Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 78
Filter
1.
Nepal J Ophthalmol ; 4(1): 17-22, 2012.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22343991

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Presbyopia is an important cause of avoidable visual disability. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of near vision impairment and spectacle coverage among middle and older-aged adults in rural Nepal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surveys was carried out among the people of age 35 and over in randomly-selected cluster samples in rural settings of Kaski district of western Nepal, Near visual acuity, with and without presenting near correction, was measured at 40 cm using a LogMAR near vision tumbling E chart under ambient indoor lighting. Subjects with uncorrected binocular distance vision of 20/40 or worse were refracted and those with near vision of 20/40 or worse tested with plus sphere to obtain the best-corrected binocular near visual acuity. RESULTS: A total of 2,360 persons aged 35 years and over were enumerated and 2,156 (91.3%) were examined. The age- and gender-standardized prevalence of uncorrected near visual impairment (vision of 20/40 or worse) in study population was found to be 66.1 %. Near vision could not be corrected (>20/40) even after distance and near vision correction in 6.4 % . Using the multiple logistic regression models, uncorrected visual impairment was associated with an older age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.13, P less than 0.001) and a lower educational level (OR = 1.11, P = 0.01) was less associated with female gender (OR = 0.72, P = 0.038). Over 90 % of people with near visual impairment did not have spectacles. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of presbyopia appears to be higher with an earlier onset and over 90 % of people in need of near correction do not have spectacles in this setting.


Subject(s)
Eyeglasses/statistics & numerical data , Myopia/epidemiology , Presbyopia/epidemiology , Rural Population , Vision, Low/epidemiology , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myopia/complications , Myopia/therapy , Nepal/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , Presbyopia/complications , Presbyopia/therapy , Prevalence , Sex Distribution , Vision Tests , Vision, Low/etiology , Vision, Low/therapy , Visual Acuity
2.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 90(10): 1230-5, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16809384

ABSTRACT

AIM: To compare the prevalences of refractive errors in Malay, Chinese and Indian children in Malaysia and Singapore. METHODS: Children aged 7-9 years from three schools in the Singapore Cohort study of the Risk factors for Myopia (n = 1962) and similarly aged children from a random cluster sample in the metropolitan Kuala Lumpur area in the Malaysia Refractive Error Study in Children (n = 1752) were compared. Cycloplegic autorefraction was conducted in both countries. RESULTS: The prevalence of myopia (spherical equivalent of at least -0.5 diopters (D) in either eye) was higher in Singapore Malays (22.1%) than in Malays in Malaysia (9.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2 to 14.7; p<0.001). Similarly, Singapore Chinese (40.1%) had higher prevalences than Malaysian Chinese (30.9%; 95% CI 1.5 to 16.9). Singapore Indians had a higher prevalence (34.1%) than Malaysian Indians (12.5%; 95% CI 17.4 to 25.9). The multivariate odds ratio of astigmatism (cylinder at least 0.75 D in either eye) in Singapore Malays compared with Malaysian Malays was 3.47 (95% CI 2.79 to 4.32). Ethnicity-specific hyperopia rates did not differ in Singapore and Malaysia. CONCLUSION: The ethnicity-specific prevalences of myopia in Singapore Malays, Chinese and Indians are higher than those in Malaysian Malays, Chinese and Indians. As Malays, Chinese and Indians in Malaysia have genetic make-up similar to that of Malays, Chinese and Indians in Singapore, environmental factors may contribute to the higher myopia rates.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors/ethnology , Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Astigmatism/ethnology , Child , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Hyperopia/ethnology , Malaysia/epidemiology , Male , Myopia/ethnology , Prevalence , Singapore/epidemiology , White People/statistics & numerical data
3.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 86(5): 505-12, 2002 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11973242

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To assess the prevalence of vision impairment, blindness, and cataract surgery and to evaluate visual acuity outcomes after cataract surgery in a south Indian population. METHODS: Cluster sampling was used to randomly select a cross sectional sample of people > or =50 years of age living in the Tirunelveli district of south India. Eligible subjects in 28 clusters were enumerated through a door to door household survey. Visual acuity measurements and ocular examinations were performed at a selected site within each of the clusters in early 2000. The principal cause of visual impairment was identified for eyes with presenting visual acuity <6/18. Independent replicate testing for quality assurance monitoring was performed in subjects with reduced vision and in a sample of those with normal vision for six of the study clusters. RESULTS: A total of 5795 people in 3986 households were enumerated and 5411 (93.37%) were examined. The prevalence of presenting and best corrected visual acuity > or =6/18 in both eyes was 59.4% and 75.7%, respectively. Presenting vision <6/60 in both eyes (the definition of blindness in India) was found in 11.0%, and in 4.6% with best correction. Presenting blindness was associated with older age, female sex, and illiteracy. Cataract was the principal cause of blindness in at least one eye in 70.6% of blind people. The prevalence of cataract surgery was 11.8%-with an estimated 56.5% of the cataract blind already operated on. Surgical coverage was inversely associated with illiteracy and with female sex in rural areas. Within the cataract operated sample, 31.7% had presenting visual acuity > or =6/18 in both eyes and 11.8% were <6/60; 40% were bilaterally operated on, with 63% pseudophakic. Presenting vision was <6/60 in 40.7% of aphakic eyes and in 5.1% of pseudophakic eyes; with best correction the percentages were 17.6% and 3.7%, respectively. Refractive error, including uncorrected aphakia, was the main cause of visual impairment in cataract operated eyes. Vision <6/18 was associated with cataract surgery in government, as opposed to that in non-governmental/private facilities. Age, sex, literacy, and area of residence were not predictors of visual outcomes. CONCLUSION: Treatable blindness, particularly that associated with cataract and refractive error, remains a significant problem among older adults in south Indian populations, especially in females, the illiterate, and those living in rural areas. Further study is needed to better understand why a significant proportion of the cataract blind are not taking advantage of free of charge eye care services offered by the Aravind Eye Hospital and others in the district. While continuing to increase cataract surgical volume to reduce blindness, emphasis must also be placed on improving postoperative visual acuity outcomes.


Subject(s)
Blindness/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Blindness/etiology , Blindness/physiopathology , Cataract/epidemiology , Cataract/physiopathology , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Refractive Errors/epidemiology , Refractive Errors/physiopathology , Regression Analysis , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Sex Distribution , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data , Visual Acuity/physiology
4.
Ophthalmology ; 108(4): 686-92, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11297484

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of cataract surgery in rural northwest India. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 549 cataract-operated persons (723 operated eyes). METHODS: Cluster sampling was used in randomly selecting a cross-sectional sample of persons 50 years of age or older for visual acuity measurement, refraction, and slit-lamp and direct ophthalmoscope examination early in 1999. Those operated on for cataract were queried as to the date and place of surgery. The principal cause of reduced vision was identified for all examined eyes with presenting visual acuity worse than 6/18. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presenting and best-corrected visual acuity and cause of vision loss. RESULTS: Presenting visual acuity was less than 6/60 in the better eye in 33.7% of cataract-operated persons and greater than or equal to 6/18 in both eyes in 8.2%; 31.7% were bilaterally operated on. Of cataract-operated eyes, 44.1% initially had visual acuity less than 6/60 and 31.5% greater than or equal to 6/18; with best correction, the corresponding percentages were 14.0% and 61.5%. Intracapsular cataract extraction was used in 92% of cases, and 66% had been operated on in surgery camps. Surgical complications were common and a major cause of vision impairment. In multiple logistic regression modeling, female gender and residence in a rural area were associated negatively with both presenting and best-corrected visual acuity outcomes, and surgery conducted before 1990 was associated negatively with best-corrected visual acuity. Place of surgery and subject schooling were not associated with vision outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract surgery subjects in rural areas of India that are without adequately equipped facilities and skilled surgeons, and lack of availability of intraocular lenses, are not realizing the full sight-restoring potential of modern-day surgery. Emphasis on the quality of cataract surgery outcomes must be increased to keep pace with that being given to increasing surgical volume.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cataract/complications , Cataract/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Cluster Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , India/epidemiology , Intraoperative Complications/epidemiology , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Refraction, Ocular , Visual Acuity
5.
Ophthalmology ; 108(4): 679-85, 2001 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11297483

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of central vision blindness and cataract surgery in older adults in rural northwest India. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4284 examined persons 50 years of age or older. METHODS: A random selection of village-based clusters was used to identify a population sample in the predominantly rural Bharatpur district of Rajasthan. Eligible subjects in the 25 selected clusters were enumerated through a door-to-door household survey and invited to village sites for visual acuity testing and eye examination early in 1999. The principal cause of reduced central vision was identified for eyes that had visual acuity worse than 6/18. Independent replicate testing for quality assurance monitoring took place in participants with reduced vision and in a sample of those with normal vision in five of the study clusters. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presenting and best-corrected visual acuity and lens status. RESULTS: A total of 4728 eligible persons in 2821 households were enumerated, and 4284 (90.6%) were examined. The prevalence of presenting and best-corrected visual acuity worse than 6/60 in both eyes was 11.9% (95% confidence interval: 10.0%-13.9%) and 6.1% (95% CI: 4.7%-7.4%), respectively. Presenting blindness was associated with increasing age, female gender, lack of schooling, and rural residence. Cataract was the principal cause of blindness in one or both eyes in 67.5% of blind persons, with uncorrected aphakia and other refractive error affecting 18.4% in at least one eye. The prevalence of cataract surgery was 12.8% (95% CI: 11.6%-14.0%), with an estimated 65.7% of the cataract blind operated on; low surgical coverage was associated with lack of schooling. CONCLUSIONS: Blindness, particularly blindness because of cataract, continues to be a significant problem among the elderly living in remote areas of rural northwest India. Increased attention should be given to reaching women and the illiterate.


Subject(s)
Blindness/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Cataract/epidemiology , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blindness/diagnosis , Blindness/etiology , Cataract/diagnosis , Cataract/etiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Vision Disorders/etiology , Visual Acuity
6.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 130(3): 304-9, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11020409

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To estimate the cumulative incidence of posterior capsule opacification 4 years after surgery in patients who participated in the Madurai Intraocular Lens Study and had extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: In the Madurai Intraocular Lens Study, 1,700 patients with best-corrected visual acuity 20/120 or worse in the better eye had extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation, and 1,474 (86.7%) of these completed the 1-year follow-up examination. From this group of 1,474 pseudophakic patients, 400 were randomly selected for reexamination 4 years after the original surgery. The eye that was operated on was examined by an ophthalmologist who was involved in the 1-year follow-up examinations and posterior capsule opacification grading. A grading of I to III was used to reflect the degree of opacification. With grades II and III, posterior capsule opacification detectable with an undilated pupil was present in the central axis. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-seven (81.8%) of the selected population were examined between October 1997 and December 1998. Thirty-four (8.5%) were confirmed as being deceased, and 39 (9.8%) were unavailable for follow-up. The median age was 60 years, and 57.2% were women. The 4-year incidence of grade II or III posterior capsule opacification, including eyes already treated with laser capsulotomy, was 13.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.7% to 17.3%). Each year of increased age was associated with a decreased risk of posterior capsule opacification (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.00). Based on best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or worse without co-existing pathology, the 4-year incidence of posterior capsule opacification was 13.5%. CONCLUSION: Because patients with relatively mature cataracts routinely receive extracapsular cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation instead of the traditional intracapsular extraction, the subsequent need for laser capsulotomy may be less than that anticipated, based on previous reports.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction/adverse effects , Cataract/epidemiology , Lens Capsule, Crystalline/pathology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Cataract/etiology , Cataract/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , India/epidemiology , Lens Implantation, Intraocular , Male , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Postoperative Complications/pathology , Pseudophakia/complications , Visual Acuity
7.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; 7(3): 169-85, 2000 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11035553

