Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
2.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38662539

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endoscopic cryotherapy has emerged as a minimally invasive procedure for targeted tissue ablation within the gastrointestinal tract. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of current clinical applications of EC with a review of the pertinent literature. RECENT FINDINGS: Endoscopic cryotherapy has demonstrated safety and efficacy for various gastrointestinal conditions. Recent studies have highlighted the efficacy of endoscopic cryotherapy, including both liquid nitrogen-based spray cryotherapy and the novel cryoballoon focal ablation system, in achieving complete eradication of dysplasia and neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic cryotherapy has also shown promise as a second-line treatment option for patients with dysplastic Barrett's esophagus refractory to radiofrequency ablation and as an alternative to surgical resection for duodenal adenomas, when endoscopic resection is not feasible. Innovative applications for the treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding and management of benign refractory esophageal strictures have also been reported. SUMMARY: Endoscopic cryotherapy represents a safe, effective, and well tolerated therapeutic option for various clinical scenarios in gastrointestinal endoscopy, including challenging disease states such as refractory Barrett's esophagus and advanced esophageal cancer. Advancements in cryotherapy technology and ongoing research continue to explore additional clinical indications and expand the role of endoscopic cryotherapy in patient care with an aim toward improved patient outcomes.

3.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) ; 18(5): 248-291, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36397752

ABSTRACT

Recent outbreaks of duodenoscope-associated multidrugresistant organism infections have increased awareness and concern about the pitfalls in high-level disinfection protocols and duodenoscope design. A call for innovative approaches to reduce the risk of transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms through duodenoscopes has led to the development of single-use duodenoscopes. As a new technology, questions have been raised regarding the performance, safety, cost, feasibility of implementation, and environmental impact of these novel duodenoscopes. This article discusses several of these aspects and presents a brief review of the literature.

4.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am ; 31(4): 681-693, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34538408

ABSTRACT

The gastroenterology (GI) hospitalist model has improved endoscopic operations through improved interdisciplinary coordination, efficiencies introduced in endoscopy unit workflow, and increased patient access to both inpatient and outpatient GI care. The challenges and opportunities associated with a GI hospitalist model and supporting a GI hospitalist team are reviewed, especially in relation to advanced endoscopy. The roles of the GI hospitalist in endoscopy quality measurement and value-based care are also explored. Greater awareness of the GI hospitalist model and tailoring it to fit the needs of the GI practice or endoscopy unit will be key to practice sustainability and growth.


Subject(s)
Gastroenterology , Hospitalists , Endoscopy , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Gastrointestinal Tract , Humans
5.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 93(3): 640-646, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32621818

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The EndoRotor, nonthermal, powered endoscopic debridement (PED) instrument (Interscope Inc, Whitinsville, Mass, USA), is a novel device used in the GI tract. It uses adjustable suction and a rotary cutting blade to precisely resect mucosal and submucosal tissue. Our aim was to assess the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PED using the EndoRotor device. METHODS: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved, multicenter, retrospective review. Patients underwent PED with the EndoRotor device from August 2018 to September 2019 at 4 high-volume U.S. centers. Patient demographics, indication for PED, and procedural and histopathologic data were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients underwent PED (41 lesions). The most common indications for PED were colon polyps (18, 52.9%) and Barrett's esophagus (8, 23.5%). Most lesions (35, 85.4%) were resected previously for the same indication using standard techniques. Technical success was achieved in 97.6% of lesions (n = 40). Clinical success was achieved in most patients who underwent a follow-up examination (19, 79.2%). Intraprocedural bleeding (in 10 patients) was managed endoscopically; no EndoRotor-related perforations occurred. Three postprocedural adverse events occurred: self-limited chest pain in 1 patient and delayed bleeding in 2. CONCLUSIONS: The EndoRotor is a novel, effective, and safe PED device for endoscopic resection of flat and polypoid lesions in the colon and foregut. It may have a promising role in the endoscopic management of naïve and scarred mucosal lesions based on this initial experience. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify its role in endoluminal resection.


Subject(s)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Colon/surgery , Debridement , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
6.
Cancer Control ; 27(1): 1073274820976668, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33297725

