Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 35
Filter
1.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 22(12): 2222-2229, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32424700

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To assess the use of external beam radiotherapy in Catalonia (Spain), overall and by health management area. METHODS: We assessed radiotherapy treatments in a cohort of patients diagnosed with cancer from 2009 to 2011, using the population-based cancer registries in Girona and Tarragona. Participants had to have a minimum follow-up of 5 years from the time the cancer registry database was linked to the catalan health service database for financing radiation oncology. Outcomes included the proportion of patients receiving radiotherapy within 1 and 5 years of diagnosis. A log-binomial model was used to assess age-related trends in the use of radiotherapy by tumour site. Finally, we calculated the standardized utilization rate and 95% confidence intervals by health management area covered by the radiation oncology services, using indirect methods. RESULTS: At 1 and 5 years from diagnosis, 21.4 and 24.4% of patients, respectively, had received external beam radiotherapy. Patients aged 40-64 years had the most indications for the treatment, and there was a negative correlation between the patients' age and the use of radiotherapy for most tumour sites (exceptions were cervical, thyroid, and uterine cancers). There were no statistically significant differences in the use of radiotherapy according to th health management area. CONCLUSIONS: Population-based data show that external beam radiotherapy is underutilized in Catalonia. This situation requires a careful analysis to understand the causes, as well as an improvement of the available resources, oriented toward achieving realistic targets for the optimal use of external beam radiotherapy in our country.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Cohort Studies , Confidence Intervals , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Spain/epidemiology , Time-to-Treatment
2.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(10): 1120-1129, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31099455

ABSTRACT

AIM: Although colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces mortality and morbidity the uptake in target populations is suboptimal. The aim was to assess whether adding a brief phone intervention to the usual invitation process increases participation in a CRC screening programme based in Catalonia. METHOD: This was a non-blinded prospective randomized control study of patients eligible for their first CRC screening test (immunochemical faecal occult blood test). Between March and December 2017, 512 invitees (age range 50-69 years) were randomized to receiving either a brief informative phone call prior to receiving the standard screening invitation (letter and informative brochure) or the standard screening invitation alone. The primary outcome was participation in the screening programme at 6 months. RESULTS: In all, 492/512 patients (54.7% women; 45.3% men) could be analysed (239/256 intervention group; 253/256 control group). On an intention to treat basis, the intervention group (55% women; 45% men) saw an 11% increase in the participation rate (51.05% vs 40.32%, P = 0.017). The intervention was more effective in male patients (50.93% vs 33.91%, P = 0.01) and those patients aged between 50 and 54 years (54.32% vs 37.77%, P = 0.03). After adjusting for sex, age and geographic area, the benefit of the intervention remained statistically significant (adjusted OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.07-2.20). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that a brief, informative intervention by phone in addition to the usual invitation process is effective in increasing participation in a CRC screening programme. It may be a useful strategy to improve uptake in groups which are less likely to participate in CRC screening (clinicaltrials.gov NCT03082911).


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/psychology , Health Promotion/methods , Patient Education as Topic/methods , Patient Participation/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Humans , Intention to Treat Analysis , Male , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies , Spain , Telephone
3.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 21(8): 1014-1025, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30607790

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Evidence suggests an excess of long-term mortality due to cardiovascular diseases, second tumours and other causes in patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer (BC). Our aim was to assess this risk of death in a cohort of patients diagnosed with BC in Girona and Tarragona, northeastern Spain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data from the cancer registries in these areas, a population-based cohort study was carried out including all the women diagnosed with BC during 1985-2004 and followed up until December 31st 2014 (N = 10,195). The standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for causes other than BC in the cohort at 10 years (periods 1985-1994/1995-2004) and 20 years (period 1985-1994). The impact of competing causes of death in the long-term survival was evaluated through competing risk analysis. RESULTS: The SMRs at 10 and 20 years for all-cause mortality, except BC, were 1.21 and 1.22. The main causes of mortality showing statistically significant SMR at 10 years were other tumours (colon, lung, corpus uteri, ovary, and haematological), diabetes mellitus, diseases of the nervous system, cardiovascular diseases (after BC, the second competing cause of death among patients diagnosed > 69 years) and diseases of the kidney. Globally, the 10-year SMR was higher in the first period. After 20 years of follow-up (1985-1994 cohort), there were 48.5 excess deaths per 10,000 patient-years for causes other than BC. CONCLUSIONS: Women who did not die from BC at 10 or 20 years after the BC diagnosis had 20% higher risk of dying from other causes than women without BC. This excess risk must be clinically considered during 20 years after the BC diagnosis.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Cause of Death , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/mortality , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Incidence , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Registries , Risk Factors , Spain/epidemiology , Survival Rate , Young Adult
4.
Colorectal Dis ; 21(4): 441-450, 2019 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30585686

