ABSTRACT
First identified in mammals, Mx proteins are potent antivirals against a broad swathe of viruses. Mx proteins arose within the Dynamin superfamily of proteins (DSP), mediating critical cellular processes, such as endocytosis and mitochondrial, plastid, and peroxisomal dynamics. And yet, the evolutionary origins of Mx proteins are poorly understood. Using a series of phylogenomic analyses with stepwise increments in taxonomic coverage, we show that Mx proteins predate the interferon signaling system in vertebrates. Our analyses find an ancient monophyletic DSP lineage in eukaryotes that groups vertebrate and invertebrate Mx proteins with previously undescribed fungal MxF proteins, the relatively uncharacterized plant and algal Dynamin 4A/4C proteins, and representatives from several early-branching eukaryotic lineages. Thus, Mx-like proteins date back close to the origin of Eukarya. Our phylogenetic analyses also reveal that host-encoded and NCLDV (nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses)-encoded DSPs are interspersed in four distinct DSP lineages, indicating recurrent viral theft of host DSPs. Our analyses thus reveal an ancient history of viral and antiviral functions encoded by the Dynamin superfamily in eukaryotes.
ABSTRACT
Antiviral proteins often evolve rapidly at virus-binding interfaces to defend against new viruses. We investigated whether antiviral adaptation via missense mutations might face limits, which insertion or deletion mutations (indels) could overcome. We report one such case of a nearly insurmountable evolutionary challenge: the human anti-retroviral protein TRIM5α requires more than five missense mutations in its specificity-determining v1 loop to restrict a divergent simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV). However, duplicating just one amino acid in v1 enables human TRIM5α to potently restrict SIV in a single evolutionary step. Moreover, natural primate TRIM5α v1 loops have evolved indels that confer novel antiviral specificities. Thus, indels enable antiviral proteins to overcome viral challenges inaccessible by missense mutations, revealing the potential of these often-overlooked mutations in driving protein innovation.
ABSTRACT
Host antiviral proteins inhibit primate lentiviruses and other retroviruses by targeting many features of the viral life cycle. The lentiviral capsid protein and the assembled viral core are known to be inhibited through multiple, directly acting antiviral proteins. Several phenotypes, including those known as Lv1 through Lv5, have been described as cell type-specific blocks to infection against some but not all primate lentiviruses. Here we review important features of known capsid-targeting blocks to infection together with several blocks to infection for which the genes responsible for the inhibition still remain to be identified. We outline the features of these blocks as well as how current methodologies are now well suited to find these antiviral genes and solve these long-standing mysteries in the HIV and retrovirology fields.
Subject(s)
Capsid , Host-Pathogen Interactions , Lentivirus Infections , Lentivirus , Animals , Capsid/metabolism , Capsid Proteins/genetics , Capsid Proteins/metabolism , Lentivirus/metabolism , Lentivirus Infections/metabolismABSTRACT
In the United States (US), biosafety and biosecurity oversight of research on viruses is being reappraised. Safety in virology research is paramount and oversight frameworks should be reviewed periodically. Changes should be made with care, however, to avoid impeding science that is essential for rapidly reducing and responding to pandemic threats as well as addressing more common challenges caused by infectious diseases. Decades of research uniquely positioned the US to be able to respond to the COVID-19 crisis with astounding speed, delivering life-saving vaccines within a year of identifying the virus. We should embolden and empower this strength, which is a vital part of protecting the health, economy, and security of US citizens. Herein, we offer our perspectives on priorities for revised rules governing virology research in the US.
Subject(s)
Biomedical Research , Containment of Biohazards , Virology , Humans , COVID-19 , United States , Viruses , Biomedical Research/standardsABSTRACT
We sought to explore the hypothesis that host factors required for HIV-1 replication also play a role in latency reversal. Using a CRISPR gene library of putative HIV dependency factors, we performed a screen to identify genes required for latency reactivation. We identified several HIV-1 dependency factors that play a key role in HIV-1 latency reactivation including ELL, UBE2M, TBL1XR1, HDAC3, AMBRA1, and ALYREF. The knockout of Cyclin T1 (CCNT1), a component of the P-TEFb complex that is important for transcription elongation, was the top hit in the screen and had the largest effect on HIV latency reversal with a wide variety of latency reversal agents. Moreover, CCNT1 knockout prevents latency reactivation in a primary CD4+ T cell model of HIV latency without affecting the activation of these cells. RNA sequencing data showed that CCNT1 regulates HIV-1 proviral genes to a larger extent than any other host gene and had no significant effects on RNA transcripts in primary T cells after activation. We conclude that CCNT1 function is non-essential in T cells but is absolutely required for HIV latency reversal.
