Long-term functional outcomes in polytrauma: a fundamentally new approach is needed in prediction.

PURPOSE: Modern trauma care has reduced mortality but poor long-term outcomes with low follow-up rates are common with limited recommendations for improvements. The aim of this study was to describe the impact of severe injury on the health-related quality of life, specifically characterise the non-responder population and to identify modifiable predictors of poorer outcomes. METHODS: Five-year (2012-2016) prospective cohort study was performed at a level 1 trauma centre. Baseline Short-Form Health Survey (SF36) was collected at admission, and at 6 and 12 months postinjury together with demographics, injury mechanism and severity, psychosocial wellbeing, and return to work capacity. RESULTS: Of the 306 consecutive patients [age 52 ± 17 years, male 72%, ISS 21 (17, 29), mortality 5%], 195 (64%) completed questionnaires at baseline, and at 12 months. Preinjury physical health scores were above the general population (53.1 vs. 50.3, p < 0.001) and mental health component was consistent with the population norms (51.7 vs. 52.9, p = 0.065). One year following injury, both physical health (13.2, 95% CI 14.8, 11.6) and mental health scores (6.0, 95% CI 8.1, 3.8) were significantly below age- and sex-adjusted preinjury baselines. Non-responders had similar ISS but with a lower admission GCS, and were more likely to be younger, and without comorbidities, employment, or university education. CONCLUSION: Contrary to their better than population norm preinjury health status, polytrauma patients remain functionally impaired at least 1 year after injury. The identified high risk for non-responding group needs more focused efforts for follow-up. A fundamentally different approach is required in polytrauma research which identify modifiable predictors of poor long-term outcomes.

The outcomes of the most severe polytrauma patients: a systematic review of the use of high ISS cutoffs for performance measurement.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review aimed to describe the outcomes of the most severely injured polytrauma patients and identify the consistent Injury Severity Score based definition of utilised for their definition. This could provide a global standard for trauma system benchmarking. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was applied to this review. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Reviews, CINAHL, CENTRAL from inception until July 2022. Case reports were excluded. Studies in all languages that reported the outcomes of adult and paediatric patients with an ISS 40 and above were included. Abstracts were screened by two authors and ties adjudicated by the senior author. RESULTS: 7500 abstracts were screened after excluding 13 duplicates. 56 Full texts were reviewed and 37 were excluded. Reported ISS groups varied widely between the years 1986 and 2022. ISS groups reported ranged from 40-75 up to 51-75. Mortality varied between 27 and 100%. The numbers of patients in the highest ISS group ranged between 15 and 1451. CONCLUSIONS: There are very few critically injured patients reported during the last 48 years. The most critically injured polytrauma patients still have at least a 50% risk of death. There is no consistent inclusion and exclusion criteria for this high-risk cohort. The current approach to reporting is not suitable for monitoring the epidemiology and outcomes of the critically injured polytrauma patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4-systematic review of level 4 studies.

Trends in polytrauma incidence among major trauma admissions.

PURPOSE: Polytrauma is increasingly recognized as a disease beyond anatomical injuries. Due to population growth, centralization, and slow uptake of preventive measures, major trauma presentations in most trauma systems show a slow but steady increase. The proportional contribution of polytrauma patients to this increase is unknown. METHODS: A 13-year retrospective analysis ending 31/12/2021 of all major trauma admissions (ISS > 15) to a level-1 trauma center were included. Polytrauma was classified using the Newcastle definition. Linear regression analysis was used to compare the rates of patient presentation over time. Logistic regression was used to measure for change in proportion of polytrauma. Data are presented as median (IQR), with odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals as appropriate. RESULTS: 5897 (age: 49 ± 43 years, sex: 71.3% male, ISS: 20 ± 9, mortality: 10.7%) major trauma presentations were included, 1,616 (27%) were polytrauma (age: 45 ± 37 years, 72.0% male, ISS: 29 ± 14, mortality: 12.7%). Major trauma presentations increased significantly over the study period (+ 8 patients per year (3-14), p < 0.01), aged significantly (0.42 years/year (0.25-0.59, p < 0.001). The number of polytrauma presentations per year did not change significantly (+ 1 patients/year (- 1 to 4, p > 0.2). Overall unadjusted mortality did not change (OR 0.99 (0.97-1.02). Polytrauma mortality fell significantly (OR 0.96 (0.92-0.99)) over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Polytrauma patients represent about 25% of the major trauma admissions, with higher injury severity, static incidence and higher but improving mortality in comparison to all major trauma patients. Separate reporting and focused research on this group are warranted as monitoring the entire major trauma cohort does not identify these specifics of this high acuity subgroup.