ABSTRACT

AIM: The oncological risk/benefit trade-off for laparoscopy in rectal cancer is controversial. Our aim was to compare laparoscopic vs open surgery for resection of rectal cancer, using unselected data from the public healthcare system of Catalonia (Spain). METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study of all patients who had surgery with curative intent for primary rectal cancer at Catalonian public hospitals from 2011 to 2012. We obtained follow-up data for up to 5 years. To minimize the differences between the two groups, we performed propensity score matching on baseline patient characteristics. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to assess locoregional relapse at 2 years and death at 2 and 5 years. RESULTS: Of 1513 patients with Stage I-III rectal cancer, 933 (61.7%) had laparoscopy (conversion rate 13.2%). After applying our propensity score matching strategy (2:1), 842 laparoscopy patients were matched to 517 open surgery patients. Multivariate Cox analysis of death at 2 years [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.48, 0.87; P = 0.004] and 5 years (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.5, 0.75; P < 0.001) and of local relapse at 2 years (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27, 0.72; P = 0.001) showed laparoscopy to be an independent protective factor compared with open surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy results in lower locoregional relapse and long-term mortality in rectal cancer in unselected patients with all-risk groups included. Studies using long-term follow-up of cohorts and unselected data can provide information on clinically relevant outcomes to supplement randomized controlled trials.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Proctectomy/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Proctectomy/methods , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spain , Treatment Outcome
5.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(10): 1252-1260, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29511947

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We provide population-based long-term survival indicators of breast cancer patients by quantifying the observed survival, and the probabilities of death due to breast cancer and to other causes by age and tumor stage at diagnosis. METHODS: We included a total of 10,195 female patients diagnosed before 85 years with invasive primary breast cancer in Girona and Tarragona during the periods 1985-1994 and 1995-2004 and followed-up until December 31st 2014. The survival indicators were estimated at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years of follow-up comparing diagnostic periods. RESULTS: Comparing diagnostic periods: I) the probability of death due to other causes did not change; II) the 20-year survival for women diagnosed ≤ 49 years increased 13% (1995-2004 = 68%; 1985-1994:55%), whereas their probability of death due to breast cancer decreased at the same pace (1995-2004 = 29%; 1985-1994 = 42%); III) at 10 years of follow-up, decreases in the probabilities of death due to breast cancer across age groups switched from 11 to 17% resulting in a risk of death reduction of 19% after adjusting by stage. During 1995-2004, the stage-specific 10-year probabilities of death due to breast cancer switched from: 3-6% in stage I, 18-20% in stage II, 34-46% in stage III and surpassed 70% in stage IV beyond 5 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, women diagnosed with breast cancer had higher long-term probability to die from breast cancer than from other causes. The improvements in treatment and the lead-time bias in detecting cancer in an early stage resulted in a reduction of 19% in the risk of death between diagnostic periods.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Registries , Spain/epidemiology , Young Adult
6.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(5): 647-657, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29027110

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Developing effective cancer control programmes requires information on the future cancer burden in an ageing population. In our study we predicted the burden of cancer in Catalonia from 2015 to 2025. METHODS: Bayesian age-period-cohort models were used to predict the burden of cancer from 2015 to 2025 using incidence data from the Girona and Tarragona cancer registries and cancer mortality data from the Catalan mortality registry. Using the Bashir-Estève method, we divided the net change in the number of cases between 2015 and 2025 into changes due to population size (S), cancer risk (R) and age (A) distribution. RESULTS: By 2025, there will be 21,743 new cancer cases in men (40% aged > 74 years) and 17,268 in women (37% aged > 74 years). More than 40% of the new cases will be diagnosed among population aged 74 and older in prostate, colorectal, lung, bladder, pancreatic and stomach cancers in men, and in colorectal, pancreatic and bladder cancers and leukaemia in women. During 2015-2025, the number of new diagnoses will increase by 5.5% in men (A + R + S = 18.1% - 13.3% + 0.7% = 5.5%) and 11.9% in women (A + R + S = 12.4% - 1.1% + 0.6% = 11.9%). Overall cancer mortality rates will continue to decrease during 2015-2025. Lung cancer will be the most lethal cancer among men (N = 2705) and women (N = 1174). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in the number of cancer cases in Catalonia from 2015 to 2025 will mostly affect the elderly, prompting the need for increased collaboration between geriatricians and oncologists.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Medical Oncology/trends , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Sex Distribution , Spain/epidemiology
7.
Clin Transl Oncol ; 20(3): 313-321, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28726040