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cryotherapy is a cold-based ablative therapy used primarily as second line therapy in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who have persistent dysplasia after undergoing endoscopic treatment with radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Few studies have described the use of cryotherapy as a primary treatment modality for dysplastic or neoplastic BE. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of cryotherapy as primary treatment of dysplastic and/or neoplastic BE by conducting a systemic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science was performed from January 2000 through March 2020. Articles included were observational studies and clinical trials which included patients who had biopsy confirmed dysplastic or neoplastic BE (i.e., high grade dysplasia (HGD), low grade dysplasia (LGD) or intramucosal adenocarcinoma (ImCA)), underwent ≥1 session of cryotherapy, and had a follow-up endoscopy. Primary outcomes were pooled proportions of patients achieving complete eradication of dysplasia (CE-D) and/or intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) by using a random effects model. RESULTS: Fourteen studies making up 405 patients with follow-up ranging from 3-54 months were included. In 13 studies, a total of 321/405 patients achieved CE-D with a pooled proportion of 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2-94.4), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 88.3%). In 13 studies, a total of 321/405 patients achieved CE-D with a pooled proportion of 84.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.2-94.4), with substantial heterogeneity (I2 = 88.3%). Subgroup analysis of only high-quality studies revealed a pooled proportion of CE-D 91.3% (95% CI, 83.0-97.4, I2 = 69.5%) and pooled proportion of CE-IM of 71.6% (95% CI, 59.0-82.9, I2 = 80.9%). Adverse events were reported in 12.2% patients. CONCLUSION: Cryotherapy is a safe and effective primary therapy for dysplastic/early neoplastic BE. CE-D and CE-IM rates are comparable to those for other ablation modalities, including RFA. Cryotherapy should be considered for primary therapy of dysplastic BE and early esophageal neoplasia.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Barrett Esophagus/surgery , Cryosurgery/statistics & numerical data , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Esophageal Mucosa/diagnostic imaging , Esophageal Mucosa/pathology , Esophageal Mucosa/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagoscopy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasm Staging , Treatment Outcome
8.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 92(4): 807-812, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32565184

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence (AI) was first described in 1950; however, several limitations in early models prevented widespread acceptance and application to medicine. In the early 2000s, many of these limitations were overcome by the advent of deep learning. Now that AI systems are capable of analyzing complex algorithms and self-learning, we enter a new age in medicine where AI can be applied to clinical practice through risk assessment models, improving diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency. This article presents a brief historical perspective on the evolution of AI over the last several decades and the introduction and development of AI in medicine in recent years. A brief summary of the major applications of AI in gastroenterology and endoscopy are also presented, which are reviewed in further detail by several other articles in this issue of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.


Subject(s)
Artificial Intelligence , Gastroenterology , Algorithms , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Humans
9.
Curr Gastroenterol Rep ; 22(8): 37, 2020 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32542508

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endoscopic screening and surveillance for Barrett's esophagus (BE) as well as treatment of dysplastic BE is well established. A significant proportion of BE patients are older (geriatric age group, > 65 years age). There is relatively little information or recommendations in the literature with regards to evaluation and management of geriatric BE patients. The purpose of this review is to outline specific caveats and best practice recommendations to help manage the geriatric BE patient. RECENT FINDINGS: In this review, we have attempted to summarize the latest evidence and guideline-based recommendations for evaluation and treatment of BE and early esophageal neoplasia, with a special focus on the challenges and considerations involved when caring for the geriatric BE patient. Concepts related to sedation, endoscopy, risk-benefit assessment, and other unique issues pertaining to the older BE patient are discussed. Expert recommendations are provided wherever possible. This review highlights the importance of recognizing the unique aspects of evaluating and managing the geriatric BE patient. Practical recommendations are discussed which will help the provider individualize and optimize care for their geriatric BE patient.


Subject(s)
Barrett Esophagus/diagnosis , Barrett Esophagus/therapy , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/etiology , Aged , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Barrett Esophagus/complications , Barrett Esophagus/pathology , Biopsy/methods , Chemoprevention/methods , Disease Progression , Early Detection of Cancer , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/etiology , Esophagoscopy , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Humans , Mass Screening , Population Surveillance , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Thromboembolism/complications , Thromboembolism/prevention & control
11.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) ; 16(11): 571-576, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34035692

ABSTRACT

Over the last 2 decades, there has been an increase in acuity among hospitalized patients and patients who present to the emergency department. As such, the role of the hospitalist as an inpatient medicine specialist has become increasingly important to many health systems. More recently, subspecialties in medicine have begun adopting the hospitalist model to care for their inpatients. This care delivery model helps provide continuity, potentially decreased cost and length of stay, and a better quality of life with a more predictable schedule for hospitalists and their outpatient colleagues. This model also aims to provide more timely consultation for inpatients, to help improve communication among inpatient caregiver teams, and to reduce redundant tests while also enhancing patient satisfaction. As a primarily outpatient procedure (and clinic)-based specialty, gastroenterology may benefit from the hospitalist model by being able to provide highly specialized care to acutely ill hospitalized patients with less disruption to outpatient schedules. This article discusses the structure of the gastroenterology hospitalist model, advantages to gastroenterologists and their practices, and the challenges of developing and implementing this model, as well as highlights the increasingly recognized value of this new paradigm in gastroenterology.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL