Right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit: a comparison of long-term graft-related events between bovine jugular vein conduit, aortic homograft, and porcine-valved conduits.

Background: The optimal conduit for right ventricle to pulmonary artery (RV-PA) reconstruction does not exist. Reinterventions are common due to conduit stenosis and endocarditis. Tailoring conduit choice according to patients' characteristics could improve the outcomes. The study aimed to compare graft-related events (infective endocarditis, transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (PVR), transcatheter conduit dilatation, surgical conduit replacement, and transcatheter pulmonary branch intervention for RV-PA reconstruction using bovine jugular vein, aortic homograft, and porcine-valved conduits. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, 155 patients with 193 procedures that were done in King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center-Jeddah (KFSHRC JED) for implanting RV-PA conduits from 1999 to 2021 were included. The patients were grouped according to the type of conduit into 3 groups; Group 1 (n=153) received bovine jugular vein (BJVs) grafts, Group 2 (n=29) received aortic homografts, Group 3 (n=11) received porcine-valved conduits. Factors associated with graft-related events were evaluated using stepwise Cox regression analysis. Results: Patients with BJVs were significantly younger than those with porcine-valved conduits 3 (P=0.009). The weight of BJVs patients was significantly lower than homografts (P=0.002) and porcine-valved conduits patients 3 (P<0.001). The conduit size was as expected significantly lower in BJVs patients than patients who received porcine-valved conduits (P<0.001) and patients who received aortic homografts (P<0.001). There was no difference between Group 2 and 3 (P=0.084). Operative mortality occurred in 13 patients: 12 (7.84%) with BJV conduit and 1 (9.09%) with porcine valved conduit (P=0.351). Male gender [odds ratio (OR): 10.04; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-78.86; P=0.028] and smaller conduit size (OR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61-0.99; P=0.048) were associated with increased operative mortality. Freedom from graft-related events at 5 and 10 years was 67% and 52% in BJVs patients, 74% and 36% in patients who received aortic homografts, and 53% in patients who received porcine-valved conduits. Factors associated with increased graft-related events were male gender (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.004-2.50, P=0.048) and younger age (HR: 0.995; 95% CI: 0.991-0.999, P=0.041). Conclusions: RV-PA reconstruction was associated with low mortality, unrelated to the conduit type. Reinterventions for graft-related events were common. The durability and graft-related events might be comparable among BJV grafts, aortic homografts, and porcine-valved conduits. Factors associated with increased graft-related events in this study were male gender and younger age.

Bidirectional glenn surgery without palliative pulmonary artery banding in univentricular heart with unrestricted pulmonary flow. Retrospective multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary artery banding (PAB) has been generally acknowledged as an initial palliative treatment for patients having single ventricle (SV) physiology and unrestrictive pulmonary blood flow (UPBF), it may result in unfavorable outcomes. Performing bidirectional Glenn (BDG) surgery without initial PAB in some selected cases may avoid the complications associated with PAB and reduce the number of operative procedures for these patients. This research aimed to assess the outcome of BDG surgery performed directly without doing initial PAB in patients with SV-UPBF. METHODS: This Multicenter retrospective cohort includes all patients with SV-UPBF who had BDG surgery. Patients were separated into two groups. Patients in Group 1 included patients who survived till they received BDG (20 Patients) after initial PAB (28 patients), whereas patients in Group 2 got direct BDG surgery without first performing PAB (16 patients). Cardiac catheterization was done for all patients before BDG surgery. Patients with indexed pulmonary vascular resistance (PVRi) ≥ 5 WU.m2 at baseline or > 3 WU.m2 after vasoreactivity testing were excluded. RESULTS: Compared with patients who had direct BDG surgery, PAB patients had a higher cumulative mortality rate (32% vs. 0%, P = 0.016), with eight deaths after PAB and one mortality after BDG. There were no statistically significant differences between the patient groups who underwent BDG surgery regarding pulmonary vascular resistance, pulmonary artery pressure, postoperative usage of sildenafil or nitric oxide, intensive care unit stay, or hospital stay after BDG surgery. However, the cumulative durations in the intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital were more prolonged in patients with BDG after PAB (P = 0.003, P = 0.001respectively). CONCLUSION: Direct BDG surgery without the first PAB is related to improved survival and shorter hospital stays in some selected SV-UPBF patients.

Does Gender Affect the Outcomes of Myocardial Revascularization for Left-Main Coronary Artery Disease?

Currently, gender is not considered in the choice of the revascularization strategy for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. This study analyzed the effect of gender on the outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with ULMCA disease. Females who had PCI (n = 328) were compared with females who had CABG (n = 132) and PCI in males (n = 894) was compared with CABG (n = 784). Females with CABG had higher overall hospital mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) than females with PCI. Male patients with CABG had higher MACE; however, mortality did not differ between males with CABG vs PCI. In female patients, follow-up mortality was significantly higher in CABG patients, and target lesion revascularization was higher in patients with PCI. Male patients had no difference in mortality and MACE between groups; however, MI was higher with CABG, and congestive heart failure was higher with PCI. In conclusion, women with ULMCA disease treated with PCI could have better survival with lower MACE compared with CABG. These differences were not evident in males treated with either CABG or PCI. PCI could be the preferred revascularization strategy in women with ULMCA disease.

Single Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Unprotected Left-Main Coronary Disease.

BACKGROUND: The use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary revascularization for left-main disease is still debated. The study aimed to characterize patients who received dual versus single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) for unprotected left-main disease and compare the outcomes of those patients. RESULTS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 551 patients who were grouped into 2 groups: patients who received SAPT (n = 150) and those who received DAPT (n = 401). There were no differences in age ( P = 0.451), gender ( P = 0.063), smoking ( P = 0.941), diabetes mellitus ( P = 0.773), history of myocardial infarction ( P = 0.709), chronic kidney disease ( P = 0.615), atrial fibrillation ( P = 0.306), or cerebrovascular accident ( P = 0.550) between patients who received SAPT versus DAPT. DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome [87 (58%) vs. 273 (68.08%); P = 0.027], after off-pump CABG [12 (8%) vs. 73 (18.2%); P = 0.003] and in patients with radial artery grafts [1 (0.67%) vs. 32 (7.98%); P < 0.001]. While SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction [55 (36.67%) vs. 61 (15.21%); P < 0.001] and in patients with postoperative acute kidney injury [27 (18%) vs. 37 (9.23%); P = 0.004]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT for follow-up major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events was not significantly different from that of SAPT [ß, -2.08 (95% confidence interval (CI), -20.8-16.7); P = 0.828]. The attributed treatment effect of DAPT on follow-up all-cause mortality was not significantly different from that of SAPT [ß, 4.12 (CI, -11.1-19.32); P = 0.595]. There was no difference in bleeding between groups ( P = 0.666). CONCLUSIONS: DAPTs were more commonly used in patients with acute coronary syndrome, after off-pump CABG, and with radial artery grafts. SAPTs were more commonly used in patients with low ejection fraction and acute kidney injury. Patients on DAPT after CABG for left-main disease had comparable major adverse cerebrovascular and cardiac events and survival to patients on SAPT, with no difference in bleeding events.

