Blood flow assessment technology in aortic surgery: a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Blood flow assessment is an emerging technique that allows for assessment of hemodynamics in the heart and blood vessels. Recent advances in cardiovascular imaging technologies have made it possible for this technique to be more accessible to clinicians and researchers. Blood flow assessment typically refers to two techniques: measurement-based flow visualization using echocardiography or four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging (4D flow MRI), and computer-based flow simulation based on computational fluid dynamics modeling. Using these methods, blood flow patterns can be visualized and quantitative measurements of mechanical stress on the walls of the ventricles and blood vessels, most notably the aorta, can be made. Thus, blood flow assessment has been enhancing the understanding of cardiac and aortic diseases; however, its introduction to clinical practice has been negligible yet. In this article, we aim to discuss the clinical applications and future directions of blood flow assessment in aortic surgery. We then provide our unique perspective on the technique's translational impact on the surgical management of aortic disease. Methods: Articles from the PubMed database and Google Scholar regarding blood flow assessment in aortic surgery were reviewed. For the initial search, articles published between 2013 and 2023 were prioritized, including original articles, clinical trials, case reports, and reviews. Following the initial search, additional articles were considered based on manual searches of the references from the retrieved literature. Key Content and Findings: In aortic root pathology and ascending aortic aneurysms, blood flow assessment can elucidate postoperative hemodynamic changes after surgical reconfiguration of the aortic valve complex or ascending aorta. In cases of aortic dissection, analysis of blood flow can predict future aortic dilatation. For complicated congenital aortic anomalies, surgeons may use preoperative imaging to perform "virtual surgery", in which blood flow assessment can predict postoperative hemodynamics for different surgical reconstructions and assist in procedural planning even before entering the operating room. Conclusions: Blood flow assessment and computational modeling can evaluate hemodynamics and flow patterns by visualizing blood flow and calculating biomechanical forces in patients with aortic disease. We anticipate that blood flow assessment will become an essential tool in the treatment planning and understanding of the progression of aortic disease.

Open, endovascular, or hybrid repair of aortic arch disease: narrative review of diverse strategies with diverse options.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: The management of aortic arch disease is complex. Open surgical management continues to evolve, and the introduction of endovascular repair is revolutionizing aortic arch surgery. Although these innovative techniques have generated the opportunity for better outcomes in select patients, they have also introduced confusion and uncertainty regarding best practices. In New York, we have developed a collaborative group named the New York Aortic Consortium (NYAC) as a means of crosslinking knowledge and working together to better understand and treat aortic disease. In our meeting in May 2023, regional aortic experts and invited international experts discussed the contemporary management of aortic arch disease, differences in interpretation of the available literature, as well as the integration of endovascular technology into disease management. In this review article, we summarize the current state of aortic arch surgery. RESULTS: Approaches to aortic arch repair have evolved substantially, whether it be methods to reduce cerebral ischaemia, improve hemostasis, simplify future operations, or expand options for high-risk patients with endovascular approaches. However, the transverse aortic arch remains challenging to repair. Amongst our collaborative group of cardiac/aortic surgeons, we discovered a wide disparity in our practice patterns and management strategies of patients with aortic arch disease. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to build unique institutional expertise in the context of complex and evolving management of aortic arch disease with open surgery, endovascular repair, and hybrid approaches, tailored to the risk profiles and anatomical specifics of individual patients.

Low-volume surgeons can have better outcomes at certain hospital settings for open abdominal aortic repairs.

