Treatment challenges and health conditions among people living with HIV with or without substance use disorder in the Russian Federation.

We quantified treatment challenges faced by people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Russia. Cross-sectional data of 150 PLHIV in Russia were from the 2019 Positive Perspectives Survey. Mean age was 38.3 y. Two-thirds (68.0%[102/150]) had ever disguised their HIV pills, and 43.3%[65/150] said they would be stressed if someone saw their HIV pills. Overall, 14.7%[22/150] reported being ever diagnosed with substance use disorder (SUD). Self-rated optimal health was significantly lower among those with vs without a report of SUD on multiple health domains: sexual (40.9%[9/22] vs. 70.3%[90/128], p = 0.007), physical (22.7%[5/22] vs. 68.0%[87/128], p < 0.001), and overall health (27.3%[6/22] vs. 68.8%[88/128], p < 0.001). Those reporting SUD were more likely to miss HIV medication ≥ 1 time in the past month because they used recreational drugs (age and gender-adjusted prevalence ratio [APR] = 8.23, 95%CI = 6.99-9.68), could not afford their medication (APR = 3.28, 95%CI = 2.90-3.72), had to work (APR = 3.27, 95%CI = 2.97-3.60), or to avoid side effects (APR = 2.62, 95%CI = 2.37-2.89). Furthermore, self-reported SUD was strongly associated with numerous poor health conditions, including self-reported diagnosis of cancer (APR = 6.67, 95%CI = 5.24-8.48), mental illness (APR = 5.01, 95%CI = 4.53-5.55), and liver disease (APR = 4.29, 95%CI = 3.98-4.61). The distinct patterns of poorer health-related outcomes among PLHIV with SUD underscore the need to address behavioral and psychosocial challenges as part of holistic HIV care.

Regional differences in perceived treatments needs and priorities in relation to antiretroviral therapy among people living with HIV in 25 countries.

While geographic differences in HIV burden are well documented, less is known about regional differences in perceived treatment needs. To fill this gap, the 2019 Positive Perspectives study of people living with HIV (PLHIV) was conducted in 25 countries across Northern America, Latin America, the Asian region, Europe (EU/Schengen countries), Russia, Australia, and South Africa (n = 2389). Overall mean duration of HIV was 10.1 (SD = 9.6) years. The perception that HIV had a negative impact on day-to-day life was lowest among participants from South Africa (14.0%[25/179]) and highest among participants from the Asian region (55.2%[127/230]). Most of the regional gap in the perception that HIV had a negative impact on daily life was explained by regional differences in medication-related unmet needs, stigma, demographic factors, and comorbidities. The percentage who felt they understood their treatment was highest among participants from Australia (87.5%[105/120]) and lowest among those from Russia (62.0%[93/150]), the Asian region (62.2%[143/230]), and South Africa (62.6%[112/179]). Among participants from Northern America, Europe, and Latin America, the treatment goals with the largest absolute increase in perceived importance, from time of starting treatment to time of survey among those diagnosed for ≥1 year, were minimizing the long term impact of antiretroviral treatment and keeping the number of medicines in their antiretroviral regimen at a minimum. Tailored approaches to care of PLHIV are needed as different regions have different disease burden and treatment needs. Equitable approaches to HIV care are needed across and within regions to ensure that patients' unmet needs and preferences are addressed to improve their overall wellbeing and health-related quality of life.

Shared Decision Making Between Patients and Healthcare Providers and its Association with Favorable Health Outcomes Among People Living with HIV.

We assessed patient-provider communication in HIV care; data were from the 2019 Positive Perspectives Survey of people living with HIV (PLHIV) from 25 countries (n = 2389). A significantly greater proportion of recently diagnosed individuals were interested in being involved when it comes to decisions about their HIV treatment compared with any other group (72.8% [399/548], 63.1% [576/913], and 62.6% [581/928], diagnosis year: 2017-2019, 2010-2016, and pre-2010 respectively) but reported less understanding of their treatment compared with those reporting the longest duration (66.8% [366/548], 68.6% [626/913], and 77.3% [717/928], respectively). One-third of PLHIV with salient treatment-related concerns were uncomfortable discussing with providers. Of participants who felt that their HIV medication limited their life but did not discuss their concerns with their provider (n = 203), top reasons for not discussing were: perception nothing could be done (49.3% [100/203]), provider never brought up the issue (37.9% [77/203]), and not wanting to appear difficult (30.5% [62/203]). To continue to identify and address unmet treatment needs among PLHIV, providers need to ensure that there is ongoing open dialogue.

Physical, Emotional, and Psychosocial Challenges Associated with Daily Dosing of HIV Medications and Their Impact on Indicators of Quality of Life: Findings from the Positive Perspectives Study.

To assess challenges with daily oral antiretroviral therapy (ART), we analyzed data for 2389 participants in the 2019 Positive Perspectives survey of people living with HIV in 25 countries. ART-related challenges reported included difficulty swallowing pills (33.1% [790/2389]); stress from daily dosing routine (33.3% [795/2389]); bad memories from daily intake of HIV medication (35.1%[839/2389]), and concern "that having to take pills every day means a greater chance of revealing my HIV status to others" (37.9% [906/2389]). Individuals who felt empowered by daily oral dosing ["taking my pill(s) every day reassures me that my HIV is being kept under control"] had 69% higher odds of optimal overall health (AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.40-2.04). Conversely, odds of optimal overall health were lower among those who felt daily pill intake "limits my day-to-day life" (AOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.44-0.64). These findings show that there is need for increased flexibility of ART delivery to meet diverse patient needs.

Undetectable equals untransmittable (U = U): awareness and associations with health outcomes among people living with HIV in 25 countries.

OBJECTIVES: 'Undetectable equals Untransmittable' (U=U) is an empowering message that may enable people living with HIV (PLHIV) to reach and maintain undetectability. We estimated the percentage of PLHIV who ever discussed U=U with their main HIV care provider, and measured associations with health-related outcomes. Secondarily, we evaluated whether the impact of the U=U message varied between those who heard it from their healthcare provider (HCP) vs from elsewhere. METHODS: Data were from the 25-country 2019 Positive Perspectives Survey of PLHIV on treatment (n=2389). PLHIV were classified as having discussed U=U with their HCP if they indicated that their HCP had ever told them about U=U. Those who had not discussed U=U with their HCP but were nonetheless aware that 'My HIV medication prevents me from passing on HIV to others' were classified as being made aware of U=U from non-HCP sources. Multivariable logistic regression was used to measure associations between exposure to U=U messages and health outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, 66.5% reported ever discussing U=U with their HCP, from 38.0% (South Korea) to 87.3% (Switzerland). Prevalence was lowest among heterosexual men (57.6%) and PLHIV in Asia (51.3%). Compared with those unaware of U=U, those reporting U=U discussions with their HCP had lower odds of suboptimal adherence (AOR=0.59, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.78) and higher odds of self-reported viral suppression (AOR=2.34, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.20), optimal sexual health (AOR=1.48, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.92) and reporting they 'always shared' their HIV status (AOR=2.99, 95% CI 1.42 to 6.28). While exposure to U=U information from non-HCP sources was beneficial too, the observed associations were attenuated relative to those seen with reported discussions with HCPs. CONCLUSION: HCP discussion of U=U with PLHIV was associated with favourable health outcomes. However, missed opportunities exist since a third of PLHIV reported not having any U=U discussion with their HCP. U=U discussions with PLHIV should be considered as a standard of care in clinical guidelines.

Relationship Between Polypharmacy and Quality of Life Among People in 24 Countries Living With HIV.

INTRODUCTION: People living with HIV (PLHIV) have greater risk of having multiple health conditions. We measured the relationship between increased medication and overall quality of life among PLHIV from 24 countries. METHODS: We analyzed data for 2,112 adult PLHIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART) in 24 countries who completed the 2019 Positive Perspectives survey. Polypharmacy was defined as taking 5 or more pills a day or currently taking medications for 5 or more conditions. Outcomes were self-rated overall health, treatment satisfaction, and self-reported virologic control. New treatment concerns were issues not prioritized at ART initiation but now deemed paramount. Data were analyzed with descriptive and multivariable statistics. RESULTS: Overall prevalence of polypharmacy was 42.1%. People reporting polypharmacy had significantly poorer health outcomes independent of existing comorbidities; their odds of treatment satisfaction, optimal overall health, and virologic control were lower by 27.0% (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.91), 36.0% (AOR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.53-0.78), and 46.0% (AOR = 0.54, 95% CI, 0.42-0.70), respectively, compared with those without polypharmacy (all P < .05). Most PLHIV (56.6%) were concerned about taking more medicines as they age, and 73.1% were interested in ARTs with fewer medicines. Top reasons for switching ART among those who had ever switched (n = 1,550) were to reduce severity and frequency of side effects (45.3%), number of pills (35.0%), or number of medicines (26.8%). People reporting polypharmacy had significantly higher odds of having new concerns relative to when they initiated ART, regarding risks of drug-drug interactions (AOR = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.02-1.71) and side effects (AOR = 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02-1.68). CONCLUSION: Polypharmacy was associated with poorer health-related outcomes among PLHIV. Many PLHIV expressed concerns about side effects of ART. Clinicians should carefully consider patient preferences, comorbidities, and drug profiles when prescribing ART.