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We assessed differences in predicted breast cancer (BC) mortality rates, across Europe, by 2020, taking into account changes in the time trends of BC mortality rates during the period 2000-2010. METHODS: BC mortality data, for 27 European Union (EU) countries, were extracted from the World Health Organization mortality database. First, we compared BC mortality data between time periods 2000-2004 and 2006-2010 through standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and carrying out a graphical assessment of the age-specific rates. Second, making use of the base period 2006-2012, we predicted BC mortality rates by 2020. Finally, making use of the SMRs and the predicted data, we identified a clustering of countries, assessing differences in the time trends between the areas defined in this clustering. RESULTS: The clustering approach identified two clusters of countries: the first cluster were countries where BC predicted mortality rates, in 2020, might slightly increase among women aged 69 and older compared with 2010 [Greece (SMR 1.01), Croatia (SMR 1.02), Latvia (SMR 1.15), Poland (SMR 1.14), Estonia (SMR 1.16), Bulgaria (SMR 1.13), Lithuania (SMR 1.03), Romania (SMR 1.13) and Slovakia (SMR 1.06)]. The second cluster was those countries where BC mortality rates level off or decrease in all age groups (remaining countries). However, BC mortality rates between these clusters might diminish and converge to similar figures by 2020. CONCLUSIONS: For the year 2020, our predictions have shown a converging pattern of BC mortality rates between European regions. Reducing disparities, in access to screening and treatment, could have a substantial effect in countries where a non-decreasing trend in age-specific BC mortality rates has been predicted.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Mortality/trends , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Cluster Analysis , Databases, Factual , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged
8.
Ann Oncol ; 28(4): 831-835, 2017 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28327898

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Preoperative oral capecitabine plus radiotherapy has been progressively adopted in oncology units to provide more convenient care to patients with rectal cancer, but little is known about adherence to this therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, multicentre observational study in six hospitals in metropolitan Barcelona (Spain), in patients with stage II and III rectal cancer. Assessment of adherence was based on the medical report in the clinical history, a patient questionnaire and a pill count in the pharmacy service upon finalization of treatment. Patients were considered adherent if they had taken 80%-110% of the prescribed treatment. We evaluated clinical variables, adverse effects, anxiety and depression (using the hospital anxiety depression scale [HADS]), and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-30). We analysed adherence-associated variables using a logistic regression model and concordance between adherence measures by means of the modified Kappa index. RESULTS: We included 119 participants. Adherence measures showed little concordance between the assessment methods used: adherence was 100% according to the clinical history, 83.2% according to self-report and 67.9% according to the pill count. In the multivariable analysis, the most relevant variable associated with non-adherence was anxiety prior to treatment (adjusted odds ratio [ORa] 6.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-32.7). We did not observe any relevant association between adherence and clinical variables and baseline quality of life parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to short-term oral neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer may be a clinical problem, and it should be acknowledged and systematically evaluated by clinicians during treatment. The limited concordance between different measures of adherence highlights the challenges in monitoring it and the need to use different approaches to assess its impact in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/methods , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Prospective Studies , Rectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Spain
9.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 42(12): 1873-1880, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27624916

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer surgery in Catalonia has been involved in a process of centralisation. We assessed the impact of this health policy strategy on quality of care and clinical results. METHODS: We compared patterns of care and clinical outcomes of all rectal cancer patients receiving radical surgery for the first time in public hospitals in two time periods, before (2005 and 2007) and after (2011-2012) centralisation, analysing indicators of care quality according to the regional clinical practice guidelines. Clinical outcomes at two years were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 3780 patients were included. From 2005 to 2012, the proportion of patients treated surgically for the first time in centres whose annual surgical caseload was more than 11 increased from 84.0% to 90.4%. The rate of locoregional recurrence at two years fell from 4.5 to 3.06/100 person-years (p = 0.005). The crude mortality rate at three months, one and two years was reduced by 55%, 40% and 34% (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Improvements in quality of care might be associated with the centralisation of surgery and with the selective focus effect derived from the process of auditing. Our results support the continuation of clinical auditing and surveillance of authorised centres.


Subject(s)
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/statistics & numerical data , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/trends , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/trends , Female , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, High-Volume/trends , Hospitals, Low-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Low-Volume/trends , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/trends , Lymph Node Excision/trends , Male , Medical Audit , Mesentery/surgery , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/trends , Neoplasm Staging , Quality Improvement , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Quality of Health Care/trends , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/trends , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectum/surgery , Spain
10.
Endoscopy ; 45(1): 51-9, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23212726

ABSTRACT

Population-based screening for early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) and precursor lesions, using evidence-based methods, can be effective in populations with a significant burden of the disease provided the services are of high quality. Multidisciplinary, evidence-based guidelines for quality assurance in CRC screening and diagnosis have been developed by experts in a project co-financed by the European Union. The 450-page guidelines were published in book format by the European Commission in 2010.  They include 10 chapters and over 250 recommendations, individually graded according to the strength of the recommendation and the supporting evidence. Adoption of the recommendations can improve and maintain the quality and effectiveness of an entire screening process, including identification and invitation of the target population, diagnosis and management of the disease and appropriate surveillance in people with detected lesions. To make the principles, recommendations and standards in the guidelines known to a wider professional and scientific community and to facilitate their use in the scientific literature, the original content is presented in journal format in an open-access Supplement of Endoscopy. The editors have prepared the present overview to inform readers of the comprehensive scope and content of the guidelines.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening/standards , Quality Assurance, Health Care , Early Detection of Cancer , Europe , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans
11.
Br J Cancer ; 107(8): 1249-56, 2012 Oct 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22955858

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare different methods in order to assess adherence and persistence with oral endocrine therapy in women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) in Catalonia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study covered all women newly diagnosed with stage I, II or IIIa BC and positive hormone receptors at six hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) in 2004. Adherence was assessed on the basis of physician report and patient self-report using a telephone questionnaire. Persistence was measured by refill prescriptions. We used the Kappa index to compare adherence measures and logistic regression to evaluate adherence-related risk factors. RESULTS: The study covered a total of 692 women. Adherence ranged from 92% (self-report) to 94.7% (physician report), depending on the measure used; persistence was 74.7% at 5 years of follow-up. Low concordance between measures was observed (Kappa range: 0.018-0.267). Patients aged 50-74 years showed higher adherence than those aged <50 years. Adherence was also associated with: adjuvant chemotherapy and sequential hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance between the different measures was remarkably low, indicating the need for further research. Adherence is an issue in the management of BC patients taking oral drugs, and should be assessed in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Administration, Oral , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Self Report , Spain
12.
Br J Cancer ; 105(6): 753-9, 2011 Sep 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21829194

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Cancer Fast-track Programme's aim was to reduce the time that elapsed between well-founded suspicion of breast, colorectal and lung cancer and the start of initial treatment in Catalonia (Spain). We sought to analyse its implementation and overall effectiveness. METHODS: A quantitative analysis of the programme was performed using data generated by the hospitals on the basis of seven fast-track monitoring indicators for the period 2006-2009. In addition, we conducted a qualitative study, based on 83 semistructured interviews with primary and specialised health professionals and health administrators, to obtain their perception of the programme's implementation. RESULTS: About half of all new patients with breast, lung or colorectal cancer were diagnosed via the fast track, though the cancer detection rate declined across the period. Mean time from detection of suspected cancer in primary care to start of initial treatment was 32 days for breast, 30 for colorectal and 37 for lung cancer (2009). Professionals associated with the implementation of the programme showed that general practitioners faced with suspicion of cancer had changed their conduct with the aim of preventing lags. Furthermore, hospitals were found to have pursued three specific implementation strategies (top-down, consensus-based and participatory), which made for the cohesion and sustainability of the circuits. CONCLUSION: The programme has contributed to speeding up diagnostic assessment and treatment of patients with suspicion of cancer, and to clarifying the patient pathway between primary and specialised care.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/methods , Neoplasms/therapy , Primary Health Care , Program Evaluation , Specialization , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Humans , Medical Oncology , Spain , Time Factors
13.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 37(4): 325-33, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21296543