OBJECTIVE: The volume-outcomes relationship is cross-cutting among open abdominal aortic operations, where higher-volume surgeons have better perioperative outcomes. However, there has been minimal focus on low-volume surgeons and how to improve their outcomes. This study sought to identify if there are any differences in outcomes among low-volume surgeons for open abdominal aortic surgeries by different hospital settings. METHODS: We used the 2012-2019 Vascular Quality Initiative registry to identify all patients who underwent open abdominal aortic surgery for aneurysmal or aorto-iliac occlusive disease by a low-volume surgeon (<7 operations annually). We categorized high-volume hospitals using three distinct definitions: those that performed ≥10 operations annually, those with at least one high-volume surgeon, and by the number of surgeons (1-2 surgeons, 3-4 surgeons, 5-7 surgeons, and 8+ surgeons). Outcomes included 30-day perioperative mortality, overall complications, and failure-to-rescue. We compared outcomes among low-volume surgeons using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions across each of these three hospital categorizations. RESULTS: Among 14,110 patients who underwent open abdominal aortic surgery, 10,252 (7 3%) were performed by 1155 low-volume surgeons. Two-thirds of these patients (66%) underwent their surgery at a high-volume hospital, fewer than one-third (30%) at a hospital that had at least one high-volume surgeon, and one-half (49%) at hospitals with at least five surgeons. Among all patients operated on by low-volume surgeons, rates of 30-day mortality were 3.8%, perioperative complications were 35.3%, and failure-to-rescue were 9.9%. Low-volume surgeons operating at high-volume hospitals for aneurysmal disease had lower rates of perioperative death (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.90) and failure-to-rescue (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.98), but similar rates of complications (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.89-1.27). Similarly, patients undergoing their operation at hospitals that had at least one high-volume surgeon had lower rates of death (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.50-0.99) for aneurysmal disease. Patient outcomes among low-volume surgeons for aorto-iliac occlusive disease did not vary by hospital setting. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing open abdominal aortic surgery have a low-volume surgeon, where outcomes are slightly better for those taking place at a high-volume hospital. Focused and incentivized interventions may be needed to improve outcomes among low-volume surgeons across all practice settings.

Outcomes of early transcarotid artery revascularization versus carotid endarterectomy after acute neurologic events.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid revascularization within 14 days of a neurologic event has been recommended by society guidelines. Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) carries the lowest overall stroke rate for any carotid artery stenting technique. However, the outcomes of TCAR within 14 days of a neurologic event have not been directly compared with those after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: We compared the 30-day outcomes of symptomatic patients who had undergone TCAR and CEA within 14 days of a stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) from January 2016 to February 2020 using the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative carotid artery stenting and CEA databases. Propensity score matching was used to adjust for patient risk factors. The primary outcome was a composite of postoperative ipsilateral stroke, death, and myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: A total of 1281 symptomatic patients had undergone TCAR and 13,429 patients had undergone CEA within 14 days of a neurologic event. After 1:1 propensity matching, 728 matched pairs were included for analysis. The primary composite outcome of stroke, death, or MI was more frequent in the TCAR group (4.7% vs 2.6%; P = .04). This was driven by a higher rate of postoperative ipsilateral stroke in the TCAR group (3.8% vs 1.8%; P = .005). No differences were found between TCAR and CEA in terms of death (0.7% vs 0.8%; P = .8) or MI (0.8% vs 1%; P = .7). Although TCAR procedures were shorter (median, 69 minutes [interquartile range, 53-85 minutes]; vs median, 120 minutes [interquartile range, 93-150 minutes]; P < .001) and the postoperative length of stay was similar (2 days; P = .3) compared with CEA, the TCAR patients were more likely to be discharged to a facility other than home (26% vs 19%; P < .01). Performing TCAR within 48 hours of a stroke was an independent predictor of postoperative stoke or TIA (odds ratio, 5.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-16). This increased risk of postoperative stroke or TIA was not found when performing TCAR within 48 hours of a TIA. CONCLUSIONS: TCAR within 14 days of a neurologic event resulted in higher ipsilateral postoperative stroke rates compared with CEA, especially when performed within 48 hours after a stroke.

Cardiac tumors prevalence and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac tumors and their associated outcomes are poorly characterized. This study sought to comprehensively assess the epidemiology and natural history of primary and secondary malignant cardiac tumors (PMCT and SMCT), a well as establish predictors of mortality. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify articles reporting on PMCTs and SMCTs. The prevalence of important cardiac tumor (CT) subtypes was evaluated and further stratified based on the continental region. Outcomes of interest included short- and long-term mortality and utilization of heart transplantation (HTX). A random effect model was adopted, and a meta-regression was performed to determine predictors of the prevalence of CTs as well as predictors of operative mortality. RESULTS: Of the 1,226 retrieved articles, 74 were included in our study (n = 8,849 patients). The mean follow-up was 2.27 years, mean age was 42.9 years, and 55% of the patients were females. There was a total number of 7,484 benign primary cardiac tumors (PCTs) (5,140 were myxoma), 862 (9.7%) malignant PCTs, and 355 secondary cardiac tumors. The prevalence of PMCTs among PCTs was 10.83% [95%CI = 09.11; 12.83%] with a trend towards being lower in South America compared to other continents (Prevalence = 5.80%). The prevalence of HTX among all patients was 2.45% [1.36; 4.38%]. The pooled short-term mortality was 5.90% [4.70; 7.39%] and the incidence of late mortality in all CTs, benign CT and PMCTs was 2.55% [1.76; 3.72%], 0.79% [0.46; 1.37%] and 14.77% [9.32; 23.40%], respectively. On meta-regression, the annual volume of cardiac tumor cases per center was the only predictor of lower early mortality (Beta = -0.14 ± 0.03, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PMCTs represent the minority of PCT (~10%) and have a higher prevalence in Europe and North America. Survival is higher in benign pathology and is significantly improved by treatment in specialized high-volume centers. Approximately 2% of patients with CTs undergo heart transplantation.

The Effect of Acute Limb Ischemia on Mortality in Patients Undergoing Femoral Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving modality increasingly used in the management cardiopulmonary failure. However, ECMO itself is not without major complications. Mortality remains high, and morbidity such as stroke, renal failure, and acute limb threatening ischemia (ALI) are common among surviving patients. We analyzed the effect of one of these complications, ALI, on the survival of patients receiving venoarterial ECMO (VA ECMO) with femoral cannulation. METHODS: Patients with cardiopulmonary failure supported by VA ECMO inserted through femoral cannulation at two institutions from December 2010 to December 2017 were enrolled in this study. Data were collected retrospectively. Our primary outcome was ALI and its effect on hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included six-month mortality, length of hospital stay, and other complications (stroke and renal failure); multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of ALI and hospital mortality. RESULTS: There were 71 patients included in this study. The overall VA ECMO hospital mortality was 53.5%. ALI was seen in 14 (19.7%) patients. Of these, four (5.6%) patients had fasciotomy, four patients (5.6%) had thrombectomy, and one underwent arterial repair (1.4%). Five additional patients (7.0%) with ALI expired and had no vascular intervention. None of the demographic and clinical characteristics significantly correlated with ALI except for stroke and renal failure requiring new-onset hemodialysis (HD). The rate of hospital and 6-month mortality in patients with and without vascular complications were 78.6%, 92.3% and 47.4%, 57.4%, respectively (P = 0.042 and P = 0.023). Multivariate analysis correlated hospital and six-month mortality with ALI, stroke, and new-onset HD. CONCLUSIONS: ALI correlates with higher mortality in VA ECMO patients with femoral cannulation. Although some of the contributing factors to mortality in these patients are related to the consequences of cardiopulmonary failure, strong efforts should be made to avoid ALI after femoral VA ECMO cannulation.

Treatment Utilization and Socioeconomic Disparities in the Surgical Management of Gastroparesis.

BACKGROUND: Gastroparesis is an end-organ sequela of diabetes. We evaluated the roles of race and socioeconomic status in hospitalization rates and utilization of surgical treatments in these patients. METHODS: Data was extracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between the years 2012 and 2014, and any discharge diagnosis of gastroparesis (536.3) was included. Gastrostomy, jejunostomy, and total parenteral nutrition were considered nutritional support procedures, and procedures aimed at improving motility were considered definitive disease-specific procedures: pyloroplasty, endoscopic pyloric dilation, gastric pacemaker placement, and gastrectomy. RESULTS: There were 747,500 hospitalizations reporting a discharge diagnosis of gastroparesis. On multivariable analysis, black race (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.89-1.98; p < 0.001) and Medicaid insurance (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.42-1.50; p < 0.001) were the strongest socioeconomic risk factors for hospitalization due to gastroparesis. Patients in urban teaching institutions were most likely to undergo a surgical intervention for gastroparesis (5.53% of patients versus 3.94% of patients treated in urban non-teaching hospitals and 2.38% of patients in rural hospitals; p < 0.001). Uninsured patients were less than half as likely to receive treatment compared to those with private insurance (OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.34-0.48; p < 0.001), and black patients had an OR 0.75 (95% CI 0.69-0.81; p < 0.001) for receiving treatment. Urban teaching hospitals had a twofold higher likelihood of intervention (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.84-2.44; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Marked racial and economic disparities exist in surgical distribution of care for gastroparesis, potentially driven by differences in utilization of care.

Carbon Dioxide Angiography in the Treatment of Transplant Renal Artery Stenosis.

BACKGROUND: Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is a serious complication associated with graft loss. Selective carbon dioxide angiography allows for effective diagnosis and therapy with the use of minimal to no contrast agent. This study sought to evaluate the efficacy of the adjunctive use of carbon dioxide angiography in the treatment of TRAS. METHODS: Patients undergoing endovascular therapy (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty with or without stent) for TRAS between the years 2012 and 2017 at a single tertiary care academic medical center were studied. Outcomes of interest included technical success, postoperative glomerular filtration rate, and renal ultrasound hemodynamic parameters. RESULTS: Of the 37 patients who underwent angiography for TRAS during the study period, 34 underwent a therapeutic intervention. Of those, 24 patients (70.6%) underwent adjunctive carbon dioxide angiography versus 10 patients (29.4%) who underwent standard contrast angiography. Baseline characteristics between the carbon dioxide angiography and traditional angiography groups were similar. Patients undergoing carbon dioxide angiography received significantly less contrast agent than patients undergoing traditional angiography [9.5 mL (IQR 2-19.5) versus 19.5 mL (IQR 15-30), P = 0.03)] and maintained equivalent technical success rates (92.2% vs. 91.7%, P = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: The adjunctive use of carbon dioxide angiography allows for significantly less contrast administration compared with standard angiography while achieving an equivalent rate of technical success. Selective carbon dioxide angiography should be considered a first-line modality for patients with TRAS in need of endovascular therapy.

Cardiotoxicity with immune system targeting drugs: a meta-analysis of anti-PD/PD-L1 immunotherapy randomized clinical trials.

Background: With antiprogrammed death receptor-1 (anti-PD-L1) therapy, a recent meta-analysis reported higher incidence of cutaneous, endocrine and gastrointestinal complications especially with dual anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy (IMM). Methods: Our primary outcome was assessment of all cardiotoxicity grades in IMM compared with different treatments, thus a systemic review and a meta-analysis on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were done. Results: We included 11 RCTs with 6574 patients (3234 patients in IMM arm vs 3340 patients in the other arm). Three non-small-cell lung cancer RCTs, seven melanoma RCTs and only one prostatic cancer RCT met the inclusion criteria. There were five RCTs that compared monoimmunotherapy to chemotherapy "(n = 2631 patients)". No difference exists in all cardiotoxicity grades or high-grade cardiotoxicity (p > 0.05). Lung cancer exhibited a higher response rate and lower mortality in IMM. Conclusion: There was no reported statistically significant cardiotoxicity associated with anti-PD/PD-L1 use. Lung cancer subgroups showed better response and survival rates.

Pneumonitis as a complication of immune system targeting drugs?-a meta-analysis of anti-PD/PD-L1 immunotherapy randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Anti-PD/PD-L1-targeted immunotherapy is associated with remarkably high rates of durable clinical responses in patients across a range of tumor types, although their high incidence of skin, gastrointestinal, and endocrine side effects with their use. The risk of pneumonitis associated with checkpoint inhibition therapy is not well described. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was conducted on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing anti-PD/PD-L1 mono-immunotherapy (IMM) to chemotherapy (CTH) protocols in cancer patients. The primary endpoint was the pneumonitis rate in IMM compared to CTH. Secondary endpoints were (I) high-grade pneumonitis rate in IMM compared to CTH and (II) tumor response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) between IMM and CTH. Random model and leave-one-out-analysis were performed. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs studying 7,246 patients were included; 3,704 (51.12%) patients in the IMM arm and 3,542 (48.88%) patients in the chemotherapy arm. Seven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) RCTs were included with 4,164 patients; 2,101 in the IMM arm and 2,063 patients in the CTH arm. Three RCTs were on melanoma patients (n=1,390). Nine RCTs compared mono-immunotherapy to CTH [docetaxel in 5 studies (38.5%), platinum-based in 2 studies (15.4%), dacarbazine in 1 study (7.7%) and everolimus in 1 study]. Both high-grade and all-grade pneumonitis were higher among patients in the IMM arm when compared to the CTH arm (OR =4.39, 95% CI: 1.65-11.69, P=0.003 and OR =2.46, 95% CI: 1.29-4.6, P=0.007). Tumor response rate was significantly better in the immunotherapy arm (OR =2.31, 95% CI: 1.62-3.29, P<0.001). PFS and OS were longer in patients who received IMM compared to patients in the CTH arm (HR =0.75, 95% CI: 0.65-0.85, P<0.001, and HR =0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.77, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of high-grade and all-grade pneumonitis is higher in anti-PD-1 therapy but not in anti-PD-L1 therapy when compared to traditional CTH regimens for NSCLC and melanoma. High-grade adverse events were otherwise more common in the CTH arm. Tumor response rate, PFS, and OS are all substantially improved with IMM over CTH. These results can be used to guide therapy selection and set expectations for treatment effect in these patients.