The most critically injured polytrauma patient mortality: should it be a measurement of trauma system performance?

PURPOSE: The risk of death after traumatic injury in developed trauma systems is at an all-time low. Among 'major trauma' patients (injury severity score, ISS > 15), the risk of dying is less than 10%. This group contains critical polytrauma patients (ISS 50-75), with high risks of death. We hypothesized that the reduction in trauma mortality was driven by reduction in moderate injury severity and that death from critical polytrauma remained persistently high. METHODS: A 20-year retrospective analysis ending December 2021 of a Level-1 trauma center's registry was performed on all trauma patients admitted with ISS > 15. Patients' demographics, injury severity and outcomes were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed. Mortality was examined for the entire study group and separately for the subset of critical polytrauma patients (ISS 50-75). RESULTS: A total of 8462 severely injured (ISS > 15) trauma patients were identified during the 20-year period. Of these 238 (2.8%) were critical polytrauma patients (ISS 50-75). ISS > 15 mortality decreased from 11.3 to 9.4% over the study period (Adjusted OR 0.98, 0.97-0.99). ISS 50-75 mortality did not change significantly (46.2-60.0%), adjusted OR 0.96, 0.92-1.00). CONCLUSION: The improvement in trauma mortality over the past 20 years has not been experienced equally. The ISS50-75 critical polytrauma mortality is a practical group to capture. It could be a group for deeper study and reporting to drive improvement.

The Dilemma of Reconstructive Material Choice for Orbital Floor Fracture: A Narrative Review.

The aim of this study is to present a narrative review of the properties of materials currently used for orbital floor reconstruction. Orbital floor fractures, due to their complex anatomy, physiology, and aesthetic concerns, pose complexities regarding management. Since the 1950s, a myriad of materials has been used to reconstruct orbital floor fractures. This narrative review synthesises the findings of literature retrieved from search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. This narrative review was conducted of 66 studies on reconstructive materials. Ideal material properties are that they are resorbable, osteoconductive, resistant to infection, minimally reactive, do not induce capsule formation, allow for bony ingrowth, are cheap, and readily available. Autologous implants provide reliable, lifelong, and biocompatible material choices. Allogenic materials pose a threat of catastrophic disease transmission. Newer alloplastic materials have gained popularity. Consideration must be made when deliberating the use of permanent alloplastic materials that are a foreign body with potential body interactions, or the use of resorbable alloplastic materials failing to provide adequate support for orbital contents. It is vital that surgeons have an appropriate knowledge of materials so that they are used appropriately and reduce the risks of complications.

Radiation Exposure in Patients with Isolated Limb Trauma: Acceptable or Are We Imaging Too Much?

The aim of our study was to investigate the cumulative effective dose of radiation resulting from medical imaging in orthopaedic patients with isolated extremity trauma. Deidentified radiology records of consecutive patients without age restriction with isolated extremity trauma requiring operative treatment at a regional hospital were reviewed retrospectively over a 1-year period, and the effective dose per patient for each study type of plain film X-ray, computed tomography, and operative fluoroscopy was used to calculate cumulative effective dose. Values were summarised as mean, ± standard deviation, maximum, and proportion with overdose (>20 mSv). The study cohort included 428 patients (193 male and 235 female) with an average age of 44 years (±28). There were 447 procedures performed, i.e., all involved operative fluoroscopy, 116 involved computed tomography, and 397 involved X-ray. The mean cumulative effective dose per patient was 1.96 mSv (±4.98, 45.12). The mean cumulative effective dose for operative fluoroscopy was 0.32 mSv (±0.73, 5.91), for X-ray was 1.12 mSv (±3.6, 39.23) and for computed tomography was 2.22 mSv (±4.13, 20.14). The mean cumulative effective dose of 1.96 mSv falls below the recommended maximum annual exposure of 20 mSv. This study can serve as a guide for informing clinicians and patients of the acceptable radiation risk in the context of isolated extremity trauma.

The prevalence of smoking and interest in quitting among surgical patients with acute extremity fractures.