Custodiol versus blood cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Blood-based cardioplegia is the standard myocardial protection strategy in pediatric cardiac surgery. Custadiol (histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate), an alternative, may have some advantages but is potentially less effective at myocardial protection. This study aimed to test whether custadiol is not inferior to blood-based cardioplegia in pediatric cardiac surgery. METHODS: The study was designed as a randomized controlled trial with a blinded outcome assessment. All pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegia, including neonates, were eligible. Emergency surgery was excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of death within 30 days, an ICU stay longer than 5 days, or arrhythmia requiring intervention. Secondary endpoints included total hospital stay, inotropic score, cardiac troponin levels, ventricular function, and extended survival postdischarge. The sample size was determined a priori for a noninferiority design with an expected primary outcome of 40% and a clinical significance difference of 20%. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and January 2021, 226 patients, divided into the Custodiol cardioplegia (CC) group (n = 107) and the blood cardioplegia (BC) group (n = 119), completed the study protocol. There was no difference in the composite endpoint between the CC and BC groups, 65 (60.75%) vs. 71 (59.66%), respectively (P = 0.87). The total length of stay in the hospital was 14 (Q2-Q3: 10-19) days in the CC group vs. 13 (10-21) days in the BC group (P = 0.85). The inotropic score was not significantly different between the CC and BC groups, 5 (2.6-7.45) vs. 5 (2.6-7.5), respectively (P = 0.82). The cardiac troponin level and ventricular function did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.34 and P = 0.85, respectively). The median duration of follow-up was 32.75 (Q2-Q3: 18.73-41.53) months, and there was no difference in survival between the two groups (log-rank P = 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: Custodial cardioplegia is not inferior to blood cardioplegia for myocardial protection in pediatric patients. Trial registration The trial was registered in Clinicaltrials.gov, and the ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier number is NCT03082716 Date: 17/03/2017.

Percutaneous coronary stent implantation in children and young infants following surgical repair of congenital heart disease.

Background: Coronary artery stent implantation (CSI) in the pediatric population is rare. Only a few reports were published on managing postoperative coronary artery obstruction using coronary stents following surgical repair of congenital heart diseases (CHD). This study aimed to analyze the feasibility, indications, procedural technique, risk factors, and short-term outcomes of CSI after pediatric cardiac surgery. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we reviewed all pediatric patients who underwent surgical repair of CHD requiring postoperative CSI in two cardiac centers (King Abdulaziz University Hospital and King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center) between 2012 and 2022. Survival to hospital discharge was the study's primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included procedural success, duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) stay, hospital stay, need for coronary reintervention, and late mortality. A descriptive analysis was performed for the collected data from the patients' medical records. Results: Eleven patients who underwent postoperative CSI were identified. The most common anatomic diagnosis was congenital aortic valve stenosis. All patients underwent cardiac catheterization on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support except one patient, who presented with chest pain after cardiac surgery. Procedural success was achieved in all patients with excellent revascularization documented by post-procedural angiograms. Both patients who had late coronary events after cardiac surgery survived hospital discharge. There was no in-hospital mortality among the two patients who required stenting of only the right coronary artery. The four patients who required more than 120 minutes to complete the procedure had early mortality. After CSI, the median duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay was 12 and 17 days, respectively. Six patients (54.5%) survived hospital discharge post-CSI; they did not require re-intervention during the follow-up period (38-1,695 days). Conclusions: CSI in pediatric patients can be performed with excellent procedural success for treating coronary artery stenosis after cardiac surgery. It could be considered a potential treatment strategy for this population.

Minimally-invasive approach via percutaneous femoral cannulation for the resection of intra-cardiac masses: a single center experience in the Middle-East.

BACKGROUND: Intra-cardiac masses are rare and challenging lesions with an overall incidence ranging of 0.02-0.2%. Minimally invasive approaches have been recently introduced for surgical resection of these lesions. Here, we evaluated our early experience using minimally invasive techniques in addressing intra-cardiac lesions. METHODOLOGY: This is a retrospective descriptive study conducted between April 2018 to December 2020. All patients were diagnosed with cardiac tumors and treated via a right mini-thoracotomy with cardiopulmonary bypass through femoral cannulation at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Jeddah. RESULTS: Myxoma was the most common pathology representing 46% of cases followed by thrombus (27%), leiomyoma (9%), lipoma (9%) and angiosarcoma (9%). All tumors were resected with negative margins. One patient was converted to open sternotomy. Tumor locations were in the right atrium, left atrium, and left ventricle in 5, 3, and 3 patients, respectively. The median ICU stay was 1.33 days. The median length of hospitalization was 5.7 days. There was no 30-days hospital mortality recorded in this cohort. CONCLUSION: Our early experience shows that minimally invasive resection can be performed safely and effectively for intra-cardiac masses. The minimally invasive approach using a mini-thoracotomy with percutaneous femoral cannulation can be an effective alternative in resecting intra-cardiac masses that achieves clear margin resection, quick post-operative recovery, and low rates of recurrence for benign lesions.

