Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Lupus ; 26(13): 1368-1377, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420071

ABSTRACT

Objectives The objectives of this study were to examine the demographic and clinical features associated with the occurrence of pleuropulmonary manifestations, the predictive factors of their occurrence and their impact on mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. Materials and methods The association of pleuropulmonary manifestations with demographic and clinical features, the predictive factors of their occurrence and their impact on mortality were examined in GLADEL patients by appropriate univariable and multivariable analyses. Results At least one pleuropulmonary manifestation occurred in 421 of the 1480 SLE patients (28.4%), pleurisy being the most frequent (24.0%). Age at SLE onset ≥30 years (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.10-1.83), the presence of lower respiratory tract infection (OR 3.19; 95% CI 2.05-4.96), non-ischemic heart disease (OR 3.17; 95% CI 2.41-4.18), ischemic heart disease (OR 3.39; 95% CI 2.08-5.54), systemic (OR 2.00; 95% CI 1.37-2.91), ocular (OR 1.58; 95% CI 1.16-2.14) and renal manifestations (OR 1.44; 95% CI 1.09-1.83) were associated with pleuropulmonary manifestations, whereas cutaneous manifestations were negatively associated (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.29-0.76). Non-ischemic heart disease (HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.63-3.09), SDI scores ≥1 (OR 1.54; 95% CI 1.10-2.17) and anti-La antibody positivity (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.39-4.57) independently predicted their subsequent occurrence. Cutaneous manifestations were protective of the subsequent occurrence of pleuropulmonary manifestations (HR 0.62; 95% CI 0.43-0.90). Pleuropulmonary manifestations independently contributed a decreased survival (HR: 2.79 95% CI 1.80-4.31). Conclusion Pleuropulmonary manifestations are frequent in SLE, particularly pleuritis. Older age, respiratory tract infection, cardiac, systemic and renal involvement were associated with them, whereas cutaneous manifestations were negatively associated. Cardiac compromise, SDI scores ≥1 and anti-La positivity at disease onset were predictive of their subsequent occurrence, whereas cutaneous manifestations were protective. They independently contributed to a decreased survival in these patients.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases/etiology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Pleurisy/etiology , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/mortality , Male , Respiratory Tract Infections/etiology , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Lupus ; 21(13): 1397-404, 2012 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22941567

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to examine the role of place of residency in the expression and outcomes of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a multi-ethnic Latin American cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SLE patients (< two years of diagnosis) from 34 centers constitute this cohort. Residency was dichotomized into rural and urban, cut-off: 10,000 inhabitants. Socio-demographic, clinical/laboratory and mortality rates were compared between them using descriptive tests. The influence of place of residency on disease activity at diagnosis and renal disease was examined by multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 1426 patients, 122 (8.6%) were rural residents. Their median ages (onset, diagnosis) were 23.5 and 25.5 years; 85 (69.7%) patients were Mestizos, 28 (22.9%) Caucasians and 9 (7.4%) were African-Latin Americans. Rural residents were more frequently younger at diagnosis, Mestizo and uninsured; they also had fewer years of education and lower socioeconomic status, exhibited hypertension and renal disease more frequently, and had higher levels of disease activity at diagnosis; they used methotrexate, cyclophosphamide pulses and hemodialysis more frequently than urban patients. Disease activity over time, renal damage, overall damage and the proportion of deceased patients were comparable in rural and urban patients. In multivariable analyses, rural residency was associated with high levels of disease activity at diagnosis (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06-2.57) and renal disease occurrence (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.00-3.11). CONCLUSIONS: Rural residency associates with Mestizo ethnicity, lower socioeconomic status and renal disease occurrence. It also plays a role in disease activity at diagnosis and kidney involvement but not on the other end-points examined.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/ethnology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Rural Health/statistics & numerical data , Urban Health/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Factors , American Indian or Alaska Native/statistics & numerical data , Black People/statistics & numerical data , Chi-Square Distribution , Comorbidity , Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Educational Status , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Humans , Hypertension/ethnology , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Latin America/epidemiology , Logistic Models , Longitudinal Studies , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/therapy , Lupus Nephritis/ethnology , Male , Medically Uninsured/ethnology , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Multivariate Analysis , Odds Ratio , Prognosis , Renal Dialysis , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors , White People , Young Adult
3.
Lupus ; 18(12): 1033-52, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19762375

ABSTRACT

We have previously developed and validated a self-administered questionnaire, modelled after the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics Damage Index (SDI), the Lupus Damage Index Questionnaire (LDIQ), which may allow the ascertainment of this construct in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients followed in the community and thus expand observations made about damage. We have now translated, back-translated and adapted the LDIQ to Spanish, Portuguese and French and applied it to patients followed at academic and non-academic centres in North and South America, Portugal and Spain while their physicians scored the SDI. A total of 887 patients (659 Spanish-speaking, 140 Portuguese-speaking and 80 French-speaking patients) and 40 physicians participated. Overall, patients scored all LDIQ versions higher than their physicians (total score and all domains). Infrequent manifestations had less optimal clinimetric properties but overall agreement was more than 95% for the majority of items. Higher correlations were observed among the Spanish-speaking patients than the Portuguese-speaking and French-speaking patients; further adjustments may be needed before the Portuguese and French versions of the LDIQ are applied in community-based studies. The relationship between the LDIQ and other outcome parameters is currently being investigated in a different patient sample.


Subject(s)
Language , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/pathology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/physiopathology , North America , Portugal , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , South America , Spain , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...