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: We studied the prevalence of smoking, the effect of hospital stay on motivation to quit and the exposure to smoking cessation advice in orthopaedic patients who required surgical intervention for acute extremity fractures. DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved a self-administered pen-and-paper survey assessing smoking status, interest and motivation to quit smoking, and current advice to quit among a consecutive cohort of patients aged 18-65 years old with acute extremity fractures. These patients were admitted to the John Hunter Hospital Level 1 trauma facility in New South Wales, Australia, for surgical intervention over a three month period. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients (response rate 98%) completed the survey. Sixty-eight patients (37.2%) reported a current smoking habit. The prevalence of smoking was 42.2% among males and 25.5% among females. A total of 40% of smokers reported that they had not received advice to quit from medical staff during hospital admission. Prior to admission, 12.1% of smokers were interested in smoking cessation; this percentage increased to 26.8% post-admission. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of smoking among surgical patients with extremity fractures was found to be more than twice the prevalence of the population of New South Wales. Hospital admission had a positive impact on the patient's interest in smoking cessation. Our study suggests that the identification of orthopaedic patients who smoke is suboptimal, and the opportunity to encourage smoking cessation during hospital admission is currently being overlooked.

Changes in hip fracture incidence, mortality and length of stay over the last decade in an Australian major trauma centre.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe the population-based longitudinal trends in incidence, 30-day mortality and length of stay of hip fracture patients in a tertiary referral trauma centre in Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, and identify the factors associated with increased 30-day mortality. METHODS: A retrospective database and chart review was conducted to patients aged ≥65 years with a diagnosis of femoral neck or pertrochanteric fracture admitted to the John Hunter Hospital between 01 January 2002 and 30 December 2011. The main outcome measure was 30-day mortality; secondary outcome was acute length of stay. RESULTS: There were 4,269 eligible patients (427±20 per year) with hip fractures over the 10-year study period. The absolute incidence increased slightly (p=0.1) but the age-adjusted rate decreased (p≤0.0001). The average age (83.5±7.1 years) and percentage of females (73.7%) did not change. Length of stay increased by a factor of 2.5% per year (p<0.0001). Thirty-day mortality decreased from 12.3% in 2002 to 8.20% in 2011 (p=0.0008). Independent risk factors associated with increased 30-day mortality were longer admissions (p<0.0001), increased age (p=0.005), dementia (p=0.01), male gender (p<0.0001), higher American Society of Anaesthesiologists score (p<0.0001), and longer time to operating theatre (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relative ageing of our population, a decrease in the age-standardised rate of fractured hip in elderly patients has seen the number of admissions remain unchanged in our institution from 2002 to 2011. There was a decrease in 30-day mortality, while length of stay increased.

Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: The management of patients with femoral shaft fractures (FSFs) is often a decision making dilemma (damage-control orthopedics vs. early total care), with equivocal evidence. The comprehensive, population-based epidemiology of patients with FSF is unknown. The purpose of this prospective study was to describe the epidemiology of patients with FSF, with special focus on patient physiology and timing of surgery. METHODS: A 12-month prospective population-based study was performed on consecutive patients with FSF in an area with 850,000 population including all ages and prehospital deaths. Patient demographics, mechanism, Injury Severity Score (ISS), shock parameters (systolic blood pressure, base deficit and lactate), transfusion requirement, fracture type [Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association classification (OA/OTA)], comorbidities, procedures, and outcomes were recorded. Patients hemodynamic status was described as stable, borderline, unstable, and "in extremis." RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (21 per 100,000 per year) with 136 femur fractures (62% male; age, 38 [28] years; ISS, 20 [19]; 51% multiple injuries) were identified in the region. Sixty patients (48.4%) sustained a high-energy injury with 19 (31.1%) of these being polytrauma patients (ISS, 28 [12]; systolic blood pressure, 98 [39]; base deficit, 6.5 [5.8]; lactate 4 [2]).Fifteen polytrauma patients (94%) required massive transfusion (12 [12] U of packed red blood cells, 8 [5] fresh frozen plasma, 1 [0.4] platelet, 13 [8] cryoprecipitate). Twenty-one patients (16.7%) died at the prehospital setting (3.5 per 100,000 per year). From the 105 hospital admissions, 68.3% was stable (14.3 per 100,000 per year), 8.7% was borderline (1.8 per 100,000 per year), 4.0% was unstable (0.8 per 100,000 per year) and 2.4% (0.5 per 100,000 per year) was in extremis. Six patients (5.7%) died. The length of stay (LOS) was 18 (15) days, and the intensive care unit LOS was 5 (6) days. Fourty-five patients sustained a low-energy injury that had in 85% of cases multiple comorbidities. Eight low-energy patients needed 3 (1) transfusions, and none of the patients died. The LOS was 15 (11) days. CONCLUSION: Patients with low-energy FSF have a hospital admission rate similar to the patients with high-energy FSF. Sixty-eight percent of patients with FSF are complicated (open, compromised physiology, multiple injuries, bilateral, elderly with comorbidities, etc.), requiring major resources and highly specialized care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiology study, level III.

The definition of polytrauma: variable interrater versus intrarater agreement--a prospective international study among trauma surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The international trauma community has recognized the lack of a validated consensus definition of "polytrauma." We hypothesized that using a subjective definition, trauma surgeons will not have substantial agreement; thus, an objective definition is needed. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted between December 2010 and June 2011 (John Hunter Hospital, Level I trauma center). Inclusion criteria were all trauma call patients with subsequent intensive care unit admission. The study was composed of four stages as follows: (1) four trauma surgeons assessed patients until 24 hours, then coded as either "yes" or "no" for polytrauma, and results compared for agreement; (2) eight trauma surgeons representing the United States, Germany, and the Netherlands graded the same prospectively assessed patients and coded as either "yes" or "no" for polytrauma; (3) 12 months later, the original four trauma surgeons repeated assessment via data sheets to test intrarater variability; and (4) individual subjective definitions were compared with three anatomic scores, namely, (a) Injury Severity Score (ISS) of greater than 15, (b) ISS of greater 17, and (c) Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of greater than 2 in at least two ISS body regions. RESULTS: A total of 52 trauma patients were included. Results for each stage were as follows: (1) κ score of 0.50, moderate agreement; (2) κ score of 0.41, moderate agreement; (3) Rater 1 had moderate intrarater agreement (κ score, 0.59), while Raters 2, 3, 4 had substantial intrarater agreement (κ scores, 0.75, 0.66, and 0.71, respectively); and (4) none had most agreement with ISS of greater than 15 (κ score, 0.16), while both definitions ISS greater than 17 and Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of greater than 2 in at least two ISS body regions had on average fair agreement (κ scores, 0.27 and 0.39, respectively). CONCLUSION: Based on subjective assessments, trauma surgeons do not agree on the definition of polytrauma, with the subjective definition differing both within and across institutions.

Epidemiology of acute transfusions in major orthopaedic trauma.

OBJECTIVES: The orthopaedic trauma-related blood product usage is largely unknown. Aim of this study was to describe the epidemiology of early (<24 hours of arrival) blood component use in major orthopaedic trauma. DESIGN: 12-month prospective observational study. SETTING: John Hunter Hospital, Level 1 Trauma Center, New South Wales, Australia. PATIENTS: 64 consecutive trauma admissions identified, who had an orthopaedic injury and required at least 1 unit of packed red blood cells (PRBC) <24 hours of arrival. INTERVENTION: Epidemiological study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographics, orthopaedic injury type, procedure type, injury severity score, timing, place of first unit of transfusion, and blood component volumes were collected. Activation of the massive transfusion protocol was recorded. Primary outcome measures were intensive care unit admission and mortality. RESULTS: From 965 major trauma admissions, 64 had one or more orthopaedic injuries and were transfused <24 hours. Forty-eight percent (31/64) required massive transfusion protocol activation. Average age was 41 ± 21 years, 73% (47/64) men. Eighty-four percent (54/64) required emergent orthopaedic intervention, 41% (22/54) having multiple procedures. Overall mortality was 13% (8/64). Twenty-five percent (16/64) required ≥10 units of PRBC. Average PRBC use was 7.2 ± 6.6 units and fresh frozen plasma use 4.3 ± 5.2 units. Thirty-nine percent (25/64) had a pelvic ring injury or acetabular fracture. Thirty-seven percent (24/64) had at least one femoral shaft fracture. Twenty patients had a total of 23 tibia fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic trauma patients consume the majority of the blood products <24 hours among blunt trauma patients. This resource-intensive group requires frequent urgent surgical interventions and intensive care unit admission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Acute transfusion practice during trauma resuscitation: who, when, where and why?

