacional como regional. En general, son más acentuadas en el año 2009. Su magnitud varió según región y factor de riesgo cardiovascular considerado. De 2005 a 2009, se incrementan los valores de índice de masa corporal, glucemia y hemoglobina glicosilada, disminuyeron los de presión arterial sistólica y los triglicéridos, sin cambios significativos en el colesterol total y presión arterial diastólica. CONCLUSIONES: En nuestro medio, los factores de riesgo cardiovascular presentan desigualdades condicionadas por su posición social, manifestándose tanto a nivel nacional como regional.

Relation between cost of drug treatment and body mass index in people with type 2 diabetes in Latin America.

AIMS: Despite the frequent association of obesity with type 2 diabetes (T2D), the effect of the former on the cost of drug treatment of the latest has not been specifically addressed. We studied the association of overweight/obesity on the cost of drug treatment of hyperglycemia, hypertension and dyslipidemia in a population with T2D. METHODS: This observational study utilized data from the QUALIDIAB database on 3,099 T2D patients seen in Diabetes Centers in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Peru, and Venezuela. Data were grouped according to body mass index (BMI) as Normal (18.5≤BMI<25), Overweight (25≤BMI<30), and Obese (BMI≥30). Thereafter, we assessed clinical and metabolic data and cost of drug treatment in each category. Statistical analyses included group comparisons for continuous variables (parametric or non-parametric tests), Chi-square tests for differences between proportions, and multivariable regression analysis to assess the association between BMI and monthly cost of drug treatment. RESULTS: Although all groups showed comparable degree of glycometabolic control (FBG, HbA1c), we found significant differences in other metabolic control indicators. Total cost of drug treatment of hyperglycemia and associated cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) increased significantly (p<0.001) with increment of BMI. Hyperglycemia treatment cost showed a significant increase concordant with BMI whereas hypertension and dyslipidemia did not. Despite different values and percentages of increase, this growing cost profile was reproduced in every participating country. BMI significantly and independently affected hyperglycemia treatment cost. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows for the first time that BMI significantly increases total expenditure on drugs for T2D and its associated CVRF treatment in Latin America.

Multistrategic approach to improve quality of care of people with diabetes at the primary care level: Study design and baseline data.

AIM: To test the one year-post effect of an integrated diabetes care program that includes system changes, education, registry (clinical, metabolic and therapeutic indicators) and disease management (DIAPREM), implemented at primary care level, on care outcomes and costs. METHODS: We randomly selected 15 physicians and 15 nurses from primary care units of La Matanza County to be trained (Intervention-IG) and another 15 physicians/nurses to use as controls (Control-CG). Each physician-nurse team controlled and followed up 10 patients with type 2 diabetes for one year; both groups use structured medical data registry. Patients in IG had quarterly clinical appointments whereas those in CG received traditional care. DIAPREM includes system changes (use of guidelines, programmed quarterly controls and yearly visits to the specialist) and education (physicians' and nurses' training courses). Statistical data analysis included parametric/nonparametric tests according to data distribution profile and Chi-squared test for proportions. RESULTS: Baseline data from both groups showed comparable values and 20-30% of them did not perform HbA1c and lipid profile measurements. Majority were obese, 59% had HbA1C ≥7%, 86% fasting blood glucose ≥100mg/dL, 45%, total cholesterol ≥200mg/dL, and 92% abnormal HDL- and LDL-cholesterol values. Similarly, micro and macroangiopathic complications had not been detected in the previous year. Most patients received oral antidiabetic agents (monotherapy), and one third was on insulin (mostly a single dose of an intermediate/long-acting formulation). Most people with hypertension received specific drug treatment but only half of them reached target values; dyslipidemia treatment showed similar data. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline data demonstrated the need of implementing an intervention to improve diabetes care and treatment outcomes.

Prevención primaria de diabetes tipo 2 en Argentina: estudio piloto en la provincia de Buenos Aires / Primary prevention of type 2 diabetes in Argentina: Pilot study in the province of Buenos Aires

Intervenciones: Sobre estilo de vida, previenen el desarrollo de diabetes tipo 2 (DMT2) en personas con tolerancia a la glucosa o glucemia de ayunas alterada (TGA y GAA, respectivamente), aisladas o combinadas. Objetivo: Evaluar la efectividad de adoptar estilo de vida saludable sobre la manifestación clínica de DMT2 en personas con riesgo de desarrollarla. Metodología: Estudio prospectivo en participantes de 3 municipios de provincia de Buenos Aires (La Plata, Berisso y Ensenada), mediante cuestionario FINDRISC; quienes superen su puntaje de riesgo (≥ 13), realizarán prueba de tolerancia oral a la glucosa. El estudio incluirá a todas las personas con TGA/GAA que deseen participar y firmen un consentimiento informado, distribuidas en 2 grupos: a) intervención autoadministrada, y b) intervención intensificada (talleres de modalidad grupal mensuales sobre plan de alimentación saludable y práctica regular de actividad física 3 veces por semana). Ambos grupos tendrán un seguimiento de 2 años. Se utilizarán cuestionarios para evaluar bienestar, hábitos alimentarios y actividad física de cada participante al inicio del estudio y cada 6 meses durante el seguimiento. En ambos grupos se realizarán individualmente mediciones antropométricas y análisis de laboratorio a los 0, 12 y 24 meses. Igualmente, se evaluará la coste-efectividad de las estrategias implementadas. Resultados y conclusiones: Los resultados del estudio permitirán: a) demostrar la factibilidad y el costo de este tipo de programas: b) identificar genotipos de personas en riesgo facilitando intervenir en ellas precoz y eficientemente; c) definir si estas intervenciones también mejoran otros FRCV presentes; d) cuantificar las lesiones de microangiopatía (microaneurismas retinianos) en población con TGA/GAA, y e) identificar barreras y alianzas estratégicas interdisciplinarias e intersectoriales para la implementación efectiva de este tipo de programas.

