In Vitro Comparison of Aztreonam/Amoxicillin-Clavulanate Versus Aztreonam/Ceftazidime-Avibactam on Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

We investigated the in vitro susceptibility of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia to the associations aztreonam/amoxicillin-clavulanate (ATM-AMC) and ATM-CZA. Forty clinical isolates of S. maltophilia recovered from sputum samples of 40 cystic fibrosis people were selected from the collection of the Nantes University Hospital, based on their resistance to CZA. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ATM-CZA and ATM-AMC were determined for each isolate by an Etest strip superposition method, and by Etest for each individual antibiotic. MICs of CZA, ATM, and AMC ranged from 12 to ≥256, ≥256, and 16 to ≥256 mg/L, respectively. Synergistic effects were observed with the ATM-CZA combination for all isolates (fractional inhibitory concentration index range of 0.01 to 0.27), with combination MICs ranging from 0.75 to 16 mg/L (MIC50/90 = 3/12 mg/L), corresponding to a decrease of at least 16-folds in the MIC of ATM. In 23 (57.5%) S. maltophilia isolates, the association of AMC to ATM was also synergistic and combination MICs were ≤16 mg/L (EUCAST breakpoint for ATM resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Our results show that ATM-CZA or ATM-AMC could be alternative therapeutic options against some highly resistant S. maltophilia. This encourages further experimental studies, in particular time-kill analyses, and clinical trials to delineate conditions required for use of these combinations in practice.

Immune alveolitis in interstitial lung disease: an attractive cytological profile in immunocompromised patients.

BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a major diagnostic tool in interstitial lung disease (ILD). Its use remains largely quantitative, usually focused on cell differential ratio. However, cellular morphological features provide additional valuable information. The significance of the "immune alveolitis" cytological profile, characterized by lymphocytic alveolitis with activated lymphocytes and macrophages in epithelioid transformation or foamy macrophages desquamating in cohesive clusters with lymphocytes, remains unknown in ILD. Our objective was to describe patients' characteristics and diagnoses associated with an immune alveolitis profile in undiagnosed ILD. METHODS: We performed a monocentric retrospective observational study. Eligible patients were adults undergoing diagnostic exploration for ILD and whose BAL fluid displayed an immune alveolitis profile. For each patient, we collected clinical, radiological and biological findings as well as the final etiology of ILD. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and December 2018, 249 patients were included. Mean age was 57 ± 16 years, 140 patients (56%) were men, and 65% of patients were immunocompromised. The main etiological diagnosis was Pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) (24%), followed by drug-induced lung disease (DILD) (20%), viral pneumonia (14%) and hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) (10%). All PCP were diagnosed in immunocompromised patients while HP was found in only 8% of this subgroup. DILD and viral pneumonia were also commonly diagnosed in immunocompromised patients (94% and 80%, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study highlights the additional value of BAL qualitative description in ILD. We suggest incorporating the immune alveolitis profile for the diagnosis and management of ILD, especially in immunocompromised patients, since it guides towards specific diagnoses.

Evaluation of the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) Scale in a cohort of patients recovering from hypoxemic SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 sequelae are numerous and multisystemic, and how to evaluate those symptomatic patients is a timely issue. Klok et al proposed the Post-COVID-19 Functional Status (PCFS) Scale as an easy tool to evaluate limitations related to persistent symptoms. Our aim was to analyse PCFS Scale ability to detect functional limitations and its correlation with quality of life in a cohort of patients, 2-9 months after hospitalisation for COVID-19 hypoxemic pneumonia. METHODS: PCFS Scale was evaluated in 121 patients together with quality of life and dyspnoea questionnaires, pulmonary function tests and CT scans. RESULTS: We observed a high correlation with multiple questionnaires (Short Form-36, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, modified Medical Research Council, end Borg Six-Minute Walk Test), making the PCFS Scale a quick and global tool to evaluate functional limitations related to various persistent symptoms following COVID-19 pneumonia. DISCUSSION: The PCFS Scale seems to be a suitable instrument to screen for patients who will require careful follow-up after COVID-19 hypoxemic pneumonia even in the absence of pulmonary sequelae.