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass grafting in emergency and non-emergency unprotected left-main revascularization.

BACKGROUND: The optimal revascularization strategy in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease in the emergency setting is still controversial. Thus, we aimed to compare the outcomes of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) vs. coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with and without emergent LMCA disease. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 2138 patients recruited from 14 centers between 2015 and 2019. We compared patients with emergent LMCA revascularization who underwent PCI (n = 264) to patients who underwent CABG (n = 196) and patients with non-emergent LMCA revascularization with PCI (n = 958) to those who underwent CABG (n = 720). The study outcomes were in-hospital and follow-up all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: Emergency PCI patients were older and had a significantly higher prevalence of chronic kidney disease, lower ejection fraction, and higher EuroSCORE than CABG patients. CABG patients had significantly higher SYNTAX scores, multivessel disease, and ostial lesions. In patients presenting with arrest, PCI had significantly lower MACCE (P = 0.017) and in-hospital mortality (P = 0.016) than CABG. In non-emergent revascularization, PCI was associated with lower MACCE in patients with low (P = 0.015) and intermediate (P < 0.001) EuroSCORE. PCI was associated with lower MACCE in patients with low (P = 0.002) and intermediate (P = 0.008) SYNTAX scores. In non-emergent revascularization, PCI was associated with reduced hospital mortality in patients with intermediate (P = 0.001) and high (P = 0.002) EuroSCORE compared to CABG. PCI was associated with lower hospital mortality in patients with low (P = 0.031) and intermediate (P = 0.001) SYNTAX scores. At a median follow-up time of 20 months (IQR: 10-37), emergency PCI had lower MACCE compared to CABG [HR: 0.30 (95% CI 0.14-0.66), P < 0.003], with no significant difference in all-cause mortality between emergency PCI and CABG [HR: 1.18 (95% CI 0.23-6.08), P = 0.845]. CONCLUSIONS: PCI could be advantageous over CABG in revascularizing LMCA disease in emergencies. PCI could be preferred for revascularization of non-emergent LMCA in patients with intermediate EuroSCORE and low and intermediate SYNTAX scores.

Left Main Coronary Artery Revascularization in Patients with Impaired Renal Function: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

INTRODUCTION: The evidence about the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease and impaired renal function is limited. Thus, we aimed to compare the outcomes of LMCA disease revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] vs. coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) in patients with and without impaired renal function. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 2,138 patients recruited from 14 centers between 2015 and 2,019. We compared patients with impaired renal function who had PCI (n= 316) to those who had CABG (n = 121) and compared patients with normal renal function who had PCI (n = 906) to those who had CABG (n = 795). The study outcomes were in-hospital and follow-up major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of in-hospital MACCE was significantly higher in CABG compared to PCI in patients with impaired renal function (odds ratio [OR]: 8.13 [95% CI: 4.19-15.76], p < 0.001) and normal renal function (OR: 2.59 [95% CI: 1.79-3.73]; p < 0.001). There were no differences in follow-up MACCE between CABG and PCI in patients with impaired renal function (HR: 1.14 [95% CI: 0.71-1.81], p = 0.585) and normal renal function (HR: 1.12 [0.90-1.39], p = 0.312). CONCLUSIONS: PCI could have an advantage over CABG in revascularization of LMCA disease in patients with impaired renal function regarding in-hospital MACCE. The follow-up MACCE was comparable between PCI and CABG in patients with impaired and normal renal function.

PR and QRS interval changes after transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement in children.

