Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biol Res Nurs ; 17(1): 100-11, 2015 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25504956

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of non-validated pain measurement tools to assess infant pain represents a serious iatrogenic threat to the developing neonatal nervous system. One partial explanation for this practice may be the contradictory empirical data from studies that use newborn pain management tools constructed for infants of different developmental stages or exposed to different environmental stressors. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the evidence regarding the physiologic and behavioral variables that accurately assess and measure acute pain response in infants. METHODOLOGY: A literature search was conducted using PUBMED and CINAHL and the search terms infant, neonate/neonatal, newborn, pain, assessment, and measurement to identify peer-reviewed studies that examined the validity and reliability of behavioral and physiological variables used for investigation of infant pain. Ten articles were identified for critical review. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Strong evidence supports the use of the behavioral variables of facial expressions and body movements and the physiologic variables of heart rate and oxygen saturation to assess acute pain in infants. CONCLUSION: It is incumbent upon researchers and clinical nurses to ensure the validity, reliability, and feasibility of pain measures, so that the outcomes of their investigations and interventions will be developmentally appropriate and effective pain management therapies.


Subject(s)
Pain Measurement , Pain/physiopathology , Acute Disease , Humans , Infant
2.
J Pain Symptom Manage ; 48(5): 903-14, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24703942

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Appropriate use of opioids is essential to manage moderate-to-severe pain in children safely and effectively, yet published guidance regarding opioid treatment for pediatric patients is limited, potentially resulting in excessive variation in opioid use in pediatric patients across hospitals in the U.S. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate hospital variation in opioid use in pediatric inpatients. METHODS: Using data from the Pediatric Health Information System and the Premier Perspective Database regarding all pediatric inpatients in 626 hospitals, we examined hospital variation in opioid use and the length of opioid use, adjusting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics and for hospital type (children's vs. general) and hospital patient volume, using multilevel generalized linear regression modeling. RESULTS: Overall, 41.2% of all pediatric hospitalizations were exposed to opioids. Among the exposed patients, the mean length of exposure was 4.6 days. Exposure proportion and exposure length varied substantially across hospitals, even after accounting for patient demographic and clinical characteristics, hospital type and hospital patient volume, especially among terminal hospitalizations. For patients discharged alive vs. died, the adjusted exposure percentage for each hospital ranged from 0.7% to 99.1% (interquartile range [IQR]: 35.3%-59.9%) vs. 0.1% to 100.0% (IQR: 29.2%-66.2%), respectively, and the adjusted exposure length ranged from 1.0 to 8.4 days (IQR: 2.2-2.7 days) vs. 0.9 to 35.2 days (IQR: 4.0-7.4 days). CONCLUSION: The substantial hospital-level variation in opioid use in pediatric inpatients suggests room for improvement in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Pediatrics/methods , Pediatrics/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Male , United States , Young Adult
3.
Nurs Clin North Am ; 48(2): 353-61, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23659819

ABSTRACT

This article presents the bedside nurses' perspectives on their experience with conducting an evidence based practice project. This is especially important in the climate of hospitals working to achieve Magnet Recognition. The facilitators and barriers to project design and completion are discussed in detail. Strategies to overcome barriers are presented. Facilitators for bedside nurses include motivation and professional development. Most common barriers were lack of time and limited knowledge about the process. Interventions aimed at research utilization can be successful when mindful of commonly understood barriers to project completion with steps taken to resolve those barriers.


Subject(s)
Diffusion of Innovation , Evidence-Based Nursing/organization & administration , Health Plan Implementation , Quality Improvement , Child , Cognition Disorders/nursing , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Nursing Staff, Hospital , Organizational Innovation , Pain Measurement , Philadelphia , Time Factors
4.
Pain Manag ; 2(6): 593-601, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23544034

ABSTRACT

The focus of this brief review is to highlight to the reader some of the 'ripple effects' of broader systems-level healthcare issues and the implications they may have for effective treatment of pediatric chronic pain. Many healthcare providers focus almost exclusively on the patient, but lack the knowledge of how to intervene effectively at systems levels with families, schools and healthcare institutions surrounding the pediatric patient with pain. We provide a case example and consider this issue across three systems that are particularly relevant to pediatric pain management: the outpatient pain clinic, school and inpatient settings. The information presented will improve the healthcare provider's ability to effectively treat pediatric pain through an enhanced understanding of the multiple systems of care that surround children with pain.

5.
Am J Primatol ; 27(3): 177-188, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31948136

ABSTRACT

Varieties of nonmanipulative motor responses were observed in chimpanzees and squirrel monkeys. Chimpanzees displayed a right hand preference for touching their inanimate environments but used their right and left hands equally for touching their faces and their bodies. The latter result was not consistent with previous reports of a left hand preference for face touching in apes. The right hand preference for environmental touching was stronger in male than in female chimpanzees. Squirrel monkeys had a right preference for combined hand and foot responses directed to their bodies, but expressed no handedness for environmentally directed touching. These limb preferences in chimpanzees and squirrel monkeys indicate that neither precise, complex manipulation nor postural instability are necessary conditions for population level hand preferences. Factor analysis of the chimpanzee manual responses showed distinct self and environmentally directed factors. Analysis of the squirrel monkey data also showed self and environmental factors, except that body scratching had a negative loading on the environmental factor. This latter result suggests that self-scratching by squirrel monkeys is a displacement activity that suppresses manual exploration of the environment. © 1992 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL