Simultaneous quantification of endothelin receptor antagonists and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors currently used in pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Combination treatment with endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5I) improved efficacy of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapy. However, drug-drug interactions, variable exposure, non-adherence can influence plasma levels. For these reasons, drug quantification may be advantageous particularly in patients with poor treatment responses. We developed, validated, and applied an assay for the simultaneous quantification of ambrisentan, bosentan, macitentan, sildenafil, and tadalafil as well as their main (and partly active) metabolites in human plasma. This method is based on LC-MS/MS separation for a rapid and sensitive quantification with stable isotopically labelled analogues as internal standards for each drug and metabolite. Sample preparation was carried out using a solid phase extraction protocol based on Oasis HLB material. The separation was achieved on a Kinetex C18 column and multiple reaction monitoring in negative ionization mode was used for sensitive detection. The calibrations were linear for all analytes with correlation coefficients >0.99 within the concentration range observed under a therapeutic PAH dosing scheme with lower limits of quantification between 0.34ng/mL (OH-ambrisentan) and 10ng/mL (despropyl-macitentan). Intra- and inter-day precision at LLOQ and QC levels ranged between 2.03% and 19.8%, and 0.65% and 14.0%, respectively. The sample turnover time was 12min. The applicability of this versatile LC/MS/MS assay was verified by the successful analysis of clinical routine samples of patients on PAH medication. This new method allows for the first time to assess trough drug and metabolite levels of the currently approved PDE5I and ERAs in PAH patients, thus enabling for measurement of samples in clinical routine.

Plasma Drug Concentrations in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension on Combination Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) sildenafil or tadalafil and the endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) bosentan, ambrisentan, or macitentan may cause mutual pharmacokinetic interactions in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze plasma drug concentrations in PAH patients receiving different combination treatments. METHODS: PAH patients receiving a stable combination treatment with ERA and PDE-5i with targeted dosage for at least 1 month were routinely assessed, including clinical parameters and plasma drug concentrations. Concentrations were normalized considering dose and time from last medication intake and presented as multiples of the expected mean (MoM) of the respective monotherapies. RESULTS: A total of 125 PAH patients (84 female, 41 male, 57% idiopathic/heritable) were included. Sildenafil and tadalafil concentrations were lowest in combination with bosentan (MoM 0.44 ± 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30-0.57, and MoM 0.89 ± 0.53, 95% CI 0.50-1.28, respectively) compared to the combination with ambrisentan (MoM 1.3 ± 0.97, 95% CI 0.86-1.73, and MoM 1.67 ± 0.63, 95% CI 1.40-1.94, respectively) and macitentan (MoM 1.16 ± 0.87, 95% CI 0.86-1.46, and MoM 1.59 ± 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-2.38, respectively). The combination of sildenafil and bosentan led to more than twice the expected bosentan concentrations in 53.8%. Patients switching from sildenafil-bosentan to macitentan showed a significant increase in sildenafil concentrations (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Only the combination with macitentan or ambrisentan led to targeted mean PDE-5i plasma concentrations and should therefore be preferred to combination with bosentan. Sildenafil-bosentan showed the strongest interaction, with low sildenafil and high bosentan concentrations. The study was not powered to analyze whether lower PDE-5i concentrations cause unsatisfying clinical response. However, plasma concentrations within a targeted range are desirable and may become of increasing importance.

Clinical feasibility of dried blood spots: Analytics, validation, and applications.

Dried blood spots (DBS) sampling and their specific advantages are becoming common in analytical and clinical routine. Being first established for metabolic disorder screening in neonates, its use emerged to a broad spectrum of clinical applications. Although DBS are easily generated, the conduction of specific analytical and clinical validation procedures should be obligatory when implementing DBS for clinical purposes, e.g. therapeutic drug monitoring or clinical drug trials. A respective recommendation has already been published by the European Bioanalysis Forum. Since no official guidelines are present, investigators are currently free in DBS procedure development and validation. This review summarizes and discusses published clinical validation procedures in relation to their applications to highlight the clinical feasibility of DBS.

Dried Blood Spot Technique for the Monitoring of Ambrisentan, Bosentan, Sildenafil, and Tadalafil in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERA) and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5I) are long-term therapeutics for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Their interindividual pharmacokinetic variability is remarkably large, and despite the seriousness of the disease, nonadherence is occurring. Therefore, methods to monitor sufficient circulating drug levels are essential. The objectives of this study were to develop and validate dried blood spot (DBS) assays for the quantification of ambrisentan, bosentan, sildenafil, tadalafil, and their main metabolites. We also quantified the influence of different hematocrit levels and assessed the correlation of simultaneously taken capillary whole blood (DBS) and venous plasma samples. The aliquot punches were extracted by liquid/liquid extraction followed by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) quantification methods. All assays fulfilled the requirements of the FDA and EMA guidelines for assay validation with a lower limit of quantification of 2.5 ng/mL for the ERAs, 5 ng/mL for sildenafil, and 10 ng/mL for tadalafil. All analytes were stable for at least 147 days when stored on DBS filter paper cards at room temperature in the dark. Due to poor distribution into erythrocytes, drug concentrations in DBS were always lower than in plasma, resulting in conversion factors of 1.58 for ambrisentan and sildenafil and 1.52 for bosentan and tadalafil.

Substantially increased sildenafil bioavailability after sublingual administration in children with congenital heart disease: two case reports.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary hypertension is a progressive disease of diverse origin with devastating consequences in adults as well as in children. The phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor sildenafil successfully lowers pulmonary vascular resistance. However, because of its poor enteral absorption, resulting in ineffective plasma concentrations, responses in infants and children are often erratic. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We report the cases of two Caucasian boys, one born at term (case 1) and one aged 2.5 years (case 2), who had structural cardiac and pulmonary defects accompanied by symptomatic pulmonary hypertension. They received sildenafil enterally and sublingually and also intravenously in one of them. Plasma samples were taken at various time points to determine the plasma concentrations of sildenafil and its partially active metabolite. Sildenafil and N-desmethyl sildenafil were quantified using a validated liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry method. Oxygen partial pressure was determined from routine arterial blood gas samples. CONCLUSION: In agreement with previous observations in adults, we found that sublingual sildenafil was more extensively absorbed in our two pediatric patients. After sublingual administration, sildenafil plasma concentrations increased by 314% to 361% compared to enteral dosing. Concurrently, the metabolic ratio increased, suggesting not only that the overall absorption was enhanced but also that first-pass metabolism was partially bypassed. In case 2, the free fraction of sildenafil was 0.9%, which is considerably less than in adults (4%), suggesting that, in case 2, higher plasma concentration would have been needed to achieve effects similar to those in adults. Sublingual sildenafil appears to be a promising alternative route of administration in children with poor enteral absorption.