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To quantify and compare the reduction in quality of life due to visual impairment and angina using patient preferences (utilities). METHODS: Using a standard time tradeoff method, we obtained utilities for current vision, monocular and binocular blindness, current angina, and moderate angina in 60 patients with both vision problems and angina pectoris who sought care at the National Eye Institute (NEI), National Naval Medical Center, or Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Patients were characterized clinically based on visual acuity and the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI). Patients also completed a seven-item version of the NEI Visual Functioning Questionnaire and the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients had a median visual acuity of 20/100 in the worst eye, 20/40 in the better eye, and a median DASI of 24.2 (0 = severe functional limitations due to anginal symptoms, 58.2 = no limitations). There was substantial variation in utilities among patients. The average utility for current vision (relative to ideal vision [= 1.0] and death [= 0.0]) was 0.82; the average utility for current angina (relative to no angina symptoms [= 1.0] and death [ = 0.0]) was 0.89. Among 26 patients with both visual impairment and recent anginal symptoms, the decrement in utility (on a scale ranging from ideal health [= 1.0] to death [= 0.0]) imposed by current visual impairment was greater than that imposed by current angina symptoms (0.146 versus 0.072, p=0.08, Wilcoxon signed rank test). The decrement in utility associated with binocular blindness was greater than the decrement associated with the symptoms of moderate angina (0.477 versus 0.039, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical status is not a surrogate for patient preferences regarding vision impairment or angina. There is substantial variation in utilities within the study population for both experienced and theoretical impairment states which is not explained by variations in clinical status. Some states of visual impairment may pose a greater quality of life burden than anginal symptoms. Because patient preferences for vision vary greatly, individual assessment is warranted for consideration in therapeutic decision making.


Subject(s)
Angina Pectoris/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Vision Disorders/epidemiology , Aged , Blindness/epidemiology , Epidemiologic Measurements , Female , Health Status Indicators , Humans , Male , Maryland/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Missouri/epidemiology , Morbidity , Patient Satisfaction , Visual Acuity
8.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 129(4): 421-6, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10764848

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The Refractive Error Study in Children was designed to assess the prevalence of refractive error and vision impairment in children of different ethnic origins and cultural settings. METHODS: Population-based cross-sectional samples of children 5 to 15 years of age were obtained through cluster sampling. Presenting, uncorrected, and best-corrected visual acuity, along with refractive error under cycloplegia, were the main outcome measures. Amblyopia and other causes of uncorrectable vision impairment were determined. RESULTS: Study design and sample size calculations, survey enumeration and ophthalmic examination methods, quality assurance monitoring, and da ta analyses and statistical methods are described. CONCLUSIONS: The study design, sample size, and measurement methods ensure that the prevalence of age-specific and sex-specific refractive error can be estimated with reasonable accuracy in the target populations. With commonality of methods, a comparison of findings between studies in different ethnic origins and cultural settings is possible.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors/ethnology , Vision Disorders/ethnology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Chile/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Epidemiologic Methods , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Nepal/epidemiology , Prevalence , Sampling Studies , Visual Acuity
9.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 129(4): 427-35, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10764849

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of refractive errors and vision impairment in school-age children in Shunyi District, northeast of Beijing, the Peoples Republic of China. METHODS: Random selection of village-based clusters was used to identify a sample of children 5 to 15 years of age. Resident registration books were used to enumerate eligible children in the selected villages and identify their current school. Ophthalmic examinations were conducted in 132 schools on children from 29 clusters during May 1988 to July 1998, including visual acuity measurements, cycloplegic retinoscopy, cycloplegic autorefraction, ocular motility evaluation, and examination of the external eye, anterior segment, media, and fundus. Independent replicate measurements of all children with reduced vision and a sample of those with normal vision were done for quality assurance monitoring in three schools. RESULTS: A total of 6,134 children from 4,338 households were enumerated, and 5,884 children (95.9%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best visual acuity 0.5 (20/40) or worse in at least one eye was 12.8%, 10.9%, and 1.8%, respectively; 0.4% had best visual acuity 0.5 or worse in both eyes. Refractive error was the cause in 89.5% of the 1,236 eyes with reduced vision, amblyopia in 5%, other causes in 1.5%, with unexplained causes in the remaining 4%. Myopia -0.5 diopter or less in either eye was essentially absent in 5-year-old children, but increased to 36.7% in males and 55.0% in females by age 15. Over this same age range, hyperopia 2 diopters or greater decreased from 8.8% in males and 19.6% in females to less than 2% in both. Females had a significantly higher risk of both myopia and hyperopia. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced vision because of myopia is an important public health problem in school-age children in Shunyi District. More than 9% of children could benefit from prescription glasses. Further studies are needed to determine whether the upward trend in the prevalence of myopia continues far beyond age 15 and whether the development of myopia is changing for more recent birth cohorts.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors/ethnology , Vision Disorders/ethnology , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Sex Distribution , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Vision Tests , Visual Acuity
10.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 129(4): 436-44, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10764850