BACKGROUND: Early transfusion (ET=within 24h) has been shown to be required in approximately 5% of trauma patients. Critical care transfusion guidelines control transfusion triggers by evidence based cut-offs. Empirical guidelines influence decision making for ET in trauma. AIM: to describe the patterns, indications and timing of ET at level 1 trauma centre. METHODS: A 12-month prospective study was performed on all trauma admissions requiring ET. Demographics, mechanism, injury severity (ISS) were collected. Timing, location, volume, the clinician initiating first unit of transfusion, reason for transfusion was recorded, with corresponding blood gas results and physiological parameters. Mortality, ICU admission, length of stay, need for emergent surgery were outcomes. RESULTS: From 965 trauma admissions 91 (9%) required ET (76% male, median age: 38 (10-88, IQR: 22-59), blunt mechanism: 87%, ISS: 25 (4-66, IQR: 16-34). 43% (39/91) had massive transfusion protocol (MTP) activation. ET was initiated in ED (52%), OR (38%) or ICU (10%). MTP transfusions were started at a median of 0.5h (0.5-4, IQR: 0.5-1.5), whilst non-MTP transfusions were initiated at a median 3h (0.5-23, IQR: 2-9). The first unit of ET was initiated by trauma surgeon (35%), anaesthetist (30%), ED (19%), ICU (13%) and general surgeon (3%). Transfusions triggers at the first unit of transfusion were 'expected or ongoing bleeding' 29%, dropping haemoglobin 26%, haemorrhagic shock 24%, hypotension 10%, tachycardia 8%. Median systolic blood pressure was 90 (45-125, IQR: 80-100), heart rate was 100 (53-163, IQR: 80-120), haemoglobin was 96 (50-166, IQR: 85-114)g/l and base excess was -4.2(-22.1 to 2.7, IQR: -7.2 to 2.4)mmol/l at the time of transfusion. Emergency surgery was required in 86% (78/91). ICU admission rate was 69% (63/91). Mortality was 14%. Low volume transfusion (1-2 units) was more likely to lead to overtransfusion (Hb>110 g/l). CONCLUSION: The prospective evaluation of acutely transfused trauma patients showed a distinct pattern of transfusion triggers as the patient passes from ED to the OT and arrives to the ICU. The conventional transfusion trigger (haemoglobin level) is not appropriate in ET as early transfusion triggers are based on vital signs, blood gas results, injury patterns and anticipated major bleeding.

Patterns of CT use and surgical intervention in upper limb periarticular fractures at a level-1 trauma centre.

OBJECTIVES: The universal availability of CT scanners has led to lower thresholds for imaging despite significant financial costs and radiation exposure. We hypothesised that this recent trend has increased the use of CT for upper limb periarticular fractures and led to more frequent operative management. METHOD: A 5-year retrospective study (01/07/2005-30/06/2010) was performed on all adult patients with upper extremity periarticular fractures (OTA: 11, 13, 21 and 23) admitted to a level-1 trauma centre. Patients were identified from the institution's prospectively maintained OTA classification database. RESULTS: A total of 1734 upper extremity periarticular fractures were identified in 1651 patients. 65% (1132/1734) were operated on. 32% (557/1734) had CT imaging and 78% (431/557) of these had operative management. CT use for all fractures and ages showed no change (0.56%/year, p = 0.210, r(2) = 0.457). Operative intervention increased at a rate of 2.17%/year (p = 0.004, r(2) = 0.959). Within each fracture type, CT rates showed no change. Operative management of proximal humerus and distal radius fractures became more frequent (6.30%/year, p = 0.002, r(2) = 0.969 and 0.96%/year, p = 0.046, r(2) = 0.784 respectively). Fractures around the elbow showed no change. In patients younger than 55 years, only proximal humerus fractures had more frequent imaging (3.17%/year, p = 0.023, r(2) = 0.866). In patients over 55 the frequency of CT scanning did not increase, but they were more frequently operated on (4.09%/year, p = 0.012, r(2) = 0.907). In older patients the rate of surgical intervention increased in all but the distal humerus region, Proximal humerus (6.19%/year, p = 0.015, r(2) = 0.894), proximal forearm (4.57%/year, p = 0.007, r(2) = 0.931) and distal radius (2.70%/year, p = 0.002, r(2) = 0.871). CONCLUSION: During the examined 5-year period no increases of in CT imaging frequency were observed. The significantly increased number of operations among older patients is unlikely to be driven by imaging frequency.