Lifestyle interventions: Prevent/delay the development of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in people with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting blood glucose (IGT and IFG, respectively), alone or combined. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of adopting a healthy lifestyle on the clinical manifestation of T2DM in people at risk of its development. Methodology: A prospective study will be conducted, using the FINDRISC questionnaire, on participants selected from three municipalities of the Province of Buenos Aires (La Plata, Berisso and Ensenada). An oral glucose tolerance test will be performed on those participants who exceed their risk score (≥ 13). The study will include all people with IGT/ IFG who wish to participate and sign an informed consent form. They will be randomly divided into two groups: a) self-administered intervention and b) Intensified Intervention (monthly group sessions on healthy meal plan and weekly sessions of physical activity). Both groups will be followed-up for two years. Questionnaires will be used to assess welfare (WHO-5), eating habits, and physical activity of each participant at baseline and every six months of followup. Individual anthropometric measurements and laboratory analysis will be performed in both groups at 0, 12 and 24 months. The cost-effectiveness of the strategies implemented will also be assessed. Results and conclusions: The results of the study will allow to: a) demonstrate the feasibility and cost of such programs, b) identify genotypes of people at risk that would facilitate early implementation of effective prevention strategies; c) define whether these interventions would also improve other associated cardiovascular risk factors, d) Identify and quantify microangiopathy lesions (retinal micro-aneurysms) in a population with IGT/IFG, and e) identify barriers and interdisciplinary strategic alliances for effective implementation of such programs.

[Education of people with type 2 diabetes through peers with diabetes: is it cost effective?]. / Educación de personas con diabetes tipo 2: ¿es costo-efectiva su implementación a través de pares con diabetes?

INTRODUCTION: Inadequate quality of care provided to people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, generates a significant socioeconomic burden and a serious public health problem. Diabetes education through peers with diabetes is an alternative to that provided by professional educators (traditional education) which achieves non-inferior results. However, there is little evidence of cost-effectiveness of education trough peers over traditional education. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost-effectiveness of education of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, during a year, by a team of professional educators (traditional education) versus education and support delivered by trained peers with diabetes. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis based on a randomized prospective clinical study conducted in the city of La Plata, including 199 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus, divided in two groups:, one receiving traditional education and another receiving the same education but delivered by peer educators with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) was considered as a primary indicator of effectiveness and secondary indicators were others, such as body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels. The direct cost of each strategy was estimated based on resources used in the trial, evaluating three cost scenarios for peer education. The strength of the results was assessed by univariate sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Cost per unit decrease (%) in HbA1c: traditional education: $2 621; peer education: $1 508, $1 779 y $2 071 for each of the three scenarios considered (scenario 1, scenario 2, scenario 3), respectively. For each $100 invested a decrease of 0.04% in the HbA1c with traditional education was achieved; and 0.07% in scenario 1; 0.06% in scenario 2 and 0.05% in scenario 3, with education delivered by peer educators. Sensitivity analysis showed the strength of the results. CONCLUSION: Education of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients through peers as a complement to control and treatment of the disease, is cost-effective compared to traditional education.

INTRODUCCIÓN : La inadecuada calidad de atención brindada a personas con diabetes tipo 2, genera un gran impacto socioeconómico y un grave problema de salud pública. La educación de estas personas a través de pares con diabetes mellitus es una alternativa, a la brindada por equipos profesionales (educación tradicional), que logra resultados no inferiores a esta última. Sin embargo, hay escasa evidencia de costo-efectividad de la educación a través de pares respecto de la tradicional. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la relación costo-efectividad de la educación de personas con diabetes tipo 2, durante un año por un equipo profesional (educación tradicional), versus educación y apoyo impartida por un par con diabetes mellitus (educación de pares). MÉTODOS: Análisis de costo-efectividad basado en un estudio clínico prospectivo aleatorizado, desarrollado en la ciudad de La Plata sobre 199 personas con diabetes tipo 2, organizados en dos grupos: uno que recibió educación tradicional y otro educación a través de pares con diabetes mellitus. Como indicador primario de efectividad se consideró el cambio en la hemoglobina glicosilada y como secundarios otros como índice de masa corporal, presión arterial sistólica, presión arterial diastólica, glucemia en ayunas, colesterol total y triglicéridos. Se estimó el costo directo de cada estrategia basándose en recursos utilizados en el estudio clínico y evaluándose tres escenarios de costos para la educación de pares. La robustez de los resultados se evaluó mediante análisis de sensibilidad univariado. RESULTADOS: El costo por unidad de descenso (%) de hemoglobina glicosilada con educación tradicional fue de $2621 pesos argentinos; y con educación a través de pares fue de $1508, $1779 y $2071 pesos argentinos, para cada uno de los tres escenarios considerados (escenario 1, escenario 2 y escenario 3), respectivamente. Por cada $100 pesos argentinos invertidos se logró descender 0,04% de hemoglobina glicosilada con la educación tradicional. Con la educación a través de pares los resultados fueron 0,07% en escenario 1; 0,06% en escenario 2 y 0,05% en escenario 3. El análisis de sensibilidad demostró la robustez de los resultados obtenidos. CONCLUSIÓN: La educación de personas con diabetes tipo 2 a través de pares, complementaria al control y tratamiento de la enfermedad, es costo efectiva respecto a la educación tradicional.