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of refractive error and vision impairment in school age children in the terai area of the Mechi zone in Eastern Nepal. METHODS: Random selection of village-based clusters was used to identify a sample of children 5 to 15 years of age. Children in the 25 selected clusters were enumerated through a door-to-door household survey and invited to village sites for examination. Visual acuity measurements, cycloplegic retinoscopy, cycloplegic autorefraction, ocular motility evaluation, and anterior segment, media, and fundus examinations were done from May 1998 through July 1998. Independent replicate examinations for quality assurance monitoring took place in all children with reduced vision and in a sample of those with normal vision in seven villages. RESULTS: A total of 5,526 children from 3,724 households were enumerated, and 5,067 children (91.7%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best visual acuity 0.5 (20/40) or worse in at least one eye was 2.9%, 2.8%, and 1.4%, respectively; 0.4% had best visual acuity 0.5 or worse in both eyes. Refractive error was the cause in 56% of the 200 eyes with reduced uncorrected vision, amblyopia in 9%, other causes in 19%, with unexplained causes in the remaining 16%. Myopia -0.5 diopter or less in either eye or hyperopia 2 diopters or greater was observed in less than 3% of children. Hyperopia risk was associated with female gender and myopia risk with older age. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of reduced vision is very low in school-age children in Nepal, most of it because of correctable refractive error. Further studies are needed to determine whether the prevalence of myopia will be higher for more recent birth cohorts.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors/ethnology , Vision Disorders/ethnology , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Nepal/epidemiology , Prevalence , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Sex Distribution , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Vision Tests , Visual Acuity
11.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 129(4): 445-54, 2000 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10764851

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of refractive errors and vision impairment in school-age children in a suburban area (La Florida) of Santiago, Chile. METHODS: Random selection of geographically defined clusters was used to identify a representative sample of children 5 to 15 years of age. Children in the 26 selected clusters were enumerated through a door-to-door survey and invited to report to a community health clinic for examination. Visual acuity measurements, cycloplegic retinoscopy, cycloplegic autorefraction, ocular motility evaluation, and examination of the external eye, anterior segment, media, and fundus were done from April through August 1998. Independent replicate examinations of all children with reduced vision and a sample of those with normal vision were done for quality assurance monitoring in six clusters. RESULTS: A total of 6,998 children from 3,830 households were enumerated, and 5,303 children (75.8%) were examined. The prevalence of uncorrected, presenting, and best visual acuity 0.50 (20/40) or worse in at least one eye was 15.8%, 14.7%, and 7.4%, respectively; 3.3% had best visual acuity 0.50 or worse in both eyes. Refractive error was the cause in 56.3% of the 1,285 eyes with reduced vision, amblyopia in 6.5%, other causes in 4.3%, with unexplained causes in the remaining 32.9%. Myopia -0.50 diopter or less in either eye was present in 3.4% of 5-year-old children, increasing to 19.4% in males and 14.7% in females by age 15. Over this same age range, hyperopia 2.00 diopters or greater decreased from 22.7% to 7.1% in males and from 26.3% to 8.9% in females. Females had a significantly higher risk of hyperopia than males. CONCLUSIONS: Refractive error, associated primarily with myopia, is a major cause of reduced vision in school-age children in La Florida. More than 7% of children could benefit from the provision of proper spectacles. Efforts are needed to make existing programs that provide free spectacles for school children more effective. Further studies are needed to determine whether the upward trend in myopia continues far beyond 15 years of age.


Subject(s)
Refractive Errors/ethnology , Vision Disorders/ethnology , Adolescent , Age Distribution , Child , Child, Preschool , Chile/epidemiology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Refractive Errors/diagnosis , Sex Distribution , Vision Disorders/diagnosis , Vision Tests , Visual Acuity
13.
Ophthalmology ; 106(8): 1602-8, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10442910

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess blindness prevalence and that caused specifically by cataract in rural southern China. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5342 persons older than 50 years of age. METHODS: Visual acuity and eye examinations were performed in the summer of 1997 in a random sample of villages in Doumen County. Differences in blindness prevalence associated with age, gender, and education were explored using logistic regression. The survey was preceded by a pilot study in which operational methods were refined and quality assurance measures were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distance visual acuity and lens status. RESULTS: Bilateral blindness (presenting visual acuity < 0.10) was found in 4.37% (95% confidence interval, 3.67%-5.06%). Blindness was associated with increasing age (P < 0.001) and with the lack of education (P < 0.01). Cataract was the principal cause of blindness in at least one eye in 61.5% of blind people, with refractive error responsible for another 10%. An estimated 40% of the cataract blind were operated on; surgical coverage was lowest among the elderly, women, and those without schooling, although not at statistically significant levels. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increased attention given to eye care in Doumen County, blindness remains a major public health problem. Cataract surgery is reaching fewer than half of those who could benefit from it.


Subject(s)
Blindness/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blindness/etiology , Cataract/complications , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Rural Population
14.
Ophthalmology ; 106(8): 1609-15, 1999 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10442911

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of cataract surgery in achieving sight restoration and vision-related quality-of-life (QOL) in patients from rural southern China. DESIGN: Population-based, cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 109 cataract operated persons (152 eyes) and 654 unoperated persons. METHODS: Cluster sampling was used in identifying a random sample of 5342 persons 50 years of age and older for visual acuity and eye examinations. Visual functioning (VF) and QOL questionnaires were administered to aphakic and pseudophakic individuals, unoperated persons with presenting visual acuity less than 0.10 in either eye, and a sample of those with normal vision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Distance visual acuity, VF, and QOL questionnaire scores. RESULTS: Among the cataract operated participants, 43 (39.4%) were bilaterally operated on, 32.1% had presenting visual acuity less than 0.10 in both eyes with 8.3% greater than or equal to 0.32 in both eyes. Of operated eyes, 52.6% presented with visual acuity less than 0.10, 23.7% greater than or equal to 0.32; with best correction, the corresponding percentages were 21.1% and 42.1%. Uncorrectable aphakia due to surgical complications was common. In a multivariate regression model, better visual acuity outcomes were associated with higher level surgeon practice settings and recent surgery. On a 0 to 100 scale, mean VF and QOL scores for the cataract operated population were 41.6 and 54.5, respectively. Mean scores ranged from 84.4 and 93.4, respectively, for the unoperated persons with normal vision, to 14.6 and 31.2, respectively, for those with visual acuity less than 0.05 in both eyes. The VF and QOL scores were closely correlated with presenting visual acuity in both cataract operated and unoperated populations (r = 0.49-0.64). Scores among the cataract operated population were not influenced by age, gender, or education level. Among the unoperated population, lack of education was associated with lower VF and QOL scores (P = 0.017 and P = 0.005, respectively), and older age was associated with lower QOL scores (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients in rural southern China are not realizing the full sight-restoring potential of modern-day cataract surgery. Remedial efforts are needed to improve the performance of local eye surgeons.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction , Cataract/epidemiology , Quality of Life , Visual Acuity , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Rural Population , Surveys and Questionnaires
15.
Bull World Health Organ ; 76(5): 459-67, 1998.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9868836

ABSTRACT

The financial viability of programme services and product offerings requires that revenue exceeds expenses. Revenue includes payments for services and products as well as donor cash and in-kind contributions. Expenses reflect consumption of purchased or contributed time and materials and utilization (depreciation) of physical plant facilities and equipment. Standard financial reports contain this revenue and expense information, complemented when necessary by valuation and accounting of in-kind contributions. Since financial statements are prepared using consistent and accepted accounting practices, year-to-year and organization-to-organization comparisons can be made. The use of such financial information is illustrated in this article by determining the unit cost of cataract surgery in two hospitals in Nepal. The proportion of unit cost attributed to personnel, medical supplies, administrative materials, and depreciation varied significantly by institution. These variations are accounted for by examining differences in operational structure and capacity utilization.


Subject(s)
Accounting , Cataract Extraction/economics , Financial Management, Hospital , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , Income , Investments , Nepal
16.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 82(6): 600-5, 1998 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9797657

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A national eye care programme was launched in Nepal in the early 1980s. The impact of this programme on blindness and cataract surgery prevalence was evaluated in two geographic zones. METHODS: People aged 45 years and older were sampled using a stratified cluster design. Within randomly selected clusters, door to door enumeration was followed by visual acuity measurement and eye examinations at conveniently located sites. The full survey was preceded by a pilot study where operational methods were refined and quality assurance measures carried out. RESULTS: Of the 5112 enumerated individuals 90% were examined. Blindness, defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in both eyes, was found in 5.3% (95% CI 3.6, 6.8) of individuals examined, with cataract being the principal cause in at least one eye in 78% of cases. Considering both cataract operated and unoperated cataract blind cases, surgical coverage was approximately 42%. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that blindness prevalence may have decreased slightly from that estimated in a 1981 national survey, both overall and cataract related. Similarly, cataract surgical coverage may have increased somewhat. None of these changes, however, are at statistically significant levels. Accordingly, the blindness problem remains challengingly high.


Subject(s)
Blindness/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Cataract/epidemiology , Aged , Blindness/physiopathology , Blindness/surgery , Cataract/physiopathology , Cluster Analysis , Female , Health Promotion , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nepal/epidemiology , Pilot Projects , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Visual Acuity/physiology
17.
Br J Ophthalmol ; 82(6): 606-10, 1998 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9797658

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Visual acuity and vision related quality of life outcomes in cataract surgery were evaluated in a population based survey in two geographic zones in Nepal. METHODS: Case finding was based on random sampling using a stratified cluster design with door to door enumeration of people aged > or = 45 years followed by eye examinations at village sites. All aphakics/pseudophakics, those with visual acuity less than 6/60 in either eye, and a sample of those with normal visual acuity were administered visual functioning (VF) and quality of life (QOL) questionnaires. RESULTS: 15% of the 159 cataract operated cases had presenting visual acuity > or = 6/18 in both eyes, 38% with best corrected visual acuity. 21% were still blind with presenting visual acuity < 6/60 in both eyes, 7% with best correction. On a 0-100 scale, mean VF and QOL scores were 87.2 and 93.9 respectively in normally sighted unoperated individuals, dropping to 15.6 and 29.5 for those severely blind (< 3/60). Among the cataract operated, mean VF and QOL scores were 47.5 and 55.4, respectively. VF and QOL scores correlated with vision status at statistically significant levels (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Cataract surgery outcomes, whether measured by traditional visual acuity or by patient reported VF/QOL, are at levels many would consider unacceptably low. It is apparent that in the quest to reduce cataract blindness much more attention must be given to improving surgery outcomes.


Subject(s)
Blindness/surgery , Cataract Extraction , Cataract/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Visual Acuity , Aged , Blindness/epidemiology , Blindness/physiopathology , Cataract/epidemiology , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nepal/epidemiology , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Refraction, Ocular , Surveys and Questionnaires , Visual Acuity/physiology , Visual Fields/physiology
18.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 126(4): 506-14, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9780095

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of blindness and cataract surgery among older adults in rural China. METHODS: Cluster sampling was used in randomly selecting men and women aged 50 years or older for visual acuity testing and an eye examination in 28 villages in Shunyi County. The survey, which was carried out in the fall of 1996, was preceded by a pilot study in which operational methods were refined and quality assurance evaluations carried out. RESULTS: Of 5,555 enumerated subjects > or =50 years of age, 91.5% (5,084/5,555) were examined and 90.9% (5,052/5,555) were tested for visual acuity. In this population, 2.8% (139/5,052) were blind, defined as presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in both eyes. Blindness was associated with older age and female sex. Cataract was the principal cause of blindness in at least one eye in 48.2% (67/139) of blind people. The ratio of those blind from cataract who were operated on to the those who could have been operated on, cataract surgical coverage, was estimated to be 47.8% (54/113). Cataract surgery was associated with younger age but not sex or education. CONCLUSIONS: Blindness, particularly blindness related to cataract, continues to be a significant problem among the elderly, especially women, in this population-based sample of rural Chinese. Despite an active eye-care program in Shunyi County, only half of those who might benefit from cataract surgery are receiving it.


Subject(s)
Blindness/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blindness/etiology , Cataract/complications , Cataract/epidemiology , China/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Educational Status , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Random Allocation , Rural Population , Sex Distribution , Visual Acuity
19.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 126(4): 515-23, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9780096

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To measure visual acuity and vision-related quality of life in individuals in rural China operated on for cataract. METHODS: Five thousand fifty-two persons age 50 years and older, 90.9% (5,052/5,555) of a randomly selected population in Shunyi County, were examined in the fall of 1996. Visual functioning and quality of life questionnaires were administered to those with presenting visual acuity less than 6/60 in either eye and to those who were aphakic or pseudophakic. RESULTS: Of the 87 individuals operated on for cataract, 12% (10/87) had presenting visual acuity of 6/18 or more in both eyes, and 24.1% (21/87) had less than 6/60. Twenty-five percent (29/116) of the 116 eyes operated on for cataract had presenting visual acuity of 6/18 or more, and 44.8% (52/116) had less than 6/60. Aphakic cases without glasses and uncorrectable aphakia attributable to surgical complications were common. In a multivariate regression model, including time period of surgery, hospital type, and surgical procedure, only pseudophakia was associated with better outcomes (P = .05). On a scale from 0 (maximum problems) to 100 (no problems), the mean visual functioning score (+/-SD) for the operated-on population was 61.9 +/- 30.0, and 71.0 +/- 31.8 for the quality of life questionnaire. These scores were comparable to those of the unoperated-on population with moderate bilateral blindness (<6/60 to > or =3/60 in the better eye). Visual functioning and quality of life scores were closely correlated with visual acuity in operated-on (r = 0.64 and r = 0.61, respectively) and unoperated-on populations (r = 0.68 and r = 0.59, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both clinical and patient-reported cataract surgery outcomes are below what should be achievable. Improvement in outcomes must be given greater emphasis if the potential of cataract surgery in restoring sight is to be realized.


Subject(s)
Cataract/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Visual Acuity , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aphakia, Postcataract/physiopathology , Cataract/epidemiology , Cataract Extraction , China/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pseudophakia/physiopathology , Random Allocation , Rural Population , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 46(1): 47-50, 1998 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9707848

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to investigate cataract surgery procedures and caseloads among Indian ophthalmologists in private and government practices. Members of the All India Ophthalmological Society and state ophthalmic societies were surveyed by mail questionnaire in December 1995. Out of 6,800 surveyed, 2,098 responses (31%) were received. Over 61% of the 990,249 reported cataract surgeries were carried out in private facilities with 24% of private patients receiving extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) and 41% ECCE with intraocular lens (IOL). Intracapsular cataract extraction remains more common in government facilities with 62% of cases. Over 85% of all surgeons reported some experience with ECCE/IOL. Surgeons operating in both private and government facilities carry an average annual caseload of 861 cataract surgeries, which is twice that of their colleagues operating exclusively in either private or government settings. Although the questionnaire response rate was low, the findings suggest that ECCE is more common in India than in generally recognized, and with the recent availability of low-cost IOLs, its popularity is rapidly expanding.


Subject(s)
Cataract Extraction/methods , Cataract Extraction/statistics & numerical data , Ophthalmology/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Health Surveys , Humans , India , Retrospective Studies , Societies, Medical , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL