Teleneurology via tablet technology: an effective low-cost method to increase healthcare accessibility.

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine is a valuable tool to increase access to health care, especially for patients in rural areas who need to visit a specialist. In place of telemedicine robots, which are costly and complicated, hospitals have implemented successful telemedicine programs using lower-cost tablet technology; opting for tablet technology increases the organizational feasibility of a large-scale telemedicine program. METHODS: Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC), in Nashville, Tennessee, USA, launched its teleneurology network program in 2014 to serve patients in surrounding community hospitals who needed a neurology consult. Consults are conducted using an iPad, including examinations and the secure sharing of images and patient information. This article reports on teleneurology consult data and the results of patient and physician satisfaction surveys. RESULTS: Between February 2014 and November 2021, the VUMC teleneurology network program provided consultations for 14 241 patients with a wide variety of neurological diagnoses presenting to 12 community-based hospitals. Patient and community physician satisfaction surveys showed that 96% of physicians were satisfied with the overall care provided, and 89% of patients reported that the telehealth visits met their medical needs. CONCLUSION: One of the goals of telemedicine programs is to increase access to care. Therefore, it is important that the technology used to implement the program also be accessible in terms of cost and complexity. Tablets are low-cost technology, and their use in telemedicine has been shown to satisfy both physicians and patients with a wide variety of diagnoses.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center Ambulatory Teleneurology COVID-19 Experience.

Background: Telehealth has proliferated since the 1950s, but adoption and coverage of telehealth services for the U.S. public have been slow. In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the federal government has implemented temporary policy changes that removed barriers and catalyzed the unprecedented adoption of telehealth. Methods: To assess ambulatory teleneurology satisfaction, we analyzed postvisit questionnaire data from patients and clinicians who completed teleneurology visits during the COVID-19 pandemic at Vanderbilt University Medical Center Department of Neurology (VUMC). Results: From March 18 to May 8, 2020, VUMC completed 3,935 teleneurology visits. More than 97% of patients were very highly or highly confident in the telehealth care they received, whereas almost 99% of clinicians were very likely or somewhat likely to recommend telehealth to other clinicians. Conclusions: Teleneurology satisfaction at VUMC has been positive, and going forward, we must advance upon this unprecedented adoption of telehealth and never revert to former restrictive policies.

A comparative evaluation of telehealth and direct assessment when screening for spasticity in residents of two long-term care facilities.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of telehealth as a screening tool for spasticity compared to direct patient assessment in the long-term care setting. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study. SETTING: Two long-term care facilities: a 140-bed veterans' home and a 44-bed state home for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. SUBJECTS: Sixty-one adult residents of two long-term care facilities (aged 70.1 ± 16.2 years) were included in this analysis. Spasticity was identified in 43% of subjects (Modified Ashworth Scale rating mode = 2). Contributing diagnoses included traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, birth trauma, stroke, cerebral palsy, and multiple sclerosis. MAIN MEASURES: Movement disorders neurologists conducted in-person examinations to determine whether spasticity was present (reference standard) and also evaluated subjects with spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Telehealth screening examinations, facilitated by a bedside nurse, were conducted remotely by two teleneurologists using a three-question screening tool. Telehealth screening determinations of spasticity were compared to the reference standard determination to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC) in receiver operating characteristics. Teleneurologist agreement was evaluated using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: Teleneurologist 1 had a specificity of 89% and sensitivity of 65% to identify the likely presence of spasticity (n = 61; AUC = 0.770). Teleneurologist 2 showed 100% specificity and 82% sensitivity (n = 16; AUC = 0.909). There was almost perfect agreement between the two examiners at 94% (kappa = 0.875, 95% CI: 0.640-1.000). CONCLUSION: Telehealth may provide a useful, efficient method of identifying residents of long-term care facilities that likely need referral for spasticity evaluation.