Subject(s)
Cyclin T , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Virus Latency , Humans , Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing/genetics , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , Cyclin T/genetics , Cyclin T/metabolism , HIV-1/physiology , Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes/genetics , Virus ActivationABSTRACT
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other lentiviruses adapt to new hosts by evolving to evade host-specific innate immune proteins that differ in sequence and often viral recognition between host species. Understanding how these host antiviral proteins, called restriction factors, constrain lentivirus replication and transmission is key to understanding the emergence of pandemic viruses like HIV-1. Human TRIM34, a paralogue of the well-characterized lentiviral restriction factor TRIM5α, was previously identified by our lab via CRISPR-Cas9 screening as a restriction factor of certain HIV and SIV capsids. Here, we show that diverse primate TRIM34 orthologues from non-human primates can restrict a range of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) capsids including SIVAGM-SAB, SIVAGM-TAN and SIVMAC capsids, which infect sabaeus monkeys, tantalus monkeys, and rhesus macaques, respectively. All primate TRIM34 orthologues tested, regardless of species of origin, were able to restrict this same subset of viral capsids. However, in all cases, this restriction also required the presence of TRIM5α. We demonstrate that TRIM5α is necessary, but not sufficient, for restriction of these capsids, and that human TRIM5α functionally interacts with TRIM34 from different species. Finally, we find that both the TRIM5α SPRY v1 loop and the TRIM34 SPRY domain are essential for TRIM34-mediated restriction. These data support a model in which TRIM34 is a broadly-conserved primate lentiviral restriction factor that acts in tandem with TRIM5α, such that together, these proteins can restrict capsids that neither can restrict alone.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus , Animals , Macaca mulatta , Lentivirus , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics , Antiviral AgentsABSTRACT
We sought to explore the hypothesis that host factors required for HIV-1 replication also play a role in latency reversal. Using a CRISPR gene library of putative HIV dependency factors, we performed a screen to identify genes required for latency reactivation. We identified several HIV-1 dependency factors that play a key role in HIV-1 latency reactivation including ELL , UBE2M , TBL1XR1 , HDAC3 , AMBRA1 , and ALYREF . Knockout of Cyclin T1 ( CCNT1 ), a component of the P-TEFb complex important for transcription elongation, was the top hit in the screen and had the largest effect on HIV latency reversal with a wide variety of latency reversal agents. Moreover, CCNT1 knockout prevents latency reactivation in a primary CD4+ T cell model of HIV latency without affecting activation of these cells. RNA sequencing data showed that CCNT1 regulates HIV-1 proviral genes to a larger extent than any other host gene and had no significant effects on RNA transcripts in primary T cells after activation. We conclude that CCNT1 function is redundant in T cells but is absolutely required for HIV latency reversal.
ABSTRACT
Inflammasomes are cytosolic innate immune complexes that assemble upon detection of diverse pathogen-associated cues and play a critical role in host defense and inflammatory pathogenesis. Here, we find that the human inflammasome-forming sensor CARD8 senses HIV-1 infection via site-specific cleavage of the CARD8 N-terminus by the HIV protease (HIV-1PR). HIV-1PR cleavage of CARD8 induces pyroptotic cell death and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from infected cells, processes regulated by Toll-like receptor stimulation prior to viral infection. In acutely infected cells, CARD8 senses the activity of both de novo translated HIV-1PR and packaged HIV-1PR that is released from the incoming virion. Moreover, our evolutionary analyses reveal that the HIV-1PR cleavage site in human CARD8 arose after the divergence of chimpanzees and humans. Although chimpanzee CARD8 does not recognize proteases from HIV or simian immunodeficiency viruses from chimpanzees (SIVcpz), SIVcpz does cleave human CARD8, suggesting that SIVcpz was poised to activate the human CARD8 inflammasome prior to its cross-species transmission into humans. Our findings suggest a unique role for CARD8 inflammasome activation in response to lentiviral infection of humans.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus , Animals , Humans , Inflammasomes/metabolism , Pan troglodytes/metabolism , Apoptosis Regulatory Proteins/metabolism , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , CARD Signaling Adaptor Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and other lentiviruses adapt to new hosts by evolving to evade host-specific innate immune proteins that differ in sequence and often viral recognition between host species. Understanding how these host antiviral proteins, called restriction factors, constrain lentivirus replication and transmission is key to understanding the emergence of pandemic viruses like HIV-1. Human TRIM34, a paralogue of the well-characterized lentiviral restriction factor TRIM5α, was previously identified by our lab via CRISPR-Cas9 screening as a restriction factor of certain HIV and SIV capsids. Here, we show that diverse primate TRIM34 orthologues from non-human primates can restrict a range of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV) capsids including SIV AGM-SAB , SIV AGM-TAN and SIV MAC capsids, which infect sabaeus monkeys, tantalus monkeys, and rhesus macaques, respectively. All primate TRIM34 orthologues tested, regardless of species of origin, were able to restrict this same subset of viral capsids. However, in all cases, this restriction also required the presence of TRIM5α. We demonstrate that TRIM5α is necessary, but not sufficient, for restriction of these capsids, and that human TRIM5α functionally interacts with TRIM34 from different species. Finally, we find that both the TRIM5α SPRY v1 loop and the TRIM34 SPRY domain are essential for TRIM34-mediated restriction. These data support a model in which TRIM34 is a broadly-conserved primate lentiviral restriction factor that acts in tandem with TRIM5α, such that together, these proteins can restrict capsids that neither can restrict alone.
ABSTRACT
At each stage of the HIV life cycle, host cellular proteins are hijacked by the virus to establish and enhance infection. We adapted the virus packageable HIV-CRISPR screening technology at a genome-wide scale to comprehensively identify host factors that affect HIV replication in a human T cell line. Using a smaller, targeted HIV Dependency Factor (HIVDEP) sublibrary, we then performed screens across HIV strains representing different clades and with different biological properties to define which T cell host factors are important across multiple HIV strains. Nearly 90% of the genes selected across various host pathways validated in subsequent assays as bona fide host dependency factors, including numerous proteins not previously reported to play roles in HIV biology, such as UBE2M, MBNL1, FBXW7, PELP1, SLC39A7, and others. Our ranked list of screen hits across diverse HIV-1 strains form a resource of HIV dependency factors for future investigation of host proteins involved in HIV biology. IMPORTANCE With a small genome of ~9.2 kb that encodes 14 major proteins, HIV must hijack host cellular machinery to successfully establish infection. These host proteins necessary for HIV replication are called "dependency factors." Whole-genome, and then targeted screens were done to try to comprehensively identify all dependency factors acting throughout the HIV replication cycle. Many host processes were identified and validated as critical for HIV replication across multiple HIV strains.
Subject(s)
Cation Transport Proteins , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Humans , HIV-1/genetics , Virus Replication/genetics , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , Cell Line , Host-Pathogen Interactions/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Co-Repressor Proteins/genetics , Cation Transport Proteins/genetics , Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes/geneticsABSTRACT
The APOBEC3 (A3) proteins are host antiviral cellular proteins that hypermutate the viral genome of diverse viral families. In retroviruses, this process requires A3 packaging into viral particles1-4. The lentiviruses encode a protein, Vif, that antagonizes A3 family members by targeting them for degradation. Diversification of A3 allows host escape from Vif whereas adaptations in Vif enable cross-species transmission of primate lentiviruses. How this 'molecular arms race' plays out at the structural level is unknown. Here, we report the cryogenic electron microscopy structure of human APOBEC3G (A3G) bound to HIV-1 Vif, and the hijacked cellular proteins that promote ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. A small surface explains the molecular arms race, including a cross-species transmission event that led to the birth of HIV-1. Unexpectedly, we find that RNA is a molecular glue for the Vif-A3G interaction, enabling Vif to repress A3G by ubiquitin-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Our results suggest a model in which Vif antagonizes A3G by intercepting it in its most dangerous form for the virus-when bound to RNA and on the pathway to packaging-to prevent viral restriction. By engaging essential surfaces required for restriction, Vif exploits a vulnerability in A3G, suggesting a general mechanism by which RNA binding helps to position key residues necessary for viral antagonism of a host antiviral gene.
Subject(s)
APOBEC-3G Deaminase , HIV-1 , Proteolysis , vif Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus , Animals , Humans , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/antagonists & inhibitors , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/chemistry , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/metabolism , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/ultrastructure , HIV-1/metabolism , HIV-1/pathogenicity , RNA/chemistry , RNA/metabolism , Ubiquitin/metabolism , vif Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/chemistry , vif Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/metabolism , vif Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/ultrastructure , Cryoelectron Microscopy , Viral Genome Packaging , Primates/virologyABSTRACT
Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns - conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we - a broad group of working virologists - seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology.
