ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Bidirectional interactions between eosinophils and mast cells (MCs) have been reported in various allergic diseases. Bone marrow (BM) eosinophilia, and to a lesser extent blood eosinophilia, is common in systemic mastocytosis (SM), but its significance remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe blood and BM eosinophil characteristics in SM. METHODS: A large collection of BM biopsies was analyzed using immunohistochemical staining and whole-slide imaging. Eosinophil and extracellular granules were detected by eosinophil peroxidase (EPX) staining, and MCs by KIT staining. Complementary analyses were conducted using flow cytometry and immunofluorescence. RESULTS: Eosinophil infiltrates and large areas of eosinophil degranulation were observed within or around BM MC infiltrates in SM. EPX staining surface, highlighting intact eosinophils and eosinophil degranulation, was higher in non-advanced-SM (n=37 BM biopsies) compared to both controls (n=8, p=0.0003) and to advanced SM (n=24, p=0.014). In non-advanced SM, positive correlations were observed between serum tryptase levels and percentages of eosinophil counts in BM aspirations (Spearman r coefficient r=0.38, p=0.038), eosinophils count in BM biopsies (r=0.45, p=0.007), EPX staining (r=0.37, p=0.035) and eosinophil degranulation (r=0.39, p=0.023). Eosinophil counts in BM biopsies also correlated with MC counts (r=0.47, p=0.006) and KIT staining surface (r=0.49, p=0.003). BM MCs expressed interleukin-5 receptor and other usual eosinophil cytokine/chemokine receptors, and blood eosinophils display several increased surface markers compared to controls, suggesting an activated state. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest a possible crosstalk between MCs and eosinophils, supporting MC tryptase release and MC activation-related symptoms. This suggests a rationale for targeting eosinophils in non-advanced-SM not fully controlled by other therapies.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Inflammation is an established contributor to the pathophysiology of depression and the prevalence of depression in those with chronic inflammatory disease is two- to four-fold higher than the general population. Yet little is known about the neurobiological changes that confer depression or resilience to depression, that occur when episodes of heightened inflammation are frequent or span many years. METHODS: We used an innovative combination of longitudinal resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging coupled to segmental bronchial provocation with allergen (SBP-Ag) to assess changes in resting state functional connectivity (rsFC) of the salience network (SN) caused by an acute inflammatory exacerbation in twenty-six adults (15 female) with asthma and varying levels of depressive symptoms. Eosinophils measured in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and blood provided an index of allergic inflammation and the Beck Depression Inventory provided an index of depressive symptoms. RESULTS: We found that in those with the highest symptoms of depression at baseline, SN rsFC declined most from pre- to post-SBP-Ag in the context of a robust eosinophilic response to challenge, but in those with low depressive symptoms SN rsFC was maintained or increased, even in those with the most pronounced SBP-Ag response. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, the maintenance of SN rsFC during inflammation may be a biomarker of resilience to depression, perhaps via more effective orchestration of large-scale brain network dynamics by the SN. These findings advance our understanding of the functional role of the SN during inflammation and inform treatment recommendations for those with comorbid inflammatory disease and depression.