ABSTRACT

AIM: Clinical practice guidelines in cancer are a relevant component of Catalonian Cancer Strategy aimed at promoting equity of access to therapy and quality of cancer care. The colorectal cancer (CRC) guideline was first published in 2003 and subsequently updated in 2008. This study examined the quality of therapy administered to patients with rectal cancer in public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain) in 2005 and 2007, according to CRC guideline recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for primary rectal cancer at Catalonian public hospitals in 2005 and 2007. Data were drawn from clinical records. RESULTS: The study covered 1831 patients with rectal cancer. Performance of total mesorectal excision (TME) was poorly reported by surgeons (46.4%) and pathologists (36.2%). Pre-operative radiotherapy was performed on 52% of stage-II and -III patients. Compared to high-caseload hospitals, those with a low caseload (≤11 cases/year) registered more Hartman's procedures, worse TME quality, a higher rate of post-operative complications and lower adherence to recommended pre-operative radio-chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting quality of care is essential for ascertaining current performance status and opportunities for improvement. In our case, there is a need for the quality of the information included in clinical records to be improved, and variability in adherence to guideline recommendations to be reduced. In view of the fact that heterogeneity in the quality of the health care process was linked to hospital caseload, the health authorities have decided to reorganise the provision of rectal cancer care.


Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Medical Records/standards , Quality of Health Care/standards , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/mortality , Female , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, Public/standards , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology
14.
Prev Med ; 52(3-4): 265-7, 2011.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21295061

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators associated with participation in the first round of a population-based program for colorectal cancer (CRC) in Catalonia, Spain and to identify strategies for motivating and supporting behavioral change. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A two-part, mixed-methods design was used. In first place, a prospective study of individuals aged 50-69 years (n=1961) was conducted in 2006-2007. Secondly, focus groups were undertaken with participants and non-participants of the CRC screening, in 2008. RESULTS: Intention to participate was an important determinant of participation (82.9% vs 65.9%, OR=2.56, 95%CI:1.95-3.36) in addition to knowledge about CRC and its early detection. Respondents who reported that CRC may be asymptomatic in early stages enrolled in the screening program more frequently than those who thought CRC is always symptomatic (49.4% vs 44.8%, OR:1.82; 95%CI:1.3-2.6). Barriers for participation mentioned in focus groups were competing perceived for other health problems and other demands as well as misunderstanding about personal relevance of the screening. CONCLUSION: Individuals' perceptions of CRC are amenable to change through education-based interventions. Increasing public knowledge related to the burden of CRC and its preventive potential may be an effective way for improving participation in a population-based screening program.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Feces/chemistry , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/psychology , Middle Aged , Occult Blood , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Prospective Studies , Sex Factors , Spain
16.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 131 Suppl 1: 42-9, 2008 Oct.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19080814

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The results of analysis of incidence, survival and mortality should be applied to set the priorities in cancer prevention and screening and improvement of cancer care in Catalonia. POPULATION AND METHODS: A review of the impact of cancer in Catalonia and its foreseeable tendencies, as well as the recent proposals made across Europe regarding cancer prevention and care, was carried out. RESULTS: The main priority in prevention continues to be smoking prevention in all age groups but especially among young women and people with a low socioeconomic position, together with overweight and obesity reduction, dietary improvements, and avoidance of excessive sun exposure. Colorectal cancer screening should cover all people aged 50 to 69 years old. Cancer care should be based on a multidisciplinary approach, with clinical practice guidelines, and should take into account the psychosocial and rehabilitation aspects of care. Areas that deserve greater efforts to improve oncology care are outcomes assessment among hospitals and improvements in coordination among centers and health professionals. CONCLUSIONS: The main priority should be to apply current knowledge to clinical practice, both in diagnosis and in treatment, within a multidisciplinary framework to improve outcomes. Other priorities aimed at reducing the impact of cancer in Catalonia are reducing the prevalence of smoking and obesity and extending the coverage of colorectal cancer screening to the target population.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Health Priorities , Humans , Male , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/prevention & control , Neoplasms/therapy , Spain/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...