Tissue oxygen saturation changes during intramedullary nailing of lower-limb fractures.

BACKGROUND: The systemic complications of acute intramedullary nailing (IMN) in trauma patients are well known. There are no reliable methods available to predict these adverse outcomes. Noninvasive near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) allows measurement of oxygen saturation within muscle tissue (StO2) and quantification of the potential metabolic and microcirculatory effects of IMN in real time. The aim of this study was to characterize tissue oxygenation changes occurring during reamed IMN. METHODS: Patients undergoing reamed IMN for fixation of a tibia or femur fracture and patients having an open reduction and internal fixation of the ankle (to control for potential effects of anesthesia) had a noninvasive NIRS probe attached to the thenar eminence of the hand. Tissue oxygenation was monitored continuously throughout the operation and digitally recorded for later analysis. Vascular occlusion tests, an established technique with the NIRS device, were performed before canal opening and after nail insertion (at equivalent times in the control group), to establish the presence and nature of changes in systemic microcirculation occurring during the duration of the operation. RESULTS: Tissue oxygenation data were collected on 23 patients undergoing 26 IMN. (mean [SD] age, 36 [19] years; median Injury Severity Score [ISS], 9; interquartile range, 9-12). The control group consisted of 19 patients (mean [SD] age, 41 [18] years; ISS, 4). Remote muscle tissue desaturated significantly faster after IMN compared with the control operation (mean [SD] difference in IMN desaturation rate, 1.8% per minute [2.6% per minute]; mean [SD] difference in control group desaturation rate, -0.6% per minute [1.5% per minute]; p = 0.014). Near infrared-derived muscle oxygen consumption (NIR VO(2)) was significantly increased during the course of IMN compared with the control (mean [SD] difference in IMN NIR VO(2), 19.9 [32.1]; mean [SD] difference in control NIR VO(2), -4.2 [17.9]; p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: IMN causes significant remote microcirculatory changes. The responsiveness of the microcirculation could be a predictor of secondary organ dysfunction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiologic study, level III.

Prehospital nausea and vomiting after trauma: Prevalence, risk factors, and development of a predictive scoring system.

BACKGROUND: Nausea and vomiting are common problems in trauma patients and potentially dangerous during trauma resuscitation. These symptoms are present in up to 10% of ambulance patients, but their prevalence in trauma patients is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of prehospital nausea and vomiting in trauma patients and evaluate antiemetic usage. METHODS: Prospective, cohort study of trauma resuscitation patients transported by ambulance to a major trauma centre. Patients with hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure <90, heart rate >120) or Glasgow Coma Scale score <14 on arrival were excluded. Nausea, vomiting, and antiemetic use were recorded. RESULTS: Convenience sample of 196 trauma resuscitation patients (68% men; age, 42 ± 18 years, mean Injury Severity Score 8 ± 7) were interviewed over the 5-month study period, of a total 369 admitted trauma patients (53%). Seventy-five (38%) patients reported some degree of nausea, 57 (29%) moderate or severe nausea, and 15 (8%) vomited. Older age and female gender were associated with vomiting (p < 0.01). Seventy-nine patients (40%) received a prophylactic antiemetic. Of these, four became nauseous (5%), compared with 71 of 117 (61%) for patients not given an antiemetic (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital nausea and vomiting are more common in our cohort of trauma patients than the reported rates in the literature for nontrauma patients transported to hospital by ambulance. Only 40% of patients receive prophylactic antiemetics, but those patients are less likely to develop symptoms. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, epidemiological study.

Intercostal catheter insertion: are we really doing well?

INTRODUCTION: Intercostal catheters (ICC) are the standard management of chest trauma, but are associated with complications in up to 30%. The aim of this study was to evaluate errors in technique during ICC insertion to characterize the potential benefit of improved training programmes. METHODS: Prospective audit of all ICC in trauma patients at a level 1 trauma centre for over 12 months. Exclusions were pigtail catheters and ICC inserted during thoracic surgery. Errors were identified from patient examination and chest imaging; they were defined as insertional, positional, incorrect size (<28 French) and lack of antibiotic prophylaxis. Ongoing complications unrelated to an error in technique, for example blocked tube, were not analysed. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients received a total of 94 ICC during the study period. Patients were predominantly male (77%), mean age of 40 ± 20 years, mean injury severity score 27 ± 13, mean abbreviated injury scale chest 3.8 ± 0.72. 86% were blunt trauma and 14% penetrating chest injuries. Thirty-six errors in technique occurred in 33 ICC insertions (38%). The most common errors were absence of prophylactic antibiotics (13%), ICC too far out (9%), kinked (6%) and wrong-sized ICC (5%). Emergency had a significantly greater frequency of errors than other specialties (67%, relative risk 2.11, P= 0.002). The majority of ICC were inserted by registrars, and registrars made a greater number of errors than fellows or consultants (relative risk 2.00, P= 0.02). DISCUSSION: This study identified a large number of preventable errors for ICC insertion in trauma patients. Standardized institutional credentialing systems may be required to ensure adequate proficiency of trainees performing this procedure.