Transradial interventions in contemporary vascular surgery practice.

OBJECTIVES: Upper extremity arterial access is often required for endovascular procedures, especially for antegrade access to the visceral aortic branches. Radial arterial access has been shown previously to have low complication rates, and patients tolerate the procedure well and are able to recover quickly. However, transradial access remains relatively uncommon amongst vascular surgeons. METHODS: The radial artery was evaluated by ultrasound to evaluate for adequate caliber, and to identify any aberrant anatomy or arterial loops. A modified Barbeau test was performed to ensure sufficient collateral circulation. A cocktail of nitroglycerin, verapamil and heparin was administered intra-arterially to combat vasospasm. Sheaths up to 6 French were utilized for interventions. On completion of the procedure, a compression band was used for hemostasis in all cases. RESULTS: Twenty-five interventions were performed in 24 patients. The left radial artery was used in 23/25 cases (92.0%). Procedures included visceral and renal artery interventions; stent graft repair of a renal artery aneurysm; embolization of splenic, pancreaticoduodenal and internal mammary aneurysms; embolization of bilateral hypogastric arteries following blunt pelvic trauma; interventions for peripheral arterial disease; delivery of a renal snorkel graft during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair, and access for diagnostic catheters during thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Technical success was 92.0%. There was one post-operative radial artery occlusion (4.3%) which led to paresthesias but resolved with anticoagulation. There were no instances of arterial rupture, hematoma, or hand ischemia requiring intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Using the transradial approach, we have demonstrated a high technical success rate over a range of clinical contexts with minimal morbidity and no significant complications such as bleeding or hand ischemia. The safety profile compares favorably to historical complication rates from brachial access. Radial access is a safe and useful skill for vascular surgeons to master.

Operating Room Attire Policy and Healthcare Cost: Favoring Evidence over Action for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections.

BACKGROUND: The Association of Perioperative Registered Nurses (AORN) released new guidelines for operating room attire in 2015 in an attempt to reduce surgical site infections (SSIs). These guidelines have been adopted by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. We aimed to assess the relationships among operating room attire, SSIs, and healthcare costs. STUDY DESIGN: In March 2016, our center introduced the AORN attire policy. National Health Safety Network data from our hospital were collected on general surgery, cardiac, neurosurgery, orthopaedic, and gynecology procedures from January 2014 to November 2017. The SSI rates and microbiological culture data for 30,493 procedures before and after policy implementation were compared using propensity score matching. The associated costs of the AORN policy were analyzed. RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 12,585 matched pairs spanning the policy change were included (25,170 patients total); before policy change (BC group) and after policy change (AC group). The rate of SSIs did not differ between groups (1.0% AC group vs 1.1% BC group; p = 0.7). There was no difference in the incidence of Staphylococcal species cultured from wounds (19.3% AC group vs 16.8% BC group; p = 0.6). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that wound classification and emergent procedures were the strongest independent predictors of SSIs. The cost of attire for 1 person entering the operating room increased from $0.07 to $0.12 before policy change to $1.11 to $1.38 after policy change. Use of the mandated operating room long-sleeved jackets alone in our institution was associated with an added cost of $1,128,078 annually, which translates to an estimated $540 million per year for all US hospitals combined. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of the AORN guidelines has not decreased SSIs and has increased healthcare costs.

Individual Operator Experience and Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of individual operator experience on transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) outcomes. BACKGROUND: TAVR volume-outcome relationships have not been evaluated at the individual operator level. METHODS: New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data from 8,771 transfemoral TAVR procedures performed by 207 operators between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed. Operator volume was defined as the number of TAVR procedures performed during 1 year prior to the index procedure. Hierarchical and restrictive cubic spline regression models were used to evaluate the impact of individual operator experience on risk-adjusted in-hospital outcomes. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital mortality, stroke, and/or acute myocardial infarction. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcome. RESULTS: After adjusting for hospital and physician characteristics, patients undergoing TAVR performed by high-volume physicians (≥80/year) had a significantly lower risk for death, stroke, or acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio: 0.59; 95% confidence interval: 0.37 to 0.93) compared with those treated by low-volume physicians (<24/year). Being treated by operators who performed 200 procedures during the prior year was associated with significantly lower risks for post-procedural stroke (odds ratio: 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.97) and composite events (odds ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.26 to 0.78). This relationship was nonlinear, and a sensitivity analysis excluding the first 10, 20, and 30 procedures for each operator mitigated the effect of the initial learning curve. CONCLUSIONS: Increased TAVR experience of operators is associated with improved risk-adjusted in-hospital outcomes. These results have potentially important implications for individual training and hospital programs in TAVR.

Off- Versus On-Pump Coronary Surgery and the Effect of Follow-Up Length and Surgeons' Experience: A Meta-Analysis.

Background The debate on the relative benefits of off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery ( OPCABG and ONCABG ) is still open. We aimed to provide an updated and complete summary of the evidence on the differences between OPCABG and ONCABG and to explore whether the length of the follow-up and the surgeons' experience in OPCABG modify the comparative results. Methods and Results All randomized clinical trials comparing OPCABG and ONCABG were included. Primary outcome was follow-up mortality. Secondary outcomes were operative mortality, perioperative stroke, perioperative myocardial infarction, and late repeated revascularization. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the length of the follow-up and the percentage of crossover from the OPCABG group (used as a surrogate of surgeon experience with OPCABG ). One hundred four trials were included (20 627 patients, OPCABG : 10 288; ONCABG : 10 339). Weighted mean follow-up time was 3.7 years (range 1-7.5 years). OPCABG was associated with a higher risk of follow-up mortality (incidence rate ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.23, P=0.05). The difference was significant only for trials with mean follow-up of ≥3 years and for studies with a crossover rate of ≥10%. There was a trend toward lower risk of perioperative stroke and higher need for late repeated revascularization in the OPCABG arm. Conclusions OPCABG is associated with a higher incidence of incomplete revascularization, an increased need for repeated revascularization, and decreased midterm survival compared with ONCABG . Surgeon inexperience in OPCABG is associated with late mortality.

Distal Perfusion Cannulation and Limb Complications in Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

The utility of distal perfusion cannula (DPC) placement for the prevention of limb complications in patients undergoing femoral venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is poorly characterized. Patients undergoing femoral VA ECMO cannulation at two institutions were retrospectively assessed. Patients were grouped into those who did and those who did not receive a DPC at the time of primary cannulation. The primary outcome was any limb complication. Secondary outcomes included successfully weaning ECMO and in-hospital mortality. A total of 75 patients underwent femoral cannulation between December 2010 and December 2017. Of those, 65 patients (86.7%) had a DPC placed during primary cannulation and 10 patients (13.3%) did not. Baseline demographics, indications for ECMO, and hemodynamic perturbations were well matched between groups. The rate of limb complications was 14.7% (11/75) for the overall cohort and did not differ between groups (p = .6). Three patients (4%) required a four-compartment fasciotomy for compartment syndrome in the DPC group; no patients without a DPC required fasciotomy. Of the three patients who required a thrombectomy for distal ischemia, two were in the DPC group and one was in the no-DPC group (p = .3). Two patients (2.7%) underwent delayed DPC placement for limb ischemia with resolution of symptoms. The in-hospital morality rate was 59.5% and did not differ between groups (p = .5). Patients in the present study, undergoing femoral VA ECMO without preemptive DPC placement did not experience a higher rate of limb complications. However, the two patients who underwent delayed DPC placement for post-cannulation ischemia experienced resolution of symptoms, suggesting that a DPC may be used as an effective limb salvage intervention.

Aortic Angulation Does Not Impact Outcomes in Self-Expandable or Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The role of aortic angulation in attenuating procedural success in balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expandable (SE) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been controversial. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed patients undergoing SE and BE TAVR who had an aortic angle measured on multidetector computed tomography at a single tertiary referral center. The primary outcome was device success, measured per the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. Clinical outcomes at 30 days (including mortality) were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 251 patients were identified; 182 patients received a BE valve and 69 patients an SE valve. The median aortic angle was 46.8° (range 24.4-70°) in the BE group and 43.3° (range 20-71°) in the SE group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, aortic angulation did not affect device success. Mortality at 30 days and 12 months and postprocedural clinical outcomes were similarly not associated with aortic angulation. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients undergoing BE and SE TAVR over a wide range of aortic angles, we found no associations between angle and device success or any other clinical metrics. Increased aortic angulation does not adversely affect outcomes in BE or SE TAVR.

Robotic Reoperative Anti-reflux Surgery: Low Perioperative Morbidity and High Symptom Resolution.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic reoperative anti-reflux surgery (ARS) has a significantly higher morbidity than laparoscopic primary ARS; however, it is not known whether the same pattern exists within the robotic approach. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic reoperative ARS in comparison with primary robotic ARS. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients undergoing primary or reoperative robotic ARS at a tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2017 was performed. Perioperative outcomes and long-term symptom resolution were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included (38 reoperative and 162 primary ARS). Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. Seven (18.4%) of the reoperative patients had two or more prior foregut operations. Patients in the reoperative group had a longer operative time (226 vs. 180 min, p < 0.001). There were no conversions to open technique, and one patient in the reoperative group (2.6%) had an intraoperative perforation. Twenty of the 38 reoperative patients (52.6%) were discharged within 24 h as compared to 109/162 primary patients (64.9%) (p = 0.09). The readmission rate and postoperative complication rates were 6 and 3%, respectively, and did not differ between groups. At a mean follow-up of 1 year, complete or partial resolution of preoperative symptoms was achieved in 97% of primary patients and 100% of reoperative patients (p = 0.4). CONCLUSION: The robotic approach allows for minimal morbidity, short length of stay, and excellent functional outcomes in patients undergoing reoperative ARS when compared to patients undergoing primary ARS.

Systemic blood pressure trends and antihypertensive utilization following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation: an analysis of the interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support.

BACKGROUND: Elevated systemic blood pressure (SBP) has been linked to complications in Continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs), including stroke and pump thrombosis. We queried Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) to describe the response of SBP to CF-LVAD implantation and to delineate contemporary trends in antihypertensive (AH) utilization for patients with these pumps. METHODS: We identified all CF-LVAD implantations in patients older than 18 years from 2006-2014, excluding those whose durations were less than 30 days. Pre-implant patient demographics and characteristics were obtained for each record. SBPs [i.e., mean arterial pressures (MAPs)], AH-use data, and vital status were tabulated, extending up to 5 years following implantation. RESULTS: A total of 10,329 CF-LVAD implantations were included for study. Post-implant, SBPs increased rapidly during the first 3 months but plateaued thereafter; AH utilization mirrored this trend. By 6 months, mean MAPs climbed 12.2% from 77.6 mmHg (95% CI: 77.4-77.8) pre-implantation to 87.1 mmHg (95% CI: 86.7-87.4) and patients required a mean of 1.8 AH medications (95% CI: 1.75-1.78) -a 125% increase from AH use at 1-week post-implantation (0.8 AHs/patient, 95% CI: 0.81-0.83) but a 5.3% decrease from pre-implant utilization (1.9 AHs/patient, 95% CI: 1.90-1.92). Once medication changes stabilized, the most common AH regimens were lone beta blockade (15%, n=720) and a beta blocker plus an ACE inhibitor (14%, n=672). CONCLUSIONS: SBP rises rapidly after CF-LVAD implantation, stabilizing after 3 months, and is matched by concomitant changes in AH utilization; this AH use has increased over consecutive implant years.