The burden of end-stage renal disease in Khartoum, Sudan: cost of illness study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Sudan is increasing, affecting the economic status of patients, caregivers and society. This study aimed to measure ESRD's costs, including direct and morbidity indirect expenditures, and to investigate any associated factors and financial consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a standardized questionnaire to collect data from 150 ESRD patients who had been receiving dialysis for at least one year before the time of data collection at 13 specialized renal centres in Khartoum state. Data about sociodemographic, clinical, and economic factors were gathered, and their relationship to the cost of ESRD was examined using both bivariate (Man Whitney test, Kruskal Wallis test and Spearman correlation) and multivariate analytical procedures (multivariate linear regression). RESULTS: This study reported a median direct per capita ESRD cost of 38 600 SDG ($1 723.2 PPP) annually with an interquartile range of 69 319.3 SDG ($3 094.6 PPP). The median morbidity indirect cost was estimated to be 0.0 ± 3 352 SDG ($ 0.0 ± 149.6 PPP) per annum. In 28.8% of cases, the patients were their family's primary income earner and over 85% were covered by medical insurance. Our study found that none of the study variables were significantly associated with the total cost of ESRD. CONCLUSION AND LIMITATIONS: Our findings point out considerable direct out-of-pocket expenses and productivity losses for patients and their households. However, these results should be carefully applied for comparison between the different countries due to differences in the cost of medical interventions and insurance coverage. Further longitudinal studies and studies on health finance and insurance policies are recommended.

As medical care costs continue to rise in Sudan, this study aimed to estimate direct and indirect costs associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) from the patient's perspective. Accurate information on the cost of illness (COI) helps policymakers prioritize healthcare services and resources, optimize public well-being, and determine health policy effectiveness. Future research should include a longitudinal design and understand ESRD costs from caregivers' and healthcare providers' perspectives.

Economic hardship among principal family caregivers of cancer patients at Khartoum oncology hospital 2020: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of cancer extends beyond patients and consumes their families. Family members are widely recognized as informal caregivers. The economic burden on family caregivers is increased with new treatments, prolonged survival, and reduced stay in the acute care setting. This is especially true in African countries where family bonds are sacred and health system is fragile that they need to pay out of pocket for care. The aim of this study is to estimate the perceived caregivers' economic burden in the subsequent aspects: financial strain, inability to make ends meet, not enough money for necessities, and economic adjustments/cutbacks. METHOD: This study was a quantitative, descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at Khartoum oncology hospital. Included 143 caregivers of cancer patients. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using the socio-demographic Questionnaire and Economic Hardship Questionnaire (EHQ). RESULTS: One hundred forty-three cancer patients and their caregivers were included. 56.6% of patients were females, and about 32.2% were aged 51-65 years. The most common cancer types were breast cancer and leukemia. Roughly 33% of patients had stage IV cancer on presentation, and about 53.9% received chemotherapy. Unlike cancer patients, (47.6%) of family caregivers were aged 18-34 years, yet they were mainly females (54.4%). Most of them (34.3%) were unemployed, with a mean monthly gross income of 53.3 dollars, while the mean household monthly gross income was 113.0 dollars. The mean score of the economic hardship scale was 35.8 out of 64. Most of the caregivers experience no difficulties affording necessities. However, they experience difficulties with medical and leisure activities. There was no significant association between caregiver economic hardship and cancer patient characteristics (patients' age, cancer stage, and treatment type). However, there was a significant association between caregivers' economic hardships and their gender, marital status, educational level, occupation, caregiver monthly gross income, and household monthly gross income. CONCLUSION: The study findings suggest a moderate financial burden among cancer caregivers. The predicting factors include being single, a student, male, of higher educational level, and lower income. Financial difficulties are associated with maladaptive behavior and should come to light.