Massive transfusion in trauma: blood product ratios should be measured at 6 hours.

BACKGROUND: Most potentially preventable haemorrhagic deaths occur within 6 h of injury. Conventionally, blood component therapy delivery is measured by 24-h cumulative totals and ratios. The study aim was to examine the effect of a massive transfusion protocol (MTP) on early (6 h) balanced component therapy. METHODS: An 88-month retrospective clinical study at a level 1 trauma centre was undertaken, examining consecutive trauma patients receiving ≥10 units of packed red blood cells (PRBCs) within 24 h, before (pre-MTP) and after implementation of MTP. Demographic data, injury severity score (ISS), abbreviated injury scale (AIS), shock parameters, coagulation profile, the need for surgical intervention (<24 h), mortality and intensive care unit length of stay were collected. The ratios of blood products given by 6 h, by 24 h and the time between administrations of components was collected and analysed. RESULTS: Pre-MTP and MTP patients had similar demographics, shock severity and initial laboratory findings. Despite MTP patients having had a higher ISS (42 ± 12 versus 36 ± 12, P < 0.05) and AIS head score (2.6 ± 1.8 versus 1.6 ± 2.0, P < 0.05), there was no difference in mortality. Area under the curve (AUC) of the MTP period showed earlier delivery of higher median ratios of fresh frozen plasma (FFP)/PRBC (P= 0.004). Similar findings were found for cryoprecipitate/PRBC and platelet/PRBC ratios. By 24 h, the AUC for FFP/PRBC ratios were no different. DISCUSSION: Implementation of MTP resulted in earlier balanced transfusion. The difference between the FFP/PRBC ratios of the two types of resuscitations levelled by 24 h. The efficacy of component therapy delivery should be measured earlier than 24 h.

Percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures: computer-assisted determination of safe zones, angles and lengths for screw insertion.

INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous retrograde screw fixation for acetabular fractures is a demanding procedure due to the complex anatomy of the pelvis and the varying narrow safe bony corridors. Limited information is available on optimal screw placement and the geometry of safe zones for screw insertion in the pelvis. METHODS: Three-dimensional reconstructions of 50 consecutive CT scans of polytrauma patients (35 males, 15 females) were used to introduce three virtual CAD bolts (representing screws) into the anterior column (superior ramus of the pubic bone), posterior column (the ischial bone) and the supraacetabular region, as performed during percutaneous screw fixation. The three-dimensional (3D) position of these screws was evaluated with a computer software (MIMICS) after virtual optimal insertion. The 3D position, the narrowest zone and the distance to the hip joint of the two columns and the supraacetabular region were defined. RESULTS: The mean maximal screw length for the three virtual screws measured between 107.4 and 148 ± 18.7 mm. The narrowest zone of the pelvic bone (superior pubic ramus) had a width of 9.2 ± 2.4 mm. The average distances between the bolts and the hip joint were 3.9 and 19.4 ± 7.4 mm. For the anterior column (superior pubic ramus) screw, the mean lateral angle to the sagittal midline plane was 39.0 ± 3.2° and the mean posterior angle to the transversal midline plane was 15.1 ± 4.0°. The mean supraacetabular screw angles measured 22.4 ± 3.4° (medial), 35.3 ± 4.6° (cranial) and the mean angles for the ischial screw were 12.0 ± 5.4° (posterior) and 18.4 ± 4.0° (lateral). CONCLUSIONS: The zones for safe screw positioning are very narrow, making percutaneous screw fixation of the acetabulum a challenging procedure. The predefined angles for the most frequently positioned percutaneous screws may aid in preoperative planning, decrease operative and radiation times and help to increase safe insertion of screws.