BACKGROUND: Changes in PR intervals after transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TCPVR) have not been thoroughly evaluated in children. This study evaluated the changes in PR and QRS intervals six months after TCPVR in children with congenital heart disease. RESULTS: This study included 41 patients who underwent TCPVR from 2010 to 2022. ECG of patients was reviewed before and six months after TCPVR, and the PR and QRS intervals were reported. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) was retrieved indirectly from echocardiography and compared pre- and 6-months after TPVR. The median age was 13 years (25th-75th percentiles: 11-16), and 61% were males. The preoperative diagnosis was tetralogy of Fallot (n = 29, 71%), transposition of great vessels (n = 4, 10%), common arterial trunk (n = 3, 7%), pulmonary valve stenosis (n = 3, 7%) and pulmonary atresia (n = 2, 5%). The Melody valve was used in 30 patients, and Edwards Sapien was used in 11 patients. RVSP was significantly reduced six months after the procedure (pre-RVSP 40 (30-55) mmHg vs. post-RVSP 25 (20-35) mmHg; P < 0.001). The PR interval was 142 (132-174) msec before TPVR and 146 (132-168) msec post-TCPVR (P = 0.442). Post-TPVR PR was positively related to the pre-PR (ß: 0.79 (0.66-0.93), P < 0.001) and inversely related to the right ventricular outflow tract size (- 1.48 (- 2.76 to - 0.21), P = 0.023). The pre-TPVR QRS was 130 (102-146) msec, and the post-TPVR QRS was 136 (106-144) msec (P = 0.668). CONCLUSIONS: In children undergoing TCPVR, the PR and QRS intervals did not change significantly during a 6-month follow-up.

Factors affecting the outcomes after bidirectional Glenn shunt: two decades of experience from a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUND: Despite the improved management of patients with a single ventricle, the long-term outcomes are not optimal. We reported the outcomes of the bidirectional Glenn procedure (BDG) and factors affecting the length of hospital stay, operative mortality, and Nakata index before Fontan completion. RESULTS: This retrospective study included 259 patients who underwent BDG shunt from 2002 to 2020. The primary study outcomes were operative mortality, duration of hospital stay, and Nakata index before Fontan. Mortality occurred in 10 patients after BDG shunt (3.86%). By univariable logistic regression analysis, postoperative mortality after BDG shunt was associated with high preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressure (OR: 1.06 (95% CI 1.01-1.23); P = 0.02). The median duration of hospital stay after BDG shunt was 12 (9-19) days. Multivariable analysis indicated that Norwood palliation before BDG shunt was significantly associated with prolonged hospital stay (ß: 0.53 (95% CI 0.12-0.95), P = 0.01). Fontan completion was performed in 144 patients (50.03%), and the pre-Fontan Nataka index was 173 (130.92-225.34) mm2/m2. Norwood palliation (ß: - 0.61 (95% CI 62.63-20.18), P = 0.003) and preoperative saturation (ß: - 2.38 (95% CI - 4.49-0.26), P = 0.03) were inversely associated with pre-Fontan Nakata index in patients who had Fontan completion. CONCLUSIONS: BDG had a low mortality rate. Pulmonary artery pressure, Norwood palliation, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and pre-BDG shunt saturation were key factors associated with post-BDG outcomes in our series.

Outcomes of Left Main Revascularization in Patients with Anemia: Gulf Left Main Registry.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of baseline anemia and anemia following revascularization on outcomes in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease. METHODS: This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational study conducted between January 2015 and December 2019. The data on patients with ULMCA who underwent revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) were stratified by the hemoglobin level at baseline into anemic and non-anemic groups to compare in-hospital events. The pre-discharge hemoglobin following revascularization was categorized into very low (<80 g/L for men and women), low (≥80 and ≤119 g/L for women and ≤129 g/L for men), and normal (≥130 g/L for men and ≥120 g/L for women) to assess impact on follow-up outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2,138 patients were included, 796 (37.2%) of whom had anemia at baseline. A total of 319 developed anemia after revascularization and moved from being non-anemic at baseline to anemic at discharge. There was no difference in hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) and mortality between CABG and PCI in anemic patients. At a median follow-up time of 20 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 27), patients with pre-discharge anemia who underwent PCI had a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (CHF) (p < 0.0001), and those who underwent CABG had significantly higher follow-up mortality (HR: 9.85 (95% CI: 2.53-38.43), p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: In this Gulf LM study, baseline anemia had no impact upon in-hospital MACCE and total mortality following revascularization (PCI or CABG). However, pre-discharge anemia is associated with worse outcomes after ULMCA disease revascularization, with significantly higher all-cause mortality in patients who had CABG, and a higher incidence of CHF in PCI patients, at a median follow-up time of 20 months (IQR: 27).

Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on outcomes after left main revascularization: g-LM Registry.

AIMS: The impact of left ventricular dysfunction on clinical outcomes following revascularization is not well established in patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease (ULMCA). In this study, we evaluated the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on clinical outcomes of patients with ULMCA requiring revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). METHODS: The details of the design, methods, end points, and relevant definitions are outlined in the Gulf Left Main Registry: a retrospective, observational study conducted between January 2015 and December 2019 across 14 centres in 3 Gulf countries. In this study, the data on patients with ULMCA who underwent revascularization through PCI or CABG were stratified by LVEF into three main subgroups; low (l-LVEF <40%), mid-range (m-LVEF 40-49%), and preserved (p-LVEF ≥50%). Primary outcomes were hospital major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and mortality and follow-up MACCE and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 2137 patients were included; 1221 underwent PCI and 916 had CABG. During hospitalization, MACCE was significantly higher in patients with l-LVEF [(10.10%), P = 0.005] and m-LVEF [(10.80%), P = 0.009], whereas total mortality was higher in patients with m-LVEF [(7.40%), P = 0.009] and p-LVEF [(7.10%), P = 0.045] who underwent CABG. There was no mortality difference between groups in patients with l-LVEF. At a median follow-up of 15 months, there was no difference in MACCE and total mortality between patients who underwent CABG or PCI with p-LVEF and m-LVEF. CONCLUSION: CABG was associated with higher in-hospital events. Hospital mortality in patients with l-LVEF was comparable between CABG and PCI. At 15 months' follow-up, PCI could have an advantage in decreasing MACCE in patients with l-LVEF.

Outcomes of Myocardial Revascularization in Diabetic Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: A Multicenter Observational Study From Three Gulf Countries.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data for managing patients with diabetes and left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease are scarce. We compared percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in diabetes and LMCA disease patients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients with LMCA presented to 14 centers from 2015 to 2019. The study included 2138 patients with unprotected LMCA disease; 1468 (68.7 %) had diabetes. Patients were grouped into; diabetes with PCI (n = 804) or CABG (n = 664) and non-diabetes with PCI (n = 418) or CABG (n = 252). RESULTS: In diabetes, cardiac (34 (5.1 %) vs. 22 (2.7 %); P = 0.016), non-cardiac (13 (2 %) vs. 6 (0.7 %); P = 0.027) and total hospital mortality (47 (7.1 %) vs. 28 (3.5 %); P = 0.0019), myocardial infarction (45 (6.8 %) vs. 11 (1.4 %); P = 0.001), cerebrovascular events (25 (3.8 %) vs. 12 (1.5 %); P = 0.005) and minor bleeding (65 (9.8 %) vs. 50 (6.2 %); P = 0.006) were significantly higher in CABG patients compared to PCI; respectively. The median follow-up time was 20 (10-37) months. In diabetes, total mortality was higher in CABG (P = 0.001) while congestive heart failure was higher in PCI (P = 0.001). There were no differences in major adverse cerebrovascular events and target lesion revascularization between PCI and CABG. Predictors of mortality in diabetes were high anatomical SYNTAX, peripheral arterial disease, chronic kidney disease, and cardiogenic shock. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter retrospective study, we found no significant difference in clinical outcomes during the short-term follow-up between PCI with second-generation DES and CABG except for lower total mortality and a higher rate of congestive heart failure in PCI group of patients. Randomized trials to characterize patients who could benefit from each treatment option are needed.

One Versus Two Stents Strategies for Unprotected Left Main Intervention: Gulf Left Main Registry.

The optimal stenting strategy for unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) disease remains debated. This retrospective observational study (Gulf Left Main Registry) analyzed the outcomes of 1 vs 2 stents in patients with unprotected left main percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Overall, 1222 patients were evaluated; 173 had 1 stent and 1049 had 2 stents. The 2-stent group was older with more comorbidities, higher mean SYNTAX scores, and more distal bifurcation lesions. In the 1-stent group, in-hospital events were significant for major bleeding, and better mean creatinine clearance. At median follow-up of 20 months, the 1-stent group was more likely to have target lesion revascularization (TLR). Total mortality was numerically lower in the 1-stent group (.00% vs 2.10%); however, this was not statistically significant (P=.068). Our analysis demonstrates the benefits of a 2-stent approach for ULMCA patients with high SYNTAX scores and lesions in both major side branches, while the potential benefit of a 1-stent approach for less complex ULMCA was also observed. Further studies with longer follow-up are needed to definitively demonstrate the optimal approach.

Unprotected Left Main Revascularization in the Setting of Non-coronary Atherosclerosis: Gulf Left Main Registry.

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in revascularization of left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease has been evaluated in previous studies. However, there has been minimal study of the relationship between co-existing non-coronary atherosclerosis (NCA) and LMCA disease revascularization. We aim to examine this relationship. The Gulf-LM study is a retrospective analysis of unprotected LMCA revascularization cases undergoing PCI with second generation drug-eluting stent vs CABG across 14 centers within 3 Gulf countries between January 2015 and December 2019. A total of 2138 patients were included, 381 with coexisting NCA and 1757 without. Outcomes examined included major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), cardiac and non-cardiac death, and all bleeding. In patients with NCA, preexisting myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure were more common, with PCI being the most common revascularization strategy. A statistically significant reduction in in-hospital MACCE and all bleeding was noted in patients with NCA undergoing PCI as compared to CABG. At a median follow-up of 15 months, MACCE and major bleeding outcomes continued to favor the PCI group, though no such difference was identified between revascularization strategies in patients without NCA.In this multicenter retrospective study of patients with and without NCA who require revascularization (PCI and CABG) for unprotected LMCA disease, PCI demonstrated a better clinical outcome in MACCE both in-hospital and during the short-term follow-up in patients with NCA. However, no such difference was observed in patients without NCA.

A robotic-assisted hybrid coronary revascularization program: Establishment and early experience in the Middle East.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) is a technique that merges coronary artery bypass grafting surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) approaches for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. The surgical component of the procedure is minimally invasive and can be done using robotic technology that avoids the need for sternotomy. Our objective is to study all patients who underwent robotic-assisted HCR (RHCR) to evaluate the feasibility and safety of the procedure during the establishment phase. METHODS: This study is a retrospective chart review conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Jeddah (KFSRC-J). The study focuses on patients who underwent RHCR between July 2018 to December 2020. The study was approved by the institutional review board #2020-103. RESULTS: Robotic-assisted HCR was performed on 78 patients (mean age, 56 years (range, 43-72 years); 89.75% males) during the study phase. Left internal mammary artery grafting was used in all patients. There was no hospital mortality, and the mean hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay were 5.8 and 1.4 days, respectively. We found that 93.6% of the patients had no blood transfusion. There were no major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and perioperative MI recorded. There was a 3.8% rate of postoperative complications. The percentage of surgeries converted to conventional and re-exploration for bleeding were 1.2% and 2.6%, respectively. The average operation time was 164 min. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes on the safety and effectiveness of RHCR in treating patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Moreover, robotic-assisted hybrid coronary revascularization offers an alternative, functionally complete revascularization option to a selected group of patients with minimal surgical trauma, short hospital and ICU length of stay, quick recovery, and little to no blood transfusion requirement.

Intraoperative spontaneous tension pneumothorax during robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting.

Patients undergoing robotic-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting are increasing. Several complications have emerged with the increasing use of minimally invasive procedures. We reported a case of spontaneous tension pneumothorax that developed in the ventilated lung during robotic assisted left internal mammary artery harvesting causing severe hemodynamic instability. A sudden rise of airway pressure occurred, and the patient became hypotensive. Immediately, the surgeon was notified to look at the right pleura. Pneumothorax was identified, the right pleura was opened using robotic arms, and the right lung was decompressed. A small emphysematous bulla was identified and stabled. Proper identification of the procedure-associated complications is essential for timely management. Tension pneumothorax is a potentially fatal complication, especially in patients under positive pressure ventilation.

Patent ductus arteriosus stenting versus modified Blalock-Taussig shunt for palliation of duct-dependent pulmonary blood flow lesions.

BACKGROUND: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) stenting is an alternative to modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS) as first-stage palliation of duct-dependent lesions. The superiority of one approach over the other is still controversial. Our objective was to compare PDA  stent versusMBTS for palliation in regard to safety, efficacy, and efficiency. METHODS: From 2010 to 2021, 134 patients had first-stage palliation with either PDA stent (n = 83) or MBTS (n = 51). Twenty-seven patients failed the primary treatment and were converted to the other group. The study endpoints were hospital outcomes, interstage reintervention, and concomitant procedures at the second-stage palliation. RESULTS: Patients with PDA stent were significantly younger. The prevalence of antegrade pulmonary blood flow (PBF) was higher in patients who had MBTS and graft thrombosis was higher in the PDA stent. Hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who had MBTS. Predictors of prolonged mechanical ventilation were low-weight, MBTS, and conversion. Intensive care unit stay significantly increased with conversion, low-weight, and antegrade PBF. The interstage intervention was required more frequently in PDA-stent group. Predictors of reintervention were conversion and pulmonary atresia with the intact interventricular septum. Pulmonary artery plasty was required more frequently during the second-stage palliation in PDA-stent group. CONCLUSION: PDA stent is an alternative to MBTS for first-stage palliation. It is associated with shorter hospital stays and avoidance of surgery at the expense of a high rate of stent thrombosis and interstage reintervention. Conversion increased the risk of the procedure. More studies are needed to determine factors that affect PDA-stent outcomes and patient selection criteria.

Combined Norwood and cavopulmonary shunt as the first palliation in late presenters with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and single-ventricle lesions.

OBJECTIVE: A primary cavopulmonary shunt as a component of the initial Norwood palliation could be an option in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome and single-ventricle lesions. We present our initial experience with this approach in carefully selected patients with unrestricted pulmonary blood flow and low pulmonary vascular resistance. METHODS: The study included 16 patients; the mean age was 137.9 ± 84.2 days. All patients underwent a Norwood palliation consisting of atrial septectomy, Damus-Kaye-Stansel connection, and arch augmentation in addition to the cavopulmonary shunt as the initial palliation. RESULTS: The mean preoperative pulmonary to systemic blood flow (Qp/Qs) ratio on room air (n = 9) and with 100% oxygen (n = 8) was 5.3 ± 3.2 and 8.6 ± 4.3, respectively. The mean pulmonary vascular resistance on room air (n = 10) and 100% oxygen (n = 9) was 4.8 ± 3.1 and 1.7 ± 0.97 WU/m2, respectively. Delayed chest closure was needed in 12 patients, and 6 patients required postoperative inhaled nitric oxide. One patient underwent takedown of the cavopulmonary shunt and construction of the right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit after 1 month. The mean intensive care unit stay was 18.9 ± 15.4 days. There were 2 in-hospital deaths (48 hours and 8 days after surgery) and 2 postdischarge deaths (6 months and 2 years after hospital discharge). Seven patients have undergone the Fontan completion successfully, and 5 patients await further surgery. CONCLUSIONS: First-stage Norwood palliation with cavopulmonary shunt for patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome or single-ventricle lesions is feasible in late presenters with low pulmonary vascular resistance.