Comparison of cytokine changes in three different lipoprotein apheresis systems in an ex vivo whole blood model.

INTRODUCTION: Even if proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors have replaced lipoprotein apheresis in many patients, lipoprotein apheresis still is an important option in homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, progressive atherosclerosis or when removal of lipoprotein(a) is indicated. Additional possible favorable effects beyond lipid lowering could include changes in the concentration of cytokines and improvement of hemorheology. METHODS: We evaluated how whole blood adsorption, dextran sulfate plasma adsorption, and double filtration plasmapheresis lipoprotein apheresis systems affected cytokine concentrations, using a human whole blood ex vivo model differentiating the effect of the lipoprotein apheresis and plasma separation columns and describing temporal changes. RESULTS: Compared to the control bag, the whole blood adsorption system reduced Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), IL-8, IL-1ra, eotaxin, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), platelet derived growth factor (PDGF)-BB, regulated on activation T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), macrophage inflammatory protein-1ß (MIP-1ß), and IP-10 (P < .05). The dextran sulfate plasma adsorption system reduced IFN-γ, IL-8, IL-1ra, eotaxin, TNF, MCP-1, PDGF-BB, MIP-1ß, and IP-10 (P < .05). Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) were increased in the whole blood and dextran sulfate plasma adsorption systems (P < .05). The double filtration plasmapheresis system reduced IFN-γ, IL-1ra, TNF, MIP-1ß, and IP-10 (P < .05), while MCP-1,VEGF, GM-CSF, and RANTES were increased (P < .05). The plasma separation column increased concentration of RANTES, and was a barrier to reduction of eotaxin. Temporal patterns of concentration change indicated first pass increase of PDGF-BB and first pass reduction of IP-10. CONCLUSION: There were marked differences in how the three systems affected total and temporal cytokine concentration changes in this in vitro model, as well as compared to former in vivo studies.

Addition of marine omega-3 fatty acids to statins in familial hypercholesterolemia does not affect in vivo or in vitro endothelial function.

BACKGROUND: Prestatin trials reported positive effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) in cardiovascular disease, whereas recent studies and meta-analyses have not reproduced these results. The effect of n-3 PUFA in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a group with particularly high risk of cardiovascular disease, is not well established. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of n-3 PUFA in the early stage of atherosclerosis in FH patients by evaluating in vivo (peripheral arterial tonometry [PAT]) and in vitro (plasma asymmetric dimethylarginine and E-selectin) endothelial function. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled cross-over study with 34 FH patients on statin treatment (mean age 46.6 years). In random order, all individuals were treated for 3 months with high-dose n-3 PUFA (2 g, ×2) and 3 months placebo (olive oil, 2 g ×2), separated by a 3-month washout period. Anthropometric data, blood samples, and PAT were collected at 4 time points. RESULTS: There were no significant changes in reactive hyperemia index measured by PAT after n-3 PUFA compared with placebo, median reactive hyperemia index after n-3 PUFA was 1.98 and after placebo 1.96 (P = .51). No significant changes were detected in the soluble endothelial marker asymmetric dimethylarginine (in 2 different assays) when comparing n-3 PUFA and placebo (P = .92 and .14, respectively). Finally, the level of E-selectin did not change significantly during the trial (P = .26). CONCLUSION: Addition of n-3 PUFA to standard lipid-lowering treatment in genetically verified FH patients did not affect the in vivo endothelial function or soluble endothelial markers.

Telemonitoring and Quality of Life in Patients after 12 Months Following a Pacemaker Implant: the Nordland Study, a Randomised Trial.

The purpose of this study was to analyse the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients followed up using a remote device-monitoring system (TM) compared to patients followed up through standard outpatient visits (HM), 12 months after the implantation of a pacemaker. This was a trial design that used the EuroQol-5D Questionnaire and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF). The HRQoL of a cohort of 50 consecutive patients randomly allocated to one of the two follow-up modalities was measured at baseline and then during follow-up, 12 months after the pacemaker implantation. Eventually, 23 patients were followed-up through standard outpatient visits, while 23 used a remote monitoring system. Results: The baseline clinical characteristics and health-related quality of life of the patients from both groups were observed to be statistically similar. Twelve months after the pacemaker implantation, both groups showed statistically significant improvements in the baseline parameters based on the MLHF. The patients followed up through hospital visits showed a greater increase in MLHF-HRQoL after 12 months, although the increase was not significantly greater than that of the TM group. Furthermore, the frequencies of emergency visits and re-hospitalisations did not differ between the groups.

Health-related quality of life on tele-monitoring for users with pacemakers 6 months after implant: the NORDLAND study, a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: With an ageing population and widening indications for pacemakers implantation, the number of persons carrying an implant is steadily increasing. The routine follow-up is thus a heavy burden for the respective NHS as well as for the patients and their relatives. Most of them of the studies have been performed in densely populated areas and nearby to the hospital. It is thus unknown whether these results could be applied also in rural areas such as Northern Norway with a more scattered population. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of tele-monitoring (TM) in patients with pacemakers regarding reliability, safety and health-related quality of life, compared to traditional follow-up in outpatient clinic in a setting where geographical effects could possible influence the results. METHODS: The NORDLAND study is a controlled, randomized, non-masked clinical trial in pacemaker patients, with data collection carried out during the pre-implant stage and after 6 months. Between August of 2014 and November of 2015, 50 patients were assigned to either a tele-monitoring group (n = 25) or a conventional hospital monitoring (HM) group (n = 25). The EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) utilities and visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) were used to measure Health-Related Quality of Life. Baseline characteristics and number of hospital visits were also analyzed. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two study groups were similar for EQ-5D utilities (TM:0.81; HM:0.76; p = 0.47), EQ-5D VAS (TM: 64.00; HM:64.88; p = 0.86) and the MLHFQ (TM:20.20; HM:28.96; p = 0.07). At the 6 month follow-up, there were no significant differences between the groups in EQ-5D utilities (TM: 0.81; HM: 0.76; p = 0.54) and EQ-5D VAS scores (TM: 72.71; HM: 59.79; p = 0.08). The MLHFQ score was improved in both groups (TM: -4.40; HM: -15.13; p <  0.001). The number of in-office visits was similar in both groups (TM: 1.24 vs HM: 1.12; P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The NORDLAND trial shows that HRQoL is improved after implant in both groups. Without significant differences with regards to effectiveness and safety. In addition, provides a scientifically rigorous method to the field of HRQoL evaluations in patients with pacemakers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02237404 , September 11, 2014.

Granulocyte and monocyte CD11b expression during plasma separation is dependent on complement factor 5 (C5) - an ex vivo study with blood from a C5-deficient individual.

The aim of the study was to investigate the role of complement factor 5 (C5) in reactions elicited by plasma separation using blood from a C5-deficient (C5D) individual, comparing it to C5-deficient blood reconstituted with C5 (C5DR) and blood from healthy donors. Blood was circulated through an ex vivo plasma separation model. Leukocyte CD11b expression and leukocyte-platelet conjugates were measured by flow cytometry during a 30-min period. Other markers were assessed during a 240-min period. Granulocyte and monocyte CD11b expression did not increase in C5D blood during plasma separation. In C5DR samples granulocytes CD11b expression, measured by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), increased from 10481 ± 6022 (SD) to 62703 ± 4936, and monocytes CD11b expression changed from 13837 ± 7047 to 40063 ± 713. Granulocyte-platelet conjugates showed a 2.5-fold increase in the C5DR sample compared to the C5D sample. Monocyte-platelet conjugates increased independently of C5. In the C5D samples, platelet count decreased from 210 × 109 /L (201-219) (median and range) to 51 × 109 /L (50-51), and C3bc increased from 14 CAU/mL (21-7) to 198 CAU/mL (127-269), whereas TCC formation was blocked during plasma separation. In conclusion, up-regulation of granulocyte and monocyte CD11b during plasma separation was C5-dependent. The results also indicate C5 dependency in granulocyte-platelet conjugates formation.

LDL apheresis activates the complement system and the cytokine network, whereas PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab induces no inflammatory response.

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis is an extracorporeal treatment modality used in high-risk coronary patients. It may, however, induce complement activation and downstream inflammation due to bio-incompatibility. OBJECTIVE: We explored changes in soluble inflammatory markers when changing from LDL apheresis to the novel PCSK9 inhibitor evolocumab. METHODS: Three patients with familial hypercholesterolemia participated. Blood samples (EDTA plasma) for complement activation and markers of inflammation were obtained before (baseline) and after LDL apheresis week at 0 and before biweekly administration of evolocumab at weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7. Complement activation was measured by ELISA and cytokines by multiplex technology. RESULTS: Complement activation products C3a and Bb were both significantly higher after LDL apheresis compared to baseline (P = .01), returned to baseline levels before administration of evolocumab and remained low through week 7. C4d was unchanged during LDL apheresis, whereas TCC was slightly higher after apheresis compared to baseline and week 7 without statistical difference. MCP-1 was higher after LDL apheresis compared to baseline (P = .04), returned to baseline levels before administration of evolocumab and remained low through week 7. There were minor changes for other cytokines including TNF, IFN-γ, MIP-1α, MIP-1ß, with some higher and some lower after apheresis; however, none of these changes were statistically significant. Fibrinogen and CRP were lower after LDL apheresis and had returned to levels comparable to baseline at week 7, statistically significant however only for fibrinogen. CONCLUSIONS: LDL apheresis activated the alternative complement system significantly as reflected by an increase in C3a and Bb. PCSK9 inhibition did not affect complement or cytokines during 7 weeks follow-up.

Transition from LDL apheresis to evolocumab in heterozygous FH is equally effective in lowering LDL, without lowering HDL cholesterol.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: LDL apheresis is effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C) and clinical endpoints, however, the treatment is invasive and time consuming. In the present study, we explored lipid profiles and quality of life in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) when altering the treatment regimen from weekly LDL apheresis to bi-weekly evolocumab treatment. METHODS: Three patients with FH and coronary artery disease, established in LDL apheresis for 135 ± 13(SD) months, participated. The patients were examined with blood sampling before and after LDL apheresis (week 0), and before evolocumab administration (week 1-7), quality of life was assessed (week 1, 3, 7). RESULTS: The historically highest, untreated LDL-C was 10.3 ± 0.8 mmol/L, during weekly LDL apheresis, 5.5 ± 0.9 mmol/L pre-apheresis and 1.2 ± 0.2 mmol/L post-apheresis (p = 0.02). One week after apheresis, LDL-C was 6.1 ± 0.7 mmol/L, after three (bi-weekly) injections of evolocumab, LDL-C was 5.0 ± 0.7 (p < 0.001). High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was reduced from 1.0 ± 0.2 mmol/L pre- to 0.5 ± 0.1 mmol/L post-apheresis (p = 0.03), it increased after apheresis and remained constant during evolocumab treatment. Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) decreased from 484 ± 76 mg/L pre- to 142 ± 15 mg/L post-apheresis (p = 0.02), but increased during evolocumab treatment, with a small increase from week one to week seven (p < 0.01). There was a non-significant trend towards an increase in perceived health status (week 0; 57 ± 21, week three; 65 ± 9 and week seven; 77 ± 10). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study, we demonstrate reductions in LDL-C, HDL-C, triglycerides and Lp(a) during apheresis. Switching from LDL apheresis to evolocumab maintained the LDL-lowering effect but did not decrease HDL levels.

Complement profile and activation mechanisms by different LDL apheresis systems.

Extracorporeal removal of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol by means of selective LDL apheresis is indicated in otherwise uncontrolled familial hypercholesterolemia. During blood-biomaterial interaction other constituents than the LDL particles are affected, including the complement system. We set up an ex vivo model in which human whole blood was passed through an LDL apheresis system with one of three different apheresis columns: whole blood adsorption, plasma adsorption and plasma filtration. The concentrations of complement activation products revealed distinctly different patterns of activation and adsorption by the different systems. Evaluated as the final common terminal complement complex (TCC) the whole blood system was inert, in contrast to the plasma systems, which generated substantial and equal amounts of TCC. Initial classical pathway activation was revealed equally for both plasma systems as increases in the C1rs-C1inh complex and C4d. Alternative pathway activation (Bb) was most pronounced for the plasma adsorption system. Although the anaphylatoxins (C3a and C5a) were equally generated by the two plasma separation systems, they were efficiently adsorbed to the plasma adsorption column before the "outlet", whereas they were left free in the plasma in the filtration system. Consequently, during blood-biomaterial interaction in LDL apheresis the complement system is modulated in different manners depending on the device composition.

Three different LDL apheresis columns efficiently and equally reduce lipoprotein(a) concentrations in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and small apolipoprotein(a) particles.

INTRODUCTION: High levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] are associated with cardiovascular disease. In this study we determined apo(a) particle size and compared the Lp(a) reducing efficacy of three different LDL apheresis columns; DL-75, LA-15 and EC-50W in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). RESULTS: Average Lp(a) concentration was reduced by 70%, 74% and 75% (all p<0.0001) for DL-75, LA-15 and EC-50W, respectively. No significant changes in the relative proportion of the isoforms of 14 and 32K 4 domains were observed after apheresis. CONCLUSION: Three different LDL apheresis columns reduced Lp(a) efficiently with preserved ratio between apo(a) isoforms.

Patient tolerance regarding different low-density lipoprotein apheresis columns: frequent minor side effects and high patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: Side effects and patient satisfaction in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis treatment has been less vigorously studied than hemodialysis treatment in end-stage renal failure. OBJECTIVE: In the present study we systematically compared three different LDL apheresis columns with respect to side effects and patient satisfaction. METHODS: Three patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia went through six treatments with each of the LDL apheresis columns DL-75, LA-15, and EC-50W. Possible side effects were recorded during and after apheresis treatment, and patient satisfaction was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale ranging from 1 to 10. RESULTS: One or several side effects during apheresis were noted in 40%, 29%, and 30% of the treatments for the columns DL-75, LA-15, and EC-50W, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between the columns. Side effects after apheresis were noted in 33%, 33%, and 18% of the treatments for the columns DL-75, LA-15, and EC-50W, respectively. The latter column was statistically different from the two others. However, general patient satisfaction was high, with visual analogue scale scores of 8.8, 8.7, and 8.9 for DL-75, LA-15, and EC-50W, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Side effects were noted quite frequently during and after LDL apheresis, although significantly there were fewer when the EC-50W column was used after apheresis treatment. Patient satisfaction with the LDL apheresis treatment was high with all columns.