Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
4.
J Pediatr ; 227: 128-134.e2, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553865

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether commencement of antibiotics within 3 postnatal days in preterm, very low birth weight (VLBW; ≤1500 g) infants is associated with the development of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). STUDY DESIGN: Preplanned statistical analyses were done to study the association between early antibiotic treatment and later NEC development, using the NEOMUNE-NeoNutriNet cohort of VLBW infants from 13 neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in 5 continents (n = 2831). NEC incidence was compared between infants who received early antibiotics and those who did not, with statistical adjustments for NICU, gestational age, birth weight, sex, delivery mode, antenatal steroid use, Apgar score, and type and initiation of enteral nutrition. RESULTS: The incidence of NEC was 9.0% in the group of infants who did not receive early antibiotics (n = 269), compared with 3.9% in those who did receive early antibiotics (n = 2562). The incidence remained lower in the early antibiotic group after stepwise statistical adjustments for NICU (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35-0.94, P < .05) and other potential confounders (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.47; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: In this large international cohort of preterm VLBW infants, a small proportion of infants did not receive antibiotics just after birth, and these infants had a higher incidence of NEC. It is important to better understand the role of such variables as time, type, and duration of antibiotic treatment on NEC incidence, immune development, gut colonization, and antibiotic resistance in the NICU.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/prevention & control , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/prevention & control , Infant, Premature , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Male
7.
J Pediatr ; 196: 71-76.e1, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29499988

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus definition of growth restriction in the newborn that can be used clinically to identify newborn infants at risk and in research to harmonize reporting and definition in the current absence of a gold standard. STUDY DESIGN: An international panel of pediatric leaders in the field of neonatal growth were invited to participate in an electronic Delphi procedure using standardized methods and predefined consensus rules. Responses were fed back at group-level and the list of participants was provided. Nonresponders were excluded from subsequent rounds. In the first round, variables were scored on a 5-point Likert scale; in subsequent rounds, inclusion of variables and cut-offs were determined with a 70% level of agreement. In the final round participants selected the ultimate algorithm. RESULTS: In total, 57 experts participated in the first round; 79% completed the procedure. Consensus was reached on the following definition: birth weight less than the third percentile, or 3 out of the following: birth weight <10th percentile; head circumference <10th percentile; length <10th percentile; prenatal diagnosis of fetal growth restriction; and maternal pregnancy information. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus was reached on a definition for growth restriction in the newborn. This definition recognizes that infants with birth weights <10th percentile may not be growth restricted and that infants with birth weights >10th percentile can be growth restricted. This definition can be adopted in clinical practice and in clinical trials to better focus on newborns at risk, and is complementary to the previously determined definition of fetal growth restriction.


Subject(s)
Fetal Growth Retardation/diagnosis , Infant, Small for Gestational Age/physiology , Neonatology/standards , Pediatrics/standards , Ultrasonography, Prenatal , Algorithms , Birth Weight , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Pregnancy
10.
J Pediatr ; 163(2): 424-8, 2013 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23507026

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the role of viral infections in causing fetal and infant death. STUDY DESIGN: We assessed a well-validated population database of fetal (≥20 weeks gestation) and infant death for infective deaths and deaths from viruses over a 21-year period (1988-2008). We analyzed by specific viral cause, timing (late fetal loss [20-23 weeks], stillbirth [≥24 weeks], neonatal death [0-27 days], and post-neonatal infant death [28-364 days]) and across time. RESULTS: Of the 989 total infective deaths, 108 were attributable to viral causes (6.5% of late fetal losses, 14.5% of stillbirths, 6.5% of neonatal deaths, and 19.4% of postneonatal infant deaths). Global loss (combined fetal and infant losses per 100,000 registerable births) was 139.6 (95% CI, 130.9-148.3) for any infective cause and 15.2 (95% CI, 12.3-18.1) for viral infections. More than one-third (37%) of viral-attributed deaths were before live birth, from parvovirus (63%) or cytomegalovirus (33%). Parvovirus accounted for 26% (28 of 108) of all viral deaths. Cytomegalovirus was associated with a global loss rate of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.8-4.4) and an infant mortality rate of 1.3 (95% CI, 0.4-2.1) per 100,000 live births; 91% of cases were congenital infections. Herpes simplex virus caused death only after live births (infant mortality rate, 1.4; 95% CI, 0.5-2.3). No changes in rates were seen over time. CONCLUSION: We have identified a substantial contribution of viral infections to global fetal and infant losses. More than one-third of these losses occurred before live births. Considering our methodology, our estimates represent the minimum contribution of viral illness. Strategies to reduce this burden are needed.


Subject(s)
Fetal Death/epidemiology , Fetal Death/virology , Stillbirth/epidemiology , Virus Diseases/mortality , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies
11.
J Pediatr ; 160(1): 49-53.e1, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21868028

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To establish how cause of death for live-born preterm infants (24-31 weeks gestation) has changed in a single large UK population over 2 decades. STUDY DESIGN: This was an interrogation of a population-based survey of >680, 000 live births (between 1988 and 2008) for deaths in the first postnatal year. We collected cause of death grouped into major etiologies: respiratory, infection, malformation, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and other. Data were analyzed in three 7-year epochs and 2 gestational groups (<27 and 28-31 weeks). Numbers, rates per 1000 live births, and proportional contributions to each epoch were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1504 deaths occurred. The infants who died had a median gestational age of 26 weeks (IQR, 25-28 weeks) and a median birth weight of 880 g (IQR, 700-1170 g). The number of deaths decreased with each later epoch (from 671 to 473 and then to 360), as did the proportion of deaths from respiratory causes (64% to 62% and then to 49%). The proportion of deaths occurring after 40 weeks postmenstrual age remained stable across the 3 epochs (8.8%, 8%, and 8%). Deaths from infection and NEC increased with time (from 11% to 13% and then to 21%), as did median time to death (from 2.7 to 3.8 days). CONCLUSION: Infection and NEC are increasingly prevalent causes of death in preterm infants.


Subject(s)
Infant, Premature, Diseases/mortality , Cause of Death/trends , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL