Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetries in Caucasian adult patients with different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. A cone beam study using 3D segmentation and mirroring procedures.

INTRODUCTION: An accurate identification of mandibular asymmetries is required by modern orthodontics and orthognathic surgery to improve diagnosis and treatment planning of such deformities. Although craniofacial deformities are very frequent pathologies, some types of asymmetries can be very difficult to assess without the proper diagnostic tools. The purpose of this study was to implement the usage of three-dimensional (3D) segmentation procedures to identify asymmetries at the mandibular level in adult patients with different vertical and sagittal patterns where the asymmetries could go unnoticed at the observational level. METHODS: The study sample comprised 60 adult patients (33 women and 27 men, aged between 18 and 60 years). Subjects were divided into 3 sagittal and vertical skeletal groups. CBCT images were segmented, mirrored and voxel-based registered with reference landmarks using ITK-SNAP® and 3DSlicer® software's. 3D surface models were constructed to evaluate the degree of asymmetry at different anatomical levels. RESULTS: There was a degree of asymmetry, with the left hemimandible tending to contain the right one (0.123 ± 0.270 mm (CI95% 0.036-0.222; p < 0.001). Although the subjects under study did not present significant differences between mandibular asymmetries and their sagittal or vertical skeletal pattern (p = 0.809 and p = 0.453, respectively), a statistically significant difference has been found depending on the anatomical region (p < 0.001; CI95%=1.020-1.021), being higher in the condyle, followed by the ramus and the corpus. CONCLUSIONS: Although mandibular asymmetries cannot be correlated with vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns in symmetric patients, knowledge about 3D segmentation procedures and color maps can provide valuable information to identify mandibular asymmetries.

Compliance with the ISO 27020:2019 norm of a sample of currently available preadjusted Orthodontic bracket systems. Are the actual dimensions as expected?

BACKGROUND: Determine the exact slot dimension of a sample of a MBT prescription stainless steel conventional brackets from different manufacturers to compare the actual values with the nominal ones declared by the manufacturers and to verify the compliance with tolerance limits given by the ISO 27020:2019. Different batches from each manufacturer were evaluated to determine whether or not they are different in size. In addition, the geometry of the slot walls was assessed. METHODS: 360 stainless steel preadjusted orthodontic brackets of 12 different manufacturers were assessed. All brackets had a nominal slot size of 0.022 by 0.028 inches, belonged to the right upper central incisor, and were fabricated with the metal injection molding technique (MIM). For each manufacturer, three different manufacturing batches were evaluated. Brackets were coded using a single-blind design. RESULTS: All bracket systems in the study group except one displayed a statistically significant difference with the nominal declared value, although only four of the systems did not comply with the tolerance limits established by the ISO 27020:2019. In most of the systems, the slot height was oversized when compared to the nominal one. A significant interbatch variability was found in most of the evaluated systems. Most of the brackets walls were divergent. CONCLUSIONS: The dimensional accuracy of commercially available metal brackets is not guaranteed. The respect for the norm should be enforced as well as the quality controls along the manufacturing process since orthodontic brackets are a precision medical device.