Subject(s)
Research , Virology , Virus Diseases , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Information Dissemination , Pandemics/prevention & control , Policy Making , Research/standards , Research/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , Virology/standards , Virology/trends , Virus Diseases/prevention & control , Virus Diseases/virology , VirusesABSTRACT
Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns - conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we - a broad group of working virologists - seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Tract Infections , Viruses , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics/prevention & control , Viruses/geneticsABSTRACT
Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns - conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we - a broad group of working virologists - seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Viruses , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics/prevention & control , Antiviral AgentsABSTRACT
Transcriptional silencing of latent HIV-1 proviruses entails complex and overlapping mechanisms that pose a major barrier to in vivo elimination of HIV-1. We developed a new latency CRISPR screening strategy, called Latency HIV-CRISPR which uses the packaging of guideRNA-encoding lentiviral vector genomes into the supernatant of budding virions as a direct readout of factors involved in the maintenance of HIV-1 latency. We developed a custom guideRNA library targeting epigenetic regulatory genes and paired the screen with and without a latency reversal agent-AZD5582, an activator of the non-canonical NFκB pathway-to examine a combination of mechanisms controlling HIV-1 latency. A component of the Nucleosome Acetyltransferase of H4 histone acetylation (NuA4 HAT) complex, ING3, acts in concert with AZD5582 to activate proviruses in J-Lat cell lines and in a primary CD4+ T cell model of HIV-1 latency. We found that the knockout of ING3 reduces acetylation of the H4 histone tail and BRD4 occupancy on the HIV-1 LTR. However, the combination of ING3 knockout accompanied with the activation of the non-canonical NFκB pathway via AZD5582 resulted in a dramatic increase in initiation and elongation of RNA Polymerase II on the HIV-1 provirus in a manner that is nearly unique among all cellular promoters.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections , HIV Seropositivity , HIV-1 , Humans , Histones/metabolism , Nuclear Proteins/metabolism , HIV-1/physiology , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Virus Latency/genetics , Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats , HIV Seropositivity/genetics , Proviruses/genetics , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Homeodomain Proteins/metabolism , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism , Cell Cycle Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Vertebrate immune systems suppress viral infection using both innate restriction factors and adaptive immunity. Viruses mutate to escape these defenses, driving hosts to counterevolve to regain fitness. This cycle recurs repeatedly, resulting in an evolutionary arms race whose outcome depends on the pace and likelihood of adaptation by host and viral genes. Although viruses evolve faster than their vertebrate hosts, their proteins are subject to numerous functional constraints that impact the probability of adaptation. These constraints are globally defined by evolutionary landscapes, which describe the fitness and adaptive potential of all possible mutations. We review deep mutational scanning experiments mapping the evolutionary landscapes of both host and viral proteins engaged in arms races. For restriction factors and some broadly neutralizing antibodies, landscapes favor the host, which may help to level the evolutionary playing field against rapidly evolving viruses. We discuss the biophysical underpinnings of these landscapes and their therapeutic implications.
Subject(s)
Virus Diseases , Viruses , Animals , Biological Evolution , Humans , Mutation , Viral Proteins , Virus Diseases/genetics , Viruses/geneticsABSTRACT
APOBEC3G (A3G) is a host-encoded cytidine deaminase that potently restricts retroviruses such as HIV-1 and depends on its ability to package into virions. As a consequence of this, HIV-1 protein Vif has evolved to antagonize human A3G by targeting it for ubiquitination and subsequent degradation. There is an ancient arms race between Vif and A3G highlighted by amino acids 128 and 130 in A3G that have evolved under positive selection due to Vif-mediated selective pressure in Old World primates. Nonetheless, not all possible amino acid combinations at these sites have been sampled by nature, and the evolutionary potential of species to resist Vif antagonism is not clear. To explore the evolutionary space of positively selected sites in the Vif-binding region of A3G, we designed a combinatorial mutagenesis screen to introduce all 20 amino acids at sites 128 and 130. Our screen uncovered mutants of A3G with several interesting phenotypes, including loss of antiviral activity and resistance of Vif antagonism. However, HIV-1 Vif exhibited remarkable flexibility in antagonizing A3G 128 and 130 mutants, which significantly reduces viable Vif resistance strategies for hominid primates. Importantly, we find that broadened Vif specificity was conferred through loop 5 adaptations that were required for cross-species adaptation from Old World monkey A3G to hominid A3G. Our evidence suggests that Vif adaptation to novel A3G interfaces during cross-species transmission may train Vif toward broadened specificity that can further facilitate cross-species transmissions and raise the barrier to host resistance. IMPORTANCE APOBEC3G (A3G) is an antiviral protein that potently restricts retroviruses like HIV. In turn, the HIV-1 protein Vif has evolved to antagonize A3G through degradation. Two rapidly evolving sites in A3G confer resistance to unadapted Vif and act as a barrier to cross-species transmission of retroviruses. We recently identified a single amino acid mutation in a simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) Vif that contributed to the cross-species origins of SIV infecting chimpanzee and, ultimately, the HIV-1 pandemic. This mutation broadened specificity of this Vif to both antagonize the A3G of its host while simultaneously overcoming the A3G barrier in the great apes. In this work, we explore the evolutionary space of human A3G at these rapidly evolving sites to understand if the broadened Vif specificity gained during cross-species transmission confers an advantage to HIV-1 Vif in its host-virus arms race with A3G.
Subject(s)
APOBEC-3G Deaminase/antagonists & inhibitors , HIV-1/physiology , vif Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/antagonists & inhibitors , APOBEC-3G Deaminase/genetics , Adaptation, Physiological/genetics , Amino Acids , Animals , HIV Infections/transmission , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1/genetics , Host Microbial Interactions , Humans , Mutation , Primates , Simian Immunodeficiency Virus/genetics , Viral Zoonoses/transmission , Viral Zoonoses/virology , vif Gene Products, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/geneticsABSTRACT
The APOBEC3 (A3) family of single-stranded DNA cytidine deaminases are host restriction factors that inhibit lentiviruses, such as HIV-1, in the absence of the Vif protein that causes their degradation. Deamination of cytidine in HIV-1 (-)DNA forms uracil that causes inactivating mutations when uracil is used as a template for (+)DNA synthesis. For APOBEC3C (A3C), the chimpanzee and gorilla orthologues are more active than human A3C, and we determined that Old World Monkey A3C from rhesus macaque (rh) is not active against HIV-1. Biochemical, virological, and coevolutionary analyses combined with molecular dynamics simulations showed that the key amino acids needed to promote rhA3C antiviral activity, 44, 45, and 144, also promoted dimerization and changes to the dynamics of loop 1, near the enzyme active site. Although forced evolution of rhA3C resulted in a similar dimer interface with hominid A3C, the key amino acid contacts were different. Overall, our results determine the basis for why rhA3C is less active than human A3C and establish the amino acid network for dimerization and increased activity. Based on identification of the key amino acids determining Old World Monkey antiviral activity we predict that other Old World Monkey A3Cs did not impart anti-lentiviral activity, despite fixation of a key residue needed for hominid A3C activity. Overall, the coevolutionary analysis of the A3C dimerization interface presented also provides a basis from which to analyze dimerization interfaces of other A3 family members.
Subject(s)
Cytidine Deaminase/chemistry , Cytidine Deaminase/classification , Evolution, Molecular , HIV Infections/virology , HIV-1 , Protein Multimerization , Amino Acid Sequence , Amino Acid Substitution/genetics , Animals , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics , HEK293 Cells , Humans , Macaca mulatta , Mutation , Phylogeny , Protein Multimerization/genetics , Substrate SpecificityABSTRACT
The APOBEC3 (A3) genes encode cytidine deaminase proteins with potent antiviral and anti-retroelement activity. This locus is characterized by duplication, recombination, and deletion events that gave rise to the seven A3s found in primates. These include three single deaminase domain A3s (A3A, A3C, and A3H) and four double deaminase domain A3s (A3B, A3D, A3F, and A3G). The most potent of the A3 proteins against HIV-1 is A3G. However, it is not clear if double deaminase domain A3s have a generalized functional advantage to restrict HIV-1. In order to test whether superior restriction factors could be created by genetically linking single A3 domains into synthetic double domains, we linked A3C and A3H single domains in novel combinations. We found that A3C/A3H double domains acquired enhanced antiviral activity that is at least as potent, if not better than, A3G. Although these synthetic double domain A3s package into budding virions more efficiently than their respective single domains, this does not fully explain their gain of antiviral potency. The antiviral activity is conferred both by cytidine-deaminase dependent and independent mechanisms, with the latter correlating to an increase in RNA binding affinity. T cell lines expressing this A3C-A3H super restriction factor are able to control replicating HIV-1ΔVif infection to similar levels as A3G. Together, these data show that novel combinations of A3 domains are capable of gaining potent antiviral activity to levels similar to the most potent genome-encoded A3s, via a primarily non-catalytic mechanism.